Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: WITE vs. WITP

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: WITE vs. WITP Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 7:39:23 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline
A WW1 game seems indeed boring: you know you will not break your opponent's front. But in WitE, just think about Barbarossa or how the Germans were finally stuffed in Ukraine or Operation Bagration So not really an immobile mire... er more like the Soviet Steamroller

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 91
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 7:40:03 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana

You need to care somehow, it being big in itself isn't so interesting.

How many people are begging for a game about the War of the Triple Alliance?



Isn't that the one where, after the war, polygamy was mandatory in Paraguay because they lost >90% of their male population?

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 92
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 8:52:05 PM   
berto


Posts: 20708
Joined: 3/13/2002
From: metro Chicago, Illinois, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana

... masses and masses of counters all stacked up opposing each other at the front and think... ugh. It's just too dense...

+1

_____________________________

Campaign Series Legion https://cslegion.com/
Campaign Series Lead Coder https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1515
Panzer Campaigns, Panzer Battles, Civil War Battles Lead Coder https://wargameds.com

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 93
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 10:43:04 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: berto


quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana

... masses and masses of counters all stacked up opposing each other at the front and think... ugh. It's just too dense...

+1


Less dense than having two divisions fight over Johnston Atoll or Nauru island

(in reply to berto)
Post #: 94
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 10:47:06 PM   
2ndACR


Posts: 5665
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline
80% of those masses of counters are basically empty shells. Check my AAR over in the WITE forum and look at the AI defense lines. Won't find any masses like that. It happens, but not always. Just tap a stack like that and they blow away.

The AI is really good as the Russians. Really good. It will pull back if it feels threatened.

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 95
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 11:01:12 PM   
V22 Osprey


Posts: 1593
Joined: 4/8/2008
From: Corona, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko


quote:

ORIGINAL: berto


quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana

... masses and masses of counters all stacked up opposing each other at the front and think... ugh. It's just too dense...

+1


Less dense than having two divisions fight over Johnston Atoll or Nauru island


Agreed.

And WitE isn't even dense. The max stack limit is 3 units, and most of the front is covered by one unit per hex. I've seen more units in the average Panzer Campaigns title. Trust me, it's ALOT easier to do a GC turn in WitE than in Panzer Campaigns.

_____________________________


Art by rogueusmc.

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 96
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 11:05:16 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: V22 Osprey
And WitE isn't even dense. The max stack limit is 3 units, and most of the front is covered by one unit per hex. I've seen more units in the average Panzer Campaigns title. Trust me, it's ALOT easier to do a GC turn in WitE than in Panzer Campaigns.


I was positively shocked by the manageablity in WITE. It's actually nowehere near monsterish to manage as WITP even though you are commanding far bigger number of troops and units than WITP.

Some players don't like it, but in my opinion, usage and management of support units (anything smaller than a division, basically) is nothing short of pure genius.

(in reply to V22 Osprey)
Post #: 97
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 11:07:42 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 2ndACR

80% of those masses of counters are basically empty shells. Check my AAR over in the WITE forum and look at the AI defense lines. Won't find any masses like that. It happens, but not always. Just tap a stack like that and they blow away.

The AI is really good as the Russians. Really good. It will pull back if it feels threatened.



Lots of HQs and Air Bases counters, right. In WitE there are no airfields but Air Bases [counters]. You have to remember that there is a huge geographic thing in Europe: The European Plain, from SW France to the Urals, so you only need clear or light woods hexes and the Air Bases counters (you can attach a maximum of nine air units) will magically launch planes. This IS 100% historical by the way.

But there are still MASSES of soldiers If my PBEM Axis opponent could see the many rifle / cavalry / tank / motorised / mountain divisions and rifle and naval brigades I've got, he would surrender. The poor thing is heading to Moscow, and he is rather confident from what he is saying on the emails Oh well, just like the Germans did: "we have only to kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will come crashing down..." Hitler dixit. Hahaha! NOSTRADAMUS!

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to 2ndACR)
Post #: 98
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 11:11:30 PM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
Tullius, I don't understand the meaning of the two photographs of Stalin in your sig. Can you explain it please? Thanks!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 99
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 11:24:20 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline
Sure

The pic of the left is the original. Then you can see that on the pic of the right one guy has disappeared It's Comissar Yezhov. He was purged... Then they did this aberrant trick: they erased him from the photo. Pure Stalinism. The guy was physically "terminated" but that was not enough, he had to disappear from history BOOKS. This was a classic and aberrant Stalinist trick: notably Trotsky was erased from many photos

By the way, that comissar was a big bast*rd... he was a NKVD big boss and thus was involved in Stalinist purges. But then one day Uncle Joe decided the guy had to be purged as well. Which was done...

