Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812.

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 12:21:00 AM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		In the south everything runs away. I did a little damage to his retreating units and almost managed to surround a couple units just south of Kiev. But he was too far away and I just ran out of MP's.

I'm not sure how difficult it will be to get across the Dnepr river. Tophat loves rivers so I have no doubt that every hex will be defended.

Anyone have any experience to share here??




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moses -- 12/30/2010 12:25:29 AM >

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 61
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 1:48:17 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		Be sure to run recon flights; there should be masses of rifle divisions springing up on the map.

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 62
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 3:50:38 AM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		He's lost masses of divisions. 105 of them.

I've done lots of recon every turn and there doesn't seem to be much that isn't getting sent straight to the front line.

Maybe he's hiding a big mass of troops somewhere???????

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 63
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 4:24:29 AM   
notenome

 

Posts: 608
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline 		He's not. The Soviets seem to have inexhaustible troops because they get huge amounts of reinforcements. Its actually quite harrowing in the beginning as there simply aren't enough troops to defend everything. Its just that when we play Axis we believe there is a Soviet division behind every tree and every rock, but there ain't.

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 64
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 4:37:37 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		There might be 200 or more divisions still on the map, though some are not close to filled out.

(in reply to notenome)
Post #: 65
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 4:39:48 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		It might even be closer to 250...or more.

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 66
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 4:39:51 AM   
notenome

 

Posts: 608
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline 		And 30 of them are visiting Duty Free stores in Turkey for some 70 odd turns.

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 67
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 2:26:45 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		In my game vs. german AI, I've lost 1,734,511 men 26,749 guns, 9757 tanks, and 76 full divisions by turn 20. I have 1,326,689 men in the manpower pool.

Game vs. Tophat I've killed 1,533,452 men, 20,744 guns, 10,464 tanks, and 105 full divisions by turn 7.

Against the AI I remember being pretty worried around turn seven. Tophat has a lot less to defend with and he's not playing the AI. It has to look grim on his end.

(in reply to notenome)
Post #: 68
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 9:49:18 PM   
krupp_88mm


Posts: 406
Joined: 10/13/2008
Status: offline 		nice work!, from the maps ive seen of Russia, it looks like you may be a month ahead of schedule in the north, will you dig into Moscow and wait out the winter there? although holding Moscow wont end the game, it is a highly strategic place to launch attacks in 1942 from he cant defend against you from Moscow you can strike north to Leningrad south to caucuses or east to cut him in two

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 69
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/30/2010 10:30:26 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Well I hope I take Moscow. It does depend on a few things.

First I have to get across the Dnepr. If I take to long then Tophat might well strip the Southern front and I will find myself opposed by 50-60 extra divisions.

Second there is the possibilty that I have no clue about how hard this will be. The Germans assumed they would take Moscow about this time and I could be just as deluded. We shall see.

But yes I would hope to drive well beyond Moscow and then hold the city through the winter. I would guess Tophat will defend Moscow to the death so it's capture would mean the loss of another large chunk of Russian units.

Strange that around turn 4 I was very concerened that I might actually be stopped or at least that my offensive would suffer crippling delays. But in three turns it seems that Russian resistance is crumbling and I feel quite confident in my prospects.

Probably deluded.

(in reply to krupp_88mm)
Post #: 70
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/31/2010 7:14:29 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Turn 8 was botched a bit. Wish I had a do-over.

Here the situation after my recon in the south. Note the undefended hexes especially the one east of the Dnepr river. It was really undefended. I reconed it at least five times and every hex around.

I decided to go for a bridgehead with everything I had.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moses -- 12/31/2010 7:19:29 PM >

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 71
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/31/2010 7:29:22 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Here's the result. The airborne brigades were retreated quickly to the second rough hex. I moved up to finish them off but they held off the first main attack despite the lack of fortifications. From there it was one attack after another as I kept thinking their morale had to break. 13 attacks!!!!

The guys had a defensive CV of 1 and you can see my adjacent units have a combined CV of 50.

I really screwed that one up.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moses -- 12/31/2010 7:30:29 PM >

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 72
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/31/2010 8:19:52 PM   
notenome

 

Posts: 608
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline 		Give them Guards status!

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 73
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 12/31/2010 11:31:17 PM   
karonagames


Posts: 4712
Joined: 7/10/2006
From: The Duchy of Cornwall, nr England
Status: offline 		Unfortunately tanks and rough terrain don't mix - the panzers get big penalties. If you had used infantry and a deliberate attack you would probably have had more luck.

