How much can you do with the LCS?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

How much can you do with the LCS?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> How much can you do with the LCS?

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 2:45:34 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

Just for fun...

The two LCS platforms get slammed on because they don't have much in the way of teeth. Personally, I'm beginning to think the real problem is they gave these ships the wrong names. No one gets mad at the Wasp-class for not being a "combat" ship. :) They should have called them something like the LOS, "Littoral Operations Ship." These things aren't supposed to engage an enemy directly...their weapons are for self-defense, like those found on an aircraft carrier. If they need to kill something, they send a drone or a helicopter or a boat full of SEALS. They're not supposed to be warships, they're spy ships, anti-piracy ships, minehunters, omg-there's-a-volcano-send-help-good-thing-you-have-a-modular-hospital-you-can-plug-in ships, etc.

So...since it looks like we will end up with anywhere from 24 to 32 of these things, we might as well get some use out of them in Command.

What additional roles can you envision for the two LCS classes?

Obviously, these things could be used to hunt submarines (presumably from a safe distance since they don't have their own torpedoes, only those on their helicopters--I guess you find the sub, launch the chopper, and then head in the opposite directly as quickly as you can) and mines. They could also be used as platforms for launching small and targeted raids (two MH-60s with Hellfires...that could ruin a terrorist's day...).

But what other jobs could the LCS do in Command? Spy ship? Anti-crime/anti-piracy? Hospital ship? The mission bays have 6,000 square feet and 15,000 square feet (LCS-1 and LCS-2 classes, respectively). That's about the same as four or ten medium-sized (1,500-square foot) houses...you could fit dozens of cargo containers in spaces like that. That's a lot of room, and room designed to be have different mission modules built for it and swapped in and out as needed.

So...what could you do if you had that kind of mission space?

Post #: 1

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 5:45:38 PM

dcpollay

Posts: 532
Joined: 11/22/2012
From: Upstate New York USA
Status: offline

Just for fun...I'm going to slam them some more.

I don't think they're getting slammed because they are named incorrectly. Rather, they are being slammed because they are largely incapable of carrying out their promised missions. They are indeed combat ships. They are intended to go in harm's way, and engage hostile subs, patrol boats, pirates, mines, and I'm sure I missed a few others.

But, they have construction problems, structural problems, technical problems, weapon problems, cost problems, and I'm sure I missed a few. My understanding is that the ships will be past a significant portion of their service life before some of the mission modules are ready to use.

They were sold to Congress as being "all things to all people," and although the process is not yet done, they are winding up being "no things to most people." Changing the name is just slapping lipstick on a pig.

As for additional roles, in Command they can be very flexible, since most of the problems I talked about above are disregarded. In real life, they might make nice pierside training ships.

OK, go ahead and flame away.

_____________________________

"It's all according to how your boogaloo situation stands, you understand."

Formerly known as Colonel Mustard, before I got Slitherine Syndrome.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 2

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 5:49:51 PM

orca

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline

Agree completely with your comments. It's not designed as an offefencive combat ship.

Was able to tour USS independence during a public viewing this week. The missin bay is huge. The ships should be very flexible. The modularity will allow them to more easily be upgraded when new weapons are developed.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 3

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 5:59:08 PM

jtoatoktoe

Posts: 208
Joined: 10/9/2013
Status: offline

Well they're suppose to be replacements for Frigates.....the Perry Class had SM-1 and Harpoon before the launchers were taken out. So they maintain their other weapons a cannon, torpedo tubes and a Helo's.
a LCS relies on "modules" which don't seem that impressive. A Anti Submarine Module is probably the only real module for warfare it would pack that's comparable. The Anti ship is suppose to be the Griffin....yeah ok as for anti air its point defense.

They would of been better using the Freedom Class and putting a small VLS system so it could at least carry most modern U.S. Navy weapons. Should also ditch the Independence model though I can see it being more stealthy from a front search.

For the entire fleet i'm also not a fan of them replacing Phalanx with SeaRAM. Yeah its got better range but i'd feel better with hundreds of bullets over 11 missiles in a SeaRam system. As its basically using the same radar system. I'd like to see a combo system.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 4

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 6:14:25 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

(Definitely do not want to use LCS in combat roles if you can help it unless you can give them more weapons...I tried a sample "sandbox" scenario with a "swarm" attack by putting an LCS against 10 7-meter RHIBs armed with machine guns...it did not go well. Generally, the LCS could sink five to seven of the RHIBs, but was then out of ammo. At that point, it was either overwhelmed by the other boats or could survive only by running away. A Burke, on the other hand, had little trouble dispatching all ten attackers.)

