RE: New to the game - Basic Questions

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> WIF School >> RE: New to the game - Basic Questions

Page: << < prev 19 20 [21] 22 23 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 12/26/2015 4:31:31 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

Yes, it's the same as the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact...

Thanks. Shifting gears (i.e., another, unrelated question).

My question concerns the surprise German invasion of the Netherlands. From what I can tell most, many or all experienced WiF players stress that its key for both Rotterdam and Amsterdam to be captured on the 1st, or surprise, impulse of the invasion in order to keep CW troops from coming ashore in the Netherlands. Why would CW troops in the Netherlands in 1940 be more than just an inconvenience? Given CW transport and troop limitations in 1939, or early 1940, wouldn't these troops likely be the BEF anyway? What CW strategy am I missing here?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)

Post #: 601

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 12/26/2015 5:14:41 PM

AlbertN

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline

Because Rotterdam is behind rivers, and hinders access to Belgium and how many Axis units can attack Belgium itself in the surprise impulse in general.
Ontop that these UK units in Rotterdam can indeed be as well extra than the ones for the BEF as they'd not count against Gort limits in France.

So pratically the UK can easily have Rotterdam as a forward base from where to operate too their FTRs.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 602

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 12/26/2015 5:15:23 PM

Shannon V. OKeets

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

Yes, it's the same as the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact...

Thanks. Shifting gears (i.e., another, unrelated question).

My question concerns the surprise German invasion of the Netherlands. From what I can tell most, many or all experienced WiF players stress that its key for both Rotterdam and Amsterdam to be captured on the 1st, or surprise, impulse of the invasion in order to keep CW troops from coming ashore in the Netherlands. Why would CW troops in the Netherlands in 1940 be more than just an inconvenience? Given CW transport and troop limitations in 1939, or early 1940, wouldn't these troops likely be the BEF anyway? What CW strategy am I missing here?

If the BEF land in the Netherlands (Rotterdam usually), then one of the Belgian units should be able to survive. If the 3 Belgian land units are the only land units in Belgium, then the Germans should be able to take out all 3 of them in the surprise impulse of the DOW on Belgium. Thus, the Allies lose not only another useful corps, but also a couple of nice defensive hexes.

Usually the Belgians would set up in Liege, Antwerp, and Brussels. Then the Germans can get pretty good attacks from 6 hexes: 1, 2 and 3 hexes for each Belgian unit. Given their air units and maybe the Para unit, all those attacks should be able to destroy the 1 Belgian unit in each hex. The Allies would then only be able to occupy 4 hexes in Belgium - 3 of which are Clear terrain.

If you place a couple of Commonwealth corps in Rotterdam and then set up the Belgians, you can place 1 corps in Liege, another in Luxembourg, and have a third left over. Just don't place the third unit in Antwerp or Brussels or anywhere alone that can be attacked by the Germans. When the Allied impulse rolls around, the Allies can occupy both Antwerp and Brussels. Of course, you have to be careful to not reenact the historical disaster of letting the Germans blitz through from the Ardennes to Dunkirk.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 603

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 12/28/2015 2:26:25 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cohen

Because Rotterdam is behind rivers, and hinders access to Belgium and how many Axis units can attack Belgium itself in the surprise impulse in general.
Ontop that these UK units in Rotterdam can indeed be as well extra than the ones for the BEF as they'd not count against Gort limits in France.

So pratically the UK can easily have Rotterdam as a forward base from where to operate too their FTRs.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

Yes, it's the same as the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact...

Thanks. Shifting gears (i.e., another, unrelated question).

My question concerns the surprise German invasion of the Netherlands. From what I can tell most, many or all experienced WiF players stress that its key for both Rotterdam and Amsterdam to be captured on the 1st, or surprise, impulse of the invasion in order to keep CW troops from coming ashore in the Netherlands. Why would CW troops in the Netherlands in 1940 be more than just an inconvenience? Given CW transport and troop limitations in 1939, or early 1940, wouldn't these troops likely be the BEF anyway? What CW strategy am I missing here?

If the BEF land in the Netherlands (Rotterdam usually), then one of the Belgian units should be able to survive. If the 3 Belgian land units are the only land units in Belgium, then the Germans should be able to take out all 3 of them in the surprise impulse of the DOW on Belgium. Thus, the Allies lose not only another useful corps, but also a couple of nice defensive hexes.

