Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Disaster!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Disaster! Page: <<   < prev  223 224 [225] 226 227   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Disaster! - 2/11/2016 5:09:51 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Here are more units at Nagoya. The artillery with 20 something disruption arrived yesterday.







Those are all units that can either:

1) Fire back at bombarding ships (AA/ART has gun tubes that will fire if ships come within range, yes?), especially if he has the bombardment range set to 0.

2) Base forces, which will be disrupted as the AF (for Av Supp) or Port (for Nav Supp) is bombarded.

Does that 1st Ind. Tank Co have tubes to shoot back at the ships?

An important point though - having the bombardment standoff range does not mean a battleship will close in to the beach - they will usually come in no closer than 4000 yards, but DDs sometimes come in as close as 2000 yards. Even with ranges this close, DP guns seem to save their anti-ship ammo for an amphib TF rather than a bombardment one.


"Seem to"? I think they shoot at the first targets that come into range.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 6721
RE: Disaster! - 2/11/2016 11:41:33 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Judging by the caliber of hits on ships bombarding, they do not shoot. But when I tried landing troops they sure shoot up the amphib ships if I do not have plenty of suppression ships embedded in the TF.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 6722
RE: Disaster! - 2/11/2016 3:33:53 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Judging by the caliber of hits on ships bombarding, they do not shoot. But when I tried landing troops they sure shoot up the amphib ships if I do not have plenty of suppression ships embedded in the TF.


This could be a function of the range, I suppose, as the combat ships will begin their bombardment from farther offshore and move closer in until they use up the allotted ammo for the bombardment (when DL is lower, I have seen ships use up less than half of their main battery ammo - another reason DL is important).

It's possible that the amphibs are treated as coming in closer than the bombarding ships do, so are shot at by more weapons.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 6723
RE: Disaster! - 2/11/2016 4:38:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Thanks Alfred for the clarifications.

I am sending two more tank regiments of Type 3s to Nagoya to beef up the defense there. Two shattered divisions are on their way out, while I will rotate some Depot divisions in to absorb the aerial/port attacks.

I managed to FT 1000 supplies into Vietnam this day...the PB will probably be sunk tomorrow, but mission accomplished. I have a weak air supply bridge flying supplies in, but it simply isn't enough. Added to the FT, and transports, an SST is running supplies, and I think I will augment that with more subs.

I hope to have a few surprises for the Allies this upcoming day.


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 6724
RE: Disaster! - 2/12/2016 7:24:10 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
July 12, 1944

Allies catch a few of my planes on the ground and some Jacks when I miss a setting and their CAP bleeds into a Jugs sweep.

No major attacks, just threatening accumulation of Allied troops.

I have a few traps set, but they don't spring day after day.

I have 200 type 3 tanks in the field. Make 2-4 a day and I have surpassed the actual production.






Still holding below a 2-1 allied AV; if not this month, then next for sure.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/12/2016 8:30:00 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 6725
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 4:31:20 PM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline
quote:

Still holding below a 2-1 allied AV; if not this month, then next for sure


Hmmm your opponent seems to pull off pyrrhic victories .. do not be so sure ..

You have pulled off quite a turnaround extending this game. More so .. you have taught all the AFB's
the evils of an early "Hokkaido Hurricane" or invasion of the home islands

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6726
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 4:42:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
July 13, 1944

Almost all of Honshu has 9/10 dl or thereabouts. No place left to hide.

Hvy bombardments at Nagoya, heavy air bombing on my runways, and at Matsumaya against the troops. Probably an attack there.




A big fear is now the Allies have interior lines and good roads. If he were to mass his tanks along with a sacrificial division or three and made an all out push for Nagoya, causing me to rejigger my lines, and then quickly moved his tanks and marines and massed a push northeast of Gifu life would be very difficult.

Well, life is pretty difficult at Nagoya now.



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/13/2016 6:05:51 PM >

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 6727
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 4:45:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Matsumaya




Forts back to 1 after the attack.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/13/2016 5:46:54 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6728
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 4:49:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Over near Hainan, Oscars try to stop a CVE attack and protect a ak with 4000 supply for Vietnam. They fail, but take some wildcats and bombers with them.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6729
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 4:54:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
In the north of Vietnam the 2nd Tank Div arrives and restores equilibrium in my lines there (the Allies built up a 2-1 advantage prior to arrival).

Supplies needed in Vietnam. Trying everything that I know of.

Baby carriers picket the coast. Perhaps an opportunity if I can replenish my supply.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6730
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 4:57:55 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
A nice little hornets nest for a blundering convoy to run into.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6731
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 5:01:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

quote:

Still holding below a 2-1 allied AV; if not this month, then next for sure


Hmmm your opponent seems to pull off pyrrhic victories .. do not be so sure ..

You have pulled off quite a turnaround extending this game. More so .. you have taught all the AFB's
the evils of an early "Hokkaido Hurricane" or invasion of the home islands


A few slight changes & I could have done so much better.

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 6732
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 5:02:37 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
I don´t think you will find anything outside Perth at this stage. He probably hasn´t sent anything on that route for years.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6733
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 5:05:59 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

I don´t think you will find anything outside Perth at this stage. He probably hasn´t sent anything on that route for years.


