Fänrik Stål
Posts: 108
Joined: 1/4/2006 From: Sweden Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: micha1100 quote:
ORIGINAL: Fänrik Stål quote:
ORIGINAL: micha1100 Austria has always been a German state, only inner-German conflicts prevented its inclusion into the new German Reich built by Bismarck in 1871. Inner-German? In 1871 Austria-Hungary was an empire spanning huge areas of non-german lands. It would have had major international consequences. Yes, inner-German. As I said, Austria (German-Austria) always was a German state. For a long time it was expected or at least hoped that a unified Germany would include German-Austria. However, the growing Austrian possessions on the Balkan increasingly focussed Austrian attentions eastwards. Had they wanted (and, as it turned out, accepted Prussian leadership), German-Austria could have become part of the German Reich. As it is, when the Austro-Hungarian Empire broke apart at the end of WWI, the remaining Austria intended to join Germany (iirc it was even in the original constitution after the monarchy was abolished in 1918), but then the peace treaties of 1919 forbade that. It's a fact that the difference in language and culture between Northern Germans (like Prussians) and Southern Germans (like Bavarians) ist greater than the difference between Southern Germans and Austrians. All this does is show that it wasn't inner-German conflicts that prevented German Austria from becoming part of the Reich in 1871, but rather the reality that was Austria-Hungary. There was IMO no way it could realistically be either broken up or included wholesale in the Reich at that time. 1918 is a completely different kettle of fish. To be clear, I'm not disagreeing with your conclusion about Guderian, just this specific argument.
|