I think they will be first in the queue for guards status!

edit: What were your ammo levels like? After a couple of attacks ammo can get short.

< Message edited by BigAnorak -- 12/31/2010 11:32:45 PM >

(in reply to notenome)
Post #: 74
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 2:56:56 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline 		"Don't mix" in this case means: even small units will essentially always stop mobile unit hasty attacks in difficult terrain even when you're attacking with a full stack with an on-counter CV of around 30 against a unit or stack with an on-counter CV of 1. I'd also suggest using at least two infantry divisions for deliberate attacks, as a battle where the Soviets start with a CV of 10 can turn into a battle where they end with a CV of 80 due to impressive modifiers that you can't really counter with only a single division.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to karonagames)
Post #: 75
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 3:46:23 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		I did try to clear the front line with my infantry. The problem was I miscalculated how much force I would need to retreat the airborne brigades a second time.

One of the great things about this game is that you have to make economy of force decisions all the time with only limited intell.

In the example I used most of my infantry forces to clear the front line for my armor to pass through to the river. Then I would have 7 armored units to clear the two divisions next to the river and actually cross the river. 7 units should have been enough but most of my armor started with 30 or so MP's and I don't exactly know the strenth of the two units to be defeated. Maybe 4 divisions would have sufficed but that would mean 2 hasty attacks with a stack of three and my fourth division using all it's movement to cross.

Anyway I decided to try and clear the airborne brigades with my last available infantry division and a deliberate attack. When this failed all I had left was armor and I'm trying to conserve this to get across the river.

So I think "these are two measly airborne brigades that have already been retreated once, are unfortified, and have been softened up by my infantry. So in comes the mech inf and a panzer Div with a hasty attack. Why hasty?? Well to do a deliberate I needed the units with the most MP's. But I wanted to save these for phase 2 of the operation. Attack fails. Try again. Fail.

Now at this point I should realize that evn if I defeat the airborne with my remaining armor it will be a hollow victory. (I won't have enough left to get across the river) But you know it doesn't take long to click another attack. And I'm pissed. Well 10 attacks later 3403 remaining airborne troops sit stubbornly in the hills.

What I should have done was bring in the two armored units with my infantry division in the first attack. But it's all easy in retrospect.


(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 76
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 4:26:01 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Here's the center on turn 8 and another example of sub-optimal play.

Toward the end of the turn I have two main options. Destroy the circled 2-7 infantry division to complete an airtight encirclement of Smolensk, or simply displace that big mob of routed units.

With hindsight clearly I should have done the later since I was unable to retreat that infantry division. Especially since my grand plan involves my armor inching it's way toward Vyazma.

Does anyone else have the problem of always using every MP available?? There is always something more to do. I know I should try to conserve fuel and vehicles. I have to worry that my armored force is going to just wear out.

Still not a horible operation. 4 division are completly surrounded and Smolensk is basically cut off.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moses -- 1/1/2011 4:34:30 PM >

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 77
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 4:40:04 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Turn 8 North.

4 Divisions surrounded but I'm not sure he won't be able to reesablish supply. I was scrambling to shore up the pocket but again ran out of MP's.








Attachment (1)

< Message edited by moses -- 1/1/2011 4:41:50 PM >

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 78
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 4:44:59 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Finally for turn 8 I ran some recon around Moscow. Note some of these are double, even triple missions. Below are what I found.

Nothing much. Same everywhere on the map. It looks like everything Tophat has is on the front line or heading there as fast as it can.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 79
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 6:12:06 PM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline
Panzers in the swamp up north might be the weak spot in that ring. It doesn't look like he has much to attack with however.


_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 80
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 6:21:49 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Yeah it's pretty weak. I also was afraid he would cut off my armor at the bottom of the screen but I had that security unit to bring over which I think secures my supply line.

Every one of my units was completrly out of movement so I didn't have much ability to fix things at the end.

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 81
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 9:21:52 PM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		Where are all the 1/3 rd size rifle divisions?

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 82
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/1/2011 9:44:45 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw

Where are all the 1/3 rd size rifle divisions?




?????

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 83
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/2/2011 4:32:57 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		On week 9 my troops crossed the Dnepr against weak opposition. I was really surprised that Tophat did not try to defend the riverline in greater strength. The three crossing hexes were each defended by single weak divisions, and this right in the vicinity of Kiev.