(in reply to jtoatoktoe)

Post #: 5

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 6:16:17 PM

Elouda

Posts: 183
Joined: 2/16/2008
From: Helsinki, Finland
Status: offline

One of the things I'm looking at for a future scenario is potential loadouts for these ships;

One of the things I'm considering is the feasibility of installing an 8 cell VLS system for a total of 32 ESSM, and a pair of twin or quad ASM canisters, in exchange for the modular packages. This would make the somewhat useful as light combatants and escorts. Optionally they could retain the ASW gear and still try to squeeze in the VLS for a more capable escort role.

Need to take a look at whats actually possible in terms of space and weight.

As for SeaRAM - while I initially though the same way, at least in command SeaRAM is incredibly good - I just wish it wasnt a choice of either/or, but you could have both in some Kashtan like configuration (I'd probably go for 2x11 launchers and a single 20mm in the middle).

(in reply to jtoatoktoe)

Post #: 6

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 6:25:36 PM

IWS

Posts: 60
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

The LCS is not intended to be a frigate, and adding and integrating VLS, harpoon, torpedos, etc would increase the cost. A lot.

As an example, upgrading the weapons on the Australian Adelaide class frigates (ex Perrys) to include VLS and other improvements cost over US $320m per ship (AU dollar = .9 US dollars at current exchange rates).

From the Wikipedia article on the Adelaide class. The project covered 4 ships:
"In the mid-1990s, the Australian government commenced SEA 1390, also known as the FFG Upgrade Project.[8] Originally costing A$1 billion, which has expanded to A$1.46 billion, the project includes improvements to the combat and fire control system, the sonar suite, and the air defence missiles."

Here's a recent white paper by the Undersecretary of the Navy discussing the LCS history and rationale.

http://www.aviationweek.com/Portals/AWeek/Ares/work%20white%20paper.PDF

(in reply to jtoatoktoe)

Post #: 7

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 6:32:26 PM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

Agreed. LCS-1 Freedom visited Boston in 2008 and took a tour. Was pretty clear the ship was more about hauling stuff than a pure warship.

I have them pegged as really the ultimate scouts.

Mark what happens if you host UAV's or helo's and engage that swarm at night?

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to IWS)

Post #: 8

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 6:35:47 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

A related issue is what can be fit into its weapon stations. An LCS has four that could be modified. You could replace the 57-mm. gun and the Sea Ram missiles--they're not modular, so it would be a major job, but they could be replaced with something else. Could the Sea RAM be replaced with a 30-mm. cannon and leave the two weapon pods for other things?

I've been trying to figure out how big the weapon modules are...the one technical paper I could find...

http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2006garm/tuesday/canaday.pdf

...looks like you have room for four small missile canisters (not sure how many missiles each one carried...could you get four Hellfires in each one? That would give you sixteen in each station or 32 total for the whole ship).

What else could you put in those weapon pod stations?

Last idea for now...a "low tech" solution...what about putting 81-mm. mortars in the two weapon pods? Mortars don't have much range, but they are versatile and you can carry a lot of ammunition for them.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 9

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 7:32:12 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Colonel Mustard

Just for fun...I'm going to slam them some more. I don't think they're getting slammed because they are named incorrectly. Rather, they are being slammed because they are largely incapable of carrying out their promised missions. They are indeed combat ships. They are intended to go in harm's way, and engage hostile subs, patrol boats, pirates, mines, and I'm sure I missed a few others.

But, they have construction problems, structural problems, technical problems, weapon problems, cost problems, and I'm sure I missed a few. My understanding is that the ships will be past a significant portion of their service life before some of the mission modules are ready to use.

They were sold to Congress as being "all things to all people," and although the process is not yet done, they are winding up being "no things to most people." Changing the name is just slapping lipstick on a pig.

As for additional roles, in Command they can be very flexible, since most of the problems I talked about above are disregarded. In real life, they might make nice pierside training ships.

OK, go ahead and flame away.

No flames. I agree there are some SERIOUS problems with the whole program. But I think one of those problems was that they raised the wrong expectations. The problem isn't that calling it a littoral operations ship would be putting lipstick on a pig; the problem is that we already put lipstick on the pig by calling it a littoral combat ship. If we had just called it a pig to begin with--i.e., said something like "Look, this is not a destroyer; it's a ship designed to handle all the grunt work like mine sweeping and hunting pirates that navies still have to do"--I think there would have been a lot less controversy about it.