Usually the Belgians would set up in Liege, Antwerp, and Brussels. Then the Germans can get pretty good attacks from 6 hexes: 1, 2 and 3 hexes for each Belgian unit. Given their air units and maybe the Para unit, all those attacks should be able to destroy the 1 Belgian unit in each hex. The Allies would then only be able to occupy 4 hexes in Belgium - 3 of which are Clear terrain.

If you place a couple of Commonwealth corps in Rotterdam and then set up the Belgians, you can place 1 corps in Liege, another in Luxembourg, and have a third left over. Just don't place the third unit in Antwerp or Brussels or anywhere alone that can be attacked by the Germans. When the Allied impulse rolls around, the Allies can occupy both Antwerp and Brussels. Of course, you have to be careful to not reenact the historical disaster of letting the Germans blitz through from the Ardennes to Dunkirk.

Appreciate the insights ... Thanks!

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to AlbertN)

Post #: 604

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 12/30/2015 10:03:43 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Situation: Italian subs and German u-boats in the same area. Italy just declared war on the CW, but Germany been at war with the CW for a while. Would the Italians still get the benefit of a surprise attack if the Italians and Germans combine to attack the CW in that sea area? If not, is there any way that only the Italians could attack?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 605

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 12/30/2015 11:28:46 PM

paulderynck

Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

The answer to both is No, unless the Germans are separate and in a lower box, and you are lucky enough to only roll the Italians into the combat.

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 606

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 12/30/2015 11:38:09 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

The answer to both is No, unless the Germans are separate and in a lower box, and you are lucky enough to only roll the Italians into the combat.

OK, thanks. Then when surprising an enemy at sea you don't won't to mix with naval units of an ally that isn't surprising. Good to know.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to paulderynck)

Post #: 607

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 1/4/2016 7:16:28 AM

Joseignacio

Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

quote:

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

If enemy convoys are there, you still have a one in 10 chance to find them next turn if the weather is fine, but I would never leave them out in the zero box.

Generally the only time to leave them out is if they are not disorganized and there's a very good chance enemy units will RTB through their sea zone, especially if they are in the 3-box and even more especially if enemy convoys are also present, since if there's an RTB interception battle, they'll get another chance to search for the convoys if the subs are still around, unless the enemy aborts all his forces which is also a good outcome so close to the production phase.

Otherwise all that leaving them out does is subtract one tenth from their chances to find in the next turn, albeit you'll need to take an action choice that will get them out to sea again. Thus it's a bigger consideration for Germany as opposed to the other powers.

So if I understand correctly, in general you return all subs/u-boats during the RTB unless they're in a high sea box (3 or 4) and are in position to intercept allied RTB's?

It seems that depends on the player.

And the options selected because of spending petrol or not if you are using oil rules.

And the season.

In my case, I many times don't return them because even in a 1 or 2 they can dissuade transports from moving freely or at least unescorted (and depending which expansions you are playing with, the escorts come to shortage sooner or later...

Of course it would be nicer to move them anew from the ports and reach a higher level at sea, but in good weather turns, you usually are too busy fighting in the land or moving your units, so you need land movements or at least combined (only possible exception CW should try to get a naval each turn if possible).

However, even the CW needs land moves, be them for blocking the Burma border, redeploy units in Egypt, or for the BEF in France or expeditionary forces in Greece, Portugal, Morocco or Yugoslavia, for example.

And the Germans can't even dream of Navals most of the time, combined being scarce.

If you leave your units at sea, you can use them with an activation from a combined, but also be activated by your allies or by the pass of enemy units.

Plus, if you are trying to attack convoys in a further area, looking for weaker escorts, you'll most probably reach the 1 box maximum, leaving them at sea at 0 box next turn makes your subs get a 10% (at least) to chase convoys instead of a 20%, but that is for free, you don't need any naval moves. And it's still a 10%. The bad side is the worse position against the escorts but we are speaking of weaker escorts and sometimes escorting only in the 0 box as well.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 608

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 1/4/2016 7:20:18 AM

Joseignacio

Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

quote:

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

Personally I think garrison ratio without chits is better. Otherwise Russia has a big advantage because she can often bring on a lot of reinforcements close to the border, whereas Japan's must appear in Japan unless they are Manchurians. Japan could try and anticipate what can appear out of the blue and maintain a minimum garrison. Also in years one and two, defensive garrisons are much harder to break, without a large commitment of units, so thus the other power should rightly see that something is brewing.

