Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 3:08:48 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
The camera makes a huge difference to recon missions.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 751
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 3:19:18 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Nov 8, 1942

Quiet day, except for 4e bombing in burma focused on troops. Many damaged bombers for a total of 1 support squad and 1 gun destroyed. 3 Allied planes lost total versus 2 for Japan.

Normal bombardments today, and a deliberate attack - the first- will go in at Batavia maybe tomorrow (all the troops are there but two tank units). 3400 IJA AV versus 600 Allied AV. Maybe I can squeak by with a 1-1 but I doubt it. Forts are probably 6 and the terrain is nasty.

Batavia has been bombarded for about 7 days now, and it has knocked down Allied AV by 80 points. Perhaps I should just keep bombarding for another week or two before launching my first deliberate attack...The other option is to deliberate attack, bombard with ART for three to four days while the Infantry recovers, and then deliberate attack again, until the base falls. Not really sure which would be faster.

I have brought some light cruisers in to bombard the city to prevent the forts from rebuilding.

I am half way to having the PP for a Division which I could use on Port Moresby or China, or I could buy out 5 ART units now, and get them over to Rangoon to be able to bombard that city daily or to China. However, if Batavia can fall relatively quickly, then I can start to move some more units from Java to Rangoon. Decisions.








(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 752
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 6:22:23 AM   
Spidery

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 10/6/2012
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
The Ann and Sonia have an SR of 1 so can maintain a higher rate of operations out of small airfields in China.

I don't know if it works, but are the Sonia's 4x50Kg bombs almost as likely to get a hit as 4x250kg bombs from a 2E and will that hit have just as much effect in forcing a unit out of move mode?

The Sonia has a very short transfer range.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 753
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 12:12:05 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
I divided the Sonia up into thirds, sent all the good pilots to the reserve, and sent two off to China and one to the Kuriles to see how well they do as recon planes, and to experiment if the detection gets raised even if they bomb.

Perhaps I will have a decent use for up to 2 squadrons of Sonia.

Decided to bombard in Batavia for another day...





(in reply to Spidery)
Post #: 754
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 2:59:56 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Ah, but they aren't the actual AVG airgroups. The airframes would still be available, of course, as the AVG withdraws to pools. Could be the pilots, too, as those get sent to pools with the planes.


Aren't the AVG classed as American units though?

The H81's can be used by the Chinese Air Force, but I'm fairly sure the pilots can only transfer into American units.


Looks like American group names to me in the combat replay.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I have a Babs factory that will be switched out soon, and I am pondering into what direction it will go.

I currently have no production of single engine bombers: Ida, Ann, Mary, Sonia. It costs PP to move those squadrons to twin engine use or fighter bombers (which are ridiculously expensive).

Ida: worthless, except I have 370 engines, trainer only.

Ann: best, few engines, no engine factory

Mary: 80 engines, range 1 less than Ann, no engine factory

Sonia: small multiple bombs, short range, Camera, existing engine factory 120 in pool

I am somewhat intrigued by the Sonia because of the Camera. Does it raise detection level on normal bomb runs thus enhancing other bomber attacks?

Or am I better off just using all the 1E bombers as trainers and not making anymore of them and instead go r and d for a late war fighter.

I have pressed some Anns into ASW work, and use the Sonia in China, so they do see some actual work.



If you are going to use these planes on ASW, you should use them on Search in my opinion. They don't have the bomb load to sink any subs. Better to use them for suppression via DL rather than killing.

FWIW, I don't produce any 1E bombers at all. I concentrate my IJAAF bomber production on the Ki-21-Ic Sally until the Helen-IIa becomes available. Then I produce that one. After that... Don't know yet. The Helen-II lasts a while. The Peggy is available later, and I'll probably switch, but perhaps not completely. I may not need an upgrade in China, for example.

You can use these planes for Recon missions, as usual, however they aren't Recon-type planes so they won't be very effective at raising the DL. There was a discussion about cameras a few weeks ago and Alfred posted a link to an old thread. In that old thread, it says that cameras are basically a chance to raise the DL by some value related to the effect value of the camera (I think up to +4 DL). Obviously, you still need air crews skilled in Recon for this use to be most effective. I would consider using the Sonia in this role, but probably no others, and only as an auxiliary measure as the Sonia doesn't have much range and you have plenty of other Recon groups if you split them into 3's.

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 755
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 3:59:50 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Ah, but they aren't the actual AVG airgroups. The airframes would still be available, of course, as the AVG withdraws to pools. Could be the pilots, too, as those get sent to pools with the planes.


Aren't the AVG classed as American units though?

