Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: War in China

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: War in China Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: War in China - 7/11/2009 6:25:53 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
Some good points about how to go about defending in China on this map.  After the game's release it will be very interesting to see how different strategies work out for both China and Japan.

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 121
RE: War in China - 7/11/2009 6:19:13 PM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
The May/Jun 41turn starts with a Japanese initiative after a reroll. The weather is Fine everywhere.

The US has not talen any additional actions with their entry situation. it has been adversely affected by some notices of Axis atrocities not being published
( a bug)

Japan groundstrike on Chihkiang succeeded and the defender is disorganized.

Chihkiang is attacked and taken with the Chinese losing a Mil, no adverse affects on Japans units.

Japan also attacks a Mil further south and has a +18 rolls a 4 for 22. Japan kills the defending Mil but suffers two units disorganized.

Japan also broke down an Infantry unit into two Infantry Divisions at the north end of the south front.

In the north Japan continues to ooze southwards to the central plains and is sending a Mech Div to the orth and west of the front lines.

The poor Chinese in the meantime have so far not been able to breakdown any units, Nationalists or Communists, seems they have not figured out how to do that yet. (a Bug)






Attachment (1)

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 122
RE: War in China - 7/12/2009 12:54:09 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
May/June impulse 2 with fine weather everywhere.

The Chinese impulse now is facing disaster in the south and the forces are running for the hills away from the Japanese. Some will be saved.
Blocking of the Japanese advances towards the central plain are also made. In view of what has happened they would have been better off running away earlier.

At this point it look quite bad for China. Do keep in mind that in a normal game Japan would by now have to stop major activities in China and keep occupied by preparations and p[ositioning for the Pacific War. Here that still seems to be quite some time in the future.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 123
RE: War in China - 7/13/2009 12:09:48 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
For Japans impulse 3 there is rain in the south which puts acrimp on the advances there. Japan chooses a combined action and sends troops out to Siam and Truk in preparations for advances from those points later on. This leaves only 3 land moves available in China and they are used to continue oozing south from the north and oozing west from the central area to force China to garrison Chengtu and Chungking and have even fewer troops at the fronts.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 124
RE: War in China - 7/13/2009 4:42:44 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
May/Jun 41 Chinese impulse 4 and rain in the south is saving a few Chinese units that are running to the mountains. 2 Uits are now in Kweiyang and Chengtu and Chungking are safe for the moment.

In the meantime Germany has now attacked the USSR. Soon the Japanese will have to pay attention to the CW areas in the Pacific.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 125
RE: War in China - 7/13/2009 3:54:05 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
I rather thought that the Chinese would eventually pay for having a line of 1 unit per hex in the south. All it took were some better Japanese dice (which finally showed up!). Fortunately for China, the threat of conquest or crippling is over.

The Communists can stand past, the Nationalists will want to head back to Kunming and hold the line there. The Japanese may want to withdraw to mountains in the north, take Ankang while they can to prevent it from being an advance base for China, and maybe seize Kweiyang. But I think they're about done their offensives against China.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 126
RE: War in China - 7/13/2009 5:42:01 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
I don't know, China is tottering so badly it could really pay off for the Japanese to go all-in with more reinforcements and a use of the Offensive Chit in China; a smashing victory seems within their grasp. Especially with USE running late. I guess a lot of players like to attack the CW before the US, but I see no reason this always has to be the case.

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 127
RE: War in China - 7/13/2009 5:49:03 PM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline
China is going to survive and perhaps prosper.

The lack of breakdown and USE at this stage of the game is somewhat concerning as far as bugs.



< Message edited by sajbalk -- 7/13/2009 5:53:02 PM >


_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 128
RE: War in China - 7/13/2009 6:12:55 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sajbalk

China is going to survive and perhaps prosper.

The lack of breakdown and USE at this stage of the game is somewhat concerning as far as bugs.



There is a bug with USE for taking out Chinese cities. For some reason, that was handled slightly differently in CWIF ("delayed usage") and I have never figured out why.

The break down stuff has to do with the unlimited breakdown optional rule. Basically, there will be two compeltely separate sets of code for when the optional rule is on and when it is off.

