Hard Sarge
Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000 From: garfield hts ohio usa Status: offline
|
well off hand BAR (depending on model) 16 to 24 pounds (comes with a 12 clip ammo belt) MG 42 25.5 pounds (without tripod) MG 34 26.7 pounds (without tripod) 30 Cal M1919A4 31 pounds (would think without, also this is not the LMG model, so that would be lighter) 50 Cal M2 84 pounds, 128 pounds with Tripod M2 60mm Mortar 42 pounds (but this does not look like what I used, mine was in the 45-6 pound range, but after WWII of course) I never played with the tripod to the 50, but the tripods to the M-60 and M1919 were not in the heavy range, you carried it with one hand, the extra barrel bag was heavier then the tripod if you want more, I can keep looking, just from the numbers in the list, I don't think the code is counting weight as pounds, but is using it as another figure look at the MG 34 Heavy MG 34 202-205 (this is a MG on a tripod, belt fed, maybe with a sight mounted) MG 34 102-105 (same gun, normally using the bipod, 100 round clip, or also using a belt) Assult MG 34 56-60 (same gun, bipod, but not being used, normally a 50 round clip, but could use the 100) then Carbine 28 vs Garand 20 the old M1 is sweet, but it is nothing like light (M-14 is even heavier, but even sweeter) but why would something that was made to save weight and space, weigh more then a Battle Rifle ? (don't tell me ammo load, those 30 cals were light compared to those 30-06s the Garand is using) standard would have a full stock, Airborne, Tanker, would have a folding stock, very nice toy, but totally worthless in combat (most of the early changes, were larger and larger clips, once they found out the round didn't like to hurt people who were mad at you)
_____________________________
|