Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers Page: <<   < prev  101 102 [103] 104 105   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 6:05:28 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

In db build 447 the range for the HQ-16A is 2-21.59 nm. Shouldn't it be 2-40 nm?


See post at the bottom of this page

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3436106&mpage=99&key=

Will update as data evolves but I think his post and data are closer to reality. The B variant has a better range and probalbly closer to the SA-17.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3061
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 6:06:42 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

Can you add Rafale for India?

France and India signed a contract on Sept 2016 for 36 Rafale. First jets to be delivered in Sept 2019.

http://www.defensenews.com/articles/india-inks-deal-with-france-for-36-rafale-fighter-jets



On our list and will be added when more data is available. My understanding is the system involved might be quite different so best to no rush to get it in.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to orca)
Post #: 3062
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 7:47:25 PM   
Filitch


Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Filitch
Characteristics of active radar seekers of 3M-54 and 3M-14 are different in DB and at the manufacturer's site.


Added to worklist but need a weblink so we can verify.

Thanks!

Mike


What kind of web links you mean? Unfortunately producer of these seekers has no website on English, only on Russian.
Same data is present at Air power Australia But they give no references to the sources.

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3063
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 7:54:26 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Filitch


quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Filitch
Characteristics of active radar seekers of 3M-54 and 3M-14 are different in DB and at the manufacturer's site.


Added to worklist but need a weblink so we can verify.

Thanks!

Mike


What kind of web links you mean? Unfortunately producer of these seekers has no website on English, only on Russian.
Same data is present at Air power Australia But they give no references to the sources.


I need sources to back up changes. Russian links are absolutely fine.

Look at Triode's posts to see what we like. He really does a great job at finding what we need to impliment changes.

Thanks!

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 11/15/2016 7:55:03 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 3064
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 8:28:42 PM   
Filitch


Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

I need sources to back up changes. Russian links are absolutely fine.

Look at Triode's posts to see what we like. He really does a great job at finding what we need to impliment changes.

Thanks!

Mike

I'm not sure, but here you can found a lot of information about these missles http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-818.html
and here http://www.russianarms.ru/forum/index.php/topic,13206.0.html
Seekers data: http://radar-mms.com/Product.aspx?product_7_4 and http://radar-mms.com/Product.aspx?product_7_2

Thanks

< Message edited by Filitch -- 11/15/2016 8:29:11 PM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3065
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 8:33:15 PM   
Filitch


Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
Some pages above there is a post about installing SVP-24 Gefest on the Su-33. mikmyk has requested a photo.
I think this is a first photo Su-33 with FAB-500: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1126120927456643&set=a.178241115577967.39891.100001762398819&type=3&theater

< Message edited by Filitch -- 11/15/2016 8:34:26 PM >

(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 3066
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 11:01:42 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Filitch

Some pages above there is a post about installing SVP-24 Gefest on the Su-33. mikmyk has requested a photo.
I think this is a first photo Su-33 with FAB-500: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1126120927456643&set=a.178241115577967.39891.100001762398819&type=3&theater


Definitely looks like one. Think you can wait a week for a better picture to appear

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 3067
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/15/2016 11:02:52 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Filitch

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

I need sources to back up changes. Russian links are absolutely fine.

Look at Triode's posts to see what we like. He really does a great job at finding what we need to impliment changes.

Thanks!

Mike

I'm not sure, but here you can found a lot of information about these missles http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-818.html
and here http://www.russianarms.ru/forum/index.php/topic,13206.0.html
Seekers data: http://radar-mms.com/Product.aspx?product_7_4 and http://radar-mms.com/Product.aspx?product_7_2

Thanks


Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 3068
PL-10E - 11/16/2016 2:29:41 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
http://3g.china.com/act/military/11132797/20161116/30040986.html (simplified Chinese)

Detail of PL-10E WVRAAM mentioned by Lead Designer Leung:

PL-10 should be called PL-10E
Range should reduce to 10.8nm (20km) from 15nm
Infrared imaging guidance
>60G


_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3069
RE: PL-10E - 11/16/2016 2:44:53 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

http://3g.china.com/act/military/11132797/20161116/30040986.html (simplified Chinese)

Detail of PL-10E WVRAAM mentioned by Lead Designer Leung:

PL-10 should be called PL-10E
Range should reduce to 10.8nm (20km) from 15nm
Infrared imaging guidance
>60G



Added


_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3070
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/16/2016 11:27:09 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Filitch

Some pages above there is a post about installing SVP-24 Gefest on the Su-33. mikmyk has requested a photo.
I think this is a first photo Su-33 with FAB-500: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1126120927456643&set=a.178241115577967.39891.100001762398819&type=3&theater


Definitely looks like one. Think you can wait a week for a better picture to appear

Mike


How about one day? Will give it a few more as I'm guessing it could carry at least 2 more bombs.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3071
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/16/2016 4:29:39 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline
I'd be more keen to see it actually taking off with bombs...

