Jabba
Posts: 62
Joined: 3/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
I've decided to ignore (at least at the beginig) Vielkie Luki and Rzhev - they are not on the axis of main assault and I don't think I have forces I can spare. I can do that, because this is not campaign, so I don't have to do any major thurst towards Moscov. Interesting AAR. I, also a beginner, recently completed the Road to Leningrad scenario, and I faced the same dilemma. I decided after some hesitation to detach the 16th Army to advance towards Rzhev. The decision paid off: 16th Army faced minimal resistance and not only captured Velikie Luki and Rzhev, but also wheeled north to capture Vishny Volochek. The icing on the cake was that having undertaken this grand left-wheel manoeuvre, 16th Army ended the game by taking the Soviets - by this time holed up in the extreme north-east - in the rear, completing their encirclement. Rarely has a strategic gamble paid greater dividends! The downside I suppose is that I was not strong enough to take Leningrad, which ended the game completely isolated but still mostly in Soviet hands. This didn't matter though, as every other victory hex on the map was in my hands. Bypassing Leningrad seemed like a wise move as it was chock-a-block with Soviet units. It just goes to show that there are many different ways to skin a Red! I don't doubt your strategy was equally valid, but I can testify that the German player can afford to detach forces to advance towards Rzhev. It seems to me that the trouble with a narrow front strategy is what to do if the narrow front hits a brick wall. A broader front provides more flexibility to exploit gaps in the defence by changing the axis of advance. The eternal strategic dilemma, I suppose!
< Message edited by Jabba -- 6/13/2012 10:44:58 PM >
|