---
In general, prioritizing tasks is never the way someone wants it (except me). I am confident in saying that no two players would agree on the priorities/order for my MWIF task list.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to sajbalk)
Post #: 129
RE: War in China - 7/14/2009 1:10:48 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
M/J 41 impuse 5 Japan makes only one attack on the Chungking warlord unit that is blocking the road access for Japan.
From the present situation it is tempting for Japan to continue towards Kweiyang and perhaps even Kunming eventually.

Japan also debarked units in Siam and in Truk.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 130
RE: War in China - 7/14/2009 9:32:21 AM   
hdosbe


Posts: 24
Joined: 5/26/2006
From: Bergamo, Italy
Status: offline
How many hexes may run the Warlords from their city?

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 131
RE: War in China - 7/14/2009 4:59:26 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
Up to 6 in MWiF.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to hdosbe)
Post #: 132
RE: War in China - 7/14/2009 6:59:43 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: composer99

Up to 6 in MWiF.

Yes.

Another change from WIF FE is that we let the players set them up (at the beginning of the game) anywhere within that range of 6 hexes. WIF FE required them to start in their home cities.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 133
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 12:46:36 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
May/Jun impulse 7 and the weather has cleared in the south. Too late for Japan to do much since most of their units have been disrupted. The Marine Div has moved to the South China Sea coast.

Impulse 8, the Allies all passed for a 40% chance of ending the turn and it did end on a roll of 2.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 134
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 6:55:26 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
In this game, were the builts for Japan including finishing the construction pool carriers and repair pool cruisers & BB, and building 2 CP per turn ?

I ask this because it looks to me as if the Japanese have put a strong emphasis on land builts.

I am preparing the 1939-1941 builts for my Japanese in our new Vassal game, and I could not fit a single INF for the moment in my build plan. Only 2 MIL in 1939.

I am planning an initial production of 10 in 1939 and 13 in 1940. This is without taking extra resources in China so it could raise to 15 if I take Sian and another resource and clear the railways, but in your game this was achieved very late.

I am also saving 1 BP per turn for building a synth in late 1940, and saving 1 oil per turn and planning on an oil consumption of 1 per turn too.

How did you came up with a so large army ? You did not build CP, no Synth, no oil saved, no navy ?

If that is true, this Japanese is already doomed in front of the Western Allies.

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 135
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 7:06:07 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
My builds are :

S/O 39 - 10 BP
2 CP
CV Shokaku (2)
repair CA Aoba
MIL
PIL
1 BP saved

N/D 39 - 10 BP
2 CP
CV Zuikaku (2)
repair CA Kinugasa
MIL
PIL
1 BP saved

J/F 40 - 14 BP
2 CP
CVL Zuiho (2)
repair BB Hiei
DIV ARM
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

M/A 40 - 12 BP
2 CP
CVL Chitose (2)
repair CA Takao
ART
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

M/J 40 - 12 BP
1 CP
1 TK
CVL Chiyoda (2)
repair CA Atago
DIV MAR
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

J/A 40 - 13 BP
1 CP
1 TK
CVL Shoho (2)
AMPH (1)
TRS (1)
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

S/O 40 - 13 BP
1 CP
1 TK
CVL Ryuho (2)
repair CA Asama
SUB (1)
DIV ENG
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

N/D 40 - 12 BP
1 CP
1 TK
BB Yamato (2)
SUB (1)
PIL
CVP
Synth
Use 7 saved BP

J/F 41 - 15 BP
1 CP
1 TK
TRS (2)
SUB (1)
Yamashita HQ-I
PIL
CVP

Only from now do I have turns productions of 5 BP so I can plan land units.

