Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: T35 nearing the end of the blizzard

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: T35 nearing the end of the blizzard Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: T35 nearing the end of the blizzard - 12/30/2013 8:58:20 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		rmonical you may have done some things wrong, but the raw math is daunting no matter what you do. If the game is designed in a way that makes it likely the Soviet player will have 6 million men and the Germans 4 million, and a loss ratio of 2 Soviets for 1 German is built into the combat system, then the soviets are 2 million men shy. I'm not saying the loss ratio is built in at 2 to 1, but it should be built in at some level because it was there historically, and that may be creating a design problem. Or maybe its not, the game is complex to the point that it baffles many of the people playing it, and even very analytical players are missing large parts of what is going on.

I do plan on playing somewhat differently from the way you played in 1942, we'll see what happens. Thanks for posting your aar, its been informative.

(in reply to rmonical)
Post #: 331
RE: T35 nearing the end of the blizzard - 12/30/2013 11:57:04 PM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Hunter

If the game is designed in a way that makes it likely the Soviet player will have 6 million men and the Germans 4 million, and a loss ratio of 2 Soviets for 1 German is built into the combat system, then the soviets are 2 million men shy. I'm not saying the loss ratio is built in at 2 to 1, but it should be built in at some level because it was there historically, and that may be creating a design problem. Or maybe its not, the game is complex to the point that it baffles many of the people playing it, and even very analytical players are missing large parts of what is going on.


I wouldnt say thats designed to be that way. The generally accepted until at leased half a year ago. Changes has been made since with some stuff going forth and back balance wise. Since AAR/interrest has vained apparently until recently there hasnt been alot of material to judge from.

Non the less as said of a half a year ago the accepted number u needed to have have was at leased 7 to 7.5m men come summer 42 as russian. To have any chance to stop / slow the inlarged german army against those that knew how to use it. That was certainly attainble in most cases. Ofc depending on how 41 went. U would in cases see ppl geting more if teh german did badly in 41.
On the other hand u also saw cases with less than 7m and when u start to get near 6m well ppl generally accepted that, that person was most likely in trouble.

So in most cases u could get higher than the 6m russian figur u mention. The way to achieve that was in many cases some form of utter force presevation ie running. As u cant rely on the in game reinforcement/replacements to sacrific "endless" number of troops and gain repalcements to make up for that. That forces a force presevation mentallity, which is quite the opposite of the historic, as ofc any one playing russian side as german side wants to win and ppl learned in order to survive 42 and the dynamics of 42 in game u needed a bigger than historic army.
Here in comes the problem. Im in no way opposed, quite the opposite, to getting a more historic feel for the 41 campaign which seems to be the general consensus ppl wants tho im not as certain what exactly it means is teh same to all. What i think is non sense is just substitude one set of problems with another set of problems.
If u dont get some more comprehensive thinking going. Acknowledging if making it harder/less running for russians in 41, making blizzard as done less harsh. U alter what will happen later on in this case 42 and as they dynamcis in 42 is alrdy off. All things given less german casulties and lost territoty by a mild blizzard rules plays directly into balancing comming out of the blizzard and the "faulty" dynmamics of teh 42 campaign all things given strengthen those issues. Some thing has to be done to this. Else u indeed end up sustituting one set of issues with anotehr set of issues and u havent IMO really made much progress.

Do ppl as russian then survive 42 and gets on the offensive as russians. Then the russian side gets to benefit of the same issues with the combat engine.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 332
RE: T35 nearing the end of the blizzard - 12/31/2013 4:44:59 AM   
rmonical

 

Posts: 2474
Joined: 4/1/2011
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

rmonical you may have done some things wrong, but the raw math is daunting no matter what you do.

Soviets have a material and monpower advantage. In this case, my manpower problems meant I had an armaments surplus. I was more focused on keeping a plus balance in trucks than in deploying my tanks. I built too many rifle corps and not enough cavalry and tank corps. Given my positive armaments situation and personnel problems, I should have built a lot more cavalry corps filled with tank battalions. I stopped at 5 tank corps. I should have built 10-15.

I might have achieved a draw.

Hooooper has shown me that even on the defensive as Soviet, I should accept more low odds attacks.

