Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: CSV T7

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: CSV T7 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:01:10 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The 2746th NVA Reg decides this might be a good time to try a run at Da Nang:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 121
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:01:49 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And here's the results of the attacks:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 122
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:02:33 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		results 109_71

EDIT: My Migs got 11 of his planes before they got blown away.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/9/2008 7:42:08 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 123
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:03:06 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		attack results 82_70




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 124
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:03:46 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		attack results 29_129




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 125
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:04:18 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		attack results 81_22




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 126
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:04:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		attack results 39_134




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 127
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 9:05:41 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		attack results 68_12

And the turn ends here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 128
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 7:48:11 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		As these attack results show, sometimes the Allied aircraft help out ( with CS ) and sometimes they don't.  Maybe too, I should attack the US units and try to destroy them instead of the ARNV units, because the ARVN units reconstruct and the US units don't. 

Also, maybe I should try to capture provincial cities further to the south, closer to the border instead of attacking units in the coastal areas.  And maybe instead of disbanding I should dig in and make him attack me.  Questions for food for thought.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 129
RE: CSV T7 - 5/9/2008 10:43:03 PM   
cesteman


Posts: 845
Joined: 2/15/2004
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Status: offline 		I'd say dig in and let him waste his resources trying to dig you out. Cheers.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 130
RE: CSV T7 - 5/10/2008 5:35:32 AM   
Raindem

 

Posts: 696
Joined: 7/15/2000
From: Arizona
Status: offline 		Allied Turn 7:

The NLF has grown bolder this turn, invading in I Corps with several strong NVA units.  I would have preferred a couple more turns to buildup but I can't let this size force go unmolested.  I use the ARVN 1st division and some Marine recon to surround the 308th NVA division.  I was hoping to neutralize the enemy force with my air force but forgot that it is the monsoon so the best I could do is make some perimeter attacks and dig in.


I didn't take a picture but I launched a successful attack on a couple of NVA battalions that were closing in on Da Nang.



_____________________________

Grab them by the balls. Their hearts and minds will follow.

(in reply to cesteman)
Post #: 131
RE: CSV T7 - 5/10/2008 5:45:41 AM   
Raindem

 

Posts: 696
Joined: 7/15/2000
From: Arizona
Status: offline 		Southwest of Hue elements of the 1st NVA would not go away.  I would not normally attempt an attack at these odds but I had bountiful Marine artillery just sitting around doing nothing and their support tipped the scales.  Both enemy battalions were KIA.


Down in the central highlands the 316th NVA division has crossed the border.  The 22nd ARVN division answered the call and moved into blocking positions.  I have 2 fast response groups ready to meet this threat, depending on what Larry does next.

Things have been quiet in the Mekong Delta but the VC managed to occupy the provincial capital Cao Lanh.  Once again it was an ARVN division that was able to attack and re-establish government control. 

So far the ARVN has only been effective about 50/50, but I've been lucky with them.  The divisions that were able to move just happened to be where I needed them and the ineffective ones (with Static orders) happened to be in quiet sectors.


_____________________________

Grab them by the balls. Their hearts and minds will follow.

(in reply to Raindem)
Post #: 132
RE: classification scheme question - 5/10/2008 11:46:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		So um......I finally woke up the fact that when I post pictures like the one below I'm giving away the exact position of hexes that the Allied forces need to re-convert back to friendly status. That's valuable intell. Or could be in the right hands.

So my question to you guys is this: (1) Should I stop posting pictures like that? or (2) Should I turn off the borders option for those kinds of pictures...which would leave the before and after picture the same for those situations where the units disband afterward? or (3) Should I just leave the classification as CLASSIFIED for the length of the entire game? or (4) Should I forget posting pictures and just concentrate on reports that concentrate on tactical / strategic considerations? or (5) Should I suck it up and post such pictures anyway believing he has that information already from the playback's he gets to watch?

I'm leaning toward (5) above since I know from experience that I get very valuable info from the playback myself.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Raindem)
Post #: 133
RE: classification scheme question - 5/10/2008 12:51:38 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		so um.......here's a picture of me in my back yard. Actually it's the Pima Air Museum display of an early F-4.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 134
RE: classification scheme question - 5/11/2008 2:02:38 AM   
Monkeys Brain


Posts: 605
Joined: 10/8/2006
Status: offline 		Larry you are looking great! Time to grab some bride

You are good man.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 135
RE: classification scheme question - 5/11/2008 3:56:25 AM   
Raindem

 

Posts: 696
Joined: 7/15/2000
From: Arizona
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

So um......I finally woke up the fact that when I post pictures like the one below I'm giving away the exact position of hexes that the Allied forces need to re-convert back to friendly status. That's valuable intell. Or could be in the right hands.

So my question to you guys is this: (1) Should I stop posting pictures like that? or (2) Should I turn off the borders option for those kinds of pictures...which would leave the before and after picture the same for those situations where the units disband afterward? or (3) Should I just leave the classification as CLASSIFIED for the length of the entire game? or (4) Should I forget posting pictures and just concentrate on reports that concentrate on tactical / strategic considerations? or (5) Should I suck it up and post such pictures anyway believing he has that information already from the playback's he gets to watch?

I'm leaning toward (5) above since I know from experience that I get very valuable info from the playback myself.


FWIW I don't read your AAR until I've completed my turn and sent it off. The only intel I gather is from the playback. BTW nice picture of you at the Air Museum. We'll be sort of neighbors in a couple years as I plan to retire southeast of Tucson.

_____________________________

Grab them by the balls. Their hearts and minds will follow.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 136
Tucson is neighborly sort of - 5/11/2008 4:39:50 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Southeast of Tucson....that sounds like Green Valley or somewhere like that.  I'll take you to lunch when you get into these parts.

(in reply to Raindem)
Post #: 137
CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:40:49 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Campaign for South Vietnam Turn 8 as of 09MAY2008

This is the report of NVA actions taken during turn 8. This report is UNCLASSIFIED.
Here's the news summary for this turn:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/15/2008 3:02:46 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 138
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:41:56 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 1st/K48 divides into three units and converts hexes and disbands. Sorry I don't
have a movie to show you. Here's the area they operated in:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 139
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:42:41 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 1st and 2nd Co's of the K14 Sappers converts hexes and disbands. Oops, the
1st of the K14 left his home province. I'll leave him undisbanded so you can kill it Curt:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 140
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:43:27 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 2nd/306th Bn decides to try to chase the ARVN arty battery, gets a retreat before
combat result and then disbands:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 141
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:44:16 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The Binh Dinh VC Viet Cong decides to divide into three units, convert hexes and
then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 142
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:44:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 405th Bn decides to divide into three units, convert hexes and then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 143
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:45:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 120th Bn decides to divide into three units, convert hexes and then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 144
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:46:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 516th Bn decides to convert hexes and then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 145
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:46:49 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 42nd Recon Bn decides to divide into three units, convert hexes and then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 146
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:47:25 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC R20 Bn decides to divide into three units, convert hexes and then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 147
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:48:19 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC Khanh Hoa Bn decides to divide into three units, convert hexes, blow some
bridges and then disband. I forgot to blow a bridge before I moved as seen below
NOTE TO CURT It seems that I'm having problems keeping these guys in their home
province. Maybe you could change the rules to subtract a point whenever that happens? ]:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 148
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:48:58 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 96th Bn decides to divide into three units, convert hexes and then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 149
RE: CSV T8 - 5/11/2008 4:49:46 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The VC 406th Bn decides to divide into three units, convert hexes and then disband:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: CSV T7 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.250