Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22 September 2012

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22 September 2012 Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/8/2013 5:49:16 PM   
barkman44

 

Posts: 344
Joined: 1/17/2010
Status: offline 		I'm running 1123b do i have to upgrade to 1123c first and then 1123d?
Also I just spent a couple of days setting up first turn using saardukar's thread
if I change to 1123d will i have to start again?
I notice there are'nt any data changes so maybe i can use my turn?

Should have looked down a few threads beta's can be used in ongoing games.


< Message edited by barkorn45 -- 2/8/2013 5:52:17 PM >

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 541
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/8/2013 6:18:12 PM   
barkman44

 

Posts: 344
Joined: 1/17/2010
Status: offline 		I made a shortcut to desktop but when i start i get an error message "can't find PW data"

(in reply to barkman44)
Post #: 542
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/8/2013 7:55:26 PM   
Uncivil Engineer

 

Posts: 1014
Joined: 2/22/2012
From: Florida, USA
Status: offline 		The update makes its own shortcut; I suspect if you use another it won't work properly.

(in reply to barkman44)
Post #: 543
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/8/2013 9:06:37 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: barkorn45

I made a shortcut to desktop but when i start i get an error message "can't find PW data"

Making your own shortcut works fine, you just have to make both parts point to the correct area. Right-click on the shortcut and click on 'properties'. When the window opens you will see that there are two places where things can be typed in. The first is the command line, which points to the program you want to run, and incidentally contains all the 'command line switches' that you want to use. The second area, a little below the first, tells the PC what folder to point the program at. It sounds like the second area is wrong. Edit it and make sure it points to your main AE folder for the installation. When I say 'main AE folder', I mean that folder that contains the executables and all the other folders.

Note that if you are running one of the Beta test patches that the first line will have a 'beta2' somewhere in it because the executable for the patch is in the beta2 sub-folder. But the second part should still point to the main folder, not the beta2 sub-folder.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to barkman44)
Post #: 544
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/9/2013 4:27:13 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: n01487477

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm
quote:

03/02/13: 1123d - ...
CV groups should retain resize capability when moved back to ship


Hi Michael -
I just downloaded the beta and the zip shows it as 1123c. I'm taking a stab that it is just a version number thing ..

Like Seille, I moved my airgroups off while upgrading and forgot about the 7/42 resize. Some retained the ability to resize others didn't (it came down to if I'd set "not resize"). I've already moved them back before this beta - Am I now fried or should I move them off and back on again ?

PM sent with password.

edit: the two CV's in question are in Hiroshima/Kure

I rechecked the beta in the first post and it shows as 1123d

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 545
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/9/2013 7:49:11 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm


I rechecked the beta in the first post and it shows as 1123d

+1

2nd post has 1123c

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 546
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/9/2013 8:10:56 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline 		It was first ver. c for me too, but when I re-downloaded, it was ver. d. Might have been a forum issue.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 547
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/9/2013 8:21:35 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		It could be a timing issue. Normally I update the first post, and then update the second one.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 548
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/12/2013 10:49:49 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline 		@michaelm
Did you check these post?
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3264041
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3264094

_____________________________

JOIN The Blitz Wargaming Club
JOIN Napoleonic Wargame Club
JOIN American Civil War Game Club

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 549
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/17/2013 12:00:38 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		Updated 1123e
Possible overflow error when build list of ships
Change direction when set for direct move. Added description to March Direction on screen to help identify when direct move is set
Devices in TOE of less than 3 could cause subunits not to rebuild
TF destination (unload at) not allowing some TFs to return home

There may be some more later in relation to AI.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 550
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123c updated 2... - 2/17/2013 12:54:37 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BigDuke66

Save from a PBEM, end of turn save from t22 I think. Are the passwords needed?
The tender was there from t10 on with some Catalinas flying naval search, thinking that the tender would sooner or later need supplies a brought in 504 supplies some turns later in, by t23 I had to move the tender and AG back and up until then no supply was used by the tender nor from the dot base, at least according to what the numbers from the tracker say.
Oh and at the first turn there a plane was damaged and next turn repaired but even that didn't use any supplies.
Beware that save is I think still of 1223c.

A seaplane tender can support up to its capacity without expending any supply. Once exceeded, it needs ship or base supply.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 551
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/17/2013 12:56:05 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline 		Thanks Michael!!!