There is nothing wrong with a pig if what you want is bacon.

Aside from that, I'm just trying to be practical. It looks like we're going to end up with between 24 and 32 of these ships. They're not useless. They're just not destroyers. But they are fast. And they have a pretty good range. They have that nice 57-mm. gun, which can handle small threats fairly well I imagine as long as there's only one or two of them coming after you at a time. They've got a big hanger. They've got lots of room for extra equipment.

Since we're going to be stuck with a couple of dozen of them for a while, we might as well figure out what we can use them for.

< Message edited by Mgellis -- 2/15/2014 9:07:08 PM >

(in reply to dcpollay)

Post #: 10

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 7:40:20 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Mark what happens if you host UAV's or helo's and engage that swarm at night?

If you are ready for the swarm and can get even one helicopter with Hellfire missiles in the air before too many of them get too close, things look very different. The helicopter can zap four or five of the small boats and the LCS can handle the rest. (If you have armed MQ-8 drones, too, that's even better.)

It also does not hurt that the LCS can move quickly enough that even speedboats have trouble catching it. I was letting the swarm come to the LCS in the tests and then defending without attempting to get away...if the LCS was moving, evading and/or hunting as opportunity allowed, that by itself becomes a powerful weapon for dealing with small, lightly armed threats.

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 11

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 8:04:25 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

One question...and I really don't know the answer to this one...can power (like, a lot of power) be run from the big reconfigurable space in an LCS to the weapon station pods? If so, maybe those 30 mm. guns could be swapped out for COIL lasers? I'll bet the module bay is big enough for the power source, but can you get the power to the turrets? If so...well, a pair of those lasers would make an LCS a lot more impressive, I think.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 12

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 8:27:04 PM

IWS

Posts: 60
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Mark what happens if you host UAV's or helo's and engage that swarm at night?

If you are ready for the swarm and can get even one helicopter with Hellfire missiles in the air before too many of them get too close, things look very different. The helicopter can zap four or five of the small boats and the LCS can handle the rest. (If you have armed MQ-8 drones, too, that's even better.)

It also does not hurt that the LCS can move quickly enough that even speedboats have trouble catching it. I was letting the swarm come to the LCS in the tests and then defending without attempting to get away...if the LCS was moving, evading and/or hunting as opportunity allowed, that by itself becomes a powerful weapon for dealing with small, lightly armed threats.

After I read your post, ran a similar sandbox against 15 armed RHBs out of curiosity.

The LCS ran away. With a 10 knot speed advantage it broke contact pretty quickly, then dodged to one side.

Once the LCS broke contact, the swarm had no way of knowing where it was. They chased the stale datum and the LCS just sat back and watched them charge off in the wrong direction.

An MQ-8 kept track of the swarm, and a couple of MH-60 missions resulted in 9 kills 3 damaged using hellfires.
I let the LCS kill the last 3 functioning boats in the interest of crew morale...

With enough hellfires and room to run, seems like the LCS can take on lots of small boats with no worries.
Fast attack craft would be a whole different ballgame, though.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 13

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 8:42:46 PM

jdkbph

Posts: 339
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: CT, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

There is nothing wrong with a pig if what you want is bacon.

All well and good... and probably accurate as far it goes... until you look at the (actual) price tag.

We're paying Knox/Perry replacement dollars and getting... what? I wouldn't be surprised if, privately at least, most surface "TF" level commanders see them as a liability if placed in their formation. And I'm not at all sure a surface support TG commander would be comforted by their presence as an escort.

JD

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 14

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 8:47:37 PM

IWS

Posts: 60
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

A related issue is what can be fit into its weapon stations. An LCS has four that could be modified. You could replace the 57-mm. gun and the Sea Ram missiles--they're not modular, so it would be a major job, but they could be replaced with something else. Could the Sea RAM be replaced with a 30-mm. cannon and leave the two weapon pods for other things?

I've been trying to figure out how big the weapon modules are...the one technical paper I could find...

http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2006garm/tuesday/canaday.pdf

...looks like you have room for four small missile canisters (not sure how many missiles each one carried...could you get four Hellfires in each one? That would give you sixteen in each station or 32 total for the whole ship).

What else could you put in those weapon pod stations?