It will probably take me another week to expand the bridgehead and then things should start to open up in the country beyond Kiev.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 84
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/2/2011 4:46:34 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		And in the center Vyazma will fall next turn as my troops close on Moscow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 85
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/2/2011 4:58:28 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		For a couple weeks now Tophat has been falling back 30 miles each week and adopting the checkerboard type defence. Thus it's hard to get big encirclements. Still I consistantly gain ground and get enough small encirclements each turn to keep his losses in the 130,000-150,000 range which is what I consider the minimum acceptable.

In the area of Moscow he is running out of space and at some point must stand and fight. I'm 100 miles away and will be in Moscow in 3 or 4 weeks at the present rate of advance. I still see nothing solid between my troops and the city. Surely he must make a stand soon and casualties will soar. The red army will be destroyed in front of Moscow.

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 86
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/2/2011 5:53:27 PM   
krupp_88mm


Posts: 406
Joined: 10/13/2008
Status: offline 		whats the hex measurement?, using a map it looks like each hex is 20KM or 12.4 miles, it also looks like your 10 hexs form moscow so that would be 124 miles? , lol just nit picking, but what does the game say hex distance is anyone?

here's a map of germans advance form 26 August to 5 december, (so the map is about 2 weeks ahead of you)

its amazing your southern front looks very similar even the river crossing, but maybe ahead of schedule a week

in the north again looks like your right on schedule maybe a week ahead of time,
however for the drive on moscow your nearly a month ahead of time, nice work, i hope an extra month will give you enough time to encircle it, i suppose as long as you have it encircled by the time mud strikes you can reduce it and then shelter some units their through winter i woudl set up defense lines ahead of moscow on the flanks and fall back hopefully using moscow a s a rock to pivot around, hopefully you can hold it through winter, i think if you can hold it through winter 1942 should go very well for you,

if you take moscow that will probably be the main thrust of his winter counter attack so if you have any alpine units you may want to prepare to transfer them their with winter bonus, you can give ground elsewhere, have you thought about sending some armor south of the oka river the terrain down their is much more suited for tanks, moscow has lots of woods around it

remember you may not have to actually take Moscow to win if you make him think you'll take it and transfer out the factories that is a small victory in itself

< Message edited by krupp_88mm -- 1/2/2011 6:09:08 PM >

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 87
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/2/2011 7:00:41 PM   
moses

 

Posts: 2252
Joined: 7/7/2002
Status: offline 		Nice maps!!! It's 10 miles/hex per manual.

Yes, even if I fail to take Moscow there are advantages to making the main effort there.

Tophat was badly hurt I think during the initial battles when he defended fairly far forward.I don't think his forces have recovered as I'm running into a lot of understrength divisions and in general weak defensive lines. The only thing saving his army is that by pulling back every turn I have to spend a good portion of my combat power just catching up.

This will end soon. Last week I advanced 40 miles. I'm either going to reach Moscow in 3 weeks or he is going to stand and fight. When he does so, hopefully I will be able to do some serious damage to his army.

As far as the winter I think it depends on how badly the Russians get hurt. If he falls back in good order or even if he lets me take it without much fight then I have to worry a lot. Best case is I surround and capture Moscow with about 30 divisions!!!!---well maybe the winter offensive won't be so bad.

< Message edited by moses -- 1/2/2011 7:02:40 PM >

(in reply to krupp_88mm)
Post #: 88
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/2/2011 8:03:10 PM   
Klydon


Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline 		Interesting going for the Germans. You are not going to have to send PG2 south to help with the advance down south. While he still has troops down there, it appears to be weakening and he may be considering trading space for time. He certainly appears to be making a big stand at Leningrad and may not realize how much danger Moscow appears to be in. Historically, the Germans stopped advancing east of Smolensk at the end of July. They spent close to a month trying to fix the supply situation, rehabbing their panzer forces and then sent troops south and north, giving the Soviets a month in front of Moscow to dig in and bring troops in. He isn't going to get that month.

A lot will depend on your ability to get the rail lines switched over, but I think you mentioned you had doubled up on the line in the middle, which is a good move and may be enough to keep the drive against Moscow going. An issue you might run into is if you don't kick him out of the Valdi hills, then AGC's northern flank and communications are going to be threaten from there or your drive will be weaken quite a bit as you drop off screening forces on your flank.

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 89
RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. - 1/2/2011 10:59:52 PM   
Avenger


Posts: 140
Joined: 6/8/2002
Status: offline 		Nice AAR. As for the Soviet units: the longer it takes to reach Moscow the more troops you will face. In my games Moscow is empty on turn 10, but by the time the Mud comes the place is no longer even take able.

(in reply to moses)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Moses(axis) vs. Tophat1812. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.035