warspite1
Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dixie
quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dixie
Back from a mid week break in London. Saw the Tower of London, Liz's house, science museum, natural history museum, maritime museum and a few of the memorials dotted around. We also finally got around to watching Rush. And thanks to work we gor free first class train travel into London, sometimes there ate perks to my job....
warspite1
What did you think of Rush?
I liked it, as did Mrs Dixie. As with many films it's not exactly 100% accurate in some respects, iirc the rivalry between Hunt and Lauda is exaggerated and a few events are moved (his meeting to cancel the race at the Nurburgring is placed just prior to the race rather than a week before). But it's a good representation of the state of F1 back in the day and doesn't take excessive liberties unlike some films which shall not be named. The racing scenes are obviously the most memorable bits but the off track stuff works well IMO. It's a long film, but it didn't feel like a two hour one which is a sign I enjoyed it. Mrs Dixie said she was surprised how much she enjoyed it as well.
Compared to Senna, it's more of an action film than a documentary. Overall it's a good solid film, but perhaps not suitable for the more squeamish due to some fairly gruesome scenes at the start as well as Lauda's accident.
warspite1
Agreed. I did a review for the imdb website - would recommend this film to anyone - F1 fan or not.
The film is just over 2 hours long, but when it was over it seemed like I had been in the cinema about 30 minutes.
The film centres on the battle for the 1976 Formula 1 World Championship, and the rivalry between the Austrian "professor" Niki Lauda and the British playboy James Hunt.
The two are depicted as enemies, but in actual fact they were good friends who trusted and respected each other on, as well as off-track. This bit of artistic licence does not spoil the film and is reasonable in order to make the battle between the two for the F1 crown more intense.
The film is nicely paced. We are introduced to both characters through their own narrative and scenes that leave the watcher in no doubt as to their background and philosophy on life.
The two are first seen in competition in 1970 at a Formula 3 race at Crystal Palace (where they have a coming together) and sets the scene for the rivalry throughout the film. I'm not sure if this is further artistic licence. The two definitely did race each other in F3, but I am not convinced as to whether this actual incident occurred.
After that we are given a whistle stop journey between 1973 (when Hunt came into F1) to 1975. We are shown the dangerous nature of F1 at the time with the Francois Cevert accident at Watkins Glen in gory detail – although this does not seem gratuitous, but necessary to bring home just how unforgiving the sport was back then – and it truly was (of the top 12 points scorers in 1976, F1 cars were to claim 3, 1 ended up in a wheelchair and 1 had his career ended by a leg crunching crash).
We are then taken to 1976 and that titanic struggle for the World Crown. Only one real issue here – the British Grand Prix result, but I suspect this was simplified in the interests of time.
The casting is superb. Chris Hemsworth, an Aussie, does an excellent job on public schoolboy James Hunt, while Daniel Bruhl both sounds and looks frighteningly like the Austrian. There is little room for a supporting cast amongst the drivers which is a shame – only Clay Regazzoni has a part of any real substance. Peterson, Watson, Depailler, Scheckter, Andretti et al could have featured a little more I think. What did their contemporaries think of the two protagonists? The supporting cast is mainly required for Hunt – Lord Hesketh, "Bubbles" Horsley and Teddy Mayer / Tyler Alexander of McLaren, while the Ferrari team principals are rarely seen.
The love angle is perfectly catered for by Olivia Wilde (Hunt's first wife Suzy) and the gorgeous Alexandra Maria Lara - of Downfall fame – as the future Marlene Lauda. Both give quality performances.
The attention to detail is superb. Although the tracks are not the actual ones (for understandable reasons) the cars, the helmets, the sponsors are all authentic. The film "feels" like it's happening in the 70's.
For anyone interested in great personal stories, F1, the 70's, cars or just like to see a great film, then Rush is for you.
_____________________________
England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805  |
Printable Version
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread