Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Why are captured resources not being used?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: Why are captured resources not being used? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 9:53:28 AM   
Empire101


Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline
You have a point.

But surely one of the primary reasons for launching Barbarossa was to secure the vast resources of the Soviet Union.
Put aside all the bogus and frankly crazy Nazi ideas of Race etc, and you are left ONLY with the economic and military reasons for Barbarossa.

Surely there should be some mechanism in the game to allocate a percentage of rail capacity to transport these vital resources back to the Reich.
After all, oil was probably THE strategic resource of WWII, and this is admirably recreated in WitP, so why not WitE ?


< Message edited by Empire101 -- 6/10/2011 9:59:46 AM >


_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 61
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 10:46:48 AM   
Chris10


Posts: 114
Joined: 6/7/2011
From: Germany,living in Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101

You have a point.

But surely one of the primary reasons for launching Barbarossa was to secure the vast resources of the Soviet Union.
Put aside all the bogus and frankly crazy Nazi ideas of Race etc, and you are left ONLY with the economic and military reasons for Barbarossa.

Surely there should be some mechanism in the game to allocate a percentage of rail capacity to transport these vital resources back to the Reich.
After all, oil was probably THE strategic resource of WWII, and this is admirably recreated in WitP, so why not WitE ?


Its not that easy as it sounds and the war in the east can not be compared to any other war theatre in WWII as it had its own very special rules and difficultys.
Let me recall some facts.
1. The where various reasons for Barbarossa, not necessarily in that order but the german leadership wanted to kill various birds with one stone mainly due to the following thinkings:

a. To gain living room in the east
b. To secure the huge ucranian agricultural land (also called the "Granary of Europe" cause of endless fields of grain)
c. To forestall an unavoidable attack from the russians which sooner or later would have taken place anyway (5 Million
Russian Troops in non defensive formation on the border in summer 1941 without making efforts to garrison or fortifying or start building winter quarters to camp properly over winter is speaking for itself...)
d. The huge coal and iron ressources of the Donets Basin and industrial areas and the possible taking of the oilfields in Maikop..
e. Communism was anyway the natural enemy of national-socialism and it was declared goal of Hitlers filosofy to get rid of
the bolschewiks at some time once and for all

There is the so called Göring Atlas (published in 2004) which was a series of maps showing possible important ressources for germany outside germany itself as well it contained some sort of plan how to push the german industrial production in order to prepare for war (but that was for the time before 1939)

I drift away...however...
various factors made the usage of these captured ressource-areas in the east very very difficult and it turned out that they never really helped the german war economy in a way that some may expect cause of the following reasons:

A. Lots of the so called war-important ressources and production plants the german war economy was longing for were located in the area of the Dnepr, the Donets-Basin, the Sea of Azov and on Crimea but on their retreat in late summer 1941 the Russians dismanteld all industrial plants and equipment down to the last bolt and made the existing ressource stocks which they could not carry away useless. So Germans captured empty industrial parks, mines and useless ressource stocks. Material and machines had to be brought over from Germany to reinstall some sort of production but when the first Fabrics and Mines went online again in April 1943 the advancing Red Army already threatend these areas again.
All in all the captured ressources and industrial areas where useless and had cost Germany more then it could profit from them.
B. The coal from the Donets Basin is another of these storys. It was highly energy efficient and very demanded for steel production in the Reich but soon we found out that it was unusable for German locomotives due to its composition so we had to spent truckloads of good German brown coal to transport the Donets-Coal back to the Reich which turned out to be unprofitable and a waste of time/ressources with no gain as the used brown coal for transport was needed elsewhere , lnot to mention the logistics to provide the additional needed brown coal for the additional ressource trains along the entire track from russia to germanys industrial centers.
C. The same goes for the oil fields in Maikop. Iam not sure right now if the Russians made the installations useless or if they had made preparations to make them uselss in case German forces would capture the area (I would have to dig that up in the books but the point remains the same). So even if finally we would have captured those oilfields it would have taken years to reinstall oilmining and refining let alone the immense engagement to supply large german troop contingents so far away from home. It only could have worked out if Stalingrad would have been totally taken and the Russian Armys around Stalingrad had been counter-encircled and destroyed during their attempt to encircle and destroy the 6th army...but this is another story