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 333
T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 4:17:21 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		I think I need to keep Saper222 moving slowly in the South, so I plan a fighting withdrawal. To prep for the Summer I’ve been building defensive lines and holding points. I don’t think I can fight in the open, but fighting in trench lines worked fairly well in 1941, and the Red Army is bigger and more powerful than it was then. I’m also playing a lot better, which is probably the biggest change in the game since the start.

There are no factories on this map, further North everything is gone except some of the factories in Saratov and Gorky, but even those two are mostly empty and will be fully evacuated by the end of Mud maybe earlier.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to rmonical)
Post #: 334
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 4:30:45 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		In the center I destroyed the German rail net as far as Kharkov, I don’t think Saper222 is going to push here, and I am a bit light in troops forward, so I am pulling back. There is some possibility he will try to bag my retreating troops (he got 1 cavalry corps this turn) by moving into the open space East of Kharkov or due east into the screening force. He has several motorized inf divisions there, I do not know the location of most of his pnz divisions. I’ve got one of my better Cav armies rested at a point where he will have used 20mps, I think that will be enough to keep the situation under control for a turn if he tries something.

Farther back you can see the fort lines taking shape. In additions to the North – South lines across Saper222s front I am putting in a few East West lines to see if I can restrict the movement of his pnzs when they break through.

All these lines are started in the expectation that the main fronts will move back into them over the course of the Summer.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 335
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 4:44:39 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		In the center I am pulling back to the rail head across most of the front, but staying in contact at Moscow where I have troops in the suburbs and lots of L2 forts. I expect to retreat here too, but maybe not yet. I’ve loaded the area up with fighters to see if I can shift the air battles my way for a turn or two. Saper222 has been winning the air battle for a few turns, but I was winning it for a few turns before that, so we will see if this moves things my way.

Over all I am experimenting with these hexes to see if the combination of lots of reserves, L2 forts and big air commitment can mess up the German advance. The rule book says brigades are more likely to commit to a reserve action than divisions, so I am moving in strong brigades and reorganizing the armies a bit in this area as well.

I figure I have a few turns of snow to experiment and then some turns of mud to recover if the experiment goes poorly.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 336
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 4:54:18 PM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline 		When clear weather arrives, your cavalry corps will be too close to the front. You should be prepared to back them off. Also, you should merge all available cavalry divisions into corps now. Give them all a couple sapper regiments.

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 337
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 4:58:18 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		In the far North I have been making guard units by killing Fins. I’ve been pulling some of these divisions out and replacing them with Stavka reserves to keep my Guard number growing. I’ve also got at least a few good moral infantry units, and as the last map shows I’ve got one army resting in the rear, and should soon have one or two others. Over all I am late to the game of creating guards, and there are only 15 guards divisions on the map, I’ve got another 10 that are likely to convert soon, and more are climbing the ladder because of my success in the North.

The Fins are down below 260,000 troops and get hit by a few hard attacks per turn that Saper222 seems unable (or perhaps to bored) to stop. I’m sending in a new army or two to cover the flank and going to continue pushing in the direction of Leningrad. I don’t really expect to take it, but I have local superiority in everything, and I do think this will pull some German troops North at some point.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 338
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 5:13:06 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		Finally the ground combat report. To my great delight I finally had a bombing mission that looks like a German bombing mission. I've been playing air more conservatively the past few turns because Saper222s deployments were superior to mine starting in February. I've been reorganizing my air to go back on the offensive, but that has been complicated by the disbanding of the SAD airbases. I think I will be ready to hit Saper222 again in T38, if all goes well I will have the advantage while he moves air around to counter for a couple of turns, and then we will start the process again.

By the end of the game I suspect we will both be running our airforces at a faster tempo than many of the games I see in other AARs.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 339
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 6:59:13 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		@M60 Thanks, I am in the process of pulling back, and its snow then mud then clear, so there is a lot of time between now and clear. How far back do you keep the cav? any screenshots you can share?

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 340
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 12/31/2013 9:25:23 PM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline 		It depends on the strength of your front line defense. If you have a strong defense in depth, you can stay around five hexes. Here is an example where a German breakthrough has taken place but my counterattacking forces are intact.


(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 341
T38 things get warmer - 1/2/2014 2:08:27 AM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		Saper222 has hit me hard and surrounded a lot of my troops, and I suspect that the math of a 5.9 million man Red Army vs a 4 million man German army will not work no matter how I play, but its still a very interesting game, at least for me.