And for S/O 41 I have 1 extra AMPH, 1 extra TRS, 1 extra HQ-I, finished all construction pool and repair pool ships, and build 2 CP per turn and the synth, all of which I consider necessary to face the war inthe Pacific.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 136
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 8:31:58 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

My builds are :

S/O 39 - 10 BP
2 CP
CV Shokaku (2)
repair CA Aoba
MIL
PIL
1 BP saved

N/D 39 - 10 BP
2 CP
CV Zuikaku (2)
repair CA Kinugasa
MIL
PIL
1 BP saved

J/F 40 - 14 BP
2 CP
CVL Zuiho (2)
repair BB Hiei
DIV ARM
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

M/A 40 - 12 BP
2 CP
CVL Chitose (2)
repair CA Takao
ART
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

M/J 40 - 12 BP
1 CP
1 TK
CVL Chiyoda (2)
repair CA Atago
DIV MAR
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

J/A 40 - 13 BP
1 CP
1 TK
CVL Shoho (2)
AMPH (1)
TRS (1)
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

S/O 40 - 13 BP
1 CP
1 TK
CVL Ryuho (2)
repair CA Asama
SUB (1)
DIV ENG
PIL
CVP
1 BP saved

N/D 40 - 12 BP
1 CP
1 TK
BB Yamato (2)
SUB (1)
PIL
CVP
Synth
Use 7 saved BP

J/F 41 - 15 BP
1 CP
1 TK
TRS (2)
SUB (1)
Yamashita HQ-I
PIL
CVP

Only from now do I have turns productions of 5 BP so I can plan land units.

And for S/O 41 I have 1 extra AMPH, 1 extra TRS, 1 extra HQ-I, finished all construction pool and repair pool ships, and build 2 CP per turn and the synth, all of which I consider necessary to face the war inthe Pacific.


Without doing a detailed analysis, your ship repairs seem to be started rather early. Those units will arrive when there is nothing for them to do. They just sit around idle until 1941 don't they?

The infantry are also going to be necessary for the war in the Pacific, and if they are built early they can be earning their wages in China during all of 1940.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 137
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 8:40:30 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Without doing a detailed analysis, your ship repairs seem to be started rather early. Those units will arrive when there is nothing for them to do. They just sit around idle until 1941 don't they?

The infantry are also going to be necessary for the war in the Pacific, and if they are built early they can be earning their wages in China during all of 1940.

You're damned right Steve !!! How didn't I saw that earlier !
I did not play Japan for too much time, I'm gonna revise that immediately !

Edit : I also postponned the construction pool builts by 1 turn, and manage to replace the 2 MIL by INF, and add a MIL. I may have more, depending on the resources I gain in China.

< Message edited by Froonp -- 7/15/2009 8:59:17 AM >

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 138
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 9:34:29 AM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
I usually build the Synth plant the first turn with Japan. That way I get the maximum amount of oil from it.

I do not save any oil in the beginning for Japan. I rather save more later.

I also postpone the productions of CP to later. They arrive rather fast.

< Message edited by Orm -- 7/15/2009 9:35:27 AM >


_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 139
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 4:09:27 PM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline
For the SYNTHs, I do one in J/F 1940 because I like to get many land units built in the first two turns for the China land war. The second SYNTH is started in M/A 1941 after the CV's are started in J/F.



_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 140
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 5:06:40 PM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

In this game, were the builts for Japan including finishing the construction pool carriers and repair pool cruisers & BB, and building 2 CP per turn ?

I ask this because it looks to me as if the Japanese have put a strong emphasis on land builts.

I am preparing the 1939-1941 builts for my Japanese in our new Vassal game, and I could not fit a single INF for the moment in my build plan. Only 2 MIL in 1939.

I am planning an initial production of 10 in 1939 and 13 in 1940. This is without taking extra resources in China so it could raise to 15 if I take Sian and another resource and clear the railways, but in your game this was achieved very late.

I am also saving 1 BP per turn for building a synth in late 1940, and saving 1 oil per turn and planning on an oil consumption of 1 per turn too.

How did you came up with a so large army ? You did not build CP, no Synth, no oil saved, no navy ?

If that is true, this Japanese is already doomed in front of the Western Allies.


I think the Japanese have built a fair amount of units other than land for China.

Force pool has 3Ftr, no NAV, 1large BB, 5 CV1.
Construct pool has 3 large BB, 5CV1
Arrivals:
S/O41: Ftr,NAV, TRS,CV,HQ,Pil
N/D41: 2Pil, CVP,TRS,Div.
J/F42: CV
M/A42: CV
M/J42 CV,large BB
11Convoys spare in port, 3 still for US trading, there are 9 in Cina Sea.
10 Oil saved




(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 141
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 6:30:01 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
The US hasn't even passed the second Japanese resource cut-off? Yikes.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 142
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 7:38:14 PM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
US entry lefel for Japan's side is only at 15 and the same on the European side.