PD:

Additionally it is to say that there was not enough transportation capacitys to supply troops and transport huge amount of ressources at the same time as due to patisan activity since 42 lots of supply was destroyed and the food production in the room of Heeres-Group Center went down considerably so they had to sent food from Germany which additionally needed transport capacitys.
Just to imagine how much really partisan activiy harmed german efforts here some numbers.
In 1943 german authoritys accounted:
11.000 rail explosions
9.000 derailed trains (that doesnt mean lost !)
40.000 destroyed wagons
20.000 destroyed vehicles
Not to mention the fact that for the so called Rail-War large contingents of valuable german combat troops were required who would have been needed on the front.

As a sidenote I may say that the rail war cost probably hundreds of thousands of casualties as german commanders where desperate to get rid of the sabotage and annihalated entire villages cause they expected them to collaborate with the partisans. Especially in Ucrania I doubt this to be true as entire divisions of ucranian boys joined the german army during the campaign to fight along them against the hated russian communists.

If we put down the arrived supply trains and the needed trains in 1941 it turns out that from beginning there was a deficit which became even bigger in 42 and 43.
Granted, the figures are for a winter month but the summer figures did not look much better
Daily need on supply trains for Army-Groups, Eastern front, Nov 1941
.................................needed....arrived
Heeresgroup North........20........19
Heeresgroup Center.......32........16
Heeresgroup South........22........15
Total............................74........50

Max size for supply trains where:
550 meters long
500 tons net transport weight, 850 tons total weight

*I always use original Wehrmacht archive material and numbers.

Hope this answers the topics question why captured ressources are not and should not be used to any bigger extend. A belivable timeframe to retake production of material and mining ressources would be about 1,5 years but this would requiere huge investemnts in bringing material over from Germany as Fabrics and stuff have to be rebuilt and reinstalled practically from scratch but after then there is still not a lot more transport around which would requiere an even bigger investemnt in expanding the rail net and build a lot more locomotives and wagons and that only works if the hinterlands are under real control.

What does this info mean in terms of game mechanics ?
well...there a various considerations to make
1. Germans never captured huge ressource depots and even less the russians would have allowed for capture us important stockpiled oil or fuel ressources around Maikop.
2. Production capacity of captured areas (does this exist in the game ?) has to be reduced to 0 on capturing to simulate the dismanteling of industrial plants by russians
3. Re-start production should take at least 1,5 years for simulating the real time needed to rebuilt fabrics/mines etc and restart production-mining-refining----whatever
4. Capturing enemy HQs should only provide some local supply and fuel restock (if its not already like that...)


long post...puuuh

< Message edited by Chris10 -- 6/10/2011 9:00:06 PM >

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 62
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 2:00:15 PM   
heliodorus04


Posts: 1647
Joined: 11/1/2008
From: Nashville TN
Status: offline
Here's what it means in terms of game mechanics:
The player's actions don't matter against the context of history.

War in the East has 2 probable outcomes.
1) Germany defeats the Soviet Union in 1942 (probability =.1)
2) The Soviet Union enters Berlin somewhere between late 1943 and late 1944 (probability =.9)

Thanks for paying $80 (US); we hope you enjoyed your simulation that shows invading Russia was one of the greatest military blunders ever.  The fact that I find the game less and less fun is a by-product of my misunderstandings of actual history being corrected.  WitE is the greatest semi-interactive history book ever.


_____________________________

Fall 2021-Playing: Stalingrad'42 (GMT); Advanced Squad Leader,
Reading: Masters of the Air (GREAT BOOK!)
Rulebooks: ASL (always ASL), Middle-Earth Strategy Battle Game
Painting: WHFB Lizardmen leaders

(in reply to Chris10)
Post #: 63
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 2:42:27 PM   
Chris10


Posts: 114
Joined: 6/7/2011
From: Germany,living in Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: heliodorus04
we hope you enjoyed your simulation that shows invading Russia was one of the greatest military blunders ever.

