That dang Soviet speedbump line...

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

That dang Soviet speedbump line...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> That dang Soviet speedbump line...

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 4:23:41 PM

nedcorleone1

Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline

I just hate how the Soviets get enough units, even if they are underpowered, to completely make a solid wall of troops that span the map vertically. Its making it very difficult to drive the Panzers forward to make any kind of encirclement. Sometimes I'll breech the line with my Panzers and infantry to setup a thrust for my next turn only to be met with a new wall of Soviet units.

/endrant

Post #: 1

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:04:38 PM

Empire101

Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline

Yep, thats the pain in the neck alright...you just have to keep chomping at it

_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy. - Michael Burleigh

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 2

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:05:15 PM

molchomor

Posts: 197
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline

Sounds like a game against the Soviet AI ?

I posted screenshots awhile ago on my attack into a completely empty Caucaus only to be encircled by 100+ warped units the next turn (many corps sized, and very few empty shell units as most had CVs of 3+).

I believe the warping/teleporting abilities by the AI has been nerfed a bit since then (?), but the unlimited creation ability by the AI has not AFAIK, it still has more or less unlimited APs.

WHAT THIS MEANS: You will have to commit alot more of your panzers in a major offensive than against a human opponent. Often all of your mobile units in fact. This because the AI will never lack units to put up a wall in front of you.

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 3

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:17:22 PM

Empire101

Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline

Well I'm playing a human opponent, and it seems to be the same at the moment, riverline after riverline of troops.

_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy. - Michael Burleigh

(in reply to molchomor)

Post #: 4

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:43:29 PM

nedcorleone1

Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline

It just irks me how the Soviets can have enough troops to put up what seems like an infinite line of troops. No matter how big of a bulge I create, he just fills them in indefinitely while I begin to run short on troops. And yes this is the AI I am talking about here.

I can't seem to gain any momentum after Turn 4. Its turned into a slug fest as Empire101 stated (chomping at the line). I hate hate hate this type of strategy but I feel like my hands are tied by the sheer amount of units the SU gets. I try to make headway, a buildup for penetration and the beginnings of a piercing in the line only to be met with yet MORE troops. I want to pocket them not rout them. *sigh* My Panzers can't keep taking those kinds of losses... those poor guys.

(in reply to Empire101)

Post #: 5

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 7:54:58 PM

lenin

Posts: 349
Joined: 1/19/2005
Status: offline

You are trying to exterminate a vast country of hundreds of millions of people. I'm sure a few of them will try to get in your way.....One thing the soviets were never short of was people...

_____________________________

"Imperialism is the eve of the proletarian social revolution"

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 6

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 8:08:46 PM

gradenko2k

Posts: 935
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline

If the AI has infinite AP, then does that mean that a strategy of unit destruction will not work against it, since it'll always be able to create as many Rifle Corps as it desires?

(in reply to lenin)

Post #: 7

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 8:21:13 PM

molchomor

Posts: 197
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gradenko_2000

If the AI has infinite AP, then does that mean that a strategy of unit destruction will not work against it, since it'll always be able to create as many Rifle Corps as it desires?

That is correct. Creating pockets and cap manpower centres seems the only way to (slowly) hurt the Soviet AI, atleast in the '42 campaign. If you take a look at the stockpiled resources the Ai has, he will not run out of anything anytime during the war even if you cap lots of resource, oil, fuel, armaments.

(in reply to gradenko2k)

Post #: 8

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 8:43:39 PM

mmarquo

Posts: 1376
Joined: 9/26/2000
Status: offline

The trick is not to attack everywhere, but to have a plan to get to somewhere meaningful...like the VP cities...

(in reply to molchomor)

Post #: 9

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 12:29:53 AM

Joel Billings

Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline

It doesn't have infinite AP, AFAIK, what it has is the ability to create a minimum number of units without paying APs for them if you are using a Logistics Help level of 110 or more for the Soviet AI. This is documented in the rules. Are you playing with 110 (challenging level) help?

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to mmarquo)

Post #: 10

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 12:36:53 AM

nedcorleone1

Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline

Joel thanks for popping in. I'm actually using a CUSTOM configuration with 100 across the board for GE and 90 across the board for SU. I'm not knocking the game at all really, though the whole 'teleporting' of units thing is a bit frustrating. I need to get to the point where I can play against a human opponent I suppose. Its hard to commit to something like that with school and work and such. I just can't seem to breakthrough the Soviet defenses. Granted I'm only on Turn 8 for a more serious game (played a stupid-easy campaign for learning the basics and it was a joke cutting through SU troops like butter

). I need to try procuring a bit more mass so to speak at a juncture and try another breakthrough, one that I can perhaps exploit a bit more. I just have a feeling a brand new wall of troops are going to stop me in my tracks again. Oh the frustration...!

(in reply to Joel Billings)

Post #: 11

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 1:24:45 AM

Mark43

Posts: 4
Joined: 7/23/2011
Status: offline

I under stand your frustartion I have gotten as far as 3 hexes from Moscow and run out of steam due to the ever ready new line of SU. I have restarted my times and I have learned that if I try to encircle a group of units all they do is pull back, so I am trying to use this to my advantage. I have found that all I have to do is attempt to encircle a group of units and the SU retreats back to a new defensive line. I have taken Velikie Luki and Smolensk this way and I have actually encircled 9 infantry divisions in Kiev this way. I am having trouble getting to Leningrad due to the number of SU but I have not given up.

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 12

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 1:25:12 AM

Joel Billings

Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline

In the early turns you have to move fast. Also, remember to attack with infantry and use armor to penetrate and encircle. You have to be constantry breaking through and forcing the Soviets to pull back (and or actually surrounding units so you can finish them off when isolated). Don't forget to use HQ buildup in some cases to give your armor the MPs to execute some of the bigger breakthroughs. Have fun and good luck.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 13

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 9:21:27 AM

molchomor

Posts: 197
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

It doesn't have infinite AP, AFAIK, what it has is the ability to create a minimum number of units without paying APs for them if you are using a Logistics Help level of 110 or more for the Soviet AI. This is documented in the rules. Are you playing with 110 (challenging level) help?

Nope, played with default settings. But I still am of the opinion that the AI has more or less unlimited APs.
If you look into the save I posted in the tech forum thread you'll see that during the 2.5 years of the '42 campaign, the Soviet AI lost 450 corps + alot of other units. It must also have a couple of hundred additional corps on the line as well, as the AI is still strong and healthy. Now, I'm unsure on the APs it would take to create such a mass of units, all I can say is that after crunching a big pocket with 70+ units, a few turns later the AI is up to its old strength again, so it for sure never has any lack of units to funnel its unlimited resources into. And it takes APs to create most of those units, right ?
With unlimited resources I mean everything except manpower seems unlimited, again if you open that save from my active tech thread and have a look at the Soviet arm, oil, fuel, resource pools you will see that, despite the Soviets having lost so many strategic centres, their resources are still basically unlimited which I would call a megabug.

(in reply to Joel Billings)

Post #: 14

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 12:50:51 PM

Tarhunnas

Posts: 3152
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lenin

You are trying to exterminate a vast country of hundreds of millions of people. I'm sure a few of them will try to get in your way.....One thing the soviets were never short of was people...

Yes, but one should not assume that Soviet population is inexhaustible. The Soviet Union had a population of about 200 million in 1940, compared to Germany 80 million. That is only 2.5 times as much. Germany of course fought on many fronts, the Soviet union only on one, but OTOH there were the Axis minor allies. All I want to say is that the difference is not infinite.