As I mentioned in T37 I have been pounding the Fins to improve the quality of the Red Army. That is because wins boost moral and create guards units. I also wrote about shifting air forces around to gain advantage, saying Saper222 had the advantage for the last few turns, and I had it prior to T35 or 34. This turn some of the work I have been doing on the airforce paid off. The Fins continue to be battered, but look what happens to the German HE111s and Ju88s. I have only just started moving for the turn, so I don't know how things will go, but its certainly a nice result to see.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 342
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/2/2014 3:49:41 AM   
topeverest


Posts: 3376
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Houston, TX - USA
Status: offline 		And here I thought I had something to look forward to in 42 from an interdiction perspective.




[/quote]


_____________________________

Andy M

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 343
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/2/2014 6:03:55 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		I was late to start training my airforce, you can start earlier and do more damage sooner.

(in reply to topeverest)
Post #: 344
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/2/2014 9:43:45 PM   
carlkay58

 

Posts: 8650
Joined: 7/25/2010
Status: offline 		Not really by much. The rules stipulate Soviet performance in 41 is minimal, slight increase through early 42, March 42 and later (or is it Apr?) will be normal finally.

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 345
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/3/2014 1:00:56 AM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		Not to pick a fight, but I've boosted the over all quality of the Red Airforce by 20 or 30 experience points and a similar increase in moral. Maybe you are thinking of ground units? Those are governed by national moral and improvements are limited.

Even if the performance is limited by the rules, its still better to go into March (or April or any other month) with high moral high experience units. Topeverest should begin training his pilots as soon as possible.

(in reply to carlkay58)
Post #: 346
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/3/2014 6:30:26 AM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline 		Actaully u are both correct or can be. There indeed and that is what Carl eludes too, hardcoded limits on number of aircrafts that is engages/flies for the soviet air units early on.

That limits their oprational use by limiting their numbers, but it doesnt necesarrily limit the ability to train(gain exp) which u can do from early on. As we dont see the specifics of how Tom does it, non the less Tom's results reminds me of mine own.
As u can only gain exp if ur moral is higher than the exp u can if u use ur soviet airforce "correctly", cycling out units to keep moral up, use night bombings and other types of attacking that doesnt crash units moral lvl. U can indeed start to train ur airforce from close to teh get go.
I've seen many that at least in their comments seem to use the soviet airforce in a way that grinds the moral of teh individual units down. If u do that u cant gain exp. If u micromanage/keep cycling units in with a moral at certain points over their exp then u can train those units by using them.
Not only that. Its my experience that moral can only go a certain distance above the exp even when resting. U wont see a exp 40 get moral 99 even if i u leave it during the entire war in national reserve. Once a unit gets higher up in exp u can start to see the potential maxing out moral too. So it becomes a self increasing system over time.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 1/3/2014 7:34:55 AM >

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 347
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/3/2014 4:53:59 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		Rasmus you have explained some things I have been grappling with. Every turn I cycle low moral air groups into reserve and higher moral group back into the battle. I try to avoid taking huge casualties unless I am grinding up the Germans because it takes moral and experience down. Sometimes huge casualties happen anyway, or I gamble and lose. I did not realize that moral and experience were linked, knowing that I can probably gain experience a bit quicker.

As a rule of thumb it seems that moral and experience do not grow if my airforce takes more than three or 4% casualties in a turn. At 2% they seem to keep improving. That is not a tactical goal, its more of a useful rule of thumb.

(in reply to Walloc)
Post #: 348
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/3/2014 7:40:58 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
quote:

Saper222 has hit me hard and surrounded a lot of my troops


Can you show the (ugly?) details of this?  I am curious how bad the situation is and if you are in position to rescue the pocketed units.

How many German units did you trap during the winter?

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 349
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/4/2014 4:17:05 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		The biggest problem I am having is time, it took me 5 or 6 hours to make the move. Very careful thought and carefully looking at everything you do really pays as the Soviets, but it way too time consuming. Some of the very time consuming things that help the Soviets win

Before merging a unit check how many victories it has won, this gets you more guards

At the start of a turn rotate air units in an out of national reserve based on their moral and experience

Evaluate the rail net and its effect on supply while considering where to attack, defend or run

Change plane types on certain air units to keep the groups flying with optimal strength

Check locations of air recon units to keep coverage over the whole front

Review ground units for merging opportunities, looking for units with low troop numbers and large numbers of victories, so you can get guards units and make them larger

Check on generals, especially replacement generals to be sure you have adequate quality on the front

This is all done before any movement or combat or even recon, because once you start to move you start to lose the opportunity to do these things.

