Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Next quiz

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Next quiz Page: <<   < prev  75 76 [77] 78 79   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Next quiz - 10/12/2011 4:03:32 AM   
Extraneous

 

Posts: 1810
Joined: 6/14/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ItBurns

Okay, I'll try again:

How many functioning 16" caliber guns did the Battleship South Dakota have on the night of 14-15 November 1943 at the Second Naval Battle of Guadalcanal?


The answer is NONE the South Dakota did not have 16” caliber guns. She had nine 16-inch guns of 45 calibers.


The length of artillery barrels has often been described in terms of multiples of the bore diameter.

Therefore a 16-inch gun of 45 calibers would have a barrel 45 x 16 inches = 720 inches or 60 feet long.

45 times their 16-inch (406 mm) bore, or 45 calibers from breechface to muzzle.


South Dakota Class Battleship:
Displacement 35,000 Tons
Dimensions: 680' 4" (over all) x 108' 2" x 36' 2" (Max)
Armament:
9 x 16"/45 caliber Mark 6 guns (3 turrets with 3 guns in each turret)
16 x 5"/38AA (South Dakota had 10x 5"/38AA she was set up as a flagship)
12 x 1.1"
12 x 0.5"
3 Aircraft
Armor: 12 1/4" Belt, 18" Turrets, 1 1/2" +6" +1/3" Decks, 15" Conning Tower
Machinery: 130,000 SHP; G.E. Geared Turbines, 4 screws
Speed: 27 Knots
Crew: 1793


The Battleship Action 14-15 November 1942

00:33 All power gyros and all electric fire control equipment out. Circuit breakers on No 14 switchboard tripped out. Load shifted to No3 switchboard. Bus transfer panel for No. 56 and 58 5-inch mounts shifted to alternate source on No. 3 board, causing No. 6 generator to trip out. Feeder circuits also tripped. Regained power in plotting room then lost it again almost immediately.

It is said this was the Chief Engineers fault.


USS South Dakota (BB-57) damage at The Second Naval Battle of Guadalcanal

Good pictures of the damage.


South Dakota Damage Report June 1944


_____________________________

University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)

(in reply to ItBurns)
Post #: 2281
RE: Next quiz - 10/12/2011 6:24:59 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous


quote:

ORIGINAL: ItBurns

Okay, I'll try again:

How many functioning 16" caliber guns did the Battleship South Dakota have on the night of 14-15 November 1943 at the Second Naval Battle of Guadalcanal?


The answer is NONE the South Dakota did not have 16” caliber guns. She had nine 16-inch guns of 45 calibers.


Warspite1

Wrong again.

South Dakota had no 16-inch guns of 45 calibers. She had nine 16-inch guns of 45 calibre

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 10/12/2011 6:25:22 AM >

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2282
RE: Next quiz - 10/12/2011 3:17:47 PM   
ItBurns

 

Posts: 85
Joined: 1/3/2009
Status: offline 		38 special had the answer I was looking for, only 7 main battery guns were operational before the battle. Shrapnel from a large bomb hit on the 1st turret penetrated the gap between the guns and the armor in the 2nd turret and made to guns inoperable.

As for the 16" 45 caliber stuff any mistake in nomenclature was mine, I was not trying to be tricky.


< Message edited by ItBurns -- 10/12/2011 3:37:40 PM >

(in reply to 38special)
Post #: 2283
RE: Next quiz - 10/13/2011 11:16:00 AM   
Extraneous

 

Posts: 1810
Joined: 6/14/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Wrong again.

South Dakota had no 16-inch guns of 45 calibers. She had nine 16-inch guns of 45 calibre


Funny. But this is not the write-ups and I can use calibers.

Since I’m using calibers to describe the multiple and not the gun type I can use the plural (or calibres).