It was feasable but only if Hitler would have stayed away from making strategic/tactical decisions and would have let the entire campaign to the Wehrmacht HQ and the Fieldmarshalls in command to focussing on military russian defeat instead of constantly sabotaging the Wehrmachts efforts with ridicolous ever changing objects and permanently ignoring military realitys.

quote:

ORIGINAL: heliodorus04
1) Germany defeats the Soviet Union in 1942 (probability =.1)
2) The Soviet Union enters Berlin somewhere between late 1943 and late 1944 (probability =.9)

maybe with some more balancing a german victory should be able to be obtained by mid 43 but not before (probability= .3 - .4)
and after 43 a russian victory by 45 (probability=.9)

I mean...after all there where lots of difficultys involved and a steamrollergame could not be in the desire of the devs nor the players...there are plenty of others games around to fit this sort of purpose.

but I agree with you that sometimes historical petrification can harm gameplay and the fun factor a bit

< Message edited by Chris10 -- 6/10/2011 3:10:40 PM >

(in reply to heliodorus04)
Post #: 64
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 8:22:39 PM   
kirkgregerson

 

Posts: 497
Joined: 4/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: squatter

The game has two types of fuel resource.

Oil = unrefined.

Fuel = refined.

The statement 'oil is not fuel' is so obvious as not to be worthy of making, unless you think your fellow posters are cretins.

The issue is that:

a. the game lets you capture already extracted oil resources (ie, barrels of crude), but will not let you transport those back for refining.

b. the game let you capture refined fuel stocks (ie barrels of petrol), but will not let you use them for your vehicles.

Why is this? Why is there no comment from the devs? If the Germans found 80 thousand barrels of oil when they captured Maikop, are we supposed to all agree that they would have left them there, as opposed to made every effort to transport them back for use?



Thank's for summing up a bit. Also, the game let's you capture 'resources' but they don't seem to be transporting back to Germany either.

I really fail to see why this can't be a part of WitE, to me it's a SERIOUS game flaw. If you can't use captured stocks in cities/urban then why even both displaying them. Anybody that didn't think the German forces were scavenging what they could when it came to oil/fuel is nuts.

So far I have not seen a developer comment on what the heck is going on here and when it will be fixed or explained in detail? Really makes me a bit sad..


(in reply to squatter)
Post #: 65
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 8:57:30 PM   
Chris10


Posts: 114
Joined: 6/7/2011
From: Germany,living in Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kirkgregerson
If the Germans found 80 thousand barrels of oil when they captured Maikop, are we supposed to all agree that they would have left them there, as opposed to made every effort to transport them back for use?

quote:

ORIGINAL: kirkgregerson
to me it's a SERIOUS game flaw.

I explained in detail the problems with "eastern ressources" and german war economy in post 62. The flaw consists in letting the german player finding/capturing stockpiled ressources in the first place. That should not happen and should be adressed when the game really goes for realism...

not that it matters...I only had some spare time today and knowledge which is not passed on is a breadless art.

(in reply to kirkgregerson)
Post #: 66
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 9:30:10 PM   
kirkgregerson

 

Posts: 497
Joined: 4/9/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris10


quote:

ORIGINAL: kirkgregerson
If the Germans found 80 thousand barrels of oil when they captured Maikop, are we supposed to all agree that they would have left them there, as opposed to made every effort to transport them back for use?

quote:

ORIGINAL: kirkgregerson
to me it's a SERIOUS game flaw.

I explained in detail the problems with "eastern ressources" and german war economy in post 62. The flaw consists in letting the german player finding/capturing stockpiled ressources in the first place. That should not happen and should be adressed when the game really goes for realism...

not that it matters...I only had some spare time today and knowledge which is not passed on is a breadless art.


I don't agree, because your making assumptions that same conditions for players concerning rail capacity historically would be similar for players that have found more efficient was to utilized their rail network and have partisans under control better. As I explained before, WitE already models the rail capacity (if you owned they game, you would know this), so using left over capacity could be a simple way to bring resources back to Germany on the rail network.

