Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/5/2011 6:21:18 PM   
the1sean


Posts: 854
Joined: 5/11/2010
From: Texas, USA
Status: offline
One thing that would make GDP a more interesting win option is increased population growth rates.

_____________________________


(in reply to Webbco)
Post #: 61
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/5/2011 6:38:36 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
Look who's back. Nice to see you're still around....you Iron Maiden trooper

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to the1sean)
Post #: 62
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/5/2011 11:37:15 PM   
Merker

 

Posts: 208
Joined: 7/3/2010
Status: offline
The biggest problem with DW is the fact it's so supper dupper mega uber great that players just can't wait to get their grubby paws/hands/insect appendages/tails/whatever on the next update, and so start posting 50 topics about the supposed next update.

There, that's the major problem of this game, it's so freakin' unheard of epic that you just have to have the next update by sunset or else....



_____________________________

[image][URL=http://www.nodiatis.com/personality.htm][/URL][/image]

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 63
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/6/2011 9:27:01 AM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
LOL, very true
ahh, sunset...what's the holdup?

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Merker)
Post #: 64
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/6/2011 3:01:35 PM   
Canute0

 

Posts: 616
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: Germany
Status: offline
Back to the original topic
quote:

The problem is that ultimately, regardless of whether you are a Boskaran military dictatorship or a supposedly peaceful Teekan democracy, there is ONLY one way to win: War. Because every victory condition revolves around controlling a certain portion of the map

I startet Teekan Democracy, victory cond. are 50/50/50. I started with starting Tech, while the other Empire got some Tech advance. Large Map with 9 Empire.

At moment i lead with 22% the expansion goal, population i am at 4 place.

I think it would be ok, when i am doing War with the Shakturi, because i dont think i can't avoid that anyway.
But i think i can win without doing War against any other Empire.


(in reply to Data)
Post #: 65
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/9/2011 3:11:55 AM   
Apheirox

 

Posts: 147
Joined: 2/2/2011
Status: offline
quote:

The biggest problem with DW is the fact it's so supper dupper mega uber great that players just can't wait to get their grubby paws/hands/insect appendages/tails/whatever on the next update, and so start posting 50 topics about the supposed next update.

There, that's the major problem of this game, it's so freakin' unheard of epic that you just have to have the next update by sunset or else....


There's a ton of things that's awesome about DW. There are, however, also some things that aren't so great. Praising what works is good, but it does little to help with the things that need more attention.

What are your thoughts on the issue?

quote:

At moment i lead with 22% the expansion goal, population i am at 4 place.


Canute, I'll bet you anything you're not going to win that game without getting trigger happy on someone sooner or later. It's a looong way from 22 to 50%.

Look, just look at the victory conditions you've set up. You're playing a ten empire game? That's an average 10/10/10 slice for each empire, take or give. There's no way anybody is going to hit 50 without taking territory from neighbours through conquest.

(in reply to Canute0)
Post #: 66
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/9/2011 11:42:32 PM   
Kayoz


Posts: 1516
Joined: 12/20/2010
From: Timbuktu
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Also, there are actually two new victory conditions in ROTS. You can either unite to try to defeat the Shakturi, which depending on your race can mean that you need to build up serious military might or help the other AI empires by giving them economic or technological aid, or you can join with the Shakturi and help them defeat the Ancient Guardians. Both have worked for me without playing Humans.

Regards,

- Erik


Are these victory conditions reliant on you allying with one of the ancient races - Guardians or Shakturi? For example, can you take out the Guardians - and then defeat the Shakturi - resulting in a "good" victory?

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 67
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/10/2011 12:42:36 PM   
Canute0

 

Posts: 616
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: Germany
Status: offline
No, when you conquer the Ancient Guardian Homeplanet you have Won the game or when you conquer the homeplanet of the Shakturi.
But these 2 victory conditions only appear when the Shakturi show up as Shakturi. Before that you can take over the Ancient Guardians homeplanet but i think the Refuges homeplanet was invulerable against this.

quote:

Look, just look at the victory conditions you've set up. You're playing a ten empire game? That's an average 10/10/10 slice for each empire, take or give. There's no way anybody is going to hit 50 without taking territory from neighbours through conquest.


