Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Kent class CA? snafu?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Kent class CA? snafu? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Kent class CA? snafu? - 8/20/2002 6:26:22 AM   
Sam-I-am

 

Posts: 55
Joined: 2/15/2002
Status: offline 		Most of my books list the Kent class CA rather than the Australia class CA.

Not being picky just wanted to show I read also:D
No need to change anything if I'm correct.


( I feel important now ):p
Post #: 1
- 8/20/2002 11:16:03 AM   
Jeremy Pritchard

 

Posts: 588
Joined: 9/27/2001
From: Ontario Canada
Status: offline 		Just like the Perth Class was actually a modified Leander, the Australia and Canberra were of the Kent class, but when transferred to Australia, the RAN called them the Australia class. Most nations did this with lent vessels. The RN Attacker class was actually just USN Bogue CVE's.

(in reply to Sam-I-am)
Post #: 2
- 8/20/2002 1:00:21 PM   
Sam-I-am

 

Posts: 55
Joined: 2/15/2002
Status: offline 		Thanks for the info.

I knew there had to be a logical explanation but had nothing in writing.


Thanks again.

(in reply to Sam-I-am)
Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Kent class CA? snafu? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.797