RE: Are these BUGS in 021B????

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B????

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Last Stand Arnhem >> Tech Support >> RE: Are these BUGS in 021B????

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/10/2010 4:57:11 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

well i will e mail him and ask........the only thing we dont know for sure is which BG he merged with.

everything else we know for sure ..dont we.

right?

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 61

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/10/2010 5:10:13 AM

Andrew Williams

Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline

well... we don't know because you keep giving different answers.and sending me for one on wild goose chases.. so let's just wait and see what he has to say and look at things in a calm and cool manner.

it does seem odd that there is limited deploy though...

Did the BG fight in amongst those streets last battle?

Did they lose any vehicles and left a wreck?

_____________________________

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 62

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/10/2010 5:13:05 AM

Andrew Williams

Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline

Do you have a screeshot of what you are reporting at Mook?

_____________________________

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 63

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/10/2010 5:20:09 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

ok....so now we have some real questions here.....now i know what your digging for.
i didnt originally say he merged....it was someone else that said it was obviuos he merged. so now i got my e mail from him...

he DID NOT merge with anyone other than the static BG that was there.

the BG did fight amonst all those street the battle before as i stated above. and then could not deploy there, any where in the 2nd battle.

i dont no for sure if he had any vehicles in the 1st battle. i did not see any and none were destroyed for sure. we had a big inf fight and he had 2 flak guns which were destroyed. 1 37 mm in the town and an 88 on the other side of the bridge.
i will e mail him and ask.
NEWS FLASH...... NO vehicles fo sure in the 1st fight.

< Message edited by STIENER -- 12/10/2010 5:26:28 AM >

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 64

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/10/2010 5:24:16 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

sorry ..no screen shot of mook....i didnt no till after.he didnt tell me till later after we had a couple of fights.

does using the MOVE order instead of the attack order make any difference to moving to contact? in the rules im lead to believe it DOES NOT make any diff, other than you lose more cohesion if you attack onto a map instead of moving onto a map.
he thinks he may have MOVED onto Mook instead of attacking onto mook, which has an allied AB BG on it and an allied conrolled bridge. i captured the bridge before it could be blown.

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 65

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/10/2010 11:37:28 AM

xe5

Posts: 783
Joined: 5/3/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: STIENER
i didnt originally say he merged....it was someone else that said it was obviuos he merged.

What you said was "germans have not merged any BG's as far as i know" which confused the issue because Graebner did merge with the Nijmegen Bridge static BG.

quote:

ORIGINAL: STIENER
trust me when i say that THIS BG...Graebner ...already fought one battle on this map...i fought it there. they lost allot of troops in the 1st fight. as for merging im 90% sure now that andrew pointed it out that my opponent did merge greabner with someone. NOT the static BG....it did that the turn before this one. theres german Para's in this roster...graebner was an SS recon BG, so....

News flash - trust me when I say this...I know for sure that Graebner did not fight any previous battles in your campaign. Graebner's active and forcepool rosters are intact, none of the available BG or parent formation points have been used. Unit values are green. Graebner's core BG is completely original, in exactly the same condition it started the GC. If Graebner had fought previously on Nijegen Bridge your opponent almost certainly would have used and reported having vehicles. Graebner has only merged with the Nijmegen Bridge static BG (which has FJ units).

The bug involving the Nijmegen Bridge map is that the system doesnt recognize Axis control of the RR bridge should allow Graebner's units to deploy on the south bank. On the other hand, if portions of both bridges were Allied controlled, then logically Graebner's units should not be allowed to deploy on the south bank, BUT the static BG units merged into Graebner's BG should be allowed to deploy south of the Waal. Another logical issue is - if both bridges are enemy controlled, shouldnt units be constrained to deploy on the side of the river they occupied when control of both bridges was lost?

quote:

does using the MOVE order instead of the attack order make any difference to moving to contact? in the rules im lead to believe it DOES NOT make any diff, other than you lose more cohesion if you attack onto a map instead of moving onto a map.

Yes, in addition to causing less loss of cohesion, the MOVE order is DIFFERENT than Attack because it means that BG will be in reserve if there is another friendly BG already on the map.

quote:

he thinks he may have MOVED onto Mook instead of attacking onto mook, which has an allied AB BG on it and an allied conrolled bridge. i captured the bridge before it could be blown.

I know we cant spell and our syntax is in sodden shambles but lets at least keep the facts straight ok? Your opponents BG arrived on Mook during the 0600 turn as a reinforcement. Mook doesnt have a bridge, or an Allied BG on it at the start of the 0600 turn. The problem that you previously reported is this:

"the german BG in Mook was slated to move to Heuman bridge...there is an AB BG there....it didnt move.....the green move arrow was still there after we it EXECUTE but the BG was still in Mook"

Besides the fact that Axis strat move arrows are red, not green, did you move the AB BG from Grafwegen to Mook on the 0600 turn? If you did then you pre-empted the intended Axis move from Mook to Heumen Bridge. Please post another zip of the current save file to spare the forensic analysis from depending only on convoluted Stienerisms.