_____________________________

University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2284
RE: Next quiz - 10/13/2011 4:55:58 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		In early April 1942, 6 loaded Norwegian merchant ships were sunk in the eastern North Sea by a variety of mines, Luftwaffe, and scuttling in the face of imminent capture by light surface ships of the Kriegsmarine. At what port did they load their cargoes?

(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2285
RE: Next quiz - 10/13/2011 7:43:40 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline 		While you are pondering brian brian's question here's two more:

1. The original Pearl Harbor attack plan called for four - not six - carriers. Under this plan, which two carriers would not have taken part?

2. Why was Mount Niikata used by the Japanese - as in Climb Mount Niikata - the coded order to Nagumo to proceed with the PH attack?

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2286
RE: Next quiz - 10/13/2011 8:48:23 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

In early April 1942, 6 loaded Norwegian merchant ships were sunk in the eastern North Sea by a variety of mines, Luftwaffe, and scuttling in the face of imminent capture by light surface ships of the Kriegsmarine. At what port did they load their cargoes?

Warspite1

I'm confused by this one. Presumably they must have been working for the Allies or the Germans wouldn't have attacked them; but if so, why were they in the eastern North Sea? Unless they were escaping, from being holed up in Sweden, to the UK? I'll plump for Stockholm.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2287
RE: Next quiz - 10/13/2011 10:04:16 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

In early April 1942, 6 loaded Norwegian merchant ships were sunk in the eastern North Sea by a variety of mines, Luftwaffe, and scuttling in the face of imminent capture by light surface ships of the Kriegsmarine. At what port did they load their cargoes?

Warspite1

I'm confused by this one. Presumably they must have been working for the Allies or the Germans wouldn't have attacked them; but if so, why were they in the eastern North Sea? Unless they were escaping, from being holed up in Sweden, to the UK? I'll plump for Stockholm.

I think Warspite1 is on to something. But I go with Gothenburg.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2288
RE: Next quiz - 10/14/2011 1:48:35 AM   
Red Prince


Posts: 3686
Joined: 4/8/2011
From: Bangor, Maine, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

While you are pondering brian brian's question here's two more:

1. The original Pearl Harbor attack plan called for four - not six - carriers. Under this plan, which two carriers would not have taken part?

2. Why was Mount Niikata used by the Japanese - as in Climb Mount Niikata - the coded order to Nagumo to proceed with the PH attack?

Because it was there, of course!

_____________________________

Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done and why. Then do it!
-Lazarus Long, RAH

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2289
RE: Next quiz - 10/14/2011 4:25:58 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Red Prince


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

While you are pondering brian brian's question here's two more:

1. The original Pearl Harbor attack plan called for four - not six - carriers. Under this plan, which two carriers would not have taken part?

2. Why was Mount Niikata used by the Japanese - as in Climb Mount Niikata - the coded order to Nagumo to proceed with the PH attack?

Because it was there, of course!
Warspite1


I can't argue with that logic RP, however I was thinking more in terms of what was so specail about Mount Niikata as opposed to say Mt Fuji.


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Red Prince)
Post #: 2290
RE: Next quiz - 10/14/2011 12:58:56 PM   
Extraneous

 

Posts: 1810
Joined: 6/14/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

While you are pondering brian brian's question here's two more:

1. The original Pearl Harbor attack plan called for four - not six - carriers. Under this plan, which two carriers would not have taken part?

2. Why was Mount Niikata used by the Japanese - as in Climb Mount Niikata - the coded order to Nagumo to proceed with the PH attack?


I would guess Shokaku “Flying Crane” and Zuikaku “Fortunate Crane”.

Because Mount Niikata (on Formosa) was the tallest mountain in the Japanese empire.


_____________________________

University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2291
RE: Next quiz - 10/14/2011 5:53:44 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		Orm has it right with Gothenburg. Next super trivial question - what was the cargo?

(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2292
RE: Next quiz - 10/14/2011 7:07:19 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

While you are pondering brian brian's question here's two more:

1. The original Pearl Harbor attack plan called for four - not six - carriers. Under this plan, which two carriers would not have taken part?

