maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta)

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support >> maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta)

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta) - 1/28/2012 6:37:43 PM

javats

Posts: 55
Joined: 1/21/2012
From: Flatland
Status: offline

Problem of a very large german force is defeated by a small Soviet force.

1st Example; a German Panzer Corp (45000+) in city, level 3 fort with artillery support, is defeated after 5 rounds by a single Soviet Division.
2nd Example; a German Panzer div. & a inf. div. (30000+) in light woods and level 1 fort with artillery support, again are defeated after 5 rounds by a single Soviet Division.

Yes, fatigue is important, But durning the "Great Patriotic War" no German defense position was broken with working German Artillery . I think this is a problem. This has happen before in other turns.

Also, a large defense force against a small attacker, rotation of units to reduce fatigue can be done.

Included is a file of both examples and rounds:

Thanks for the great game.

Attachment (1)

Post #: 1

RE: maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta) - 1/28/2012 11:36:24 PM

Joel Billings

Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline

Do you have a save you can post or email to 2by3@2by3games.com? It's hard to know what's going on by just looking at the screenshot of battle number 5.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to javats)

Post #: 2

RE: maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta) - 1/29/2012 12:49:40 AM

mmarquo

Posts: 1376
Joined: 9/26/2000
Status: offline

"But durning the "Great Patriotic War" no German defense position was broken with working German Artillery."

(in reply to Joel Billings)

Post #: 3

RE: maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta) - 1/29/2012 2:07:18 AM

Mentor

Posts: 51
Joined: 12/8/2011
Status: offline

I found during the first blizzard that if an Axis unit was attacked many times in a single turn (approx 5 or so), it finally did not "show up" to the battle, and a 0 CV would be reported and the unit would retreat. This appears to be what happened in the last example showing in your gif.

(in reply to mmarquo)

Post #: 4

RE: maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta) - 1/29/2012 2:16:06 AM

Peltonx

Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

Do you have a save you can post or email to 2by3@2by3games.com? It's hard to know what's going on by just looking at the screenshot of battle number 5.

yes TVD does the same during blizzard turns in our game.

You can also get an exploit win by spam bombing a single hex with 10 planes 10 to 20 times. Disrupts the forses and you can attack with 1 division vs 3 German infantry.

JB why do you guys always ask for saves and screen shots when you can recreat the same thing over and over yourself.

Both spam attacking and spam bombing a hex is an old school exploit done in other games.

You guys really need to get out more or hire some new blood.

I am not kidding by the way some of the stuff thats gotten by the "team" is really surpising.

Pelton

_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Joel Billings)

Post #: 5

RE: maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta) (CLOSED) - 2/10/2012 3:27:56 PM

javats

Posts: 55
Joined: 1/21/2012
From: Flatland
Status: offline

Reported to be fixed in 1.05.60, listed as battle report problem (CV = 0). Closed

(in reply to Peltonx)

Post #: 6

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support >> maybe a long battle problem?(1.05.53Beta)

Page: [1]