Lubyanka was the KGB (Cheka, GPU) HQ in Moscow. There was an infamous prison as well.

< Message edited by TulliusDetritus -- 1/8/2011 11:31:22 PM >


_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 100
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 11:32:14 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
Tullius,

See this link for a great book about historical edited photos (including Soviet follies): http://www.amazon.com/Making-People-Disappear-Photographic-Pergamon-Brasseys/dp/0080374301/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1294529414&sr=1-1

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 101
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/8/2011 11:50:08 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline
Zorch, it has to be a funny book (full of grotesque photo manipulations). Thank you.

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to Zorch)
Post #: 102
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/9/2011 12:29:18 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Is that Beria to Stalin's left?

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 103
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/9/2011 12:41:31 AM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline
The guy with glasses is Molotov, the military guy is Voroshilov. Beria was the successor of Yezhov.

< Message edited by TulliusDetritus -- 1/9/2011 12:43:34 AM >


_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 104
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/9/2011 2:32:02 PM   
Alpha77

 

Posts: 2116
Joined: 9/24/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Steel Panthers unfortunately doesn't like Vista 64bit.


Setup a 2nd partition with XP or even Win98SE ? It runs fine on these OSes :)

I have still my hands full with WITPae, also 3 or 4 other games which want to be played... among them a campaign of the old WIR (it is now 2/45 and the Axis took the whole southern USSR while the front is stalled at Moscow). I also have SPwaw still like this one.

So I probably will buy WITE in 1 year or so :) Or I become millionaer and don´t need to work anymore and cut down every other hobby I have, or even better make the day 48 hours god of gamers

Btw: How compares WITE to TOAW eastern front scenarios ? It seems at least the counters look simmilar ?


< Message edited by Alpha77 -- 1/9/2011 2:55:40 PM >

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 105
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/10/2011 1:39:25 PM   
morganbj


Posts: 3634
Joined: 8/12/2007
From: Mosquito Bite, Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alpha77

Btw: How compares WITE to TOAW eastern front scenarios ? It seems at least the counters look simmilar ?


They are very different games. TOAW (I assume you mean the FITE scenario) just doesn't quite work. The AI is terrible, and the supply situation is very poorly modeled. FITE was a pretty good attempt at recreating the eastern front, but the TOAW engine was just not up to the task. I played it for several thousand hours, I guess, so it was fun, but it just didn't work as well as WITE.

WITE is much more faithful to the period. The movement/combat system seems to work about right, and, as someone else said, the support unit system is very imaginative. There are hard coded weather effects (like severe penalties for the Germans in the first winter), and the mud turns actually work. In FITE, depending on which flavor one plays, mud turns were modeled as "cease fires," which makes no sense at all.

So, WITE is a much, much better EF game, in my opinion. Its only shortcoming seems to be the air war system, and perhaps the fact that northern Finland is not included.

(in reply to Alpha77)
Post #: 106
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/10/2011 3:32:59 PM   
TulliusDetritus


Posts: 5521
Joined: 4/1/2004
From: The Zone™
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alpha77
Btw: How compares WITE to TOAW eastern front scenarios ? It seems at least the counters look simmilar ?


There is thread in the WitE forum about this

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2643789

_____________________________

a nu cheeki breeki iv damke

(in reply to Alpha77)
Post #: 107
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/25/2011 4:19:25 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I've been watching the WitE forums, wishing the game well but also concerned that it has siphoned off a good number of AE players, including one in particular. As stated earlier in this thread, I think AE will prove to have longer "legs" than WitE due to the subject matter (the Pacific probably lends itself to a larger and more loyal following than does the war in Russia or any other land theater). As the OP noted, the number of users in the WitE main forum exceeds AE, roughly 2:1 I'd say, and this seems to be the case now. Nothing unusual there given the newness of WitE. However, the AE AAR sub-forum almost always has more readers than the same thread in WitE - usually about 1.5:1 or 2:1. I thought that was interesting - and indeed I'd be far more interested in reading an AE AAR than a WitE AAR.

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 108
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/25/2011 7:43:16 PM   
berto


Posts: 20708
Joined: 3/13/2002
From: metro Chicago, Illinois, USA
Status: offline
I continue to track the WITE and WITP:AE main forum visitor counts. Many times the ratio approaches 2:1, usually it's ~3:2, but sometimes the AE visitors equal or even exceed the WITE visitors. (This considers all times of the day and night.) A bored man's amusement.

_____________________________

Campaign Series Legion https://cslegion.com/
Campaign Series Lead Coder https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1515
Panzer Campaigns, Panzer Battles, Civil War Battles Lead Coder https://wargameds.com

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 109
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/26/2011 4:23:49 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: berto

I continue to track the WITE and WITP:AE main forum visitor counts. Many times the ratio approaches 2:1, usually it's ~3:2, but sometimes the AE visitors equal or even exceed the WITE visitors. (This considers all times of the day and night.) A bored man's amusement.