Ok then, garrison ratios without chits. What ratios would you use?

1st year: No break or would allow if given certain ratio?

2nd year: ratio?

3rd year: ratio?

Use the rules as written: No break the first year; 2:1 ratio after that, with defender doubled the first year, times one the second, times one half the third, one third the fourth, etc.

How do you understand the RAW re this?:

quote:

Garrison ratios
You may break a neutrality pact, any turn after the calendar year following its signing, provided you have at least a 2:1 garrison ratio on your common border.

It means 12 months afterwards or you could make the pact in December and break it in January beacause it's already a new (�calendar?) year?

We always play with the first version, 12 months.

(in reply to Courtenay)

Post #: 609

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 1/4/2016 7:25:02 AM

paulderynck

Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

RAW7 is the next "calendar year" so yes, by the rules, a pact made in Nov/Dec could be broken in the following Jan/Feb. Your system would be a house rule.

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to Joseignacio)

Post #: 610

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 1/5/2016 12:36:10 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Shifting gears (again). Even when playing with the optional rule that makes it easier to break the Nazi-Soviet pact, I have trouble getting the garrison ratios necessary for a Jul/Aug 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union, much less a May/June 1941 one. I was wondering what strategies folks use, assuming this optional rule, in order to ensure a Jul/Aug 41 or even May/June 41 invasion?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to paulderynck)

Post #: 611

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 1/5/2016 1:34:29 PM

Joseignacio

Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

Thx

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 612

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 1/5/2016 3:27:20 PM

paulderynck

Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

Shifting gears (again). Even when playing with the optional rule that makes it easier to break the Nazi-Soviet pact, I have trouble getting the garrison ratios necessary for a Jul/Aug 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union, much less a May/June 1941 one. I was wondering what strategies folks use, assuming this optional rule, in order to ensure a Jul/Aug 41 or even May/June 41 invasion?

You have to have a build strategy with Germany that ramps up to MJ or JA. If you spend on ships, subs and lending to Italy then it is quite conceivable you won't be able to break the pact until 1942.

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 613

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 2/8/2016 2:14:11 PM

VictorCharlie

Posts: 129
Joined: 4/9/2004
Status: offline

Great thread. Learned a lot about the game reading this.

One question?

What do the �1 and �2 under the ships mean? Thanks.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to paulderynck)

Post #: 614

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 2/8/2016 5:29:17 PM

Centuur

Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline

That number is the reduction which takes place for shore bombardment, due to the lower sea box number they are in. There are some other area's too, where that number is needed (invasion comes into mind).

F.e.: all French vessels have a -2, so only the Bretagne can shore bombard with only 1 combat factor.

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to VictorCharlie)

Post #: 615

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 2/26/2016 11:25:30 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

The USA mandatory trade to Japan: I was trying to "replace" 1 non-oil RP being sent from the USA to Japan with the RP located in the Philippines but couldn't make that happen. I had a CP in the South China Sea and one in the China sea in place for this. Was I trying to do something that wasn't legal?

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 2/26/2016 11:26:50 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)

Post #: 616

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 2/27/2016 12:08:57 AM

paulderynck

Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

It is legal in the boardgame. Did you try using the CP routing overrides?

Another thought is to try without (and with if needed) the CP routing overrides but leave the 5 CPs out in the proscribed sea zones anyway (since the US can spare a few) and see if that may work. (When done in the boardgame you can RTB the excess CPs.)

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 617

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 2/27/2016 3:40:47 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

It is legal in the boardgame. Did you try using the CP routing overrides?

Another thought is to try without (and with if needed) the CP routing overrides but leave the 5 CPs out in the proscribed sea zones anyway (since the US can spare a few) and see if that may work. (When done in the boardgame you can RTB the excess CPs.)

The strategic materials embargo option had been selected so I only needed 3 CPs in prescribed sea areas. I went through manually trying to route the Philippine RP and disable the one non-oil RP still being routed from the USA. After 30-minutes of trying to do I gave up and eventually just routed the Philippine RP to the USA.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to paulderynck)

Post #: 618

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 2/27/2016 11:18:26 PM

Shannon V. OKeets

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

The USA mandatory trade to Japan: I was trying to "replace" 1 non-oil RP being sent from the USA to Japan with the RP located in the Philippines but couldn't make that happen. I had a CP in the South China Sea and one in the China sea in place for this. Was I trying to do something that wasn't legal?