Last idea for now...a "low tech" solution...what about putting 81-mm. mortars in the two weapon pods? Mortars don't have much range, but they are versatile and you can carry a lot of ammunition for them.

I've read the two modular weapons stations are big enough for the Mk 48 vls, which is 8 tubes (4 ESSM per tube).

Also take a look at the Danish "Stanflex" module system and the ships that use them in Wikipedia or elsewhere.
Good stuff.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 15

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 9:19:59 PM

IWS

Posts: 60
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jdkbph

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

There is nothing wrong with a pig if what you want is bacon.

All well and good... and probably accurate as far it goes... until you look at the (actual) price tag.

We're paying Knox/Perry replacement dollars and getting... what? I wouldn't be surprised if, privately at least, most surface "TF" level commanders see them as a liability if placed in their formation. And I'm not at all sure a surface support TG commander would be comforted by their presence as an escort.

JD

They're not supposed to be escorts or frigates.
They are expensive, but otherwise fit the missions they're intended for pretty well.

About 60% will be fitted for minesweeping.
Expensive for minesweepers, but they can self-deploy across oceans, move quickly once in-theater, and will be more capable than what we have now (using ROVs, USVs, helicopters).

The "surface warfare" fit will be deployed for low threat missions. The Navy has specifically mentioned Africa and South America as being a good fit. This is a smart economy of force decision-- Using an LCS to chase pirates or show the flag frees up a Burke that would otherwise be stuck doing that.

The ASW fit is actually pretty capable. They'll have the same towed array Burkes use, and a British active/passive variable depth sonar to make up for the lack of a hull-mounted one. There are also plans to fit the USVs with lightweight versions of the dipping sonars our helos use. And again, for every LCS that's hunting subs in brown water a Burke can be doing something else instead.

(in reply to jdkbph)

Post #: 16

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 9:21:34 PM

jdkbph

Posts: 339
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: CT, USA
Status: offline

Well if that's true, and they could be armed with 32 ESSM's and 8 LRASMs, a potential adversary might start to take them seriously.

JD

(in reply to IWS)

Post #: 17

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 9:25:26 PM

dcpollay

Posts: 532
Joined: 11/22/2012
From: Upstate New York USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

No flames. I agree there are some SERIOUS problems with the whole program. But I think one of those problems was that they raised the wrong expectations. The problem isn't that calling it a littoral operations ship would be putting lipstick on a pig; the problem is that we already put lipstick on the pig by calling it a littoral combat ship. If we had just called it a pig to begin with--i.e., said something like "Look, this is not a destroyer; it's a ship designed to handle all the grunt work like mine sweeping and hunting pirates that navies still have to do"--I think there would have been a lot less controversy about it.

There is nothing wrong with a pig if what you want is bacon.

Aside from that, I'm just trying to be practical. It looks like we're going to end up with between 24 and 32 of these ships. They're not useless. They're just not destroyers. But they are fast. And they have a pretty good range. They have that nice 57-mm. gun, which can handle small threats fairly well I imagine as long as there's only one or two of them coming after you at a time. They've got a big hanger. They've got lots of room for extra equipment.

Since we're going to be stuck with a couple of dozen of them for a while, we might as well figure out what we can use them for.

I agree that the expectations are wrong; but I don't think the expectations were created by the name. They were created by the design concept that envisioned a single ship type carrying out a wide variety of very different missions. The modular concept tries to overcome what historically has been a trade-off between proficiency in different mission areas. Trying that, the designers came up with a very complex product. I've always been wary of complexity; too many working parts causes breakdowns in equipment, communications, or any other aspect of the task, and is generally expensive to boot.

For my money, if you want to hunt pirates, that's the job of a frigate such as the Perry. Not overwhelming power, but enough to handle that job, and cheap enough to have in numbers. And when the pirates show up, the crew isn't out training to sweep mines or do something else.

As you said, we're getting a couple dozen of them anyway. Only time will tell....

_____________________________

"It's all according to how your boogaloo situation stands, you understand."

Formerly known as Colonel Mustard, before I got Slitherine Syndrome.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 18

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/15/2014 10:09:57 PM

jdkbph

Posts: 339
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: CT, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: IWS

They're not supposed to be escorts or frigates.

I know. I'm just saying they're priced as if they were. Half a billion should buy more than just a fancy new MCM.

