Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: long distance travel

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: long distance travel Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: long distance travel - 2/5/2010 5:04:26 PM   
ASHBERY76


Posts: 2136
Joined: 10/10/2001
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gertjan

Indeed is there a screen which easily explains how the relations between players is determined, like in civ4, galciv2, and sins: diplomacy?


It is shown in the videos,it looks CIV4 style.

_____________________________


(in reply to Gertjan)
Post #: 31
RE: long distance travel - 2/5/2010 9:29:55 PM   
elliotg


Posts: 3597
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dingbat911
quote:

ORIGINAL: elliotg
You can impose trade sanctions against another empire, and this is when you might want to also blockade some of their key colonies or space ports. Trade sanctions is not the same as war, so there's no shooting until you decide there should be. Because trade and the free flow of resources are so critical in the game, blockades and trade sanctions can be an effective way of hurting a competitor without full-blown war. You don't necessarily need an entire fleet to enforce a blockade - just enough military ships to make the other empire think twice about running the blockade.


I see...

to further the question on this, how does such action affect diplomacy on a whole

in real life trade sanctions and blockades would cause a lot of background opinions and politics to be formed, and sustained because of various things like background politics or lack of public opinion in engaging in conflict as well as the possible lack of military force. and external countries and organisations would get involved to try and deal with the solution peacefully (or possibly lend aid if a conflict began)

now how is this controlled in game? what would stop the larger player from just continuing the blockade into full war, or crushing the smaller empire that tried to blockade their port.

do other empires have an opinion of your actios against other empires, is there some form of restraint on declaring wars or initating direct agressive acts

in essence, what would make a blockaded empire NOT want to declare war excluding lack of military?

Initiating blockades against another empire will definitely make them dislike you

Each empire has a reputation - your noble and evil actions in the game affect your reputation for better or worse. Other empires view of you is partly influenced by your reputation. So if you do a lot of nasty things other empires will take a dim view of you, and may even gang up against you.

Also, when you appear overstretched in wars or trade sanctions against other empires, your enemies may take advantage of this and declare war on you when you least want it. So you should choose your actions carefully, unless you like full-on chaos of course

(in reply to dingbat911)
Post #: 32
RE: long distance travel - 2/5/2010 9:31:30 PM   
elliotg


Posts: 3597
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gertjan
Indeed is there a screen which easily explains how the relations between players is determined, like in civ4, galciv2, and sins: diplomacy?

Yes, the Diplomacy screen provides details on your relations with all other empires and pirate factions. It explains how each empire feels about you, and exactly why, i.e. the specific factors that make them like or dislike you.

(in reply to Gertjan)
Post #: 33
RE: long distance travel - 2/6/2010 2:06:38 AM   
dingbat911

 

Posts: 35
Joined: 2/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: elliotg
Initiating blockades against another empire will definitely make them dislike you

Each empire has a reputation - your noble and evil actions in the game affect your reputation for better or worse. Other empires view of you is partly influenced by your reputation. So if you do a lot of nasty things other empires will take a dim view of you, and may even gang up against you.

Also, when you appear overstretched in wars or trade sanctions against other empires, your enemies may take advantage of this and declare war on you when you least want it. So you should choose your actions carefully, unless you like full-on chaos of course


And the AI also takes their reputation and their own of others into account when declaring actions?
For example, if they believe that Empire B is not trustworthy and are building up a force close to them they might tolerate Empire A a bit more rather than engage hostilities?

(in reply to elliotg)
Post #: 34
RE: long distance travel - 2/6/2010 7:25:51 AM   
Gertjan

 

Posts: 698
Joined: 12/9/2009
Status: offline
Are the smaller AI players also inclined to form an alliance to weaken the strongest one or don't they dare to do that?

(in reply to dingbat911)
Post #: 35
RE: long distance travel - 2/6/2010 10:10:11 PM   
elliotg


Posts: 3597
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dingbat911
quote:

ORIGINAL: elliotg
Initiating blockades against another empire will definitely make them dislike you

Each empire has a reputation - your noble and evil actions in the game affect your reputation for better or worse. Other empires view of you is partly influenced by your reputation. So if you do a lot of nasty things other empires will take a dim view of you, and may even gang up against you.

Also, when you appear overstretched in wars or trade sanctions against other empires, your enemies may take advantage of this and declare war on you when you least want it. So you should choose your actions carefully, unless you like full-on chaos of course


And the AI also takes their reputation and their own of others into account when declaring actions?
For example, if they believe that Empire B is not trustworthy and are building up a force close to them they might tolerate Empire A a bit more rather than engage hostilities?

Yes, to some extent. But there are a lot of different factors that might influence the actions of each empire. So even though an empire has a poor reputation, there might be some offsetting factor that leads one empire to tolerate them more than another empire.

(in reply to dingbat911)
Post #: 36
RE: long distance travel - 2/6/2010 10:11:12 PM   
elliotg


Posts: 3597
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gertjan
Are the smaller AI players also inclined to form an alliance to weaken the strongest one or don't they dare to do that?

Large empires that do not have good reputations tend to be envied by smaller empires. So that is one factor that can lead to alliances.

(in reply to Gertjan)
Post #: 37
RE: long distance travel - 2/7/2010 8:03:18 AM   
Gertjan

 

Posts: 698
Joined: 12/9/2009
Status: offline
Thanks and good to hear! Good luck with the final stages of development.

(in reply to elliotg)
Post #: 38
RE: long distance travel - 2/17/2010 10:39:38 PM   
Webbco


Posts: 682
Joined: 2/6/2010
Status: offline
I have looked to see whether there is an answer to this in a different thread, but didn't see one - does the movement of planets, stars and moons have any strategic advantage for fleet movement etc? For example, if planet A is aligned in a certain way with planet B and C, fuel costs will be significantly reduced when travelling from planet A to planet C.

(in reply to Gertjan)
Post #: 39
RE: long distance travel - 2/17/2010 10:59:08 PM   
elliotg


Posts: 3597
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Webbco
I have looked to see whether there is an answer to this in a different thread, but didn't see one - does the movement of planets, stars and moons have any strategic advantage for fleet movement etc? For example, if planet A is aligned in a certain way with planet B and C, fuel costs will be significantly reduced when travelling from planet A to planet C.

Not really - even a lot of in-system movement is done with hyperjumps. So travelling between planets that are a reasonable distance apart (in the same system) will initiate a hyperjump - thus the in-system planet locations don't make much difference in fuel usage.

(in reply to Webbco)
Post #: 40
RE: long distance travel - 2/17/2010 11:05:04 PM   
Webbco


Posts: 682
Joined: 2/6/2010
Status: offline
Thanks Elliot. How about inter-system travel?

P.S. I heard somewhere you are from NZ and made the video clips...if so, are you a fan of Jemaine Clement?

(in reply to elliotg)
Post #: 41
RE: long distance travel - 2/18/2010 8:23:26 PM   
elliotg


Posts: 3597
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Webbco
Thanks Elliot. How about inter-system travel?

Inter-system travel is always by hyperjump. Longer distances obviously require more fuel. Star systems don't move though, just planets and moons inside systems, so inter-system distances never change.

quote:


P.S. I heard somewhere you are from NZ and made the video clips...if so, are you a fan of Jemaine Clement?

I didn't know that was one of the guys from Flight of the Conchords until I looked him up So I guess that means I'm not really a fan. In fact I hadn't even seen FotC until a couple of months ago when I was staying at a friend's place - I don't watch much TV I guess

(in reply to Webbco)
Post #: 42
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: long distance travel Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.625