The goal was to win without doing any war against the AI empires.
But you still can do some revolts, and even without revoltes some planets from my neightbours joined my empire.

But i won now because i conquer the homeplanet of the Shakturi.

(in reply to Kayoz)
Post #: 68
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/10/2011 1:21:25 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
[/quote]

But you still can do some revolts, and even without revoltes some planets from my neightbours joined my empire.

[/quote]

It will take some time if you want to get a big chunk of the universe this way but it depends on how each one of us chooses to play the game.

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Canute0)
Post #: 69
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/10/2011 8:07:51 PM   
Canute0

 

Posts: 616
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: Germany
Status: offline
Maybe you should reread the 1.posting. it was the Question to win without War.


(in reply to Data)
Post #: 70
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/10/2011 8:53:39 PM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apheirox

While there are things like the AI sometimes leaving much to be desired (something the developers are clearly aware of and are working to improve, it seems) there is one issue that trumphs them all: The victory conditions.

The problem is that ultimately, regardless of whether you are a Boskaran military dictatorship or a supposedly peaceful Teekan democracy, there is ONLY one way to win: War. Because every victory condition revolves around controlling a certain portion of the map (population, colonies and GDP do ALL translate into pure map control - there is no difference whatsoever), the sole way to win is to conquer territory. Ultimately, there is no option for a peaceful victory. This is where DW is ultimately lacking compared to games like Civilization (diplomatic, cultural and scientific victory conditions) and, as an even better example, Armada 2526's wide variety of victory condtions.

Granted, with the RotS expansion, a new 'victory condition' was introduced: Defeat the Shakturi. However, IMHO the Shakturi are badly implemented and the expansion is as such unfortunately a failure in this regard (albeit it introduces a host of very welcome features, like the new GUI and the research tree). The reason I say so is the fact that the Shakturi are ridiculously powerful compared to anyone else. What was clearly meant to happen, then, is for the whole galaxy to gang up on them to stand a chance, but because the AI doesn't 'understand' this the Shakturi slowly but surely burn down each and every AI empire - only the human-controlled one can provide any sort of serious resistance. In other words, the Shakturi 'victory condition' is, well, bugged.

What DW really needs is an expansion pack that seriously steals the great ideas from Armada 2526 and introduces unique victory conditions for each race. The Teekans, for example, score 'victory points' by having a strong economy (but none of this '% of galaxy nonsense'). The Wekkarus can win by mining resources. Zenox score by researching technology. Boskara score both through military conquest AND genocidal bombardments of alien populations. Gizureans are geared towards controlling many colonies. etc etc etc - I think you get it.

Unless such changes are made, DW is, regardless of how refined and complex it is in many areas, nothing more than one big deathmatch blob. Republic or despotism - it doesn't really matter, the objective is always to win wars.

Please Armadadize the game!


A refresher of the initial post.

Only options are to wishlist what you want and have Igard include something like ''More Victory Conditions'' in a poll.

But it aint gonna change till the next expansion or DW2.

Also the Shakturi in my game were very weak, I coulda dropped 600 Elite Clone troopers on them if I chose to. There implementation (appearance) could be patched so that they come in all guns blazing with over 300 troops and 1500 size cloaked capital ships.

Anyone reached the victory screen yet?

It could do with some love!

(in reply to Apheirox)
Post #: 71
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/10/2011 9:28:25 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canute

Maybe you should reread the 1.posting. it was the Question to win without War.




I don't need to, I knew that. I was not criticizing your way of playing the game (I also like to win it with as few wars as possible), I was anticipating Apheirox's retort; he has a valid point but as you also proved it winning the game this way can be done....though we still have to conquer the shakturi and that counts as war also.