2. Why was Mount Niikata used by the Japanese - as in Climb Mount Niikata - the coded order to Nagumo to proceed with the PH attack?


I would guess Shokaku “Flying Crane” and Zuikaku “Fortunate Crane”.

Because Mount Niikata (on Formosa) was the tallest mountain in the Japanese empire.

Warspite1

1. Wrong
2. Is the correct answer.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2293
RE: Next quiz - 10/14/2011 10:04:16 PM   
paulderynck


Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

While you are pondering brian brian's question here's two more:

1. The original Pearl Harbor attack plan called for four - not six - carriers. Under this plan, which two carriers would not have taken part?

2. Why was Mount Niikata used by the Japanese - as in Climb Mount Niikata - the coded order to Nagumo to proceed with the PH attack?

1. Hiryu and Soryu - the two light carriers.

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2294
RE: Next quiz - 10/15/2011 3:42:45 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: paulderynck


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

While you are pondering brian brian's question here's two more:

1. The original Pearl Harbor attack plan called for four - not six - carriers. Under this plan, which two carriers would not have taken part?

2. Why was Mount Niikata used by the Japanese - as in Climb Mount Niikata - the coded order to Nagumo to proceed with the PH attack?

1. Hiryu and Soryu - the two light carriers.

Warspite1

Is the right answer, although as Mr Picky I have to point out that in no way can Hiryu and Soryu be classified as light carriers. Yes they were smaller than the other four carriers of the Kido Butai, but their aircraft complement was not in the light category.

Apparently Rear-Admiral Tamon Yamaguchi was a tad miffed at the original decision; so much so that he put Admiral Nagumo in a headlock in a bid to make him see reason. The two were seperated by another officer and Yamaguchi eventually got his way.

< Message edited by warspite1 -- 10/15/2011 4:03:31 AM >

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to paulderynck)
Post #: 2295
RE: Next quiz - 10/15/2011 3:45:49 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Orm has it right with Gothenburg. Next super trivial question - what was the cargo?
Warspite1

The cargo was from IKEA; flat-pack tanks I believe.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2296
RE: Next quiz - 10/15/2011 8:55:30 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline 		What was the nickname of Admiral Harold Stark, the chief of naval operations at the time of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2297
RE: Next quiz - 10/18/2011 6:26:37 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

What was the nickname of Admiral Harold Stark, the chief of naval operations at the time of the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Warspite1

Surprised there were no takers for this. From Wikipedia:

Stark enrolled in the United States Naval Academy in 1899 and graduated with the class of 1903. As a plebe there he received the nickname "Betty" after Elizabeth Page Stark, the wife of the Revolutionary War general John Stark, who was being commemorated at the time.

I am reading Tolland's The Pacific War at the moment and it is interesting to see senior US officials referring to him simply as Betty.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2298
RE: Next quiz - 10/18/2011 9:50:09 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Orm has it right with Gothenburg. Next super trivial question - what was the cargo?
Warspite1

The cargo was from IKEA; flat-pack tanks I believe.


I'm sure that would have been just the ticket for the Allies in the first half of the war, when their tank designers had nothing to write home about....and make for some darn interesting Squad Leader counters too.

Anyhow the details about my two questions are in my new thread about WWII books.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2299
RE: Next quiz - 10/19/2011 7:31:36 AM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Orm has it right with Gothenburg. Next super trivial question - what was the cargo?
Warspite1

The cargo was from IKEA; flat-pack tanks I believe.


I'm sure that would have been just the ticket for the Allies in the first half of the war, when their tank designers had nothing to write home about....and make for some darn interesting Squad Leader counters too.

Anyhow the details about my two questions are in my new thread about WWII books.


bofors AA guns ???