_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3072
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/16/2016 4:38:03 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hellfish6

I'd be more keen to see it actually taking off with bombs...


Yeah odds are pretty good we'll see pictures soon.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 3073
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/16/2016 6:14:54 PM   
Filitch


Posts: 423
Joined: 6/25/2016
From: St. Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
Why not? 2 x FAB-500M-54 weight 960 kg. At many videos Su-33 takes off with light loadout - 2 x R-73 + 2 x R-27 weighting about 900 kg. No problem to take off.

Colleague Triode posted many photos of Su-33. http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4181909
Maninly Strike land loadout - 2 x R-73 + 2 x FAB-500M-54.

< Message edited by Filitch -- 11/16/2016 6:28:46 PM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3074
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/16/2016 8:03:36 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Filitch

Why not? 2 x FAB-500M-54 weight 960 kg. At many videos Su-33 takes off with light loadout - 2 x R-73 + 2 x R-27 weighting about 900 kg. No problem to take off.

Colleague Triode posted many photos of Su-33. http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4181909
Maninly Strike land loadout - 2 x R-73 + 2 x FAB-500M-54.


Got it. Please be patient.

Thanks!

Mike


_____________________________


(in reply to Filitch)
Post #: 3075
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/17/2016 4:23:53 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
First video evidence that the J-10B or C can conduct SEAD with YJ-91/Kh-31P ARMs. A first for the entire J-10 series. Also, note the blue PL-10 dummy on its starboard wing's outmost pylon.

Video of the recent "Red Sword" air combat excercise of the PLAAF in link:
https://twitter.com/OedoSoldier/status/799261161271095296





This is quite a significant uograde of the J-10's multirole capability.

< Message edited by Hongjian -- 11/17/2016 4:25:26 PM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3076
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/17/2016 4:26:08 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Yeah saw this one today. Will be added.

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3077
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/17/2016 5:53:19 PM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

First video evidence that the J-10B or C can conduct SEAD with YJ-91/Kh-31P ARMs. A first for the entire J-10 series. Also, note the blue PL-10 dummy on its starboard wing's outmost pylon.


Are there any minor differences between the Kh31p and the YJ91 or are they the exact same thing?

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3078
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/18/2016 2:12:17 AM   
GrimGrom

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 11/7/2015
Status: offline
Do you plan to update the entry for BUK M3 system, as it entered the service few weeks ago?

At the moment, DB is showing no difference between M2 and M3, while open sources are indicating increased performances, PoH, and new electronics.

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 3079
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/18/2016 1:09:54 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GrimGrom

Do you plan to update the entry for BUK M3 system, as it entered the service few weeks ago?

At the moment, DB is showing no difference between M2 and M3, while open sources are indicating increased performances, PoH, and new electronics.


Sure. Could you post those open sources.

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to GrimGrom)
Post #: 3080
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/18/2016 1:26:13 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

First video evidence that the J-10B or C can conduct SEAD with YJ-91/Kh-31P ARMs. A first for the entire J-10 series. Also, note the blue PL-10 dummy on its starboard wing's outmost pylon.


Are there any minor differences between the Kh31p and the YJ91 or are they the exact same thing?



Suppossedly, the latest YJ-91 block has a modernized seeker that can engage more types of radar frequencies without changing them out before mission (which would require it to be sent back to factory again). And the range has been updated from 120km to 150km in the newest variant.

But me thinks that the YJ-91 has reached the end of its service, as the PLAAF thinks that using such a relatively large missile to smack radars is overkill. The new compact and more HARM-like CM-102 seems to have won the favor of the Chinese airforce to eventually replace the YJ-91 as mainstay ARM.

(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 3081
RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers - 11/18/2016 2:15:39 PM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian


quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

First video evidence that the J-10B or C can conduct SEAD with YJ-91/Kh-31P ARMs. A first for the entire J-10 series. Also, note the blue PL-10 dummy on its starboard wing's outmost pylon.