Once again this is NOT a simulation to recreate exactly what happen on the eastern front. I've read many books about what happened, as an axis player my goal is not to recreate most of it dealing with the later years. If WitE limited my ability to simulate all the historical nightmares the Axis had to go through, I wouldn't see the point of buying the game. Let's not EVER forget this is a GAME and needs to have the qualities of a GAME for success: fun, (re)playability, and of course some historical realism parameters.



< Message edited by kirkgregerson -- 6/10/2011 9:33:27 PM >

(in reply to Chris10)
Post #: 67
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 9:52:16 PM   
Chris10


Posts: 114
Joined: 6/7/2011
From: Germany,living in Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kirkgregerson
I don't agree, because your making assumptions that same conditions for players concerning rail capacity historically would be similar for players that have found more efficient was to utilized their rail network and have partisans under control better. As I explained before, WitE already models the rail capacity (if you owned they game, you would know this), so using left over capacity could be a simple way to bring resources back to Germany on the rail network.

I know that and I understand you perfectly. Therefore I mentioned in the last point regarding the game mechanics that capturing enemy HQs could provide supply and fuel to the armys in the area (5-6 hex radius) and could free some additional rail/train capacity for other theatres to get better supplys there as there is no need to bring supplys for this particular front section during a certain timescale.
Bringing huge stocks back to germany would be highly unrealistic as this had not happen on a massive and regular scale but I would allow for transport as you say...however..If I had to decide something on the matter I would reduce the stocks the german player could find.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kirkgregerson
Let's not EVER forget this is a GAME and needs to have the qualities of a GAME for success: fun, (re)playability, and of course some historical realism parameters.

Oh...absulutely...If I have to decide between gameplay and historical accuracy I always choose gameplay if the ladder harms the former but as a wargame with such serious claims as it is WITE it should simulate the problem with eastern ressources and german war economy in a belivable way as this was a major problem for winning the war in the east.
To re-balance a bit the fact that germans can not capture huge stockpiled ressources the russian ecomony could be toned down a bit which would make the game a bit slower.
Ive read comments that Russia can overrun German Player in 43/44. This might be to early and an indication that something should be tweaked down.

Its always difficult to find a balance which fits all kind of different skilled players and especially with highly complicated games the slightest change can result in getting to the "steamroll" point pretty quick which wouldnt be fun either, right ?
If I keep talking I will end up buying the game......


< Message edited by Chris10 -- 6/10/2011 10:10:12 PM >

(in reply to kirkgregerson)
Post #: 68
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 11:04:16 PM   
henri51


Posts: 1151
Joined: 1/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kirkgregerson


quote:

ORIGINAL: squatter

The game has two types of fuel resource.

Oil = unrefined.

Fuel = refined.

The statement 'oil is not fuel' is so obvious as not to be worthy of making, unless you think your fellow posters are cretins.

The issue is that:

a. the game lets you capture already extracted oil resources (ie, barrels of crude), but will not let you transport those back for refining.

b. the game let you capture refined fuel stocks (ie barrels of petrol), but will not let you use them for your vehicles.

Why is this? Why is there no comment from the devs? If the Germans found 80 thousand barrels of oil when they captured Maikop, are we supposed to all agree that they would have left them there, as opposed to made every effort to transport them back for use?



Thank's for summing up a bit. Also, the game let's you capture 'resources' but they don't seem to be transporting back to Germany either.

I really fail to see why this can't be a part of WitE, to me it's a SERIOUS game flaw. If you can't use captured stocks in cities/urban then why even both displaying them. Anybody that didn't think the German forces were scavenging what they could when it came to oil/fuel is nuts.

So far I have not seen a developer comment on what the heck is going on here and when it will be fixed or explained in detail? Really makes me a bit sad..




To clarify this single point, IIRC the manual says that supplies and fuel captured go to the HQ of the capturing German unit.Assuming that this works as advertised, the real problem lies with Germans capturing oilfields for no gain.

Henri

(in reply to kirkgregerson)
Post #: 69
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/10/2011 11:41:30 PM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline
The way the game use rail capacity, for moving ground units, is that distance doesn't seem to matter.  Would/should this also apply for moving crude from captured oil fields?  Would it be easier, or just as hard, moving captured resources ( not specifically oil ) from Ukraine compared to Baku?