The H81's can be used by the Chinese Air Force, but I'm fairly sure the pilots can only transfer into American units.


Looks like American group names to me in the combat replay.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I have a Babs factory that will be switched out soon, and I am pondering into what direction it will go.

I currently have no production of single engine bombers: Ida, Ann, Mary, Sonia. It costs PP to move those squadrons to twin engine use or fighter bombers (which are ridiculously expensive).

Ida: worthless, except I have 370 engines, trainer only.

Ann: best, few engines, no engine factory

Mary: 80 engines, range 1 less than Ann, no engine factory

Sonia: small multiple bombs, short range, Camera, existing engine factory 120 in pool

I am somewhat intrigued by the Sonia because of the Camera. Does it raise detection level on normal bomb runs thus enhancing other bomber attacks?

Or am I better off just using all the 1E bombers as trainers and not making anymore of them and instead go r and d for a late war fighter.

I have pressed some Anns into ASW work, and use the Sonia in China, so they do see some actual work.



If you are going to use these planes on ASW, you should use them on Search in my opinion. They don't have the bomb load to sink any subs. Better to use them for suppression via DL rather than killing.

FWIW, I don't produce any 1E bombers at all. I concentrate my IJAAF bomber production on the Ki-21-Ic Sally until the Helen-IIa becomes available. Then I produce that one. After that... Don't know yet. The Helen-II lasts a while. The Peggy is available later, and I'll probably switch, but perhaps not completely. I may not need an upgrade in China, for example.

You can use these planes for Recon missions, as usual, however they aren't Recon-type planes so they won't be very effective at raising the DL. There was a discussion about cameras a few weeks ago and Alfred posted a link to an old thread. In that old thread, it says that cameras are basically a chance to raise the DL by some value related to the effect value of the camera (I think up to +4 DL). Obviously, you still need air crews skilled in Recon for this use to be most effective. I would consider using the Sonia in this role, but probably no others, and only as an auxiliary measure as the Sonia doesn't have much range and you have plenty of other Recon groups if you split them into 3's.

quote:


Looks like American group names to me in the combat replay.


They're marked as CAF groups in the replay.

Chinese Air Force

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 756
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 4:09:31 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

You can use these planes for Recon missions, as usual, however they aren't Recon-type planes so they won't be very effective at raising the DL. There was a discussion about cameras a few weeks ago and Alfred posted a link to an old thread. In that old thread, it says that cameras are basically a chance to raise the DL by some value related to the effect value of the camera (I think up to +4 DL). Obviously, you still need air crews skilled in Recon for this use to be most effective. I would consider using the Sonia in this role, but probably no others, and only as an auxiliary measure as the Sonia doesn't have much range and you have plenty of other Recon groups if you split them into 3's.


I have a tough time maxing detection levels, so the Sonia's are going to go help, plus I get to experiment with their usage. It would be nice if the cameras worked on regular bombing runs, but I don't think they will.

Previously, they were set on 40/40/20 ASW/Train/Rest to build up pilots for Lilly ASW squadrons. I had no ASW pilots when I took over. I agree that their Naval Search would be better use for them in an ASW role.

Do you convert all your 1e groups over to 2e bombers or do you use them as training platforms? Combination?




(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 757
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 4:42:49 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

quote:


Looks like American group names to me in the combat replay.


They're marked as CAF groups in the replay.

Chinese Air Force


Herp? I probably herped.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

You can use these planes for Recon missions, as usual, however they aren't Recon-type planes so they won't be very effective at raising the DL. There was a discussion about cameras a few weeks ago and Alfred posted a link to an old thread. In that old thread, it says that cameras are basically a chance to raise the DL by some value related to the effect value of the camera (I think up to +4 DL). Obviously, you still need air crews skilled in Recon for this use to be most effective. I would consider using the Sonia in this role, but probably no others, and only as an auxiliary measure as the Sonia doesn't have much range and you have plenty of other Recon groups if you split them into 3's.


I have a tough time maxing detection levels, so the Sonia's are going to go help, plus I get to experiment with their usage. It would be nice if the cameras worked on regular bombing runs, but I don't think they will.

Previously, they were set on 40/40/20 ASW/Train/Rest to build up pilots for Lilly ASW squadrons. I had no ASW pilots when I took over. I agree that their Naval Search would be better use for them in an ASW role.

Do you convert all your 1e groups over to 2e bombers or do you use them as training platforms? Combination?



Sonias on Recon can definitely help your DLs.

