Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

rd Aircraft in RHS

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> rd Aircraft in RHS Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/3/2008 4:20:56 AM   
okami


Posts: 404
Joined: 5/23/2007
Status: offline 		As the Japanese you start the game with a number of rd aircraft in your airplane pool. Are you allowed to use them or are they just there to give a jump start once they are produced?

_____________________________

"Square peg, round hole? No problem. Malet please.
Post #: 1
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/3/2008 2:45:48 PM   
el cid again

 

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline 		They are there because - they are there. Simply put. Further - some actually were used in combat. At least one squadron used the Ki-44 before it was in production - a bit strange - and successfully so. The exact number of planes for that unit are in the pool - and it will equip with them when the unit becomes available.

There are two other important cases - the Ki-45 - which had extensive problems preventing production - and the Ki-49. Niether was ever entirely liked or successful - but both certainly were produced and used in some numbers. Wether or not the early airframes would be useful is debatable - but since you won't be able to replace them until production begins - use em if you want. EOS family scenario has three small units fitted with 9 in the main element and 3 in a recon flight - for Ki-49. I am not a big fan of two engine fighters - and don't see Ki 45 as a war winner. But there are something like 14 machines available when the war begins.

(in reply to okami)
Post #: 2
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/3/2008 4:40:00 PM   
Mistmatz

 

Posts: 1399
Joined: 10/16/2005
Status: offline 		el cid, is this also true for the allied planes in the pool but not yet in production?

B-24 or C-87/LB-30 come to mind, both have some stock in Dec/41 but production begins in mid/late 42.

Okami, maybe we should agree on either using or not using them for both sides? I'm good either way.



(in reply to el cid again)
Post #: 3
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/4/2008 1:48:29 AM   
okami


Posts: 404
Joined: 5/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mistmatz

el cid, is this also true for the allied planes in the pool but not yet in production?

B-24 or C-87/LB-30 come to mind, both have some stock in Dec/41 but production begins in mid/late 42.

Okami, maybe we should agree on either using or not using them for both sides? I'm good either way.




I would have to say that Sid believes they can be used, whether they are Japanese or Allied would not change that assertion. So let us use them if we wish.

_____________________________

"Square peg, round hole? No problem. Malet please.

(in reply to Mistmatz)
Post #: 4
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/4/2008 6:29:53 AM   
el cid again

 

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mistmatz

el cid, is this also true for the allied planes in the pool but not yet in production?

B-24 or C-87/LB-30 come to mind, both have some stock in Dec/41 but production begins in mid/late 42.

Okami, maybe we should agree on either using or not using them for both sides? I'm good either way.





C-87 is also LB-30 - both variants of B-24 as transport. The LB-30s were actually ex French bombers - and they really were used - mainly as transports - long before the C-87 was made. In the game you get them - and SHOULD use them - but they will not replace until a line comes up - at Long Beach I think.

The first model of B-24 is similar. There are some bombers in existence - so you get them. I don't see it as a problem if they get used - and I use them. They cannot be used long unless used wisely (e.g. for recon or transport or some such - where long range matters). They will not work for attrition warfare. But that is the real deal - and one unit was sent to Alaska - where it did little but watch the vast distances in the area - so this is also historica.


< Message edited by el cid again -- 3/7/2008 1:01:34 PM >

(in reply to Mistmatz)
Post #: 5
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/4/2008 6:31:20 AM   
el cid again

 

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline 		As a game modder - if I give it to you - I think it can be used.

But some things should be restricted: PAN AM civil transports, Empire Flying boats of BOAC - these are not for offensive para drops for example.


Early in the war these provide critical transport services - and even patrol for the flying boats - when nothing else is available. They are in because the matter - but not to masquarade as milittary planes. And their gorund support is static - and won't move from where it is.


< Message edited by el cid again -- 3/4/2008 6:33:12 AM >

(in reply to okami)
Post #: 6
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/4/2008 1:28:59 PM   
okami


Posts: 404
Joined: 5/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: el cid again

As a game modder - if I give it to you - I think it can be used.

But some things should be restricted: PAN AM civil transports, Empire Flying boats of BOAC - these are not for offensive para drops for example.


Early in the war these provide critical transport services - and even patrol for the flying boats - when nothing else is available. They are in because the matter - but not to masquarade as milittary planes. And their gorund support is static - and won't move from where it is.


A clarification on this Sid... are you saying that these two units should not be transfered from their start positions? What about upgrades to full military statis aircraft?

_____________________________

"Square peg, round hole? No problem. Malet please.

(in reply to el cid again)
Post #: 7
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/6/2008 3:25:11 PM   
el cid again

 

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline 		First - there are more than two units.

There is one unit of Pan Am DC-3s at Asanol India.

There are two units of Empire Flying Boats - a BOAC unit at Bombay and a QANTAS (however it is spelled) unit - at Melbourne I think.

There also are PAN AM manned Boeing 314 Clipper units - one USAAF and one USN - which I think do not start but arrive soon after the war begins.

ALL these are civil air units under military contract.

Japan has a similar number of units - DNKKK is All Japan Air Lines - and MNKKK is a simlar outfit in Manchukuo. These are divided by plane type - and operate from hubs.

I do NOT restrict WHERE the planes can go. I do not think the word would be spread far enough to make that happen. But I DO restrict where the ground support can be - by folding it into static units. These contractors WILL refuel and service ANY plane that lands where they are - just as they did IRL - but they will not move to some combat area. ONLY the ground support is static. But good play would not use the transports themselves for offensive para ops - they are to move supplies or units around - not to go where they expect to be lost. Since the planes are so valuable I think this will work - players will want to keep them safe - and if they mess areound - they will lose them - a self inflicting penalty.

In principle the aircraft can be upgraded - you probably won't want to do that - but in some scenarios you might want to go from Clippers to the Martin Mars (you get a fair number in EOS family). This would be OK - but they remain civil air units - and while I don't think any reasonable player would use a Mars for paras anyway - civil units would not do that. Upgrading is not restricted UNLESS YOU think it is not something that would be done - but it does not convert the units to military ones. It would be a bit awkward to have a PAN AM USN Clipper unit flying something else - but if you like it - fine by me. The name tells you "this is a civll unit". FYI the contractors were under military command - but remained civilians as such. This was widely adapted for services to ferry aircraft later in the war and women flew in numbers.


< Message edited by el cid again -- 3/7/2008 1:01:15 PM >

(in reply to okami)
Post #: 8
RE: rd Aircraft in RHS - 3/6/2008 8:55:08 PM   
mikemike

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 6/3/2004
From: a maze of twisty little passages, all different
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: el cid again
.
.
.
and a QUANTAS (however it is spelled) unit - at Melbourne I think.



Just can't resist:
QANTAS = Q.ueensland A.nd N.orthern T.erritories A.ir S.ervice


_____________________________

DON´T PANIC - IT´S ALL JUST ONES AND ZEROES!

(in reply to el cid again)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> rd Aircraft in RHS Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.640