(in reply to lenin)

Post #: 15

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 1:27:18 PM

JocMeister

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

I can�t remember from the top of my head but I think Glantz wrote that the Soviets also suffred from a quite severe manpower shortage from 43-44 and onwards? Might have been in "when titans clashed"? Whover it was that wrote it pointed it out on several occations. Also claiming this more or less forced the Soviet to rely even more on Mech and Tank forces later in the war.

So if the german player causes historical or bigger soviet losses it should cause a manpower problem for the Soviets aswell.

(in reply to Tarhunnas)

Post #: 16

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 5:52:57 PM

JAS Gripen

Posts: 19
Joined: 2/21/2011
Status: offline

Soviets had women also in arms, not to mention a zillion support jobs that aryan women were not allowed into.

(in reply to JocMeister)

Post #: 17

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 8:33:18 PM

Jakerson

Posts: 565
Joined: 8/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas
Yes, but one should not assume that Soviet population is inexhaustible. The Soviet Union had a population of about 200 million in 1940, compared to Germany 80 million. That is only 2.5 times as much. Germany of course fought on many fronts, the Soviet union only on one, but OTOH there were the Axis minor allies. All I want to say is that the difference is not infinite.

Soviet Union also used Women�s as Soldiers, Fighter Pilots and Snipers in large numbers. While Nazi Germany had strategy that women�s place is home only and used men only.

So Soviet Union had 5 times more Soldiers when you count womens too. Some of the best snipers and fighter pilots in Soviet army where womens.

Nazi Germany had 5-6 Million men they could use as Soldiers while Soviet union could have easily bring 25-35 million men and womens to arms.

< Message edited by Jakerson -- 7/23/2011 8:34:53 PM >

(in reply to Tarhunnas)

Post #: 18

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 2:31:50 AM

Aurelian

Posts: 3916
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mr_flappypants

It just irks me how the Soviets can have enough troops to put up what seems like an infinite line of troops. No matter how big of a bulge I create, he just fills them in indefinitely while I begin to run short on troops. And yes this is the AI I am talking about here. I can't seem to gain any momentum after Turn 4. Its turned into a slug fest as Empire101 stated (chomping at the line). I hate hate hate this type of strategy but I feel like my hands are tied by the sheer amount of units the SU gets. I try to make headway, a buildup for penetration and the beginnings of a piercing in the line only to be met with yet MORE troops. I want to pocket them not rout them. *sigh* My Panzers can't keep taking those kinds of losses... those poor guys.

No matter how many men [the Russians] lost, there seemed always to be fresh reserves. No matter how many tanks were destroyed in battle,
the next morning brought waves of tanks from a seemingly inexhaustable supply. No matter how fiercely the Luftwaffe fought in the air, the
day following brought waves of new Russian fighters and ground-attack planes. No matter how many supplies were destroyed, how much
artillery was wiped out or captured-there was always more.
Martin Caidin, Te Tigers Are Burning, pg. 225

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 19

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 3:47:15 AM

nedcorleone1

Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline

Oh absolutely I agree and I'm familiar with my history on this aspect of the war. However, I'm sure the SU was not able to teleport these troops into a solid line as fast as the game seems to allow. I understand that each turn represents a considerable amount of time but it just seems unrealistic that the 'solid line' formation would occur indefinitely. Because of this it really causes the exciting momentum of the game to turn in to a slow crawl as any dynamic and fluidity on the battlefield is stifled. In the end it just boils down to the fact that I need to play a human opponent to get this type of game. I'm not knocking the game at all really and I've enjoyed it immensely thus far. I just need to get those Panzers rolling again but after Turn 6 or so that opportunity just doesn't seem to make itself known.

(in reply to Aurelian)

Post #: 20

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 3:56:19 AM

sveint

Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline

How many more threads do we need complaining about the Soviets?

Play the Soviets against Germany then.

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 21

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:09:15 AM

nedcorleone1

Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

How many more threads do we need complaining about the Soviets?

Play the Soviets against Germany then.

