Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> WW2: Road to Victory >> RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/2/2008 3:05:55 AM   
Lucky1

 

Posts: 383
Joined: 10/30/2006
Status: offline
Am I missing something? I think stacking opens up a huge can of worms for this game (how to spread damage etc) I am not sure that it adds anything. Stacking might be more relevant when there are fewer hexes....  I reckon the developers ought to concentrate on fixing what has already been developed (and which has a lot of promise), rather than remake what is here.... Action points also allow one to move units out of the way or to push through to exploit.....

(in reply to TPM)
Post #: 61
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/5/2008 12:07:12 AM   
TPM

 

Posts: 349
Joined: 2/8/2007
Status: offline
Well, you've got some good points there. I guess the stacking thing wouldn't be too big of deal with me if you could still concentrate a large number of forces in a small area, which as you say, could be done by moving units out of the way, etc. I still think stacking would be "better", but you've given me something to think about.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucky1

Am I missing something? I think stacking opens up a huge can of worms for this game (how to spread damage etc) I am not sure that it adds anything. Stacking might be more relevant when there are fewer hexes....  I reckon the developers ought to concentrate on fixing what has already been developed (and which has a lot of promise), rather than remake what is here.... Action points also allow one to move units out of the way or to push through to exploit.....


(in reply to Lucky1)
Post #: 62
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/5/2008 2:58:52 AM   
jeffreysutro@jeffreysutro.com

 

Posts: 137
Joined: 2/27/2004
Status: offline
To me stacking is not a deal breaker in an otherwise good game, but it would give much improved ability to concentrate forces for attack or defense. Simply the ability to stack two divisions together would be a substantial improvement. Damage could be allocated proportionately to the strength of the units, as is done in some other games.

The designers did however state, in another thread, that the manner in which units and hexes are handled by the game engine would make it very difficult to program in stacking, so (unfortunately) it is not something they are able to include in this game. However, the ability of units to move freely through other units, the ability to conduct multihex attacks, and the ability of units to continue moving subsequent to combat (if they have action points left) does allow you to exploit breakthroughs and conduct "blitzkreig" type attacks. This is something that other games (eg. Strategic Command) do not handle as well, so I'm grateful for the increased realism given us in this game.


_____________________________

All My Best,

Jeff Sutro

(in reply to TPM)
Post #: 63
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/5/2008 10:26:02 AM   
doomtrader


Posts: 5321
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Poland
Status: offline
Indeed, you can easily use panzercorpsgroups to break trough and move forward behind enemy lines and then once again attack second line units.

_____________________________

Post #: 64
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/5/2008 4:39:41 PM   
Plainian

 

Posts: 212
Joined: 9/22/2006
From: Dundee in Scotland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: doomtrader

Indeed, you can easily use panzercorpsgroups to break trough and move forward behind enemy lines and then once again attack second line units.


True but I still think a Merge/Split option would have been nice. Harder to program/code I agree. Possibly making the game to flexible so that players had too many choices? (anyone who has tried Schwerpunkts game AGW will understand this)
But it would have helped offset the lack of stacking.

(in reply to doomtrader)
Post #: 65
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/6/2008 10:38:20 AM   
doomtrader


Posts: 5321
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Poland
Status: offline
I'm not concerning about the players.
I'm worried will the AI be able to use it. I don't want this feature to be an exploit.
That's from the coding point of view.

From designers, hmmm... really not sure.

_____________________________


(in reply to Plainian)
Post #: 66
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/8/2008 12:54:37 AM   
Mickrocks201

 

Posts: 95
Joined: 8/2/2008
From: Santa Fe, NM
Status: offline
Has anyone found any real reason for the axis to do anything in North Africa?  I have played the games several times and once the brits move major fleet elements into the Med it is too risky to transport any new units to Tripoli or Trobruq ( I know they are called by different names in the game, but that is not my fault).   Since the brits get to create new units in North africa and the Axis don't, there is just too much of an advantage for the brits.   It seems best for Italy to spend the points reinforcing the italian landing points with strong units and sending more units to russia and just let North Africa go as not worth any effort.

I tried creating a bunch of Axis level one divisions and transporting them to North Africa (since losing most of them would not be crippling if intercepted by the british fleet).  Then I started leveling the ones that survived and turned them in corps.  You can do this a few times before the Italian navy is sunk escorting them. This seemed one way to meet the Brit advantage.  But they were all wiped out by mid-42 and the Italians spent alot of points on transports to keep them supplied - I was often losing 15-20 transport points a turn.  Bad investment.

(in reply to doomtrader)
Post #: 67
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/26/2008 3:10:03 PM   
wurger54

 

Posts: 152
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

2. No Malta? You've got to be kidding. No Malta in a game covering World War II in Europe? C'mon.


Been waiting for a game of this scale for many years. HPS never added to its 'First Blitzkrieg' offering. Figured CWIE II would have to suffice. I almost bit on this. However no Malta means a MAJOR miss by the designers. My money will remain in the piggy bank.





(in reply to pasternakski)
Post #: 68
RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread - 9/26/2008 3:42:30 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
Malta was added in the first update.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to wurger54)
Post #: 69
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> WW2: Road to Victory >> RE: Obligitory Initial Impressions Thread Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.217