The game's support staff might notice this more if a new thread was started in the tech support section. Hint-hint, Kirk.


(in reply to henri51)
Post #: 70
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 1:47:39 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heliodorus04

Here's what it means in terms of game mechanics:
The player's actions don't matter against the context of history.

War in the East has 2 probable outcomes.
1) Germany defeats the Soviet Union in 1942 (probability =.1)
2) The Soviet Union enters Berlin somewhere between late 1943 and late 1944 (probability =.9)

Thanks for paying $80 (US); we hope you enjoyed your simulation that shows invading Russia was one of the greatest military blunders ever.  The fact that I find the game less and less fun is a by-product of my misunderstandings of actual history being corrected.  WitE is the greatest semi-interactive history book ever.



It was a major blunder, no doubt. Nor do I doubt that the goal of the Germans was indeed to capture the oilfields. But I also think it is readily apparent they intended to capture and hold them long enough to develop them and the infrastructure needed to make use of them. That means almost certainly many months of unperturbed development.

In game terms, I don't see how that is possible or relevant.

_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to heliodorus04)
Post #: 71
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 3:54:48 AM   
Michael T


Posts: 4443
Joined: 10/22/2006
From: Queensland, Australia.
Status: offline
The main reason for capturing these oil resources/refineries in game terms is simply to deprive the Soviets of them. Its still a worthwhile objective.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 72
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 4:23:26 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

Certainly true. As is true for the Germans going for industry. It makes sense for the long term, even if none of  it helps the German economy.


_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to Michael T)
Post #: 73
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 10:57:37 AM   
squatter

 

Posts: 1033
Joined: 6/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heliodorus04

Here's what it means in terms of game mechanics:
The player's actions don't matter against the context of history.

War in the East has 2 probable outcomes.
1) Germany defeats the Soviet Union in 1942 (probability =.1)
2) The Soviet Union enters Berlin somewhere between late 1943 and late 1944 (probability =.9)

Thanks for paying $80 (US); we hope you enjoyed your simulation that shows invading Russia was one of the greatest military blunders ever.  The fact that I find the game less and less fun is a by-product of my misunderstandings of actual history being corrected.  WitE is the greatest semi-interactive history book ever.



This cuts to the real heart of the debate here.

(in reply to heliodorus04)
Post #: 74
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 2:13:35 PM   
henri51


Posts: 1151
Joined: 1/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: squatter

Why is this? Why is there no comment from the devs? If the Germans found 80 thousand barrels of oil when they captured Maikop, are we supposed to all agree that they would have left them there, as opposed to made every effort to transport them back for use?



FWIW the Soviets had destroyed most of the oil and production capability in Maikor, and the Germans got no significant oil from there because they had no time to repair the facilities before they had to leave because of Stalingrad.

Of course in the game, it is always possible that the Germans could hold on to Maikor for long enough, but then the game not allowing them to get the oil would be a problem. And inversely, if they got the oil there would be discussions about the German capability to get the oil to refineries, or if the oil turned out to be light oil suitable for Diesel engines, I would probably be claiming that the Germans could use it directly...

Henri

(in reply to squatter)
Post #: 75
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 9:00:09 PM   
joliverlay

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline
Yes, but the problem is when the Germans DO capture fuel (not oil, fuel!) the units that capture it should be able to use it.

After all, we could also negate combat results because the same combat outcome did not occur each time in real life.

If you capture the damn fuel you should be able to use it.

This is the first GG game I've simply given up on.

See the point is just because the Germans did not capture fuel or oil supplies intact (or you claim that anyway) if they had done it (and it could have happened) they should darn well be able to use it.

Sorry for the rant....back to AE and Eve Online.

(in reply to henri51)
Post #: 76
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 10:07:49 PM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

Erm...they can and do use captured fuel.


_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to joliverlay)
Post #: 77
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 10:20:06 PM   
joliverlay

 

Posts: 635
Joined: 1/28/2003
Status: offline
Perhaps I misunderstood the posts and my own experience against the AI. Fuel captured from a HQ yes, but not if it is in a city, even if connected to the rail line.