< Message edited by xe5 -- 12/10/2010 11:54:11 AM >

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 66

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/11/2010 3:17:34 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

gotta love Micks sense or humour. LMAO

a bit sarcastic....love you too Mick [ did i spall that right?? ]

ok i admit this is getting a bit messed up. sorry....but lets face it no one seems to be able to read the original post which i thought was pretty detailed and make sense out of it for some reason?? perhaps try reading it a second or third time?

BUT Micks right [ god i hope my syntax and spelling is ok....Mick must have spell check ] there is a few things mixed up here. the problem is my opponent wasnt giving me some facts and im playing the other side and i was focusing on other things...like the battle. i also dont no whats in the german force pools.....im not playing them and i have not played as german yet.

Njimegan. portions of the both bridges were NOT in allied control. only the road bridge and 1 Vl in the town. see the 3 or 4 explainations above [ yes reading skills are needed ] [ god my syntax again

]
i think Mick hit the nail on the head tho with his definition of the problem " The bug involving the Nijmegen Bridge map is that the system doesnt recognize Axis control of the RR bridge should allow Graebner's units to deploy on the south bank"

Mook / Heuman bridge. were playing the 18th at 6:00. the 505/1 U.S. is in Heuman bridge. they moved there on the 17 at 15:00 from Mook and fought and took the bridge. they did not move any where. its now the 18th at 6:00. the germans come on at Mook. they tried to move to Heuman. my opponents thinks he may have used a MOVE order instead of an attack order. he did try to move there using some order. the german BG did not move but my opponent says he saw the move arrow [ he says it was green..perhaps he's color blind?? ] still there after we hit the EXE button and all the other moves were made. the allied BG did not have a move order to go any where. it was already there in heuman bridge. on my strat sceen after EXE was done there was NO move arrow that i could see, but on his strat screen he says there was.
is there enough detail here now? hope this is ok Mick, my fragile ego cant take another beating....

Attachment (1)

(in reply to xe5)

Post #: 67

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/13/2010 3:04:03 PM

RD Oddball

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: STIENER

i think Mick hit the nail on the head tho with his definition of the problem " The bug involving the Nijmegen Bridge map is that the system doesnt recognize Axis control of the RR bridge should allow Graebner's units to deploy on the south bank"

As I'd mentioned in post #54 we'd look at it. I entered a bug on that day I posted.

< Message edited by RD_Oddball -- 12/14/2010 2:41:46 PM >

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 68

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/14/2010 1:09:01 PM

xe5

Posts: 783
Joined: 5/3/2009
Status: offline

Stiener - you dont by any chance have a cousin in Oz called 'Anzac Tack'?

(in reply to RD Oddball)

Post #: 69

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/15/2010 9:07:12 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

started my GC again from the attachment above with my opponent. were still using the 021b patch.

the germans could not deploy vehicles.....a/c and h/t on the city side of the river. they hold most of the VL's there. they could deploy inf any where.....both sides of the river.
the germans had vehicles on both sides of the river including the city at the end of last battle.

(in reply to xe5)

Post #: 70

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/15/2010 9:49:37 AM

Andrew Williams

Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline

Could the infantry deploy on the other side of the river previously?

Is it the infantry that were already on the map the turn before that can deploy on the other side of the river?

Can infantry that arrive with the mobile BG deploy on either side of the river or are they also stranded on one side.

Just to let you know... it seems to be working as designed at present.. the question is should it be designed that way and is there an alternative?

_____________________________

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 71

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/15/2010 10:10:19 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

no the inf could not deply on the other side of the river previously.

the german only changed / added 2 vehicles to his BG. so yes the inf from previously are the ones that can deploy across the river. they ended last turn there along with some vehicles.

he's only using the mobile bg inf [ SS troopers ] in this battle and the last battle. im not sure if all the inf could deploy on both sides. i will e mail him.

if its designed this way its pretty wack....having to keep bringing your vehicles back acros the river.

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 72

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/15/2010 6:47:27 PM

Andrew Williams

Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline

To try and get clarification...

This is the first or second battle where vehicles are available on this map? (is it a different battle to the one you posted above?)

_____________________________

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 73

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/15/2010 8:46:10 PM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

got my info.

all his inf could deploy on both sides of the river. just not the vehicles. this is the second battle that vehicles were availible. and its the same battle posted above. its the first battle to play in the attachment above.

Steinerisms..a new word?

[ i see the guiness book of world records coming.. ]

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 74

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 5:11:25 AM

Andrew Williams

Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline

quote:

this is the second battle that vehicles were availible. and its the same battle posted above. its the first battle to play in the attachment above.

