pasternakski
Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Perturabo And things like "laws" that forbid returning defective games are okay? Somehow everyone else has to provide a finished, defect-less product or notify client about defects, but game developers are singled out as ones that have a license for doing poor work and claiming that they are selling a great product, claim that product has objective properties that it doesn't have, even after they were proven that it doesn't have them, etc. All you are going to do is create more work for that species of pond scum known as "lawyers." This is an arena where the marketplace has to sort itself out. The practice of releasing unfinished, buggy products must sink or swim on its own merits. Nasty protection schemes must either be tolerated or lead to the consumer saying, "Sorry, no sale." The extent to which software is "defective" ought to be determined by the relationship between seller and buyer, not by imposition of external regulatory imperatives.. Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to buy defective products or those that contain unwanted features. Do what I do. Refuse to buy new computer wargames until you are sure that the product is finished and stable. My rule of thumb is to hold off on new software releases for at least one year. I do my research and pay attention to forum commentary and reviews during that time, and I try to make an informed purchasing decision. That said, like many, I am thoroughly sick and tired of the crap that frequently finds its way into the computer wargame marketplace. I think that most of the original promise offered by computer-style wargames has been lost, and I have largely stopped buying them. This may not be the end for the business, but it sure is starting to look like that's the direction it's headed to me.
_____________________________
Put my faith in the people And the people let me down. So, I turned the other way, And I carry on anyhow.
|