Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 12:35:01 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I opened my turn from Kevin and found the front lines to be this ( I haven't moved anything yet ):




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 61
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 12:42:43 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		In the earlier turns I was hurting for trucks and now I'm awash in them. I've got trucks coming out of my ears. No need to put anybody in static mode yet either.

As for the Axis turn 11 attacks : There were 99 battles: 59 observed, 8 held, 22 retreated, 6 routed, and 3 "supplies" whatever that is, and one surrender.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 62
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:15:12 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've got 9 airbases that don't have any planes on them and this picture is all that's left to assign from the National Reserve. I'm guessing that the Russian Air Force isn't as big as it's forecast to get yet. Or maybe I have too many airbases. Maybe I should think about disbanding one or more of them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 63
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:28:44 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's a close-up of the Leningrad situation. Nothing is breaking through right now so I'm somewhat encouraged. Leningrad is empty but maybe Kevin doesn't know that.......or maybe he's trying to free the Finns. Or maybe he's trying to deprive the SU of the manpower that Leningrad has. Maybe I should send him an email telling him it's empty of industry and he'll divert to Moscow or something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 64
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:34:46 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the situation a little further south of the above image. Remember I haven't moved anything yet.......I'm just giving some close-ups of the various areas in play.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 65
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:39:03 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the situation around Smolensk




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 66
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:43:28 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's what it looks like in the Orel and Kursk areas




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 67
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:46:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's a look at the Kiev area. Kevin is still trying to construct a pocket near Kiev.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 68
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:50:08 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And here's what it looks like down toward Odessa. Kevin is trying to break a hole in my lines in the deep south for the first time. He must have gotten all his ducks in a row down there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 69
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 1:57:36 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 70
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 2:05:34 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		There's a couple of Front HQ's that don't have any airplanes: Bryansk and Reserve. I need to look into that. Ground support is very important in this game. Ural's and Volga Fronts don't have any planes either but then they don't need any yet.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/7/2011 2:06:57 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 71
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 2:41:32 AM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline 		Will you post a commander report showing the army HQs?

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 72
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 3:28:05 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I decided to evacuate all the industry out of Kirovgrad ( or however you spell it ) :




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 73
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 3:36:05 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
Will you post a commander report showing the army HQs?

Why yes, I will. Here you go. What's up? What are you looking for? Anything important? Details, I want details. LOL.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 74
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 3:43:32 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And then I decided to move all the industry out of Kremenchug. Yeah, I know, I've never heard of it either.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 75
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 3:52:51 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the front line after I moved everything, just before I ended my turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 76
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 4:20:53 AM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline 		I've discovered you can learn quite a bit from this screen, and uncover potential opportunities for improvement, although I also should have added "...and sort by HHQ."  But on to what's here, or not.

6th Army is overloaded, and with 200k men is your largest army.  Really too big and should try and shrink it down.  It's also commanded by Muzychenko who is a "Quad-4".  That is to say a grade 4 in admin, initiative, infantry and morale, i.e a substandard leader.  Much better commanders are available, though maybe you prefer to spend the APs elsewhere.  Koniev, Rokossovsky, Tolbukhin, Zakharov and Malinovsky all appear to be looking for meaningful work.

You have most armies locked, but have a few with high SUs and at support level 3.  So they'll bleed off unless that is your intention.

Interesting choice on the plus-up of Moscow Military District.  I don't think that command ever converts to a front. 

Bryansk Front only has 2 armies, you might add a third, even if it's only a Stavka shell army initially.  You could move some CUs around to offload some out of SW front and transfer it to the same shell army for better balance.

< Message edited by M60A3TTS -- 8/7/2011 4:26:08 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 77
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 5:13:52 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
I've discovered you can learn quite a bit from this screen, and uncover potential opportunities for improvement, although I also should have added "...and sort by HHQ."  But on to what's here, or not.

Sorry about the missing sort. Yeah, I've been looking around on this screen and I'm seeing nugets of good info here and there. Thanks for pointing this out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
6th Army is overloaded, and with 200k men is your largest army.  Really too big and should try and shrink it down.  It's also commanded by Muzychenko who is a "Quad-4".  That is to say a grade 4 in admin, initiative, infantry and morale, i.e a substandard leader.  Much better commanders are available, though maybe you prefer to spend the APs elsewhere.  Koniev, Rokossovsky, Tolbukhin, Zakharov and Malinovsky all appear to be looking for meaningful work.

Yeah, 6th Army is way too big. I'll move another HQ over there and relieve it somewhat.

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
You have most armies locked, but have a few with high SUs and at support level 3.  So they'll bleed off unless that is your intention.