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 78
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/11/2011 10:56:20 PM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

Fuel is only captured from enemy units. It isn't really stored in cities in the game model as far as I know. It's just a 'pool'.


_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to joliverlay)
Post #: 79
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/12/2011 10:13:37 AM   
squatter

 

Posts: 1033
Joined: 6/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Fuel is only captured from enemy units. It isn't really stored in cities in the game model as far as I know. It's just a 'pool'.



ROFL.

You need to do a little more work on your understanding of the game, and of what people are arguing about, and a little less work on your sig.

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 80
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/12/2011 1:39:08 PM   
Commanderski


Posts: 927
Joined: 12/12/2010
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

The main reason for capturing these oil resources/refineries in game terms is simply to deprive the Soviets of them. Its still a worthwhile objective.


In Von Manstein's book, Lost Victories, he stated the reason for invading the Crimea was to deprive the Soviets of the oil. Also post # 62 gives a pretty good detailed explanation and as stated above is a very worthwile objective.

(in reply to squatter)
Post #: 81
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/12/2011 4:03:10 PM   
henri51


Posts: 1151
Joined: 1/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: squatter


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Fuel is only captured from enemy units. It isn't really stored in cities in the game model as far as I know. It's just a 'pool'.



ROFL.

You need to do a little more work on your understanding of the game, and of what people are arguing about, and a little less work on your sig.


This personal attack is uncalled for, Squatter, even if Mynok were not a useful contributor to this forum.Let's keep it friendly. No fighting - after all this is a war forum.

Henri

(in reply to squatter)
Post #: 82
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/13/2011 11:30:29 AM   
Empire101


Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline
To be honest I thought the Crimea was taken out not for capturing oil, but for protecting the Rumanian oilfields for air attack by the Soviet Union. Von Manstein seems to have forgotten who was in charge at the time .

I think Hitler described the Crimea as a giant Soviet Aircraft Carrier.

The fact that the Crimea led over the Straits to the oilfields of the Soviet Union was a bonus.

< Message edited by Empire101 -- 6/13/2011 11:35:07 AM >


_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to Commanderski)
Post #: 83
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/13/2011 12:19:22 PM   
Chris10


Posts: 114
Joined: 6/7/2011
From: Germany,living in Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101
>I think Hitler described the Crimea as a giant Soviet Aircraft Carrier.

>Von Manstein seems to have forgotten who was in charge at the time

>There were more than one good reason for taking Crimea but mainly cause the Wehrmacht could not allow a major stronghold on the southern wing with the ability of shipping in troops thru his harbour and then pushing into the wing or back of the advancing Wehrmacht as well it was a main objective to deprive the soviet fleet of the control over the black sea as Sevastopol was THE naval base of the russina black sea fleet and thus allowing later to ship supplys from Constanta (Romania) directly over to Tuapse in the Caucasus.
Those where the decisive operational reasons...anything else (air-base etc) was just another argument for doin it anyway.

>Erich was commander of the 11th army committed to Crimea fall 41/spring 42 but he was NOT the supreme commander of Heeres-Group South by the time of the run for Stalingrad (at this time he was ordered to Leningrad-Witebsk, August 42). He was assigned to take charge of Heeres-Group Don in Nov 42 when the 6th army was already trapped and had to deal with the s-h-i-t Hitler was responsible for but even then he got no direct command assigend over Heeres-Group A which was under threat to being cut off in the Caucasus.
For a successful counter on Stalingrad he would have needed command over ALL german forces located in the area and those hanging around in Crimea doin nothing plus over some from Heeres-Group center and maybe he could have managed to rescue 6th army and crush the counteroffensive by outmaneuvering the russian troops...there where enough existing german forces available for such an operation but as Friedrich the Great from Prussia once said: "He who defends everything, defends nothing!"..Hitler "EGO" was to much of an obstacle.
In fact Mannstein was the direct superior of Paulus as the 6th army was assigned to Heeres-Group Don HQ and he ordered the break-out against Hitlers order but Paulus was a spineless brownnose and had not enough courage to do the right thing.