Pardon me while I twiddle my thumbs and await clarification.

_____________________________

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 75

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 5:13:30 AM

Andrew Williams

Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline

and

quote:

no the inf could not deply on the other side of the river previously.

the german only changed / added 2 vehicles to his BG. so yes the inf from previously are the ones that can deploy across the river.

Should I continue listening........... ??

_____________________________

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 76

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 8:23:34 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

andrew......its the first battle you play in GC in the attachement from post # 66.....Njimegan bridge battle.

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 77

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 8:32:06 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

MOOK
this is the second strat move that the german Goebel BG in mook would not move into heuman bridge. this time the german used an attack order instead of a move order. after EXE the red or pink arrow is still there but the BG did not move in.

there is now and was last time an allied AB bg at heuman bridge. it has not moved.

i tried an AI strat move. the AI being german and the AI german Goebel BG will move into heuman bridge from Mook.

Oddball....im assuming your aware of this bug?

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 78

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 8:45:14 AM

Andrew Williams

Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline

post #66 is by XE5 with no attachments

_____________________________

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 79

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 8:47:45 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

gee andrew i guess its post # 67 then

do you think you can find it??

(in reply to Andrew Williams)

Post #: 80

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 12:30:35 PM

xe5

Posts: 783
Joined: 5/3/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: STIENER
Steinerisms..a new word? [ i see the guiness book of world records coming.. ]

Apologies if Ive been spelling your name wrong all this time.

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 81

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/16/2010 7:56:59 PM

RD Oddball

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: STIENER

MOOK
this is the second strat move that the german Goebel BG in mook would not move into heuman bridge. this time the german used an attack order instead of a move order. after EXE the red or pink arrow is still there but the BG did not move in.

there is now and was last time an allied AB bg at heuman bridge. it has not moved.

i tried an AI strat move. the AI being german and the AI german Goebel BG will move into heuman bridge from Mook.

Oddball....im assuming your aware of this bug?

I see you're description but I don't understand what you're reporting. Sorry. I'll let you know once I understand. I'm a pictures kind of guy so if you can supplement your point with screenshots that might be the quickest way to help me understand.

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 82

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/17/2010 8:14:46 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

Oddball
use the attachement in post # 67 and try and get the german Goebel BG to move from mook to hueman bridge in the strat move. its as simple as that.
we havent been able to get it to move there in 2 strat moves so far.

(in reply to RD Oddball)

Post #: 83

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/17/2010 5:25:29 PM

RD Oddball

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline

Sorry if you explained this somewhere but the save game file you posted is not at a movement turn. Nijmegen is the next battle with at least three others following it up North. Do you have a saved game that is on a movement turn?

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 84

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/17/2010 7:20:46 PM

xe5

Posts: 783
Joined: 5/3/2009
Status: offline

No problem using the save file in question to move Goebel's BG from Mook to Heumen.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to RD Oddball)

Post #: 85

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/18/2010 3:35:50 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

try this one Oddball.......i dont know how Mick managed to get the BG to move

maybe my opponent is somewhat left click ..right click challenged

it doesnt make sense to me..wierd

Attachment (1)

(in reply to xe5)

Post #: 86

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/18/2010 4:15:52 AM

Q.M

Posts: 1823
Joined: 3/13/2003
From: Townsville QLD Australia
Status: offline

Hi Stiener. Which BG are you trying to move in this saved game. I have the file open at the moment and will give it a shot.
Edit: Who is playing the allied and who is the ge? Who owns the saved game file?

< Message edited by Q.M -- 12/18/2010 4:33:15 AM >

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 87

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/18/2010 4:35:57 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

german BG goebel in mook to hueman bridge

(in reply to Q.M)

Post #: 88

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/18/2010 4:38:16 AM

STIENER

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline

the allies own the files......me, im the allies, my opponent is german

thanks

< Message edited by STIENER -- 12/18/2010 4:39:11 AM >

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 89

RE: Are these BUGS in 021B???? - 12/18/2010 4:46:48 AM

Q.M

Posts: 1823
Joined: 3/13/2003
From: Townsville QLD Australia
Status: offline

Ok. As per the attachment in your post 86. Confirm it's an allied saved game file. Confrim I cant move Goebel to Hueman Bridge as it's an allied saved game file.
Who is trying to move a ge BG? On this file? I would need to have your opponents saved game file to try and move Goebel in mook to Hueman Bridge on the map. The allied saved game is no good to try and do this.

I tried the saved game file from your post 67 and as per Hooligan I too can move Goebel to the bridge.

Do you have your opponents saved game file per chance?

(in reply to STIENER)

Post #: 90

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Last Stand Arnhem >> Tech Support >> RE: Are these BUGS in 021B????