Are there any minor differences between the Kh31p and the YJ91 or are they the exact same thing?



Suppossedly, the latest YJ-91 block has a modernized seeker that can engage more types of radar frequencies without changing them out before mission (which would require it to be sent back to factory again). And the range has been updated from 120km to 150km in the newest variant.

But me thinks that the YJ-91 has reached the end of its service, as the PLAAF thinks that using such a relatively large missile to smack radars is overkill. The new compact and more HARM-like CM-102 seems to have won the favor of the Chinese airforce to eventually replace the YJ-91 as mainstay ARM.



Thank you very much

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3082
RE: PL-10E - 11/18/2016 8:54:35 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

http://3g.china.com/act/military/11132797/20161116/30040986.html (simplified Chinese)

Detail of PL-10E WVRAAM mentioned by Lead Designer Leung:

PL-10 should be called PL-10E
Range should reduce to 10.8nm (20km) from 15nm
Infrared imaging guidance
>60G




Eh, I'm against changing the name into PL-10E, since it is clearly the export designation.

Just like the recently unveiled Y-9E export aircraft, or the YJ-9E export lightweight anti-ship missile etc.

As for range, it is said that it has 'more than 20km', so I wouldnt use that as face value.


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3083
RE: PL-10E - 11/19/2016 4:23:20 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian


Eh, I'm against changing the name into PL-10E, since it is clearly the export designation.

Just like the recently unveiled Y-9E export aircraft, or the YJ-9E export lightweight anti-ship missile etc.

As for range, it is said that it has 'more than 20km', so I wouldnt use that as face value.



http://news.takungpao.com/mainland/focus/2016-10/3386219_print.html (Traditional Chinese)
Could be true for the E part. There isn't any showcase specs. before.

Leung said IR missile can theoretically extend missile range easily, but not for pilot eyes or IR seeker to lock on that far. It's basically BVR range when it's above 12nm. I might be wrong, but it's a safe bet to use PL-10 same as other WVRs, above that range is a blind fire.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 11/19/2016 4:24:06 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 3084
BATRAL Class - 11/21/2016 10:16:47 PM   
Joel

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 5/18/2000
From: France
Status: offline
Hello,

There is a small issue with the BATRAL class ships (France). It is listed in game as having 3 helo pads and 1 hangar for 4 medium aircraft, whereas in real life it only has 1 pad for medium helicopter and no hangar.


http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/18230335.jpg

http://img7.hostingpics.net/pics/210242BATRAL_Dumont_d__Urville.jpg


Keep up the good work with CMANO !

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 3085
RE: GWS.35 Sea Ceptor - 11/23/2016 2:53:03 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
http://www.janes.com/article/65385/uk-confirms-sea-ceptor-order-for-type-26-programme
For consideration:

Still trying to find how Janes have reached this conclusion but apparently its in an official UK MOD procurement document which I will post the link to in due course.

Sea Ceptor is GWS.35.

DB3k is showing mount as GWS.xx. Plus not capable against surface vessels?

The MBDA product PDF also states Sea Ceptor is also capable of engaging;
• "Wide air target set plus the ability to engage small naval craft"
http://www.mbda-systems.com/maritime-superiority/sea-ceptor/

Given that this is a state of the art system with high end processors sensors etc it seems likely it can target surface vessels.
Who needs Harpoons when you can close to within 25km of surface target and fire off a shower of missiles with a tiny warhead designed to knock out missiles and aircraft, what could possibly go wrong!

Regards

K

(in reply to Joel)
Post #: 3086
F-16 Upgrade information - 11/24/2016 1:20:39 AM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline
The Government of the ROK requested a possible sale for the upgrade of 134 KF-16C/D Block 52 aircraft, to include:

