Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Room for one more...

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Opponents wanted >> Room for one more... Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Room for one more... - 1/24/2003 9:59:05 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		Scenario 17.
Allied or IJN.
Variable arrival times.
100% force levels.
IJN sub doctrine off.
House rules desired:
1) Allied 4E bombers not allowed to be used tactically at 1000ft or lower.
2) Only night ops allowed by aircraft are by dedicated night fight groups or by bombers on naval ops (until the present effectiveness is fixed as results are WAY out of whack).
3) No sub stacking...ruins the game in my opinion.
4) Subs can only base at Truk, Rabaul, Noumea, Brisbane.

Players able to play more than one turn per day most welcome. I'd like to finish a game faster than it took in reality.:)

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
Post #: 1
- 1/25/2003 12:04:33 AM   
ganthony91

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 8/18/2002
From: Key West, FL
Status: offline 		I will take my northern neighbor to his demise. Terms sound good. Feel free to send a turn if the offer is still open.

[email]dascateer@aol.com[/email]

_____________________________

"Have gone to Florida to fight Indians. Will be back when war is over"
A. Henderson
Col. Commandant

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 2
- 1/25/2003 2:10:13 AM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline 		Hiya Ron,

I'm curious about a couple of your house rules:

<< 1) Allied 4E bombers not allowed to be used tactically at 1000ft or lower. >>

So does this imply that "strategic" bombing (e.g., of a port or airfield) is OK at those altitudes? Or do you mean to rule out all bombing by 4-engine bombings at 1000 feet or lower?

<< 2) Only night ops allowed by aircraft are by dedicated night fight groups or by bombers on naval ops (until the present effectiveness is fixed as results are WAY out of whack). >>

Hmm, so what's an example of a 'dedicated night flight group'?

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 3
- 1/25/2003 9:52:16 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		Grotious. I meant 4e bombers set at 1000 ft or lower. Unless you have some crack Lancasters and a dam to bomb.:)

Night ops. I just don't like the fact that night ops are too common and way too effective(vs bases) at the moment. While this is probably going to be addressed, until it is, I'd prefer night ops limited to naval attack and to units which are dedicated to night ops (P70s etc).

Sub basing restrictions are there simply to loosely simulate the need for adequate facilities to support subs. Right now, one can load torps etc. at any port, even if it is a fallen palm tree with a native clutching a legnth of line.:)

Sub stacking. While this seems to be used to alleviate the lack of "in transit intercept capability" for subs, I believe there are enough "at sea" choke points to merit the no stacking rule. Otherwise, bases turn into colloseums.

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 4
- 1/25/2003 11:31:23 PM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline 		Thanks for the explanation; sounds good to me. I hope we get to read some AARs from you guys.

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 5
full up - 1/26/2003 12:27:15 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		OK GAnthony. Thanks guys.

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 6
uv - 1/27/2003 2:49:40 AM   
AAED

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 1/27/2003
From: Akron, OH
Status: offline 		if u need another opponet- i will give it a shot-contact me at [email]edschreiner@earthlink.net[/email]- thanks for ur attention/ed

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Opponents wanted >> Room for one more... Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.609