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2300
RE: Next quiz - 10/19/2011 7:39:49 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Orm has it right with Gothenburg. Next super trivial question - what was the cargo?
Warspite1

The cargo was from IKEA; flat-pack tanks I believe.


I'm sure that would have been just the ticket for the Allies in the first half of the war, when their tank designers had nothing to write home about....and make for some darn interesting Squad Leader counters too.

Anyhow the details about my two questions are in my new thread about WWII books.


bofors AA guns ???
Warspite1

I'd guess ball bearings and other high tech steel products


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2301
RE: Next quiz - 10/19/2011 7:48:42 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Orm has it right with Gothenburg. Next super trivial question - what was the cargo?
Warspite1

The cargo was from IKEA; flat-pack tanks I believe.


I'm sure that would have been just the ticket for the Allies in the first half of the war, when their tank designers had nothing to write home about....and make for some darn interesting Squad Leader counters too.

Anyhow the details about my two questions are in my new thread about WWII books.


bofors AA guns ???
Warspite1

I'd guess ball bearings and other high tech steel products


Gold from the Norwegian gold reserve?

Edit: If they had moved gold it would have made for a nice movie.

< Message edited by Orm -- 10/19/2011 7:52:13 AM >

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2302
RE: Next quiz - 10/20/2011 12:15:51 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Orm has it right with Gothenburg. Next super trivial question - what was the cargo?
Warspite1

The cargo was from IKEA; flat-pack tanks I believe.


I'm sure that would have been just the ticket for the Allies in the first half of the war, when their tank designers had nothing to write home about....and make for some darn interesting Squad Leader counters too.

Anyhow the details about my two questions are in my new thread about WWII books.


bofors AA guns ???
Warspite1

I'd guess ball bearings and other high tech steel products


Gold from the Norwegian gold reserve?

Edit: If they had moved gold it would have made for a nice movie.
Warspite1



_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 2303
RE: Next quiz - 10/20/2011 1:01:36 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		I think the Norwegian gold evacuated safely and simply along with the King on a Royal Navy cruiser. A lot of other countries' gold probably went through more adventures. Sounds like a good topic for a book...


In August 1944 a German U-Boat sank a US Liberty Ship off the coast of Oman. Aside from a complement of Lend-Lease supplies (tanks, trucks, etc.) destined for the Soviet Union via the Persian railroads, this Liberty ship carried several tons of a cargo several orders of magnitude more valuable than the vehicles in it's hold. What was this extra cargo?

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2304
RE: Next quiz - 10/20/2011 7:43:04 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline 		I've read somewhere about a cargo of industrial diamonds being sunk by a German U Boat. Don't know if this is the ship...

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2305
RE: Next quiz - 10/20/2011 8:02:37 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		interesting answer I hope to learn about someday, but not the cargo I had in mind.

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 2306
RE: Next quiz - 10/20/2011 8:35:00 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		A captured Enigma machine?

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2307
RE: Next quiz - 10/20/2011 8:44:38 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		Another interesting guess, but those never left an Allied mainland. By valuable, I do mean in terms of $$$.

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 2308
RE: Next quiz - 10/21/2011 3:49:00 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		A huge amount of dollar bills?

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2309
RE: Next quiz - 10/21/2011 5:22:09 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		Pretty close there Orm. The cargo was 5 million silver Riyals, the currency of Saudi Arabia, though minted in the USA and destined for Saudi Arabia to use for payroll for the workers building the new oil fields for the US/Saudi joint venture ARAMCO. Almost 2 million of them were salvaged from 1.5 miles deep in the late 90s; a book that came out then theorized conspiratorially that they were somehow destined for Joe Stalin, thought I can't remember the author's exact argument in the book "Stalin's Silver". Given the value of the ARAMCO fields, I'm sure Uncle Sam just minted another batch for one of the true prizes of the world in the 1940s...

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 2310
Page:   <<   < prev  75 76 [77] 78 79   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Next quiz Page: <<   < prev  75 76 [77] 78 79   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.454