_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 552
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/17/2013 5:19:58 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline 		Thanks michael but what is the reason behind that?
All other tenders seem to use supply when providing support for either repairs or rearming operations.
Why shouldn't seaplane tenders do the same?
It's not reasonable that players can "outsource" their search assets and have them fly & repair for free. Unless that is again some support for the AI, but if so I again wonder why the other tenders have to "pay" supplies but not seaplane tenders.

And it's not like the swallow supplies like nothing, even small seaplane tenders could hold out on a forward dot base for weeks as search missing only coast 1/3 supply point per plane per mission what seems realistic, but now they can be the complete war there without ever consuming supplies what seems more than unrealistic.

< Message edited by BigDuke66 -- 2/17/2013 5:23:18 PM >

_____________________________

JOIN The Blitz Wargaming Club
JOIN Napoleonic Wargame Club
JOIN American Civil War Game Club

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 553
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/17/2013 11:56:32 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		If the ship has organic support, then it can support that many planes. This is the same for CV running patrol missions - ordnance is used, but lack of ordnance limits number of planes available.
If the tender has no organic support, or more planes in hex than it can support, then supplies are used for mission and repairs. If I recall, 1 seaplane support is used for each patrol mission and 2 for each plane repaired. [There is a possible bug in that intermediate repairs aren't decreasing the seaplane support.]
I think WITP use to allow you to run these missions indefinitely, and without the checks in use today.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 554
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/18/2013 12:07:54 AM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline 		Thanks again for clarifying that.

_____________________________

JOIN The Blitz Wargaming Club
JOIN Napoleonic Wargame Club
JOIN American Civil War Game Club

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 555
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/18/2013 9:21:27 AM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Updated 1123e
Possible overflow error when build list of ships
Change direction when set for direct move. Added description to March Direction on screen to help identify when direct move is set
Devices in TOE of less than 3 could cause subunits not to rebuild
TF destination (unload at) not allowing some TFs to return home

There may be some more later in relation to AI.


My Chinese TOE problem has now been recitifed. Thanks again.

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 556
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/19/2013 12:48:22 AM   
Captain Cruft


Posts: 3652
Joined: 3/17/2004
From: England
Status: offline 		This is my pet bug ...

Subs which are set to Remain on Station at a fixed point don't use fuel. Or at least they don't seem to, I haven't checked scientifically.

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 557
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123e updated 1... - 2/19/2013 8:25:34 AM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline 		Got another small problem for you.

I have a SSX that appears to be under it's own crews paddle power going form Truk to Noumea. (Klaus - Since been sunk by a mine).

I thought I'd loaded it onto a SSX carrier but there is no carrier in the hex (112,132) just the SSX. If you leave it it goes all the way to Noumea under it's own power. The save is the earliest I have got and the problem occured prior to the lastest patch. It's a PBEM so do you need a password?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 558
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/19/2013 8:29:12 AM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

This is my pet bug ...

Subs which are set to Remain on Station at a fixed point don't use fuel. Or at least they don't seem to, I haven't checked scientifically.



They don't and it's not just sub TFs. I noticed it a while ago but thought it was by design, but on reflection it's not realistic some fuel would need to be used to keep power on the ship.

(in reply to Captain Cruft)
Post #: 559
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/19/2013 8:39:33 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

This is my pet bug ...

Subs which are set to Remain on Station at a fixed point don't use fuel. Or at least they don't seem to, I haven't checked scientifically.

Should burn some based on quick test.
Some small subs seem to back out the 'burn'???. Big subs I could see the endurance go down.
Something make be recalculating endurance based on a percentage, and as change is so small it is being lost.

< Message edited by michaelm -- 2/19/2013 9:04:42 AM >

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Captain Cruft)
Post #: 560
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1123 updated - 2/22/2013 1:02:25 AM   
Captain Cruft


Posts: 3652
Joined: 3/17/2004
From: England
Status: offline 		OK thanks for looking at it.

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 561
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/22/2013 9:40:39 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: barkorn45

I'm running 1123b do i have to upgrade to 1123c first and then 1123d?
Also I just spent a couple of days setting up first turn using saardukar's thread
if I change to 1123d will i have to start again?
I notice there are'nt any data changes so maybe i can use my turn?

Should have looked down a few threads beta's can be used in ongoing games.



Betas are just EXE-file changes, no data changes. You can use them without problem in ongoing games. I do that all the time when new beta comes available.