Hey thanks for the valuable and relevant reply. I first started playing this game as the Soviets and definitely could not recreate what the AI is doing... not even close. Also, would you rather me 'complain' about something else? Last I saw this forum has these links that you can CHOOSE to click on. You have all the freedom in the world to just skip over this thread. Apparently you chose to invest the effort in not only reading this thread but also clicking on the 'Reply' button and wasting your keystrokes. Interesting. Peace be with you and perhaps I'll see you in another thread, one more of your liking.

(in reply to sveint)

Post #: 22

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:17:31 AM

Panama

Posts: 1362
Joined: 10/30/2009
Status: offline

The Germans wargamed the invasion of the Sovier Union several times. Even when they stacked the deck in their favor they failed to achieve their objectives which were Leiningrad, Ukaine and Moscow, in that order. The distances and logistics were just impossible to overcome. They would always end up in front of Moscow with no reserves, exhausted and over extended. Why the heck they went ahead with it was crazy. Of course Hitler was a genius so he knew better.

Anyway, you will most probably do better than they did speed bumps or no speed bumps.

_____________________________

(in reply to nedcorleone1)

Post #: 23

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:22:40 AM

sveint

Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline

I meant no insult. But every other thread complains about the Soviets.

I do suggest you start a game as the Soviets and you'll get a much better feel for their capabilities. 1941 right now is quite balanced (historical), except perhaps for the fall of Leningrad (advantage Axis).

(in reply to Panama)

Post #: 24

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:23:58 AM

nedcorleone1

Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline

Yeah, the Germans likely knew they couldn't win logistically but they really hoped for winning that diplomatic war and forcing a premature surrender from the Soviets. Boy did they underestimate the will of the Soviet people. Same thing with England right? I mean Hitler wanted to bomb them into submission and draw out a surrender that way since Sealion was cancelled. Winston Churchill was like a rock in a time of disarray. The will of the people caused Hitler to run out of gas.

(in reply to Panama)

Post #: 25

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 6:32:46 AM

Wild

Posts: 364
Joined: 12/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

I meant no insult. But every other thread complains about the Soviets.

I do suggest you start a game as the Soviets and you'll get a much better feel for their capabilities. 1941 right now is quite balanced (historical), except perhaps for the fall of Leningrad (advantage Axis).

Every other thread complains about the Soviets because as of this moment in time they are overpowered (more so in '42). It is therefore important to have these types of threads to bring up all these issues so the balance can be gotten right.

(in reply to sveint)

Post #: 26

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 10:07:24 AM

Monter_Trismegistos

Posts: 1359
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Gdansk
Status: offline

So why people capture Leningrad (which historically was impossible), if Soviets are overpowered?

_____________________________

Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą

(in reply to Wild)

Post #: 27

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 2:24:12 PM

Wild

Posts: 364
Joined: 12/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Monter_Trismegistos

So why people capture Leningrad (which historically was impossible), if Soviets are overpowered?

In real life the capture of Lenningrad was a near run thing, and should be quite possible if players choose to prioritize it by sending more forces than historical to capture it. Which is what most players do.

You don't have much of an argument there i'm afraid.

(in reply to Monter_Trismegistos)

Post #: 28

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 7:23:43 PM

Scook_99

Posts: 301
Joined: 6/20/2007
Status: offline

You can capture both Leningrad and Moscow in 1941 as Germany and you will still have a really rough time from 1942 on.

(in reply to Wild)

Post #: 29

RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 7:39:17 PM

Ketza

Posts: 2227
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Columbia, Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

I meant no insult. But every other thread complains about the Soviets.

I do suggest you start a game as the Soviets and you'll get a much better feel for their capabilities. 1941 right now is quite balanced (historical), except perhaps for the fall of Leningrad (advantage Axis).

After playing several games as the Soviets I came to the conclusion Axis players are nuts.

Me being one of them

(in reply to sveint)

Post #: 30

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> That dang Soviet speedbump line...

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

0.939

Slitherine

That dang Soviet speedbump line...