JD

(in reply to IWS)

Post #: 19

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 12:33:13 AM

Rudd

Posts: 1501
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

The ships were predicted to fall short in manning. And the Navy has deployed the ships with berthing modules in the mission bays in order to carry the crew required for operations. However the ships are designed with sufficient headroom to change from 2-high bunking to 3-high bunking, which would allow crew sizes of 100 if needed

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Littoral_combat_ship

Doesn't sound like they can maintain a 24/7 crew without using the berthing modules in the mission bays.

(in reply to jdkbph)

Post #: 20

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 1:09:07 AM

IWS

Posts: 60
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jdkbph

Well if that's true, and they could be armed with 32 ESSM's and 8 LRASMs, a potential adversary might start to take them seriously.

JD

Yes. I've played around with the LCS 2 that way in-game, though with harpoons instead of LRASM.

The real LCS 2 class actually has space for 3 modules: one is just behind the 57mm (might not have enough below-deck space for Mk 48, but big enough for Griffins), and two are in the superstructure, port and starboard, just behind the radar mast. You could mount your Griffins (I used Spike NLOS instead) in the front one, with the ESSMs and LRASMs in the superstructure modules. Appropriate sensors and datalinks to support ESSM/LRASM would also need to be fitted.

The Navy could certainly do something like that if they wanted to, but it would cost quite a lot. If the Australian Adelaide class is any guide, something like 200-300 million each. So instead of 500-600 million per ship, it would be more like 700-900 million.

If price is no object, another more speculative possibility is using up a bit of the flight deck just aft of the hanger, and installing two Mk 48 sized modules, one port and one starboard. The mission bay is immediately under the flight deck, so there would be plenty of below-deck space, and access the hanger doors would still be clear.

(in reply to jdkbph)

Post #: 21

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 1:31:56 AM

IWS

Posts: 60
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

So...what could you do if you had that kind of mission space?

A good starting point is to check on what the Danes are doing. They wrote the book on modular warships.

What they've done with their Stanflex mission modules is brilliant, and I expect it's where the LCS project got the "modular" idea from in the first place.

According to Wikipedia, Denmark has Stanflex mission modules for:

SSM (2 twin launchers for Boeing RGM-84 Harpoon missiles)
SAM (6-cell Mk 48 Mod 3 launcher for RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missiles)
Gun (1 Otobreda 76/62 Super Rapid gun)
ASW (Launchers for MU90 Impact torpedoes)
VDS (Thales Underwater Systems TSM 2640 Salmon variable-depth active/passive sonar)
MCM (Command and control equipment to operate MSF and MRD class drone minehunters and Double Eagle ROVs)
Crane (1 hydraulic crane for launch/recovery of a RHIB or deployment of sea mines)
Oceanography
Anti-pollution
Survey
Storage
SIGINT/ELINT

In particular, check out their Absalon Class support ship-- a better LCS than LCS, and cheaper too.

Here's a link with an interesting comparison:

http://noticiarionaval.blogspot.com/2008/07/lcs-so-why-doesnt-usa-clone-absalon.html

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 22

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 2:16:29 AM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

That is very interesting thanks.

_____________________________

(in reply to IWS)

Post #: 23

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 2:41:44 AM

IWS

Posts: 60
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

Just for fun...

...

So...what could you do if you had that kind of mission space?

I could make a TV comedy series along the lines of McHale's Navy or Down Periscope featuring an LCS and its misfit crew, wandering the South China Sea!

I mean, an LCS crew isn't that much bigger than an ensemble cast, right?

Episodes could include:

- As morale officer, Lieutenant Parker wants to find out how many of the crew can water ski simultaneously. "I mean, it's not like we don't have the horsepower, and the YouTube videos would be a valuable recruiting tool". Hilarity ensues.

- Ferrying an insufferable MARSOC group and their equipment on a top secret mission. And saving their bacon in the end.

- Trying to finagle a new "bowling alley" LCS mission module. Denied as not cost effective, because LCS 1 isn't stable enough to bowl above Sea State 4. Their arch-rival LCS 2 gets the module instead. Bastards.

- Investigating an an underground UAV racing gambling ring. And the enemy is us!

- A "small boat swarm" that turns out to be smugglers. And business is business, after all.

etc...