I had some intell and spottings not too long ago.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 6734
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 5:07:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
The obligatory picture of Nagoya's defenders.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6735
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 6:33:09 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
July 14 1944

Invasion Haiphong.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 6736
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 6:34:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Ouch.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6737
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 6:39:04 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
French Guns operated by locals...some of the guns are 155mm. Won't really matter, this being a clear hex it is impossible to see how I can defend it.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/13/2016 7:41:51 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6738
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 6:45:10 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
It's about time!! He should be invading lots of clear terrain bases all the way to Shanghai area in the coming months. This will close off your overland supply and put your troops in jeopardy. Next, I would be having a few TFs out of Saigon bombarding your bases up and down the Vietnam coast to raise disruption of your troops and make your life there even more difficult.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6739
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 6:53:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Not looking good, here. The 14th Division is 1 day from Hanoi...

Not one hint of troop transports in those baby carriers...ugh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6740
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 7:02:12 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Looks like, in that terrain, getting the 14th Division there won't help. Just more troops to get smote and retreated.

I'm guessing the CAP was hell on your naval search and they didn't see squat.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6741
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 7:19:20 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
None of the coast is holdable. I can't mount any credible opposition on the sea or in the air.

My defense rests upon x2 or x3 terrain because I have no air force or navy so to speak.

The troops in Vietnam for the most part will be surrounded and cut off..to fight at 1/3rd strength and starve - that is till Jan 1 1945 and the expected surrender.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 6742
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 10:41:28 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

quote:

Still holding below a 2-1 allied AV; if not this month, then next for sure


Hmmm your opponent seems to pull off pyrrhic victories .. do not be so sure ..

You have pulled off quite a turnaround extending this game. More so .. you have taught all the AFB's
the evils of an early "Hokkaido Hurricane" or invasion of the home islands


I disagree. This is showing the evils of an early "Hokkaido Hurricane" without proper strategic focus on just knocking Japan out of the war, or on mopping up all the VPs elsewhere.

Did the invasion at Nagoya really get him more VPs than if he'd captured Luzon? What about Shikoku AND Nagoya? I'm skeptical. Manila is an enormous bag of VPs.

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 6743
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 10:44:00 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

It's about time!! He should be invading lots of clear terrain bases all the way to Shanghai area in the coming months. This will close off your overland supply and put your troops in jeopardy. Next, I would be having a few TFs out of Saigon bombarding your bases up and down the Vietnam coast to raise disruption of your troops and make your life there even more difficult.


I have had the pleasure of learning in this theater recently. This is not how I did it, but my opponent also didn't have the coastal bases fortified at all. I started at Soc Trang, then CRB - which failed at first, so I landed at Quinhon and liberated CRB that way. It's coming down around his ears now. Might've taken 3 weeks.

The challenge here as the Allied invader is to not outpace your logistics train.

Whatever Lowpe is doing that is making his opponent delay, it's working, I suppose.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 6744
RE: Disaster! - 2/13/2016 10:44:10 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

quote:

Still holding below a 2-1 allied AV; if not this month, then next for sure


Hmmm your opponent seems to pull off pyrrhic victories .. do not be so sure ..

You have pulled off quite a turnaround extending this game. More so .. you have taught all the AFB's
the evils of an early "Hokkaido Hurricane" or invasion of the home islands


I disagree. This is showing the evils of an early "Hokkaido Hurricane" without proper strategic focus on just knocking Japan out of the war, or on mopping up all the VPs elsewhere.

Did the invasion at Nagoya really get him more VPs than if he'd captured Luzon? What about Shikoku AND Nagoya? I'm skeptical. Manila is an enormous bag of VPs.


Lok, I think you have the answer!

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 6745
RE: Disaster! - 2/14/2016 7:54:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Coming up this next day -- a massive all out shock attack versus Nagoya & Haiphong. Massive!

Plus another deliberate attack on Cam Ranh Bay.

Can the Empire hold?

Tune in later true believer!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6746
RE: Disaster! - 2/14/2016 11:54:26 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
July 15,1944

In the deep dark night, of this momentous night, Japanese submarines do good work.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 6747
RE: Disaster! - 2/15/2016 12:00:45 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
During the early morning, Nagoya is bombarded several times -- including the faux amphibious invasion bombardment exploit. Haiphong is plastered too, but the CD guns hole a ship or two.

Then comes a half hour of heavy bombing. Haiphong, Nagoya, Cam Ranh Bay get 90 percent of the hundreds of airstrikes.

Ouch.

8 Franks, eight; what shell the IJAAF has become, down a halfdozen warhawks in our only offensive air mission that went off.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6748
RE: Disaster! - 2/15/2016 12:03:53 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Before I get to the climatic battles of the day, here is a look at Allied Ship losses (collisions were done by speedy MTBs I think):




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6749
RE: Disaster! - 2/15/2016 12:06:19 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
IJN losses. You can see I am losing ships much faster than the Allies.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 6750
Page:   <<   < prev  223 224 [225] 226 227   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Disaster! Page: <<   < prev  223 224 [225] 226 227   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703