Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Updated - Master List of Issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support >> RE: Updated - Master List of Issues Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/11/2011 5:59:14 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jhak

In my 1.02 beta 1 game, none of my air units recover fatigue while being in reserve.


Thanks Jhak. This is now logged in the main list.

Has anyone else seen this or reported it elsewhere?

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to roflbinflood)
Post #: 61
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/11/2011 6:03:28 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		From another post - If possible, I would like to see the default saved game file sort order changed to be 'by date, descending' with the most recent save at the top. At the moment I have to click the sort button twice every time I launch the game and go looking for the save I just received via email.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 62
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/12/2011 5:46:52 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		Some of my airborne brigades have been upgraded to Guards; in the commander's report they now are considered company sized, changed from brigades. Their actual equipment is still like a brigade.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 63
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/23/2011 7:28:21 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		When playing traditional email-based PBEM if you edit the Options and remove FoW, you can then see all details of your opponent's army without their knowledge. I guess you would need to set FoW back on before sending the game file to hide the activity. This is a game breaker for email-based PBEM IMO.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 64
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/25/2011 1:59:51 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Reported by Reconvet. When a recon flight is flown over an enemy combat unit which is adjacent to a friendly combat unit and which has a detection level of say 6, the DL does not increase. This is apparently WAD. HOWEVER, if after the recon flight the friendly ground unit moves away and then back into place, the recon level of the enemy unit jumps to 9. Is the ground unit recon check being repeated each time the friendly unit enters the ZOC of the enemy unit? Tis would allow for some seriously gamey tactics.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 65
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/25/2011 2:16:06 PM   
Reconvet

 

Posts: 355
Joined: 1/17/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4

Reported by Reconvet. When a recon flight is flown over an enemy combat unit which is adjacent to a friendly combat unit and which has a detection level of say 6, the DL does not increase. This is apparently WAD. HOWEVER, if after the recon flight the friendly ground unit moves away and then back into place, the recon level of the enemy unit jumps to 9. Is the ground unit recon check being repeated each time the friendly unit enters the ZOC of the enemy unit? Tis would allow for some seriously gamey tactics.


Not quite correct. Enemy ground target (in clear terrain) is next to one of mine. One or multiple recon flights over this enemy unit don't show any gain in the DL level or said enemy. When I move my unit away and back next to the recon target (or if I bring a new unit next to the recon target), then the DL goes up or even jumps to max, so at least one of the recon flights must have been successful (without updating the mouseover info). Something has to happen in the ZoC of the recon target to update it's DL. Latest patch btw (Beta 1.03-2).



_____________________________

The biggest threat for mankind is ignorance.


(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 66
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/25/2011 2:18:06 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Reported by Deerslayer. When AG B arrives on map and the details are viewed, no commander is present, but the word 'Leader' is in place where the commander's name should be and is clickable. However, when 'Leader' is clicked the resulting dialogue does not display any available leaders for assignment to the role.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 67
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/25/2011 4:48:25 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Captured cities provide zero supply or fuel benefit until the rail net is taken all the way to the captured hex. I think that this seriously diminishes the players incentives to capture or defend cities.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 68
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/27/2011 4:04:41 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Adapted from a post by Matp.

When a rail line is cut near, say Minsk, all rail traffic along the entire length of the line running east (say between Minsk and Moscow) is halted. Shouldn't such a cut in the line only affect the eastward movement of troops and supplies that starts WEST of the cut?

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 69
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/27/2011 4:06:38 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Adapted from a post by Matp.

Because Romanian and Hungarian units cannot stack together, the rail movement system doesn't even allow Romanians on a train to pass through a hex containing a Hungarian unit. Can this be fixed?

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 70
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/27/2011 5:04:55 PM   
Helpless


Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Some of my airborne brigades have been upgraded to Guards; in the commander's report they now are considered company sized, changed from brigades. Their actual equipment is still like a brigade.


Can you select one of the in unit detail, to show the full name? Thanks

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 71
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 1/27/2011 8:49:06 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Posted originally by Dazoline II

"PC" (Partisan Cadre) units are cutting rail lines when they form on the actual rail hex.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 72
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/1/2011 12:53:01 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Posted by Klydon. Amphibious operations are not working.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 73
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/4/2011 6:58:55 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		My Front HQs seem to demand 15 construction units, instead of 16 ( as the manual says ).

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 74
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/23/2011 10:49:22 PM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline 		bump cos RED MARKUS cant find it

_____________________________


(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 75
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/24/2011 6:58:12 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cookie monster

bump cos RED MARKUS cant find it


Thanks - wow, that's weird. I searched through every page in this forum last night and couldn't find the thread LOL.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 76
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/25/2011 4:34:43 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		9. Possible PBEM cheat. (May have been posted elsewhere). The PBEM system allows me to load the saved game, fly recon, then close and re-load to either fly more recon in areas I didn't have the resources to cover the first time, or play without recon and thus cancel out any air losses from recon activity. (Gents - I never do this! I discovered it while trying to recreate a map for a screenie I forgot to save the first time around). Can this be changed somehow? Given the problems with the AI, which I don't expect to see fixed anytime soon, PBEM needs to be locked down tight!

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 77
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/25/2011 5:36:47 PM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4

9. Possible PBEM cheat. (May have been posted elsewhere). The PBEM system allows me to load the saved game, fly recon, then close and re-load to either fly more recon in areas I didn't have the resources to cover the first time, or play without recon and thus cancel out any air losses from recon activity. (Gents - I never do this! I discovered it while trying to recreate a map for a screenie I forgot to save the first time around). Can this be changed somehow? Given the problems with the AI, which I don't expect to see fixed anytime soon, PBEM needs to be locked down tight!



If you are saying that you can save a PBEM game take some actions and then revert to your earlier save and take different actions, that is true. There is nothing in PBEM that is stopping players from reloading a save. One reason for including server Multiplayer was that Slitherine tracks reloads to try to minimize this issue. Changing PBEM to prevent or track reloads would not be easy.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 78
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/25/2011 10:12:40 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline 		Thanks Joel. I'm going to give that some thought. There must be a way...

Multi-player doesn't support the team game structure we are testing at the moment, unfortunately...

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to Joel Billings)
Post #: 79
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/27/2011 12:44:14 AM   
bdtj1815

 

Posts: 108
Joined: 1/25/2006
Status: offline 		I bought this game on the day it was released and I think it has many things going for it. What I did not realise when I paid my £70 was that I was not buying a finished product. So far I have had to download six patches and still I read that the "game will only be balanced" when enough people play it who can point out its faults.

35 years ago my first wargame, bought as a present for my fifteenth birthday, was "Drang nach Osten" by GDW. In real terms it probably cost more than WITE but worked "straight out of the box" and is still playable today without amy major modifications.

When I bought WITE I wish someone had written on the Matrix website that "this game will be great when you all find what is wrong with it now".

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 80
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/27/2011 1:05:36 AM   
Senno

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bdtj1815

I bought this game on the day it was released and I think it has many things going for it. What I did not realise when I paid my £70 was that I was not buying a finished product. So far I have had to download six patches and still I read that the "game will only be balanced" when enough people play it who can point out its faults.

35 years ago my first wargame, bought as a present for my fifteenth birthday, was "Drang nach Osten" by GDW. In real terms it probably cost more than WITE but worked "straight out of the box" and is still playable today without amy major modifications.

When I bought WITE I wish someone had written on the Matrix website that "this game will be great when you all find what is wrong with it now".


This is the third thread this guy has copy/pasted this comment into that I've seen.

Shoo troll.

(in reply to bdtj1815)
Post #: 81
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/27/2011 1:10:25 AM   
bdtj1815

 

Posts: 108
Joined: 1/25/2006
Status: offline 		Not a troll, whatever that is?, just someone who would like a reply from someone who is involved in making money from this product.

(in reply to Senno)
Post #: 82
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/27/2011 10:56:40 AM   
VictorCharlie

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 4/9/2004
Status: offline 		What about the issue of a limit on sea supply?

At the moment we are seeing army groups (soviet so far) larger than anything the western allies could ever have supplied by sea being kept in supply by a small port on the Black and Azov seas.

(in reply to bdtj1815)
Post #: 83
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/28/2011 5:57:41 AM   
VictorCharlie

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 4/9/2004
Status: offline 		To expand on that; the ability of a large amount of units being kept in supply by a small port as opposed to being in beachhead supply, thereby allowing them to rout after losing a combat cannot really be justified?

(in reply to VictorCharlie)
Post #: 84
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/28/2011 9:39:30 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: victor charlie

To expand on that; the ability of a large amount of units being kept in supply by a small port as opposed to being in beachhead supply, thereby allowing them to rout after losing a combat cannot really be justified?


That's a good point, although I myself do have a minor issue about the way some towns are shown as little dots on the map, when they were a bit more important than that.

I'll add your comment to the list - thanks.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to VictorCharlie)
Post #: 85
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 2/28/2011 9:40:00 PM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bdtj1815

I bought this game on the day it was released and I think it has many things going for it. What I did not realise when I paid my £70 was that I was not buying a finished product. So far I have had to download six patches and still I read that the "game will only be balanced" when enough people play it who can point out its faults.

35 years ago my first wargame, bought as a present for my fifteenth birthday, was "Drang nach Osten" by GDW. In real terms it probably cost more than WITE but worked "straight out of the box" and is still playable today without amy major modifications.

When I bought WITE I wish someone had written on the Matrix website that "this game will be great when you all find what is wrong with it now".


OK, I already agreed with you on another thread :)

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to bdtj1815)
Post #: 86
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 3/1/2011 3:33:07 AM   
VictorCharlie

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 4/9/2004
Status: offline 		There is a bug with the Italian and Rumanian reinforcement air squadrons. In that they turn up with no planes.

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 87
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 3/1/2011 6:26:13 AM   
Redmarkus5


Posts: 4456
Joined: 12/1/2007
From: 0.00
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: victor charlie

There is a bug with the Italian and Rumanian reinforcement air squadrons. In that they turn up with no planes.


Hi Joel - is this WAD?

Thanks.

_____________________________

WitE2 tester, WitW, WitP, CMMO, CM2, GTOS, GTMF, WP & WPP, TOAW4, BA2

(in reply to VictorCharlie)
Post #: 88
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 3/1/2011 12:38:56 PM   
VictorCharlie

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 4/9/2004
Status: offline 		One to go on the wish list.

The ability to, at the end of a scenario, look at units from both sides. Its nice to be able to check things like morale, experience and detailed strength for both sides at the conclusion of a game.

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 89
RE: Updated - Master List of Issues - 3/1/2011 1:25:22 PM   
VictorCharlie

 

Posts: 129
Joined: 4/9/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4


quote:

ORIGINAL: victor charlie

To expand on that; the ability of a large amount of units being kept in supply by a small port as opposed to being in beachhead supply, thereby allowing them to rout after losing a combat cannot really be justified?


That's a good point, although I myself do have a minor issue about the way some towns are shown as little dots on the map, when they were a bit more important than that.

I'll add your comment to the list - thanks.



Could we get a graphic or a mod making the black dots something a little bigger and better?

(in reply to Redmarkus5)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support >> RE: Updated - Master List of Issues Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.547