150 Modular Mission Computers (MMC 7000AH),
150 Active Electronically Scanned Array Radars (AESA),
150 AN/APX-125 or equivalent Advanced Identification Friend or Foe (AIFF) Systems,
150 LN-260 Embedded Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation Systems,
150 Upgraded Radar Warning Receivers (RWR),
150 AN/ALQ-213 EW Management Units,
3 Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) II Group C Helmets,
150 JHMCS II Group A and B, 31 Joint Mission Planning Systems (JMPS),
5 GBU-54 Laser Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM),
5 KMU-57C/B Bomb Tail Kits,
2 GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb Guided Test Vehicles,
8 GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb Tactical Training Rounds,
2 BRU-61 Small Diameter Bomb Common Carriage Assemblies,
5 MK-82 General Purpose Practice Bombs, 2 Joint Programmable Fuzes,
2 CBU-105 Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser (WCMD) Sensor Fuzed Weapons (SFW),
1 CNU-411C/E, WCMD Container,
2 ATM-65 Maverick Training Missiles,
2 ATM-84 Harpoon Block II Training Missiles,
2 AGM-84 Harpoon Block II Guidance Units,
2 CATM-9X-2 Captive Air Training Missiles, and
1 AIM-9X-2 Guidance Unit.

Also included are containers, missile support and test equipment, provisioning, spare and repair parts, personnel training and training equipment, publications and technical documentation, U.S. Government and contractor technical support services, and other related elements of logistics and program support. The total estimated cost is $2.5 billion.


The Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States has requested a retrofit of 145 F-16A/B aircraft that includes sale of:

176 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars;
176 Embedded Global Positioning System Inertial Navigation Systems;
176 ALQ-213 Electronic Warfare Management systems;
upgrade 82 ALQ-184 Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) pods to incorporate Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) technology
or purchase new ECM pods (AN/ALQ-211(V)9 Airborne Integrated Defensive Electronic Warfare Suites (AIDEWS) with DRFM, or AN/ALQ-131 pods with DRFM);
86 tactical data link terminals;
upgrade 28 electro-optical infrared targeting Sharpshooter pods;
26 AN/AAQ-33 SNIPER Targeting Systems or AN/AAQ-28 LITENING Targeting Systems;
128 Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing Systems;
128 Night Vision Goggles;
140 AIM-9X SIDEWINDER Missiles;
56 AIM-9X Captive Air Training Missiles;
5 AIM-9X Telemetry kits;
16 GBU-31V1 Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) kits;
80 GBU-38 JDAM kits;
Dual Mode/ Global Positioning System Laser-Guided Bombs (16 GBU-10 Enhanced PAVEWAY II or GBU-56 Laser JDAM, 80 GBU-12 Enhanced PAVEWAY II or GBU-54 Laser JDAM, 16 GBU-24 Enhanced PAVEWAY III);
64 CBU-105 Sensor Fused Weapons with Wind-Corrected Munition Dispensers (WDMD);
153 LAU-129 Launchers with missile interface;
upgrade of 158 APX-113 Advanced Identification Friend or Foe Combined Interrogator Transponders;
and HAVE GLASS II applications.

Also included are: ammunition, alternate mission equipment, engineering and design study on replacing existing F100-PW-220 engines with F100-PW-229 engines, update of Modular Mission Computers, cockpit multifunction displays, communication equipment, Joint Mission Planning Systems, maintenance, construction, repair and return, aircraft tanker support, aircraft ferry services, aircraft and ground support equipment, spare and repair parts, publications and technical documentation, personnel training and training equipment, U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support, test equipment, site surveys, and other related elements of logistics support. The estimated cost is $5.3 billion.


The Government of Singapore has requested an upgrade of 60 F-16C/D/D+ aircraft. The upgrades will address reliability, supportability, and combat effectiveness concerns associated with its aging F-16 fleet. The items being procured in this proposed sale include:

70 Active Electronically Scanned Array Radars (AESA)
70 LN-260 Embedded Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation Systems
(GPS/INS)
70 Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing Systems (JHMCS)
70 APX-125 Advanced Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) Combined Interrogator
Transponders
3 AIM-9X Block II Captive Air Training Missiles
3 TGM-65G Maverick Missiles for testing and integration
4 GBU-50 Guided Bomb Units (GBU) for testing and integration
5 GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munitions for testing and integration
3 CBU-105 (D-4)/B Sensor Fused Weapons for testing and integration
1 AIS Interface Test Adapters for software updates
1 Classified Computer Program Identification Numbers (CPINs)
4 GBU-49 Enhanced Paveways for testing and integration
2 DSU-38 Laser Seekers for testing and integration
6 GBU-12 Paveway II, Guidance Control Units