This is not possible in MWIF. The resources have to come from the United States proper (48 states).

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 619

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 2/28/2016 3:52:55 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

The USA mandatory trade to Japan: I was trying to "replace" 1 non-oil RP being sent from the USA to Japan with the RP located in the Philippines but couldn't make that happen. I had a CP in the South China Sea and one in the China sea in place for this. Was I trying to do something that wasn't legal?

This is not possible in MWIF. The resources have to come from the United States proper (48 states).

That's good to know. Thanks for the answer.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)

Post #: 620

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/9/2016 4:09:32 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

For purposes of activating a country when, for example 4 corps in an adjacent country are required, do HQ units count as corps?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 621

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/9/2016 5:56:45 PM

Courtenay

Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

For purposes of activating a country when, for example 4 corps in an adjacent country are required, do HQ units count as corps?

Yes. MWiF indicates them as Armies or Army Groups, but that is for flavor. For all game purposes they are counted as corps.

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 622

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/9/2016 7:11:07 PM

Mayhemizer_slith

Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

For purposes of activating a country when, for example 4 corps in an adjacent country are required, do HQ units count as corps?

Yes. MWiF indicates them as Armies or Army Groups, but that is for flavor. For all game purposes they are counted as corps.

Do divisions or planes count at all?

(in reply to Courtenay)

Post #: 623

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/9/2016 7:38:01 PM

paulderynck

Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

For purposes of activating a country when, for example 4 corps in an adjacent country are required, do HQ units count as corps?

Yes. MWiF indicates them as Armies or Army Groups, but that is for flavor. For all game purposes they are counted as corps.

Do divisions or planes count at all?

No

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)

Post #: 624

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/19/2016 8:21:48 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

For purposes of activating a country when, for example 4 corps in an adjacent country are required, do HQ units count as corps?

Yes. MWiF indicates them as Armies or Army Groups, but that is for flavor. For all game purposes they are counted as corps.

My understanding is that the 4 corps do NOT need to be in supply. That is, one or more can be out of supply. Correct? Do they need to be organized?

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Courtenay)

Post #: 625

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/19/2016 8:30:16 PM

Orm

Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline

They are counted even if disorganized and out of supply. Being there is enough. Enemy ZOC does not matter either.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 626

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/19/2016 9:13:30 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

They are counted even if disorganized and out of supply. Being there is enough. Enemy ZOC does not matter either.

Wow ... just get them there and wait!

Do they have to be Italian or could one of the corps be an Iraqi corps aligned to the Italians?

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 3/19/2016 9:14:28 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Orm)

Post #: 627

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/20/2016 3:38:50 AM

Orm

Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline

All Italians or all Germans. The Iraqi one does not count.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 628

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/21/2016 1:13:08 PM

Joseignacio

Posts: 2449
Joined: 5/8/2009
From: Madrid, Spain
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

They are counted even if disorganized and out of supply. Being there is enough. Enemy ZOC does not matter either.

Wow ... just get them there and wait!

Do they have to be Italian or could one of the corps be an Iraqi corps aligned to the Italians?

I had this done once. I was too involved in Poland in the first turns, in order to crack it in one or max two impulses and run back to France with all.

The french player made a bad ratio attack in the Siegfried line and was lucky, so I had to block it but he could put more planes and Inf than I could and for a short time he controlled up to two hexes, which were enough to activate ... the Yugoslavian /( I couldn't believe that YUG was adjacent to GE but it was because AUT was part of GE

.

It just made a little bit more difficult to take YUG, for they had a better deployment, at the cost of the roll for a chit loss for the USA player and a gift of +0.5 in production for GE. Of course they had to go back pretty soon but they made their heroic action

.

< Message edited by Joseignacio -- 3/21/2016 1:14:29 PM >

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 629

RE: New to the game - Basic Questions - 3/22/2016 12:35:49 AM

paulderynck

Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

You were fortunate the Yugos didn't take out the Austrian oil, Vienna and Bratislava. And without Poland conquered, this could also have cut off the resources from Hungary and Turkey and Ploesti.

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to Joseignacio)

Post #: 630