_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to barkman44)
Post #: 562
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/22/2013 4:31:24 PM   
Theages

 

Posts: 167
Joined: 2/16/2007
From: Austria
Status: offline 		@michaelm
In port view ships, which have been convert to carry more troops (Japanese xAK or AK), are shown with a '-t' following their type (eg xAK-t)
On the ship selection screen (Task Force creation) and the Task Force screen, this extension is not shown. Especially on the Task Force creation screen this would be useful for quickly finding the converted xAKs / AKs in the list of numerous standard xAKs / AKs. Could this be implemented?

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 563
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/22/2013 4:55:18 PM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline 		+1

and another "@michaelm":

It would be nice if the mouseover info in the TF transfer screen could show the ship class as well - like:

Left click to add Kamo to Task Force
[Torpedo Boat Otori class]
3 x 12 cm etc.




_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to Theages)
Post #: 564
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/23/2013 4:21:10 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		Never mind got posts mixed up

< Message edited by michaelm -- 2/23/2013 6:18:05 AM >

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 565
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/24/2013 12:54:07 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Never mind got posts mixed up

Michael,

Are you suggesting that we are supposed to disregard this?

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 566
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/24/2013 7:00:56 PM   
BigDuke66


Posts: 2013
Joined: 2/1/2001
From: Terra
Status: offline 		As I now played the Guadalcanal scenario and saw that so few ships are upgrade and many air groups are still at low XPs I wonder if small steps should be taken to slow down Air and Naval operations similar to the slow down of land operations(wasn't the whole planing process introduced their for?).
Seeing that michaelm added for example the double air support on big airfields I hope that small steps in slowing down naval and air operations are considered too.

1. Naval operations
I propose to let upgrades only proceed if all requirements are fulfilled. Meaning that if a ship needs a yard to do its upgrade the ship has to stay in the yard to proceed the upgrade.
The way it is now one can simply let the upgrade start but can than pull the ship out of the yard without the upgrade process stopping.
If the requirements have to be fulfill over the complete process the player usually things twice if he wants to do the at a nearby base or let the ship move further back so the frontline yards aren't filled with ships in upgrade process.
This would extend the time for such upgrades as ships travel longer or block frontline shipyards, either way it would slow down naval operations.
Hopefully this would also stop mass upgrades like US subs getting radar that are totally ahistorical.

2. Air operations
I propose to let the pilot values(all by a random factor, even better the higher the XP the lower the drop is, so veterans can handle switching planes better) drop if switching to a new plane.
The way it is now upgrading to a new plane isn't a problem at all even at a frontline airfield as the unit is soon back in action.
If the pilot values drop the player hopefully considers to move the unit further back and let it train for some weeks to get them back to their old values, I guess that would simulate the process of getting the pilots and ground crews accustomed to the new plane type at a none frontline airfield.
This way the AGs would keep outdated planes or lower their pilot values at the frontline or move the AG back for the upgrade and retrain process, either way it will slow down air operations.


So are these ideas worth considering?

_____________________________

JOIN The Blitz Wargaming Club
JOIN Napoleonic Wargame Club
JOIN American Civil War Game Club

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 567
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/26/2013 3:35:04 PM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline 		Another request if possible: Would be nice if the "Load TF screen" could allow the changing of LCU ops modes. More often than not I find myself in the load screen of a transport TF and am greeted with the status "Not in strategic mode" because I forgot to prepare the LCUs for the intended move. So I have to exit, go into the LCU screen to change the op mode and than back into the TF load screen. Clicking on "Not in strategic mode" should change the LCU to this op mode. Similar if the TF is an Amphib TF and the LCU I want to load is not in combat mode - a click on "Not in combat mode" and there you go. Would same some clicks.

_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to BigDuke66)
Post #: 568
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/26/2013 11:52:43 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

Another request if possible: Would be nice if the "Load TF screen" could allow the changing of LCU ops modes. More often than not I find myself in the load screen of a transport TF and am greeted with the status "Not in strategic mode" because I forgot to prepare the LCUs for the intended move. So I have to exit, go into the LCU screen to change the op mode and than back into the TF load screen. Clicking on "Not in strategic mode" should change the LCU to this op mode. Similar if the TF is an Amphib TF and the LCU I want to load is not in combat mode - a click on "Not in combat mode" and there you go. Would same some clicks.


Great idea, you would still have the same delay in changing mode.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 569
RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22... - 2/27/2013 12:12:16 AM   
mikkey


Posts: 3142
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Slovakia
Status: offline 		+1

_____________________________


(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 570
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 07 - Unofficial Public Beta - 1117 updated 22 September 2012 Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

5.453