I convert all my 1E groups to 2Es as the Lily and Sally airframes become available from upgrading Sally units to Helens. Here's what I do once I have 30+ Helens in the pool:

1) Any Lily units on the front lines? Upgrade those as they only carry 4x100kg bombs. If NO, proceed:
2) Any Sally-Ic units on the front?
2a) Any Sally-IIa units on the front? If NO, proceed:
3) Free for use anywhere

With a Sally pool, I check for Lily units first and then Sonia/Ann/Ida/Mary units. With a Lily pool, I look strictly at 1E units to upgrade. By August 1942, I have all my 1E units swapped out to 2Es except for a very few in Manchukuo. I transfer as many bombers as possible to China, where they can get real combat training for free and skill up faster than if on simple 100% non-combat training.


I misspoke in my earlier post. I meant that I produce the Sally-Ic until out of Ha-5 engines (IIRC that's what it uses) and then the Sally-IIa only until the Helen-II is online.

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 758
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 5:07:19 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Here are my IJAAF numbers on 8/15/42.

# of planes / max group size - mission

Ann
27 / 27 - will upgrade soon. Was on Luzon, now elsewhere.
35 / 36 - Training
5 / 12 - will upgrade soon.

Mary
9 / 9 - Training

Ida
12 / 12 - Training
27 / 27 - Training

Sonia
14 / 36 - Training/minor work in China
12 / 12 - Training
9 / 9 - Training

Lily
9 / 27 - Training
27 / 27 - Training

(Operation airgroups below. Current plane status redacted for slight op sec!)

Helen IIa
5x27 Sentai - Combat
1x31 Sentai - Combat
1x18 Sentai - Combat
1x12 Sentai - Combat

Sally IIa
2x36 Sentai - Combat
3x31 Sentai - Combat
5x27 Sentai - Combat
1x27 Sentai - Training (HI restricted, arrived as Sally IIa)
1x24 Sentai - Combat
3x12 Sentai - Combat
1x12 Sentai - Training

Sally Ic
2x27 Sentai - Combat
2x27 Sentai - Training (restricted, arrived as Sally Ic)


I will eventually buy out the Sally training units and use them in combat training in Asia, I think. Same with the 2 Ann units that need upgrading. That will leave me with only a few 1E units left for some backup training.

I am using IJN units for ASW, though later in the war I will need more of them and less ground bombing so will transition some units to ASW. I skipped the Helen-I entirely, so no MAD in the IJAAF for me.




Edited to include screenshot. As you can see, I'm only producing the Helen IIa. You can also see that my losses up to 8/15/42 haven't been terrible - averaging just under 2 bombers per turn, most of that front-loaded in the DEI/SRA. You can also see that I'm researching the Peggy-T and Tsurugi.

I have the luxury of playing with PDU On, so don't need to build anything else. This means that pretty much all of my build need will be filled with Helens. I'm including all of this info in case it is of use to you as a reference point... Just keep in mind that our games could be wildly different and I could be totally wrong .

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lokasenna -- 5/21/2014 6:17:02 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 759
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 6:42:53 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Thanks, I do find it of interest.

My bomber losses are more than 3x yours! However, since I have taken over they aren't nearly as bad. I am losing .1 HelenIIa a turn for example, and that plane didn't exist prior to my reign of course the nature of battle has changed somewhat too.

I have 49 planes in my pools mostly Helens (1 and II) and a few Ann & Sonia. I have a tremendous number of understaffed bomber units.

I am making more HelenIIa than you...

I am also researching the Peggy T, but only with one size 30 factory...didn't want to put anymore into it, since I was concerned about training, and to a degree, rightly or wrongly, I am relying upon Lilly IIb to be a anti-ship Army plane for me.

I still have a few odds and end r and d here I have never changed from takeover. Mainly, because I didn't want to spend any supply.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 760
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 7:06:09 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
I am making so few Helens because the Sally is pretty much as good as the Helen - same bomb load, similar range. The Helen's main advantage is armor, and you don't need that if you're not facing flak or fighters (China and other backwaters). 90 per month is actually way more than I will use, long term. I will shut off 30 of them at some point I'm sure. I've lost 24 Helens over the course of 4 months. Even if I were to replace every Sally Ic and Sally IIa with Helens, it would only take me 6 months to build all of those planes (504 plus losses). And that includes the restricted Sally units. And then the Sally airframes can be used on the Lily units, the Ann units, etc.

Depending on upgrade path, I may upgrade the Anns directly to Helens.