It's mainly due to an oversight on my part I'm pretty sure. Good catch.

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
Interesting choice on the plus-up of Moscow Military District.  I don't think that command ever converts to a front. 

What in the world is a plus-up?

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
Bryansk Front only has 2 armies, you might add a third, even if it's only a Stavka shell army initially.  You could move some CUs around to offload some out of SW front and transfer it to the same shell army for better balance.

Moving some of the SW front to Bryansk is a good idea. Another good catch. Thanks.

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 78
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 5:18:39 AM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline 		On the Moscow Military District plus-up, I meant that you assigned armies to that command and that was interesting as I don't think it will ever move.  If you ever get moving west in a serious way that might become an issue as the armies keep moving further from Moscow.  But clearly that is not a concern now.

And FWIW, this is not the level of play we've seen from you in the previous two PBEMs. Keep up the good work . Klilly is going to find himself in trouble if you simply keep playing this well.

< Message edited by M60A3TTS -- 8/7/2011 5:20:49 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 79
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 5:36:11 AM   
kfmiller41


Posts: 1063
Joined: 3/25/2003
From: Saint Marys, Ga
Status: offline 		Hey Larry i got challenged by Carnage tonight and an going to play him as the Russians, so any sage advice you on defending the motherland please feel free to share in my thread.


_____________________________

You have the ability to arouse various emotions in me: please select carefully.

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 80
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 5:40:40 AM   
CarnageINC


Posts: 2208
Joined: 2/28/2005
From: Rapid City SD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: miller41

Hey Larry i got challenged by Carnage tonight and an going to play him as the Russians, so any sage advice you on defending the motherland please feel free to share in my thread.



What he really meant to say is any advice on how to let the motherland to be defeated, please feel free to share

_____________________________


(in reply to kfmiller41)
Post #: 81
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 6:02:56 AM   
kfmiller41


Posts: 1063
Joined: 3/25/2003
From: Saint Marys, Ga
Status: offline 		Touche Don't want ot hijack your thread Larry, your doing really well so far.

_____________________________

You have the ability to arouse various emotions in me: please select carefully.

(in reply to CarnageINC)
Post #: 82
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 7:38:56 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		I see a division south of Lake Peipus that has a few German divisions next to it; there's one of those dotted blue lines that marks the area impassible, so maybe the Germans can't attack it?  The division isn't really defending anything in that current hex.

(in reply to kfmiller41)
Post #: 83
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 11:02:15 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: miller41
Touche Don't want ot hijack your thread Larry, your doing really well so far.

Thanks for your kind words.......and don't worry about hijacking my thread.........anybody can post whatever is really interesting no matter what in the world it is.....'cause I like interesting things. So I'll be watching your AAR with interest too. Good luck to the both of you and may you both have some fun, exercise your minds, and try to teach each other your distinctive playstyle. We all have one and I'm on the brink of finding out how KLilly plays because I've played him so many times. He and I think a lot alike I think. He is a really good compeditor and I'm thankful he's playing me ( again ). This is fun.

(in reply to kfmiller41)
Post #: 84
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 - 8/7/2011 11:02:57 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: randallw
I see a division south of Lake Peipus that has a few German divisions next to it; there's one of those dotted blue lines that marks the area impassible, so maybe the Germans can't attack it?  The division isn't really defending anything in that current hex.

Lemme look the area up when I get a chance ( when it's my turn again ).....and we'll see what you mean.

EDIT: Oh. I see what you mean. Um........the dotted line doesn't travel between me and the German units so I'm assuming that I'm in that hex by necessity as that hex could be entered by the Axis dudes.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/7/2011 11:28:55 PM >

(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 85
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T12 - 8/7/2011 11:42:36 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the T12 front lines before I move anything. Anybody else see something strange? Where in the world are the Finns?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 86
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T12 - 8/7/2011 11:59:07 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's another one of those Commanders Reports to showcase the Army HQ's:






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/8/2011 12:02:54 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 87
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T12 - 8/8/2011 12:09:37 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Out of the 6,000+ aircraft that are ready only 40 or so are in the NR. So I'm almost fully deployed spoiling for a fight with the Lufftwaffe.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 88
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T12 - 8/8/2011 12:18:40 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I have bombers who have more kills than some of my fighters. I'm guessing that's because we're counting those Axis planes destroyed on the ground as well as the shoot-downs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 89
RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T12 - 8/8/2011 12:23:36 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Only 5 attacks this time. And no airstrikes. Strange. Maybe Kevin is refitting this time and resting his units.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.04.36 KLilly vs Fulkerson T11 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.688