Once missions start, here are a few more:

Convert air units from day missions to night missions, drop supply, then convert them back to day missions to support daylight bombing. I’ve been unable to get escorts to fly with supply missions (I’m still figuring out which airbases need which planes to do what) so this has been necessary

When launching air units attacks click around on multiple airbases to get the optimal attack. Selecting a different base can cause a shift of several hundred planes in the attack

@ Jwolf I keep a save of the turn Saper222 sends, then I overwrite as I go (no redoing moves that way) so I don’t have the view from the end of my turn, this is the view at the end of Saper222s. I added some notes about how the turn went for me.

I'm pretty sure I mis understood the manuals description of the effect of snow on German movement, so I am not really where I want to be, I should have broken contact a turn earlier. On the other hand I don't think Saper222 planned to launch the offensive that he chose to launch, I think he felt (correctly) that he had an opportunity and went for it. So its a lot wilder than many of our previous turns most of which are very controlled by both of us.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 350
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/4/2014 4:29:08 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		This is where my miscalculation on the movement really hurt, I counted hexes as I moved T38, but did not screen the flanks of these armies successfully.

I’m counter attacking here to try for a rescue, and in the hopes of banging up the Germans. The big question is how much of this force Saper222 can kill quickly and how effective can I be ahead of my rail head, which is too far to the rear for my liking in this area.

I’m well aware this could be a game losing move, but I am much more interested in how the Red Army does than I am in winning the game per say. So we will see what I can get done and how the counter attacks go. When I started the game and AAR it was to learn the game, which I am still doing. However the huge amount of time it takes to play it well has gotten me to the point of regretting the $80 I spent on it. So this is more of a one time thing, and I am trying for the rescue partly because the game will be much more fun it if works than it will be if I run away. So my strategy is not driven by the victory conditions, its driven by my desire to have a good time. The attack is more fun, if it does not work a dissatisfying experience is likely to end sooner, and if it works then the experience is not dissatisfying.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 351
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/4/2014 4:41:27 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		Saper222 is going to try to win the game in the South, that has been obvious for many turns, so he has no armor in the North. Around Moscow there was very little action by either of us, mostly just moves to consolidate the lines.

Rasumus’s post a page back about the number of Germans on the map is the really important thing to think about here. With a 4 million man army Saper222 can launch a slow rolling infantry offensive in this area and advance with his rail head all Summer. It’s 30 hexes from Moscow to Gorky and I think it is very possible for him to advance that far. My best strategy for stopping that is to beat up his armies where they are weak and take cities somewhere else. That is the best strategy because of the combat engine design, winning is much more likely than losing on the attack, so that is what I am going to do.

I think that is a huge design flaw, because the Soviets are missing so many troops from their army. But I am not sure it is, because so many systems interrelate in ways that the designers clearly did not anticipate that its not really possible to know. One of the things I am doing as I play is to search for options Saper222 may not really understand, in the hopes of finding things that tilt the odds in my favor. Of course he has an advantage in this area, but I’ve already surprised him a few times, once or twice on the ground and more frequently in the air.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 352
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/4/2014 4:51:10 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		In the far North I continue to smash the Fins, they seem to be reaching the critical point of losing moral in an accelerating cycle. I’m thinking hard about putting my armored corps up here to blitz them in early summer.
The troops Saper222 threatened with encirclement all walked away, and a new shock army came up. I was disappointed that their attack on the mobile brigade failed, but they were out on the end of a long supply line and had relatively low TOE.

I notice that my higher TOE units win more even when the troop numbers are the same. Saper222 and Flaviusx both advocate stronger divisions and weak support, and this is a strong argument in favor of their position if its true. Right now its just an impression on my part. I have been trying to build fewer, larger units, as I get pushed back onto my own rail net that will be easier and I think it will help me kill more of Saper222’s troops.

The other thing to note about the attack on the Fins is I have the rail repaired right up to the front. That makes a huge difference. My truck numbers are 117k (101k) but the rail supply is still king.