Also note the sheer number of Sallys that I have. I lost about 300, have almost 100 in pools, and have 500 in the field. I made a lot of Sallys while I waited for the Helen. I think my production for them was 21/month for the Sally Ic and maybe 40/month for the IIa.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 761
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/21/2014 7:56:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Well, Spidery put up his LB production/usage too, Fascinating.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3454012&mpage=24

I am definitely winning the Helen IIa production with a whopping 161 and really could use more of them! I have five sentai and five chutai upgraded to them and they are all seeing heavy work in China, the Kuriles, and Ambon.

I am not sure that is something I should be proud about.


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 762
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/22/2014 12:55:36 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
A rough count, my level bomber units are short by over 200 planes. Other than bombing where there can be no Allied fighters, they pretty much train or do ASW or train and do ASW.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 763
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/22/2014 1:58:52 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Nov 9, 1942

Quiet day. Allied 4e hit burma, at the ground troops again and kill a support squad.

Allies seem to have pulled their ships back and are content to fight in the air. I pretty much try to avoid fighting in the air.

Allied subs pretty active in the PI and Kuriles area, but no damage done.

1st Deliberate attack at Batavia for tomorrow.

I am starting to garrison the inner islands to prevent a slashing attack ala Nemo: Iwo Jima, Guam and improving the troops on Wake and Marcus.

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/22/2014 12:39:45 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 764
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/22/2014 11:55:23 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Here you can see my absolutely devastated bomber ranks...pretty horrible eh? I am now building quite a few Helens, but it will be another full month or more before things finally improve here.

Next month the Lilly IIb will come on line with a production level of 60, so this should be totally turned around in two full months.

On the positive side, I do have half decent pilots and am training up even more.

However, they are having no real impact on the Allies other than ASW, and bombing one hex of Chinese troops.

I would like to blame all this on the other Emperor, but unfortunately I have flown into several good CAP traps. Not having fighters really kind of stinks. On the brighter side, I am saving a lot of supplies by having such a small air force.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/22/2014 1:15:08 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 765
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/22/2014 12:12:26 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Tiemanj might show up in the AAR, I have given him permission to access the first page. So it is ok if you see him here.

He will be starting an AAR, as he wants to improve his game.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 766
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/22/2014 5:43:08 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I am starting to garrison the inner islands to prevent a slashing attack ala Nemo: Iwo Jima, Guam and improving the troops on Wake and Marcus.



Transfer the Bonin chain from Southern Army to General Defence Army. There are two Infantry Groups in the Home Islands that you can then fly out to the Bonins, artillery and all.

Better still, some time in late 1943 they get reinforcements to make them full divisions - just in time for when you're likely to be threatened by an Allied dagger into the Bonin.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 767
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/22/2014 5:46:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Here is my wonderful, interlocking, mutually supportive defense of the Bonins and Marianas. Procrastination, apathy, and lack of strategic planning at its best.

I am shipping here now at least one garrison unit, and 7 construction or engineering units for construction to begin.

Given Allied ship losses, I can't foresee that they will launch another offensive, but I am surely wrong given the tenor of this game so far. I suspect he will use his carriers to fly planes into some land based airport and then retreat with the carriers like he has done in Java.

I am attacking in Batavia and its nasty terrain today, and the result of that battle will determine what I do with my PP saved up. Either I will buy a slug of ART for Rangoon or keep saving for a Division.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 768
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 10:57:18 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Nov 1, 1942

Allied Heavy Bombers hit Magwe, the refineries are nearly gone, but the oil production still mostly remains. 9 big gun AA units manages to disrupt the attacks and cause some casualties.

The Allies left Magwe alone, when I had 200 fighters there, until they cottoned on the idea of sending in night bomber sweeps. They did this for an entire moon cycle and I lost probably more than 40 fighters to no losses for the Allies other than the occasional op loss. After this degradation of the fighters, I also had to move a Sentai away to protect Soerabaja. Then the Allies, in one day launched a large day time assault that shredded the weakened defenders.

The Allies then hit the neighboring air bases to prevent surprise before revisiting Magwe for destruction.

This strategy seems to me impossible to defend against, at least until I get night fighters and even then not until I get the radar equipped versions.

If I don't fly at night, the industry will burn. However, the steady loss of planes at night eventually weakens the daytime defense. If I do fly at night, I suffer the steady loss of fighters until the Allies can overwhelm the base in a large daytime raid. No real good answer here, especially with my depleted air force.

First deliberate attack at Batavia goes very well dropping forts and getting a 1-1. Will rest for a day, and attack the following day. ART bombardments will keep up.

P38G sweep at 31K shows up at Rabaul and nails the Oscars there.

Another attack in China causes over 100 Chinese squads destroyed...slow steady progress with no losses.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 769
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 11:18:01 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Tracom pilot usage:

I am trying to stuff every army pilot I can into Tracom now. One, for the training boost and HI savings, and two to save them.

