Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Disaster!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Disaster! Page: <<   < prev  257 258 [259] 260 261   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Disaster! - 7/10/2016 9:34:35 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		That is way too low IMO.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 7741
RE: Disaster! - 7/10/2016 9:39:27 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr


quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Kobe & Osaka - As Allies, isolate, place two divisions in each base, move units across to gain control of all hexsides, move on....

Garrison requirements - how many troops do the Allies have to keep in Home Island bases??



It is not onerous.. 20AV - 100 AV for a keycity

Some are that low but others are much higher. I don't have a turn open to look, but in my game (Babes 28) I know that Tokyo is no 100 AV.

< Message edited by witpqs -- 7/10/2016 9:42:21 PM >

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 7742
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 1:32:08 AM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr


quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Kobe & Osaka - As Allies, isolate, place two divisions in each base, move units across to gain control of all hexsides, move on....

Garrison requirements - how many troops do the Allies have to keep in Home Island bases??



It is not onerous.. 20AV - 100 AV for a keycity

Some are that low but others are much higher. I don't have a turn open to look, but in my game (Babes 28) I know that Tokyo is no 100 AV.


True, Kobe is 340 and Osaka is 1020 but that is the exception, not the rule.

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 7743
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 12:43:14 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Oct 25, 1944

Only a few more days to make November.

A quiet day, relatively, only 6 Allied planes down to 0 for Japan. Mostly he bombed the troops at Matsumaya and also bombed a lot in China.

No ships sunk...

No traps activated...

I am going to mass what is left of my Helens at Sian and Ankang to bomb the Chinese troops (2 Corp) as they enter the central Chinese plains. I will fly at 2000 feet, and actually have some supply so I hope that will further delay the Allied advance against Chungking.

Kweiyang has 26 Allied units....I doubt anything will be able to stop them but supplies and Allied timidity.







Attachment (1)

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 7744
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 12:47:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Kongo is at Yingkow, a size 2 port, but we are almost repairing a point a day. I will send in more naval squads...but Yingkow has the advantage of not having recon planes flying over it daily.

Kongo's repairs have been delayed by needing to move her from port to port to avoid detection.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7745
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 12:50:09 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		No naval squads at Denpassar...it is all repair ships, but we are making steady progress on the Fuso.

Hard to believe she was savaged off Shanghai and made it all the way here for repairs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7746
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 12:53:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The KB, all of one fleet carrier, is hiding out in the PI. She sortied twice in the last two months...I need to do a little work on her air contingents.

Hasn't really been high on my todo list...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7747
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 1:04:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Tracker gives the vp ratio at 2.316 to 1, up .005 for the day on 197 points lost. Allies gained 281 points, while Japan lost 116 due to troop losses and probably low supply.

I still have a cushion, but I fear another landing on Honshu will do me in tied with the loss of Chungking. The naval bombardments are savaging my troops, even behind level 5 or 6 forts...and they keep coming, and coming, and coming.

I am hoping the Allies will miscalculate their broad advance in China and I will be able to hold, for a little while, at Canton and Changsha. Plus any delays I can garner in the defense of Chungking will be well worth it hence the bombing runs planned for the Chinese in the Central Plains.

Rather than using my BBs to fight his surface fleets, I am thinking the best use is a CAP trap in the Yellow Sea.

Tally ho, lots of fighting left to do.

PS: I am probably going to crack like a rotten egg here...I doubt I can stop the Allies on Honshu.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 7/11/2016 1:13:48 PM >

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 7748
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 2:42:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		If these bombers can make it to the target...they should be able to do some damage.

This is against the two Chinese Corps heading to the central Chinese plains.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7749
RE: Disaster! - 7/11/2016 3:06:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Turn is away...setting up to hit those Chinese troops, perhaps even get in a cap trap versus the bombers against the troops in China too.

I have a few bastion bases of supplies, that have good AF and no recon by the Allies. After having been quiet so long, it will feel good to put the hurt on the Allies in the air for once over China.