btw Erich repeatedly ignored direct orders from Hitler and managed time and again to re-stabilize the front in the south...Hitlers interference with operational and tactical military decisions became an unbearable burden and Mannstein demanded various times that he should let the war-buisness to those who understand it and demanded to be assigned "Supreme Commander East" for the entire eastern forces which resulted in his dismissal...

ups...going quite off-topic now..I get driven away everytime I talk about this and the historian takes command

< Message edited by Chris10 -- 6/13/2011 3:26:37 PM >

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 84
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/13/2011 1:06:47 PM   
gradenko2k

 

Posts: 935
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101

To be honest I thought the Crimea was taken out not for capturing oil, but for protecting the Rumanian oilfields for air attack by the Soviet Union. Von Manstein seems to have forgotten who was in charge at the time .

I think Hitler described the Crimea as a giant Soviet Aircraft Carrier.

The fact that the Crimea led over the Straits to the oilfields of the Soviet Union was a bonus.

You're right that the Crimea was ordered to be taken to prevent the (mostly nonexistent?) threat of the Reds bombing Ploesti, but the attack into the oilfields of the Caucasus was definitely deliberate and not just a "bonus". Hitler wanted to deal an economic blow to the Soviets and figured that driving to Stalingrad and Baku was just the way to do it.

In fact, I believe even Rommel figured into this grand plan: He'd land in Libya, attack Egypt, cross the Suez Canal, capture Jerusalem, keep on going past Syria, into Iraq (all British holdings at this time) and then strike NORTH into the Caucasus, essentially forming a second pincer to complement Paulus 6th coming from the opposite end of the mountains.

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 85
RE: Why are captured resources not being used? - 6/13/2011 3:09:14 PM   
Chris10


Posts: 114
Joined: 6/7/2011
From: Germany,living in Spain
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gradenko_2000
You're right that the Crimea was ordered to be taken to prevent the (mostly nonexistent?) threat of the Reds bombing Ploesti, but the attack into the oilfields of the Caucasus was definitely deliberate and not just a "bonus". Hitler wanted to deal an economic blow to the Soviets and figured that driving to Stalingrad and Baku was just the way to do it.

I suggest to give post 84 another read
quote:

ORIGINAL: gradenko_2000
In fact, I believe even Rommel figured into this grand plan: He'd land in Libya, attack Egypt, cross the Suez Canal, capture Jerusalem, keep on going past Syria, into Iraq (all British holdings at this time) and then strike NORTH into the Caucasus, essentially forming a second pincer to complement Paulus 6th coming from the opposite end of the mountains.

thats sort of pc-game strategy thinking...things have been a lot simpler..the italians got their butt handed in north africa and german forces had to be comitted to help them out (like in greece)...their objective: Kick brits out of egypt to avoid a brit built up and a landing in southern europe (greece or jugoslawian coast) to open a second front and to secure the Suez-Canal to force the british convoys to go the long way around Cape of Good Hope which practically would have eliminated Englands war ability cause England was depending on ressources from India and their Asian Colonys in the Pacific...(England was always on the edge of defeat in 41/42 as the supply situation with food and ressources was close to collapse due to german sub warfare) but like a lot of other goals it was not pursued with all available forces/ressources. By an eyeleash brits where defeated in north africa by only 2 german divisions and 60.000 italians while brits had close to 240.000 troops. Just 2-3 more german divisions early in the campaign and the british armys get outmnaeuvered and crushed.
After Operation Torch everything was to late anyway and even the shipping of important german and italian troops contingents could not turn the tide anymore..so just a few months after Stalingrad Hitler allowed for another 120.000 german soldiers to be captured..


btw Paulus Heeres-Group B was not meant for going into Caucasus...it was Heeres-Group A under Fieldmarshall List (from Nov 42 it was Fieldmarshall Kleist)

< Message edited by Chris10 -- 6/13/2011 5:13:23 PM >

(in reply to gradenko2k)
Post #: 86
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: Why are captured resources not being used? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.141