Lokasenna
Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012 From: Iowan in MD/DC Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lowpe quote:
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna I agree. I'm thinking I'm going to phase out the Oscar-IV, and just switch to the Ki-100 entirely. Even for kamikazes. Don't be so hasty...calculate out your pools and account for all the lost production. It does make an excellent low altitude CAP plane. You don't want to run out! Kind of like me. I've got plenty, and still have my factories. But I've had them fighting in the same places at times, or in the same place at different times, experimenting with settings. The Oscars are OK, but many more of them die than the Tonys. Doesn't matter whether it's bombers or enemy fighters. We're talking about Durability 23 vs. 30, here. Otherwise, they're comparable planes. The Tony has 2 MGs as well... and is less maneuverable, but it sure feels like the Oscar's advantage on maneuver (+50%) isn't mattering at all. The Tony is more maneuvable than all the Allied planes already. I think I like the durability more. Edit: I actually have this Tracker open right now. Losses for Oscar: 238 (127 A, 20 G, 91 Ops). Losses for Tony: 94 (69 A, 6 G, 19 Ops). Availability date 43/5 on the Oscar, and 43/7 on the Tony, so a slight difference there. Producing the same number overall. 8 Sentai of each right now. The difference is that the Tony has been in Asia only, while the Oscar has seen the Pacific.
< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 9/24/2015 11:07:15 PM >
|