Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

AI use of bombardment

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> AI use of bombardment Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
AI use of bombardment - 4/13/2010 8:11:15 AM   
Gertjan

 

Posts: 698
Joined: 12/9/2009
Status: offline 		Does the AI use bombardment or only troop invasions? I have never seen it happening, but then again usually I'm the one who's attacking.
Post #: 1
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/13/2010 8:25:22 AM   
Fishman

 

Posts: 795
Joined: 4/1/2010
Status: offline 		I have never seen the AI use bombardment, but since bombardment is apparently such a heinous atrocity entire races independently of empire will hate you for, and the design of the game tends to make all empires multiracial, the AI is probably unable to effectively cope with the fallout from bombarding, anyway.

(in reply to Gertjan)
Post #: 2
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/13/2010 6:10:50 PM   
Malevolence


Posts: 1781
Joined: 4/3/2010
Status: offline 		I'm not totally sure, but I think bombardment weapons were added in the 11th hour. I don't think the AI behaviors were added. This goes along with some quirky behavior regarding torps and bombs being in the same tech stack. When you make a bombardment tech discovery, beware that automation will replace your torps with bombardment weapons (which do no damage to other ships) during upgrades.



_____________________________

Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.

(in reply to Fishman)
Post #: 3
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/13/2010 6:53:49 PM   
Fishman

 

Posts: 795
Joined: 4/1/2010
Status: offline 		I think that was eliminated in the update. Although the game DOES still confuse categories of torpedoes, classifying the shorter ranged "heavy" torpedo above the "sniper" version, even though I regard it as a categorically inferior weapon because range and speed are everything. If you are fighting an opponent that is faster and has longer range than you, you are dead. Period.

(in reply to Malevolence)
Post #: 4
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/13/2010 8:02:31 PM   
Malevolence


Posts: 1781
Joined: 4/3/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fishman

I think that was eliminated in the update.


As of 1.0.3, I still get nuclear devastators on my space ports.

_____________________________

Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.

(in reply to Fishman)
Post #: 5
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/13/2010 8:06:51 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malevolence

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fishman

I think that was eliminated in the update.


As of 1.0.3, I still get nuclear devastators on my space ports.


Is this with a game that was started in 1.0.3? If so, thanks for the report, we'll make sure this gets fixed.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Malevolence)
Post #: 6
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/13/2010 8:16:58 PM   
Malevolence


Posts: 1781
Joined: 4/3/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins
Is this with a game that was started in 1.0.3? If so, thanks for the report, we'll make sure this gets fixed.


The campaign (new game) I am playing now in fact.


_____________________________

Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 7
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 1:54:43 AM   
JonathanStrange


Posts: 114
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline 		An AI civilization powerful or just plain mean enough to use bombardment would be cool: you'd think twice about getting on their bad side.

_____________________________

The opinions expressed by JonathanStrange are solely those of JonathanStrange and do not reflect the opinions of Matrix Games, the forum members of Matrix Games, the forum moderators, or JonathanStrange.

(in reply to Malevolence)
Post #: 8
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 2:09:33 AM   
Wade1000


Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		Ug.

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

(in reply to JonathanStrange)
Post #: 9
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 8:10:35 AM   
Fishman

 

Posts: 795
Joined: 4/1/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JonathanStrange

An AI civilization powerful or just plain mean enough to use bombardment would be cool: you'd think twice about getting on their bad side.

Bombardment in the game is pretty much the act of a mean-spirited and impotent actor. If you were powerful, it would be easier to invade a planet than to bombard it, so you don't have to recolonize it and then rebuild your defenses there SLOWLY. And frankly, there are few planets that you cannot take with a super-battleship carrying 20+ legions on it. The AI simply does not defend planets that heavily. The AI is also far better at invading than bombarding, as he swarms it with suicide dropships. I have had to install wave blasters on starbases to defend against this.

< Message edited by Fishman -- 4/14/2010 8:12:31 AM >

(in reply to JonathanStrange)
Post #: 10
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 8:34:27 AM   
Malevolence


Posts: 1781
Joined: 4/3/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fishman

Bombardment in the game is pretty much the act of a mean-spirited and impotent actor. If you were powerful, it would be easier to invade a planet than to bombard it, so you don't have to recolonize it and then rebuild your defenses there SLOWLY.


In the absence of biological and chemical weapons, this is the only way to ensure the racial purity of your empire.


_____________________________

Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.

(in reply to Fishman)
Post #: 11
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 12:12:10 PM   
Fishman

 

Posts: 795
Joined: 4/1/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malevolence

In the absence of biological and chemical weapons, this is the only way to ensure the racial purity of your empire.
Even if such an act were considered desirable for some reason (objectively, it isn't), it does not work, because passenger craft, either yours or theirs, will transport migrants to other worlds anyway. It is possible to gain alien minority populations even if you never annex any alien populations this way.

(in reply to Malevolence)
Post #: 12
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 12:19:19 PM   
Wade1000


Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		Heh. That element in this game shows the flaws of real life segregation and genocide. Any very intelligent life form has helpful potential. Even any lesser intelligent life form has helpful potential. In a grand strategic overview of life, integration of life and the sharing of varying ideas is most beneficial to success.

For the game, though, it is good to be able to have players or AI opponents play as a evil/low reputation empires.

< Message edited by Wade1000 -- 4/14/2010 1:08:29 PM >

_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

(in reply to Fishman)
Post #: 13
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 1:31:58 PM   
Fishman

 

Posts: 795
Joined: 4/1/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wade1000

Heh. That element in this game shows the flaws of real life segregation and genocide. Any very intelligent life form has helpful potential. Even any lesser intelligent life form has helpful potential.
An oversimplification of the real issues. In real life, different peoples may have different attributes and characteristics to the point where they are simply counterproductive to keep around, because they consume the space and resources that could be better used by more productive citizens. This can be seen in games like Armada or MOO2, where populational units have different attributes, some of which may be categorically inferior to simply cleansing the planet with fire and recolonizing with your own: For instance, if you have a race that gives +3 to productionness, and another one that gives +3 to researchness, a race of inferior attributes offers you nothing, particularly if there is a productivity penalty applied to being the Non.

In DW, none of this occurs because one peasant is as good as any other: All peasants pay taxes at the same rate, and as long as your empire consists of a diverse selection of peasantry, you will receive the racial bonuses globally, and therefore, it is to your benefit to acquire a diverse selection for maximum benefitness. While a clear "Master Race" exists in every category, those of other races do not become counterproductive as there is no opportunity cost imposed for possessing them: You have already received the bonus and what happens afterwards is of no consequence.

(in reply to Wade1000)
Post #: 14
RE: AI use of bombardment - 4/14/2010 7:18:07 PM   
Malevolence


Posts: 1781
Joined: 4/3/2010
Status: offline 		Please keep in mind, all the intelligent species I know, readily and frequently conduct irrational behavior. The question is really, "who benefits?"




_____________________________

Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.

(in reply to Fishman)
Post #: 15
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> AI use of bombardment Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

7.893