Over all my strategic thinking is to try for the rescue, then retreat back onto my own rail lines during the mud.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Tom Hunter -- 1/4/2014 5:52:15 PM >

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 353
RE: T37 Disengaging here and there - 1/5/2014 9:55:26 AM   
Toidi

 

Posts: 200
Joined: 8/31/2011
Status: offline 		You need to be very careful in order to avoid the automatic loss by VP. 260 VP for Axis and the game is over... After losing Moscow, you cannot afford to lose too many cities...

Besides, do not fall into trap of attacking where Axis is weak. You need to fight with all your might where his tanks are - just do it skillfully, so he cannot encircle your best troops. Just keep them far enough, so they can counter attack when needed. Farming morale is fine, but once guards, those units need to be transferred where they are needed most, i.e. defense in depth for the panzers (that means having checkerboard lines 10 hexes deep)

And attack those tanks, attack, attack relentlessly. Even when you lose, just attack those tanks.

When your troops are encircled, attack weaker units. If you win, great, you just get some wounded into your pool and reduced morale and manpower of axis. If you lose, well, maybe he will get an extra morale point (which is bad), but you will get some guys into wounded category - those return back to you as manpower. Once they surrender, fraction of your troops return to axis as hiwis...

You need to wear down his tanks as quickly as you can, you need to wear down his high morale units as quick as you can. You can easily stand against 65-70 morale army. You have tough time against 90 morale units - but every loss of those guys mean loosing 1 or 2 or 3 morale points... Once Axis units are back to national morale, getting up more than to 73-74 is very tough.

And keep all your corps as strictly counter-attacking force, not too close to the front - third line - fourth line of units (that is some 5-8 hexes behind the front, depending on terrain).

Good luck!

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 354
Running away - 1/10/2014 11:24:28 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		So I am afraid the worst has happened, the game is getting boring.
As you all saw I attempted to fight in the snow, the upshot of that is several of my army groups have been surrounded. I think I’ll end up losing 700,000 to a million men.

That does not really bother me, and its not the source of the boredom. What you see on the map is, North of one of the pockets is a rested shock army in good supply. Unfortunately it can’t even advance to contact the germans, much less attack them.

I should have considered this more carefully before following the strategy I chose, and pulling back earlier in winter might have been more successful. All that said, the basic problem is the strategic options are limited, and they are limited in a way that is pretty dull.

I find myself in a Pelton situation, upset with a fundamental aspect of the game. I’m not going to suggest solutions, because I think the solution for me is to finish this one and not buy anything designed by Gary Grisby.
I had this problem playing the AI too, but thought a human player would be more interesting. Saper222 has made it more interesting, he plays a great game, but his skill and the entertainment it provides does not change the focus of the design.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to Toidi)
Post #: 355
RE: Running away - 1/11/2014 12:03:45 AM   
Peltonx


Posts: 7250
Joined: 4/9/2006
Status: offline 		Moral is King of the Battle Field.

How many men you have or how much equipment you have is important, but no wheres near as much as moral.



_____________________________

Beta Tester WitW & WitE

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 356
RE: Running away - 1/11/2014 12:05:58 AM   
hfarrish

 

Posts: 734
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
Is it possible to see a before screenshot of that region? Would be instructive.


_____________________________


(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 357
RE: Running away - 1/11/2014 12:16:25 AM   
Michael T


Posts: 4443
Joined: 10/22/2006
From: Queensland, Australia.
Status: offline 		Tom, I would suggest you look at Ron Dockal's up and coming WWII Europe game when it is released. Sometime this year perhaps.

_____________________________


(in reply to hfarrish)
Post #: 358
RE: Running away - 1/11/2014 12:17:02 AM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline 		@hfarrish I'm afraid I don't have the before screenshots. One of my big problems with the game is the sheer amount of time it burns to play well, and adding screenshots to that has not been possible lately because of work issues.


(in reply to hfarrish)
Post #: 359
RE: Running away - 1/11/2014 12:31:30 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Tom, you are bored and disillusioned with this game in large part because you're screwed and have been screwed for quite some time. The reality is only starting to sink in.

You made a terrible mistake in agreeing to play this thing out. It was never going to have a happy ending. Resign. And play somebody at your own level next time -- whether that game is WITE or something else.





_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 360
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: T35 nearing the end of the blizzard Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.424