Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

colonization close together good or bad?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> colonization close together good or bad? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
colonization close together good or bad? - 10/5/2013 8:42:56 AM   
buncheesy

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 8/26/2013
Status: offline
I saw somewhere on these forums that its a bad idea to colonize two planets in the same system - I think it was because of competition for resources arriving?

Is this the case? How close is two close? ie the next system to the capital system?

I am still in my first game (bloody epic!!) and my colony's are fairly spread out to try an maximise my zones of influence and because I was picking the best planets first. Some problems are: large travel distances for defending and trade, corruption(?), infilling by other powers.

Now I am looking to colony spam and I have some very good prospects within systems I have already colonised or very close to my capital.

I assume this is ultimately a balance thing?
Post #: 1
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/5/2013 9:09:31 AM   
Bingeling

 

Posts: 5186
Joined: 8/12/2010
Status: offline
Spreading out is good to "grab territory". Territory gives colony targets and resources that are yours. This is mostly important in early game, though.

As long as I can handle pirates, I would colonize every good colony target I can grab. What are good targets? Those that gives control of useful systems, and colonies with more than 80% quality or such. Do also keep in mind that too many "fresh" colonies at once may make your tax subjects leave your revenue planets to settle at fresh ones of no income, which can hurt quite a bit in the short run.

If you run with corruption, it is all the more reason to colonize good ones near the capital.

The only catch with multiple colonies in a system, is that I am usually too cheap to protect more than one properly ;-)

(in reply to buncheesy)
Post #: 2
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/5/2013 11:27:55 AM   
Canute0

 

Posts: 616
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: Germany
Status: offline
2 colonies at the same system arn't a bad thing.
But before you colonize these you should allways colonize any other ones to grab them. The potenzial colony at your system is yours, noone else can colonize it.

(in reply to Bingeling)
Post #: 3
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/5/2013 11:42:36 AM   
Fenrisfil

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 6/2/2013
Status: offline
I find a lot depends on your specific situation. For example if you are having pirate issues it can make a lot of sense to have more than one colony in a system as you only need the one fleet to protect it. In normal situations though I try and colonise as strategically as possible and that really ends up a matter of how the galaxy has been generated. I have colonisation limits active (and fairly harsh ones) so grabbing a colony that is in the range of another empire is always a priority over one that isn't, as is one that will open up a path to another colony. Once there is a clear galactic spread and I am bordering multiple empires I start to colonise closer to home rather than create isolated colonies in pockets of space within the main part of a rivals empire.

(in reply to Bingeling)
Post #: 4
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/5/2013 2:57:32 PM   
CyclopsSlayer


Posts: 583
Joined: 2/11/2012
Status: offline
My view of colony priority;

- Special Resources and Empire Wide bonuses (colored blue in the list. BUT never too many at once as that strains income.
- ALL Independent Colonies. Techs, cash, new world colonization types, empire bonuses.
- 80% Quality or better worlds first, then lesser worlds but preferably >60%.
- Systems that grab key control regions. Even then it had better be REALLY strategically valuable to colonize a sub 60% world.

Spread your colonies far and wide to grab strategic control early on especially of rarer resources. Then back fill every reasonable resource or colony.
Using colonies to control and limit expansion of neighboring empires is an often bloodless form of war. You can even nibble away at their control zones.
The Bakuras(sic) Shipyards vastly increase the number of colony ships you can turn out. If you are going to spam the galaxy with colonies they are a necessity.

(in reply to Fenrisfil)
Post #: 5
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/5/2013 5:35:58 PM   
Shark7


Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bingeling

Spreading out is good to "grab territory". Territory gives colony targets and resources that are yours. This is mostly important in early game, though.

As long as I can handle pirates, I would colonize every good colony target I can grab. What are good targets? Those that gives control of useful systems, and colonies with more than 80% quality or such. Do also keep in mind that too many "fresh" colonies at once may make your tax subjects leave your revenue planets to settle at fresh ones of no income, which can hurt quite a bit in the short run.

If you run with corruption, it is all the more reason to colonize good ones near the capital.

The only catch with multiple colonies in a system, is that I am usually too cheap to protect more than one properly ;-)


One could try to control the whole leaving due to taxes thing by manually setting the tax rate at every colony to be the same. It would slow new colony growth, but would provide less incentive for people to leave well established colonies.

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to Bingeling)
Post #: 6
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/6/2013 6:42:15 AM   
buncheesy

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 8/26/2013
Status: offline
Thanks for the replies.

Yep Bakuras shipyards...missed that one

blue...look for blue!

cheers

(in reply to Shark7)
Post #: 7
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/7/2013 11:23:47 PM   
dostillevi

 

Posts: 222
Joined: 8/31/2012
Status: offline
I find it's very worthwhile to get colonies up to max population, and I'll "invest" my income in lowering the tax rate on my homeworld as early on as possible until it maxes out, then jack the rate up to 50-60% to provide the bulk of your early game income. Colonize with the intention of getting your new colonies maxed out before they provide any income at all, and once you have 3 or 4 maxed worlds at 50% taxes you'll have enough money to basically do whatever you want.

(in reply to buncheesy)
Post #: 8
RE: colonization close together good or bad? - 10/7/2013 11:37:36 PM   
Bingeling

 

Posts: 5186
Joined: 8/12/2010
Status: offline
Indeed, high quality and high population are the key to taxable revenue. If one can afford to run zero taxes on some high quality colonies, it will pay off very well in the long run.

(in reply to dostillevi)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> colonization close together good or bad? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.688