You would make a good accountant

And WiTE is a great game. I spent many, many years studying the Eastern front.

I have simply becme addicted to all of the water, planes, ships , etc of the Pacific front.

Plus we have the island girls

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to berto)
Post #: 110
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/26/2011 5:18:39 AM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman


quote:

ORIGINAL: berto

I continue to track the WITE and WITP:AE main forum visitor counts. Many times the ratio approaches 2:1, usually it's ~3:2, but sometimes the AE visitors equal or even exceed the WITE visitors. (This considers all times of the day and night.) A bored man's amusement.



You would make a good accountant

And WiTE is a great game. I spent many, many years studying the Eastern front.

I have simply becme addicted to all of the water, planes, ships , etc of the Pacific front.

Plus we have the island girls

WITE does have the "Night Witches", right?

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 111
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/26/2011 11:51:16 PM   
PresterJohn001


Posts: 382
Joined: 8/11/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I've been watching the WitE forums, wishing the game well but also concerned that it has siphoned off a good number of AE players, including one in particular. As stated earlier in this thread, I think AE will prove to have longer "legs" than WitE due to the subject matter (the Pacific probably lends itself to a larger and more loyal following than does the war in Russia or any other land theater). As the OP noted, the number of users in the WitE main forum exceeds AE, roughly 2:1 I'd say, and this seems to be the case now. Nothing unusual there given the newness of WitE. However, the AE AAR sub-forum almost always has more readers than the same thread in WitE - usually about 1.5:1 or 2:1. I thought that was interesting - and indeed I'd be far more interested in reading an AE AAR than a WitE AAR.


The appetite for east front wargames is pretty big, its a fascinating conflict, many parallels to the Pacific War but with one big commonally assumed difference - Germany could have won (Japan in reality could not, Germany debatable). So i'd disagree and certainly from volume of wargmaes produced and played suggest that the East Front has the larger potential fanbase.

If i wasn't commited and to the witpae games i have i'd probably give it a go

< Message edited by PresterJohn -- 1/26/2011 11:52:19 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 112
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/26/2011 11:58:05 PM   
PresterJohn001


Posts: 382
Joined: 8/11/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

A WW1 game seems indeed boring: you know you will not break your opponent's front. But in WitE, just think about Barbarossa or how the Germans were finally stuffed in Ukraine or Operation Bagration So not really an immobile mire... er more like the Soviet Steamroller



Theres an excellent WW1 board game - Paths of Glory

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/91/paths-of-glory

From GMT Games' website:
"They called it the Great War. In over four years of titanic struggle, the ancient Europe of Kings and Emperors tore itself to pieces, giving birth to our own violent modern age. The bloody battles fought in the trenches of the Western Front, the icy plains of Poland, the mountains of the Balkans, and the deserts of Arabia, shaped the world we know today. We are all orphans of the Great War.

bit more than the Somme involved




Attachment (1)

(in reply to TulliusDetritus)
Post #: 113
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/27/2011 1:12:46 AM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PresterJohn

The appetite for east front wargames is pretty big, its a fascinating conflict, many parallels to the Pacific War but with one big commonally assumed difference - Germany could have won (Japan in reality could not, Germany debatable). So i'd disagree and certainly from volume of wargmaes produced and played suggest that the East Front has the larger potential fanbase.



I would propose another reason for popularity. I wouldn't press this theory too far, and it may be more specific to Greatest Generation and Baby Boomer players. But one attraction for the Eastern Front is that both sides are "bad." One Nazi, one communist and at the will of the greatest mass murderer of the 20th C. (OK, maybe 2nd worst to Mao; figures differ.)

I plan to play the Japanese side next game in AE, but more to get full value from my purchase and to see the production system. I don't relish trying to sink ships of my navy. Similarly, I think Silent Hunter 3, with mods, is the best submarine sim ever developed, but I have trouble enjoying it as I have to play as a U-boat commander.

The Eastern Front, aside from the scope and other factors that made it the largest land conflict in world history, and likely to remain so in the future, removes the guilt. At least perhaps for some players.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to PresterJohn001)
Post #: 114
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/27/2011 1:36:17 AM   
V22 Osprey


Posts: 1593
Joined: 4/8/2008
From: Corona, CA
Status: offline
While I see where the guilt comes from, it's not really a big deal is as this is a game. I have no problem playing as the 'bad guys' and mowing down a couple of Americans. In fact the 'bad guys' are usually the most interesting because it's usually a different style of play with new toys.