Over successive updates to the program the US entry picks have been adversely affected and this is not a normal entry level. It does distort the game somewhat but figuring strictly on time, the war on the CW ought to start on S/O 41 regardless of US entry levels.

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 143
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 7:52:16 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
Really? If US entry is low enough then the Japanese should consider putting the war off until May/June 1942. The later the US is in the war the later the Mighty Green Monster appears on the scene.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 144
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 10:10:20 PM   
Mike Parker

 

Posts: 583
Joined: 12/30/2008
From: Houston TX
Status: offline
I think he is saying though, that with the borked up USE levels that he should look at his current game and consider S/O 41 as the time to hit the CW.  He does get the benefit of the trade with the US longer than he should, but as long as he considers his timetable in China to be limited by what is considered a proper date to attack the Wallies, then he should be good!

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 145
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 11:22:14 PM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Parker

I think he is saying though, that with the borked up USE levels that he should look at his current game and consider S/O 41 as the time to hit the CW.  He does get the benefit of the trade with the US longer than he should, but as long as he considers his timetable in China to be limited by what is considered a proper date to attack the Wallies, then he should be good!


IMO, the proper date for Japan to go to war with the CW/US is as late as possible. Any events that push that date later in the war should be taken advantage of by Japan.

The US can't kill Axis soldiers if they aren't in the war yet.

That's the best place for them.....sitting on the West Coast watching the smoke rise in Asia.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to Mike Parker)
Post #: 146
RE: War in China - 7/15/2009 11:36:54 PM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline
As late as possible for Japan to attack the US is good, with a couple of exceptions:
1. If the US can DOW Japan, it will take on the surprise impulse Kwajelein, have a good chance at shredding the convoy lines, and have a good chance to hold the Phillipines.
2. If the CW can reinforce its Pacific possessions, Rabaul becomes a great Allied forward base,
3. If the CW reinforce the NEI and hold each oil with a WP corps.

Better for Japan to DOW too early than too late.



_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 147
RE: War in China - 7/16/2009 1:30:28 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
July/August 41 and China got the initiative. Rain in the south and fine up north.
China just draws back into the central mountains. The Communists holds their positions.

Japan takes a combined since rain in the south limits their moves anyway. More preparations for the war with the CW are made. Several SUB's sailed to Canton. A few land moves are made toweards Kweiyang.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to sajbalk)
Post #: 148
RE: War in China - 7/16/2009 2:08:11 AM   
Jagdtiger14


Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline
What about a possible war with USSR? If Germany plans on a '41 Barb, then you should be ready to assist in any way. Also, if Germany is not doing a '41 Barb, then USSR will probably DOW Japan. Our group likes to build land units early for Japan to be ready and in position for any eventuality...also a strong showing of land units in Manchuria can make the USSR re-consider a possible DOW on Japan. I concur with Steve Balk's Synth builds. Buying cp's is very important for Japan, but not really in '39/early '40. I would build air/pilots and land units.
C

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Without doing a detailed analysis, your ship repairs seem to be started rather early. Those units will arrive when there is nothing for them to do. They just sit around idle until 1941 don't they?

The infantry are also going to be necessary for the war in the Pacific, and if they are built early they can be earning their wages in China during all of 1940.

You're damned right Steve !!! How didn't I saw that earlier !
I did not play Japan for too much time, I'm gonna revise that immediately !

Edit : I also postponned the construction pool builts by 1 turn, and manage to replace the 2 MIL by INF, and add a MIL. I may have more, depending on the resources I gain in China.



_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 149
RE: War in China - 7/16/2009 4:09:48 AM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
Storm in the south andfine in the north. CHina retreats a little more.

Japan attacks and kills a nac tionalist Inf antry est of Kweiyang but loses a Terr and all disrupted. The Marine begins a trek towards the coast.
HQ Yamamoto reorganizes 4 units.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jagdtiger14)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: War in China Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.203