< Message edited by IWS -- 2/16/2014 3:53:22 AM >

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 24

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 8:19:24 AM

BB62squid

Posts: 23
Joined: 2/9/2014
Status: offline

Actually...the LCS WERE designed for direct combat. Their modular design was touted as being adaptable, and one of the interim steps the Navy envisioned to replace the Naval surface fire support role void left by the removal of the battleships.
Like many pork barrel projects, the LCS was driven and funded by select interest groups with the government that has, as usual, boned the American people with over-hyped, under-delivering platform. Sadly, if anyone looked at their fit when they were proposed it was obvious this was a gargantuan waste of taxpayer dollars. With the dismal failure to meet basic expectations on the first 3 hulls...ONLY in America can the politcos manage to squeeze more money out of the taxpayer for another projected 52 train wrecks.
With China rapidly expanding its navy and gaining the ability to enforce area denial missions, the USN should be focused more on building destroyers and cruisers--, you know, FLEET units. The LCS plan is a disaster from the word go..I doubt the Coast Guard we see any real utility in them. Just my humble opinion.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 25

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 8:23:58 AM

BB62squid

Posts: 23
Joined: 2/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jtoatoktoe

quote:

I'd like to see a combo system.

I agree...something along the lines of the Soviet CADS-N-1...point defense gatling with SA_N-11. Missiles engage first and leakers are engaged by the guns

(in reply to jtoatoktoe)

Post #: 26

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 8:44:26 AM

BB62squid

Posts: 23
Joined: 2/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Since we're going to be stuck with a couple of dozen of them for a while, we might as well figure out what we can use them for.

Mustard is spot on. If you go back and look at the proposals, the Navy promised that the ships were what we in the fleet referred to as "PFM"--Pure F***in Magic"; they were supposedly, being modular, able to be configured for all aspect warfare-AW, SUW, USW, and strike, as well as mine clearing, Humanitarian aid and NEO. IMO they can only realistically complete the latter 3 missions.
As to what we can do with them? I agree with pierside trainers, or we can try to find an allied country gullible enough to buy them. A country say, with no need for a blue water capability. Or sink the frakkin things. Utterly useless and waste of money.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 27

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/16/2014 10:14:03 AM

Flankerk

Posts: 417
Joined: 6/21/2006
Status: offline

Is there any way to do a scenario with these along the lines of choose your modules based upon the supposed OPFOR, then try out different combinations?
I can almost feel a need for module ready times!

(in reply to BB62squid)

Post #: 28

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/17/2014 3:52:01 AM

DavidRob0

Posts: 289
Joined: 4/5/2008
Status: offline

With reference to the Aussie FFGs, there was an article about their upgrade in a USNI Proceedings issue not too long ago, as well as some articles in defence of the LCS (e.g. January 2013 issue).
After the upgrade, they're still obviously frigates, with 8 VLS cells (up to 32 ESSM), and still carry the Mk13 GMLS with up to 32 SM2s/RGM84s/whatever else fits, and the originally fitted 76mm and 20mm Vulcan/Phalanx.
As an Aussie, I would rather be in an upgraded Adelaide class than in either of the 2 LCS versions today.

That said, the 4 FFGs still in service with the RAN are not that far from reaching the end of their service lives (maybe a decade?) with the new Hobart class DDGs on the way, while the LCS is at the very beginning of its life. There is obviously still much to be done with the concept and the design, but there is plenty of time to do it (remember the Spruances?). I agree with Mike, they seem to be more of a "scout" and a gofer than a true combat vessel, and I'll do my best to have a look at one of them should one visit my home town.

The costs involved in developing warships of any type today is becoming truly horrendous, so the evolution of any type tends to take some time. Flexibility in design is the key to allow adaptation to changing requirements, roles, etc. We'll just have to wait and see how the class evolves.

_____________________________

Only the Dead have seen an end to war-
David Rob

(in reply to Flankerk)

Post #: 29

RE: How much can you do with the LCS? - 2/17/2014 6:36:37 PM

dandin384

Posts: 176
Joined: 11/5/2013
From: United States
Status: offline

With more then 2 dozen of these things running around I've been thinking a wolfpack type plan would be pretty effective. Divide them into 4 ship groups and give each ship in the group a different module. Ship 1 has an VLS module with ESSM's, ship 2 has anti-surface module, ship 3 is a combo ASW/Minehunter, and ship 4 can be a intelligence gathering ship, psuedo supply ship, or any other theater specific role. One of these, as everyone is so fond of pointing out, is not to effective on it's own. However a group of ships capable of 40 knots with varied mission purposes can be very effective plus they can mutually support one another. Wolfpacks could join up with each other or other USN assets for higher risk missions as well. The LCS has a lot of potential, but it's also got big shoes to fill.

(in reply to DavidRob0)

Post #: 30