_____________________________


Art by rogueusmc.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 115
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/27/2011 1:45:03 AM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: PresterJohn

The appetite for east front wargames is pretty big, its a fascinating conflict, many parallels to the Pacific War but with one big commonally assumed difference - Germany could have won (Japan in reality could not, Germany debatable). So i'd disagree and certainly from volume of wargmaes produced and played suggest that the East Front has the larger potential fanbase.



I would propose another reason for popularity. I wouldn't press this theory too far, and it may be more specific to Greatest Generation and Baby Boomer players. But one attraction for the Eastern Front is that both sides are "bad." One Nazi, one communist and at the will of the greatest mass murderer of the 20th C. (OK, maybe 2nd worst to Mao; figures differ.)

I plan to play the Japanese side next game in AE, but more to get full value from my purchase and to see the production system. I don't relish trying to sink ships of my navy. Similarly, I think Silent Hunter 3, with mods, is the best submarine sim ever developed, but I have trouble enjoying it as I have to play as a U-boat commander.

The Eastern Front, aside from the scope and other factors that made it the largest land conflict in world history, and likely to remain so in the future, removes the guilt. At least perhaps for some players.


Agree with the fine citizen from Frostbite Falls.

Would also add the geographic customer base to be a significant factor. As a generalisation, I would suggest that the overwhelming majority of continental European plus Canadian wargamers would have very little interest in the PTO, instead focussing very much on the ETO. Whereas the interest in the two theatres from American, British and Australian wargamers would be more evenly distributed.

I would attribute this primarily to two factors; location knowledge and national participation.

Europeans would have at least a passing knowledge of most major ETO cities, how many would have prior knowledge of the location of tiny Pacific atolls or obscure jungle locations, or Chinese cities whose current names are written differently from how they appeared in 1942.

Then there is a common factor of the ETO, the Wehrmacht. The major potential wargamers customer market is based on countries which at some stage of WWII had significant combat with the Wehrmacht. A much smaller subset of that market had significant combat with Japanese forces.

A third element might well be that the PTO is a combined arms operation, with a strong focus on naval operations. Not too many continental Europeans would be interested in Mahan. Maritime operations is simply not as ingrained for them as it is for the great maritime powers of Britain and USA.

Alfred

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 116
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/27/2011 6:07:30 AM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: V22 Osprey

While I see where the guilt comes from, it's not really a big deal is as this is a game. I have no problem playing as the 'bad guys' and mowing down a couple of Americans. In fact the 'bad guys' are usually the most interesting because it's usually a different style of play with new toys.


It's not exactly guilt. More of an unease.

I'd actually have litttle problem playing the Nazis if it were my job, or if I were still on active duty and it was a war game. But for fun? Harder. At least for me.

I'm currently reading "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." It's an excellent book. It's an important part of history and why the world is oriented as it is today. But I wouldn't want to have a beer with Hitler.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to V22 Osprey)
Post #: 117
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/27/2011 6:43:51 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman
Plus we have the island girls


There are lots of pretty Russian women in combat roles.


_____________________________


(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 118
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/27/2011 7:44:19 AM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred
Would also add the geographic customer base to be a significant factor. As a generalisation, I would suggest that the overwhelming majority of continental European plus Canadian wargamers would have very little interest in the PTO, instead focussing very much on the ETO. Whereas the interest in the two theatres from American, British and Australian wargamers would be more evenly distributed.

I would attribute this primarily to two factors; location knowledge and national participation.



This. Compared to ETO I too have very little interest in the PTO. The complexity of WITPAE didnt turn me away, and the ground combat, to be fair, is fairly simple. At least compared to many other games around, where the naval and/or aerial warfare, instead, is the more abstracted part in the game.

However I personally have no problems to play for/as any nation. As long as the game doesnt give me points for getting rid of Jews and Slavic peoples, or I dont score for every 100,000 dead jap/german civilians. In WitPAE there is a reason other than "breaking morale" in strategic bombing, and manpower is not the only selectable target, but ie. Bombing the Reich's system of giving "terror points" for destroyed civilian targets made me uneasy. I can play it, but I dont like it. Historical in that the only way area bombing helps the player are the terror points counted in the total points instead of directly or indirectly helping the war effort, but still.

_____________________________


(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 119
RE: WITE vs. WITP - 1/27/2011 8:33:36 AM   
invernomuto


Posts: 986
Joined: 10/8/2004
From: Turin, Italy
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred
Would also add the geographic customer base to be a significant factor. As a generalisation, I would suggest that the overwhelming majority of continental European plus Canadian wargamers would have very little interest in the PTO, instead focussing very much on the ETO. Whereas the interest in the two theatres from American, British and Australian wargamers would be more evenly distributed.


I have the same idea as yours: European are more interested in ETO while American and British in PTO.
It would be interesting a survey in WITP/AE and WITE forums asking for players' nationality.

_____________________________


(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: WITE vs. WITP Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.016