I don't know how well it will work, but every Army Tracom pilots is going to go into night fighter squadrons, especially the planes with radar and armor.

This is part of my supply preservation goal for the endgame.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 770
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 11:21:35 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Transfer the Bonin chain from Southern Army to General Defence Army. There are two Infantry Groups in the Home Islands that you can then fly out to the Bonins, artillery and all.


Haha-Jima is General Defense. I can't switch Iwo out, and Chichi-jima can only go to the Southern command.

Is there a trick to opening up the command structure?

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 771
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 11:25:19 AM   
Spidery

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 10/6/2012
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing
Transfer the Bonin chain from Southern Army to General Defence Army. There are two Infantry Groups in the Home Islands that you can then fly out to the Bonins, artillery and all.


Haha-Jima is General Defense. I can't switch Iwo out, and Chichi-jima can only go to the Southern command.

Is there a trick to opening up the command structure?


Yes, put a cheap unit in the base (e.g, an AA unit), switch unit to General Defense, then you can switch the base to General Defense.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 772
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 11:31:26 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Many thanks.

(in reply to Spidery)
Post #: 773
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 1:54:27 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
There are two infantry groups, I've sent one to Chichi-jima and the other one is going to Haha-jima. You need to get some engineers to Iwo Jima, however, as you can't fly troops in until that base has a level 1 airfield.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 774
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 4:15:21 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

There are two infantry groups, I've sent one to Chichi-jima and the other one is going to Haha-jima. You need to get some engineers to Iwo Jima, however, as you can't fly troops in until that base has a level 1 airfield.


Taken care of, thanks for the tip.



(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 775
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 4:25:32 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Looky...two CVEs off Karachi. Who knows if that is accurate, probably not. Perhaps he is trying to get some ASW there? He has to be tired of losing tankers in that area.

Today, I switched over a factory to r&d for the Nick d version night fighter. It is the first Army night fighter. I am convinced I need to staff as many night fighter squadrons as possible to avoid Obvert's fate in the endgame (no supplies). Tiemanj is already using night bomber raids to cause all sorts of losses, and I need to counter strongly as soon as I am able to.

Even though the Nick isn't a great plane, it does come earliest for the Army, and at least has armor.

I have three size 30 factories going after the first Irving.

The goal here is to keep the industry running for as long as possible in 45 creating supplies.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 776
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 4:43:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Events to look forward to:

1. I have two surface raiding groups of heavy cruisers out and about looking to hit Allied transports.

2. I am one day away from another raid on Makin, smaller in structure than the previous raid, but a couple of juicy targets have shown up.

3. Deliberate attacks in Batavia and the Kuriles soon. Hopefully, they will net me a large score of victory points. I have started to move small units to finish of the encirclement at Tjilatjap fully enclosing that mass of Allied troops.

4. Ship adventures in the Kuriles is slowing because of the brutal winter, but I still visit his base with a bombardment a day.

5. China: closing off the Changsha pocket and snaring 40 Chinese units.

6. Thinking about attacking Ceylon, especially if I can grab a port for free. This would be one to two months away, once Java is neutralized. However, I am starting to quietly recon the area. This would be a combined KB & mini KB action with overwhelming force. I would take the island, strip it of supplies and fuel, and leave.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/23/2014 5:44:11 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 777
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 4:57:51 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

There are two infantry groups, I've sent one to Chichi-jima and the other one is going to Haha-jima. You need to get some engineers to Iwo Jima, however, as you can't fly troops in until that base has a level 1 airfield.


Taken care of, thanks for the tip.





Unless you use Mavis for it.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 778
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 5:57:40 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Just a quick note re plane upgrades. I have been relying upon Tracker to show me the units that can upgrade to the desired plane, and have been disappointed by the lack of Judy upgrades.

It seems however that I am doing something wrong with tracker, because I can convert all or almost all Babs units into the Judy. My second squadron upgraded yesterday and will be relocating to the mini kb.

My first use of this carrier capable plane and I am very happy with her performance in the Kuriles, flying in tough weather without a loss and always able to spot the enemy. I guess since the enemy was burning and emitting huge columns of oily black smoke made the Judy's job fairly straight forward.!

So two thumbs up for the Judy-C, a plane I never bothered with against the AI.

PS: Jeesh! I have to be careful now not to accidentally enter the wrong AAR!

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/23/2014 7:09:33 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 779
RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded - 5/23/2014 7:17:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Nov 11, 1942

Hey, they can be shot down!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 780
Page:   <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Kuriles Counter Invaded Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.906