Also included are Modular Mission Computers, a software maintenance facility, cockpit multifunction displays, radios, secure communications, video recorders; a Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS); maintenance, repair and return, aircraft and ground support equipment, spare and repair parts, tool and test equipment; engine support equipment, publications and technical documentation; aerial refueling support, aircraft ferry services, flight test; personnel training and training equipment, site surveys, construction, U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services, and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated cost is $2.43 billion.


http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/republic-korea-rok-kf-16-upgrade-program
http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/taipei-economic-and-cultural-representative-office-united-states-retrofit-f-16ab
http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/singapore-f-16-block-52-upgrade

< Message edited by jun5896 -- 11/24/2016 1:24:48 AM >

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 3087
Canadian Requests - 11/24/2016 4:27:27 AM   
cdnice


Posts: 179
Joined: 5/7/2009
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
Just a wish list, * denote top requests

RCN

*AOR Resolve - http://federalfleet.ca/2016/06/02/resolve-class-aor/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Asterix#Project_Resolve
*AOR Queenston Class (Modified Berlin)- http://www.navy-marine.forces.gc.ca/en/fleet-units/jss-home.page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queenston-class_auxiliary_vessel

CCG

CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCGS_Louis_S._St-Laurent http://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/Fleet/Vessel?vessel_id=81
CCGS John G. Diefenbaker - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCGS_John_G._Diefenbaker

Bell-429 SAR/Light Transport - x16 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_429_GlobalRanger
Bell-412 SAR/Medium Transport - x 7 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_412 http://news.gc.ca/web/article-en.do?mthd=tp&crtr.page=1&nid=961019

RCAF

CC-115 Buffalo - Transport/SAR - http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/aircraft-current/cc-115.page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-5_Buffalo
CC-138 Twin Otter - Transport/SAR - http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/aircraft-current/cc-138.page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-6_Twin_Otter
CC-144 Challenger - Transport - http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/aircraft-current/cc-144.page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_Challenger_600_series
*CH-146 Griffon - x85 Transport http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/aircraft-current/ch-146.page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_CH-146_Griffon
*CH-146 Griffon - x8 Armed Escort http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/Canada-Sending-Armed-Bell-412s-to-Afghanistan-05183/
CH-146 Griffon - x15 SAR

Bases

CFB Trenton http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/8-wing/index.page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFB_Trenton

Thank you for your consideration.

_____________________________



(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 3088
F-5 variants - 11/26/2016 4:14:11 PM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline
RF-5E Tigereye
Single-seat reconnaissance version of the F-5E fighter. The RF-5E Tigereye was exported to Saudi Arabia and Malaysia.

RF-5E Tigergazer
Seven upgraded single-seat reconnaissance version of the F-5E for Taiwan by ST Aerospace.

RF-5S Tigereye
Single-seat reconnaissance version of the F-5S for the Republic of Singapore Air Force.

F-5N
Ex-Swiss Air Force F-5Es used by the U.S. Navy as "aggressor" aircraft, with AN/APG-69 replacing the original AN/APQ-159. Intended to replace high-time USN/USMC F-5Es in the adversary role, and see service through to 2015.

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=1100&tid=1050&ct=1

F-5S
Upgraded version of the F-5E in use by the Republic of Singapore Air Force, equipped with the Galileo Avionica's FIAR Grifo-F X-band radar and are capable of firing the AIM-120 AMRAAM.[48][31][49]

-> no AMRAAM in database.

F-5T Tigris
Upgraded version of the F-5E of Royal Thai Air Force by Israel, also armed with EL/M-2032.

F-5E Tiger 2000
Upgraded version of Taiwan AIDC, equipped with the GD-53 radar, capable of firing the TC-2 Sky Sword II, MIL-STD-1553B Link and GPS/INS

-> upgrade variants

KF-5E
F-5E built in South Korea for Republic of Korea Air Force. First introduction: September 1982; 48 built.

KF-5F
F-5F built in South Korea for Republic of Korea Air Force. First introduction: September 1982; 20 built.


-> KF-5 are equipped an/apq-159. It is different variants.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_F-5

< Message edited by jun5896 -- 11/26/2016 4:37:25 PM >

(in reply to cdnice)
Post #: 3089
RE: F-5 variants - 11/26/2016 7:44:57 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
J-10C with PL-15 and PL-10 spotted.

Fuzzy photo only, but yeah...



(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 3090
Page:   <<   < prev  101 102 [103] 104 105   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: 3M-54, -14 active radar seekers Page: <<   < prev  101 102 [103] 104 105   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.406