Probably won't work out that way, but you never know.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7750
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 4:26:16 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		October 26, 1944

Allies have to get approximately 300 ships hiding up river, well hiding no more. Bases in western China are 10 hexes away, but the carriers strike mostly today from 10 hexes also.

Who says you can't get a 10 hex raid in? It isn't a coordinated strike, but rather dribs and drabs, but they still get to attack.

Plus destroyers coming up river in numbers...

He really wants those ships.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 7751
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 4:27:00 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Sunk today.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7752
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 4:28:50 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Caught in the open and moving...in China.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7753
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 4:42:08 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I have been trying to fiddle with the stockpiles to keep the type 3 tanks building, but I failed miserably this month.

Finally I turned off all replacements except for some tank units and they started being made again just recently. Prior to that I had been reinforcing some artillery units, and reinforcement units arriving where eating up the vehicle points usually in motorized support.

All the monthly figures here are very questionable, except for the type 3 tanks. I don't know where they come from...my vehicle production is shot, except for one factory at Keijo (an oversight I am sure on the Allies part...83 vehicle factories working there).

No way did I build 357 type 95 tanks for example.

Supply at 1 million, really I need two million.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 7/12/2016 4:47:49 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7754
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 4:49:30 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I will try to do something innovative and tricky with all the merchant ships on the river in China, but low supply will really curtail my ability. Plus the Allies have done a good job of savaging the runways all around.

Still, I think I can pull something out of my hat.

I am sure B29s will be hitting the ports, and they do unbelievable amounts of damage...it is like their bombs never miss when on port strikes. The number of ships I have lost that way is just amazing.

Allies seem to be taking a breath on Honshu...waiting for prep, supplies, or shipping -- but the bombardments continue.

My troops are still holding out in the nooks and crevices of Matsumaya. Not many left there though...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7755
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 4:55:19 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Lots of Chinese in those two units.

I put them under recon now, getting ready to bomb them when they hit the open ground.

Three bases with big runways, and more importantly plenty of stockpiled supply stand ready. The planes are building up: every FB left in the empire, 1 sentai of Oscar and another of Tony (neither full), and all the Helens left (about 200) that aren't kamikazes.

I know it will be disappointing, and if the LRCAP is heavy...well, hopefully the Oscars and Tonies can do something about them. Ok, lets not go there.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7756
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 5:00:09 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		30 days worth of reinforcements...not much to get excited about here.

The Naval Guards have some 47 mm AT guns.

The Glider unit is neat in name.

The Raiding Tank has some decent light tanks, I think they are my second armored unit with the Type 2 Light Tank which isn't terrible. It is such a let down to get those tanks in June, and nothing uses them till November.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 7/12/2016 5:03:15 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7757
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 5:08:09 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		If I make it this far, I will get two decent groups of fighters.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7758
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 1:11:51 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		On the river, several small task forces, PBs, E's mostly rush downriver in an attempt to sell their lives against the Allied destroyers heading up river.

The three hundred merchants move downriver too, where they will make their stand away from runways and ports. Protected by two destroyers and about 100 planes flying long range CAP.

To few, but what else can I do.

Along the Chinese coast, the only warship available, an E, will charge the Deathstar.

Again, what else can I do.

Transports are busy flying air HQ off Honshu and more are flying them to Sian.

A stand is being developed for Changsha, but the Allies have so many tanks heading their way. So many tanks...

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 7759
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 2:15:38 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

A stand is being developed for Changsha, but the Allies have so many tanks heading their way. So many tanks...


....so much supply sitting in San Fran and/or LA awaiting transport. Probably over 50 million worth.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7760
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 3:30:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

quote:

A stand is being developed for Changsha, but the Allies have so many tanks heading their way. So many tanks...


....so much supply sitting in San Fran and/or LA awaiting transport. Probably over 50 million worth.


Ah, Michael. Your cheery posts about the war capabilities of the Allied war machine always brings to my day a ray of sunshine!