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Canute0)
Post #: 72
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 6:20:42 AM   
colberki

 

Posts: 201
Joined: 6/16/2007
Status: offline
I am new to DS and just playing my second attempt at the game as Human Republic. So far around year 2780 no wars and we are biggest empire by territory and have the strongest military. Economy is lagging several if the AI which I am now focusing on catching up I like being able to play as such without fighting endless wars. Or is that coming later? My one fleet is having fun swatting pirates.

(in reply to adecoy95)
Post #: 73
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 10:26:48 AM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: colberki

I am new to DS and just playing my second attempt at the game as Human Republic. So far around year 2780 no wars and we are biggest empire by territory and have the strongest military. Economy is lagging several if the AI which I am now focusing on catching up I like being able to play as such without fighting endless wars. Or is that coming later? My one fleet is having fun swatting pirates.


My first real game was as the Humans. I also expanded far and wide. I only had to take 10 odd colonies and then I had won by having 33% of the galaxies colonies.

The Humans are easy as they are able to colonise the most ideal worlds early i.e continental planets.

The game is soo much harder playing a Ice/volcanic only race, as your starting choice.

(in reply to colberki)
Post #: 74
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 2:14:53 PM   
scotten_usa

 

Posts: 196
Joined: 12/9/2005
Status: offline
Here's one issue I have with the game (and overall I love it):

When I start a war, I slow the game down to .5x speed.  However, even at that speed, the games throws events at me so quick that by the time I have to pause it every 5 seconds, address the alert, unpause, run 5 seconds, etc.  I won't say it's 'annoying', but it is somewhat distracting.


(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 75
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 3:59:54 PM   
Rekm41


Posts: 561
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: Canada EH!
Status: offline
I have experienced that as well, so what he is asking for is a slower speed setting. That should be able to be modded no?

_____________________________

Keep Moving and Keep your Head DOWN!!

(in reply to scotten_usa)
Post #: 76
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 4:49:30 PM   
Rekm41


Posts: 561
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: Canada EH!
Status: offline
Awesome game though and credit to the developers!!

_____________________________

Keep Moving and Keep your Head DOWN!!

(in reply to Rekm41)
Post #: 77
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 6:45:24 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rekm41

I have experienced that as well, so what he is asking for is a slower speed setting. That should be able to be modded no?


Once it will be open for modding, yes; I'm sure some of us will mod it to 8x

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Rekm41)
Post #: 78
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 9:34:23 PM   
Rekm41


Posts: 561
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: Canada EH!
Status: offline
LOL yes. But it does move by pretty quickly at times. Would be nice if it still ran when you were accessing some of the info screens though.

_____________________________

Keep Moving and Keep your Head DOWN!!

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 79
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 9:42:39 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
Yes, having these as options we can check would be great. We could choose when to use them and when not to use them.

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Rekm41)
Post #: 80
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/18/2011 10:24:35 PM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rekm41

LOL yes. But it does move by pretty quickly at times. Would be nice if it still ran when you were accessing some of the info screens though.


Just in case you dont know, you can always click on the play button after the screen has opened for the game to run.

It's not configurable though, you must re-engage play on every screen opening.

(in reply to Rekm41)
Post #: 81
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/19/2011 1:47:45 PM   
Rekm41


Posts: 561
Joined: 8/8/2004
From: Canada EH!
Status: offline
I did not realize that. Thanks and have a cookie..

_____________________________

Keep Moving and Keep your Head DOWN!!

(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 82
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/19/2011 1:55:19 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
But if he gets the cookie than we're left with the...monster?

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Rekm41)
Post #: 83
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/19/2011 3:00:41 PM   
Shuul

 

Posts: 133
Joined: 2/16/2011
Status: offline
Biggest problem is diplomacy. I want a challenge from the AI!

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 84
RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds - 5/19/2011 3:03:58 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
Most of us want it, I think it's high up there on Igard's poll.

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Shuul)
Post #: 85
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: The biggest problem with Distant Worlds Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.424