Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

A couple observations

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> A couple observations Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
A couple observations - 1/12/2010 9:11:55 AM   
tazaaron

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 1/12/2010
Status: offline
While this is my first post in this forum im not new to it been coming around for years, used to play the original and bought AE early on and played with it off and on to re learn everything and then around Christmas after the 2 hotfixes i felt it cleared up a couple things i was worried about so i started an actual game as the Allies with the Ironman scenario. Im in March 1942 and have 3 observations which 2 are AI related and one has been mentioned in another thread.

1. We all know the AI has trouble to begin with but having it waste ships by crossing into Bataan dosnt help it out at all, i bet 15 ships were sunk including 1 BB and 3 CA. In the end you will still crush the AI weather this happens or not but it would help him out if he wasnt wasting ships like this.

2. PT boats,its not the PT boats that are the problem its that over a 14 day period in the game the AI must have flown 1000 sorties against 8 PT boats, i finally felt sorry for the AI and sunk them myself. Again it would go a long way if those 1000 sorties were bombing troops or ports and airfields or moving to a new location, dont know if its possible but tell him to leave the PT boats alone and leave them for the escorts to deal with during invasion.

3. This was mentioned in another thread, the DD vs. SS... I have about 10 ASW fleets working(4 ships each) and while they dont sink much thats not a problem i know its early in the war and i just want to keep there heads down but im losing 3 to 1 in these ASW fleets to these subs, i have had 6 DDs sunk from under me for the sinking of 2 SSs, at one point off of SF the same sub got 1 DD and the next day sunk another DD out of the same ASW fleet, overall i think the way you have subs model is excellent, love the way it all goes down but the SS are sinking to many DDs,we wont even talk about PCs, if i put 4 of them over a known sub position they go down faster than the DDs, not sure how your code works but i would keep it the way it is but make it harder for a SS to sink DDs.

Great job, always loved the game and thanks for all your hard work, if any other AI things pop up i might even post a second time.

Aaron

< Message edited by tazaaron -- 1/12/2010 9:13:41 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: A couple observations - 1/12/2010 4:34:23 PM   
Rugens

 

Posts: 213
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hoosierland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazaaron

While this is my first post in this forum im not new to it been coming around for years, used to play the original and bought AE early on and played with it off and on to re learn everything and then around Christmas after the 2 hotfixes i felt it cleared up a couple things i was worried about so i started an actual game as the Allies with the Ironman scenario. Im in March 1942 and have 3 observations which 2 are AI related and one has been mentioned in another thread.

1. We all know the AI has trouble to begin with but having it waste ships by crossing into Bataan dosnt help it out at all, i bet 15 ships were sunk including 1 BB and 3 CA. In the end you will still crush the AI weather this happens or not but it would help him out if he wasnt wasting ships like this.

2. PT boats,its not the PT boats that are the problem its that over a 14 day period in the game the AI must have flown 1000 sorties against 8 PT boats, i finally felt sorry for the AI and sunk them myself. Again it would go a long way if those 1000 sorties were bombing troops or ports and airfields or moving to a new location, dont know if its possible but tell him to leave the PT boats alone and leave them for the escorts to deal with during invasion.

3. This was mentioned in another thread, the DD vs. SS... I have about 10 ASW fleets working(4 ships each) and while they dont sink much thats not a problem i know its early in the war and i just want to keep there heads down but im losing 3 to 1 in these ASW fleets to these subs, i have had 6 DDs sunk from under me for the sinking of 2 SSs, at one point off of SF the same sub got 1 DD and the next day sunk another DD out of the same ASW fleet, overall i think the way you have subs model is excellent, love the way it all goes down but the SS are sinking to many DDs,we wont even talk about PCs, if i put 4 of them over a known sub position they go down faster than the DDs, not sure how your code works but i would keep it the way it is but make it harder for a SS to sink DDs.

Great job, always loved the game and thanks for all your hard work, if any other AI things pop up i might even post a second time.

Aaron


Perhaps you are doing this already but if not, be sure to fly ASW missions in addition to your naval ASW. This seems to degrade the subs performance significantly. Also, the ASW TF commander is very important. When the TF's are formed the computer often selects some real dogs for the smaller TF's. The PP's to put good TF commanders in place is well worth the cost.

< Message edited by Carl Rugenstein -- 1/12/2010 4:35:16 PM >

(in reply to tazaaron)
Post #: 2
RE: A couple observations - 1/12/2010 5:05:28 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazaaron


3. This was mentioned in another thread, the DD vs. SS... I have about 10 ASW fleets working(4 ships each) and while they dont sink much thats not a problem i know its early in the war and i just want to keep there heads down but im losing 3 to 1 in these ASW fleets to these subs, i have had 6 DDs sunk from under me for the sinking of 2 SSs, at one point off of SF the same sub got 1 DD and the next day sunk another DD out of the same ASW fleet, overall i think the way you have subs model is excellent, love the way it all goes down but the SS are sinking to many DDs,we wont even talk about PCs, if i put 4 of them over a known sub position they go down faster than the DDs, not sure how your code works but i would keep it the way it is but make it harder for a SS to sink DDs.




You mentioned seeing the two hotfixes around Christmas. There was a third - v 1097 (the first ones were 1096a and 1096e). Check the thread on the hotfixes because IIRC 1097 made some adjustments to the sub vs ASW ship equation.

Welcome!

(in reply to tazaaron)
Post #: 3
RE: A couple observations - 1/12/2010 8:11:41 PM   
tazaaron

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 1/12/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Carl Rugenstein

Perhaps you are doing this already but if not, be sure to fly ASW missions in addition to your naval ASW. This seems to degrade the subs performance significantly. Also, the ASW TF commander is very important. When the TF's are formed the computer often selects some real dogs for the smaller TF's. The PP's to put good TF commanders in place is well worth the cost.



Yes i forgot to mention, i had 2 different PBY units patrolling over the ASW fleet off of SF and a commander assigned and they still bought it. Somehow i missed the 3rd hotfix, have found and installed thanks. Those 2 minor AI issues i mentioned are small but in total with other adjustments will make it more challenging when playing the AI.

Aaron

(in reply to Rugens)
Post #: 4
RE: A couple observations - 1/12/2010 9:11:03 PM   
John Lansford

 

Posts: 2662
Joined: 4/29/2002
Status: offline
Same thing happened in my CG after Manilla fell.  The AI rushed two big transport TF's into the harbor, forgetting I still held Bataan.  They lost probably 2 dozen transports and smaller craft to the mines and guns.

The AI will also send airstrike after airstrike against known surface ship TF's if they're in range of LBA.  I've got a cruiser squadron at Darwin protected by half a dozen fighter groups, and they are massacreing the Bettys flying in from Timor even when they've got Zero escorts.  LBA will also attack a DD squadron I've got at Diamond Harbor and waste mission after mission trying to hit those ships.

(in reply to tazaaron)
Post #: 5
RE: A couple observations - 1/12/2010 9:16:44 PM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline
"
Same thing happened in my CG after Manilla fell. The AI rushed two big transport TF's into the harbor, forgetting I still held Bataan. They lost probably 2 dozen transports and smaller craft to the mines and guns."


Now if only I can get my PBEM opponent to make this mistake...

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to John Lansford)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> A couple observations Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.531