There you succinctly found the silver lining...if only I could do something about hitting his supply line. I still have a few light cruisers left, but they are notoriously short legged beasts...but perhaps I can get them out into the Pacific somehow. They wouldn't have to sink many ships to earn their points back.

I have been thinking of doing that with the Katsuragi...but she would have to sink a lot to earn back her points.




(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 7761
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 3:43:01 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Any major Allied base with less than 100k in supply is short of supply! Should have a yellow or red exclamation point.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7762
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 3:49:08 PM   
Andav

 

Posts: 474
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline
Some more rainbows, puppies and unicorns from Micheal for you Lowpe ...

You just keep trying to scrape up 2k supplies in one base and your fellow Japanese players will applaud your success!

Wa

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 7763
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 5:58:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Andav


Some more rainbows, puppies and unicorns from Micheal for you Lowpe ...

You just keep trying to scrape up 2k supplies in one base and your fellow Japanese players will applaud your success!

Wa



I actually have some bases with more than that Andav, but boy the red exclamation points are popping up fast. I won't release the supply from the relatively safe from bombing bases until I really need it.

I kind of like how they boosted my VP score over a thousand points. A nasty trick to pull off near the end game.

(in reply to Andav)
Post #: 7764
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 5:59:52 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Any major Allied base with less than 100k in supply is short of supply! Should have a yellow or red exclamation point.


That comes as no surprise...I know how those shore bombardments eat up supply -- especially when every ship fires at a range of 1, day after blessed day.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 7765
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 6:03:24 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I have to say this game, witp AE in general, is a lot more fun when there is only one of them going on.

I am enjoying the hiatus from my other game, about 60 turns left in this one. Less if the Allies follow Michael's advice, more if they keep slogging on the way they are slogging.

I suspect I will be in for a rude surprise when the next Allied Invasion lands.

And when I lose 300 cargo ships...2000+ VP there I bet.

And then Chungking falling...a double whammy as it removes VP from my denominator!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7766
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 6:12:21 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		As this game winds down, lots of AARs mention great units or big battles or the turning point.

I am not going to do that.

Instead, I am assessing reader participation and will hand out some awards to you, the dear reader.

Hopefully this doesn't offend anyone, and I am coming up with several different awards.

Everyone won't be getting an award. So don't get offended if you don't, but, hey, you can hand out your own awards too!

Feel free.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7767
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 6:46:33 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

As this game winds down, lots of AARs mention great units or big battles or the turning point.

I am not going to do that.

Instead, I am assessing reader participation and will hand out some awards to you, the dear reader.

Hopefully this doesn't offend anyone, and I am coming up with several different awards.

Everyone won't be getting an award. So don't get offended if you don't, but, hey, you can hand out your own awards too!

Feel free.

No worries - we should all be grown up enough to cope with being left out of other people's award decisions and just reward ourselves!
Now I have to decide: beer, wine or Magnum Ice Cream bars!


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 7768
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 6:52:27 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

As this game winds down, lots of AARs mention great units or big battles or the turning point.

I am not going to do that.

Instead, I am assessing reader participation and will hand out some awards to you, the dear reader.

Hopefully this doesn't offend anyone, and I am coming up with several different awards.

Everyone won't be getting an award. So don't get offended if you don't, but, hey, you can hand out your own awards too!

Feel free.

No worries - we should all be grown up enough to cope with being left out of other people's award decisions and just reward ourselves!
Now I have to decide: beer, wine or Magnum Ice Cream bars!



I not-so-humbly nominate myself for the "yellow cornflakes" award.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 7769
RE: Disaster! - 7/12/2016 7:06:30 PM   
panzer cat

 

Posts: 165
Joined: 10/2/2011
From: occupied Virginia
Status: offline 		Everyone should get a participation award

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 7770
Page:   <<   < prev  257 258 [259] 260 261   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Disaster! Page: <<   < prev  257 258 [259] 260 261   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.109