Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

January 1943 Summary

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> January 1943 Summary Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
January 1943 Summary - 8/3/2016 5:31:17 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
Jan 43 Summary

Another busy month in the bank! Allies made some progress without losing the fleet, and another month closer to the Hellcat! L_S_T continues to throw surprises at me, especially with the KB employment, which has made some adventures a bit bloody. But overall, it was a good month with solid gains in SWPAC and SOPAC – although the SWPAC Gove venture has been costly. I certainly didn’t expect the heavy air opposition, including the KB air being employed against the Port Hedland land attack, and progress has been slow. Another month without a decisive naval engagement, although there were some opportunities. Lack of air frame continue to limit actions, and I really think I’m over extending beyond capabilities at this point. Naval losses for the month were fairly light for both sides, with only one major naval engagement; IJN reported losses for the month were 2DD, 7SS and 8SSX as compared to the Allies losing a 4DD, 2SS and 10PT. In the air, it was a very good month for the Allied Cause, 1181 for Jpn to 551 Allied – achieving better than a 2-1 loss ratio for the first time.

INTEL: L_S_T sending the KB to operate off Port Hedland was one heck of a surprise. Using the KB from a “central position” and being able to sortie toward Hedland or toward Gove does make sense – but also provides opportunities in both SOPAC and CENPAC. Taking advantage of these opportunities is the challenge! But Lunga invasion was accelerated because the KB was confirmed well away – and so far that is working well. The real question now is whether the KB will remain operating in its present location. Frankly, I have no idea.

SUBWAR: No better news here. Continued missed opportunities against the IJN fleet – I’m overdue for some success against a major warship! Against the merchant marine, results continue to disappoint – Jpn ASW a/c continue to have good success in keeping subs surpressed in high traffic areas.

West Coast/USA/Rear Areas: Lack of fighters across the board is still the major problem. While Jan was a solid month in the air, the losses can’t be sustained with that accelerated tempo – especially the British air arm in Burma. F4Fs are stretched all too thin as well for the USMC, and will remain in short supply until the Hellcat shows. The bomber situation should be getting better starting next month when the B-24D1 effectively triples the production of Heavies.

NOPAC. Just waiting for the weather to clear now to land at Attu. Troops in place at Dutch Harbor, Buldir Island is ready to provide air support and warships are slowly arriving. No IJN activity noted in or around Attu.

CENPAC. Been quiet. Troops in place at Christmas Is, just waiting on shipping released from the Lunga Landings. As long as the KB stays put, will go forward in CENPAC.

SOPAC. Was kinda surprised that L_S_T took the pressure off Kirakira early in the month – and was equally surprised when that “pressure” showed up in force off Port Hedland. But, did manage to pull together the Lunga landing to take advantage, and Kira was sufficiently built up to support. So far so good. Will scale down naval operations, with most of the transports and warships departing Theater – Rennel Is and Tulagi are the next near term targets for landings, while troops move across Guad to take Tassafaronga.

SWPAC. Well, Groote landings went off without a hitch, Gove is proving a bit more challenging. Still Groote AF is developed and can provide cover/support against LBA – but not of course if the KB comes calling. The KB is still the Bull in the China shop, and I don’t have the resources to counter it – and L_S_T is being fairly cautious in its employment, keeping it just out of land based SBD range from the major bases of Horn, Merauke and mainland OZ. Will continue to build up both Gove and Groote, as long as the KB move out of the way of course.

WAUS. The overland ground attack toward Port Hedland met an unforeseen snag – heavy employment of both LBA and KB air to interdict the move. That cost me a Bde(+) of effectives that will need time to rest and recoup losses, but the division sized (+) main body has continued to march toward the target. Port Hedland remains the focus, although I’ll need to suppress Broome with Heavies now.

Burma/India. Pretty much continued stalemate here. Good month in the air, but can not currently sustain that kind of tempo, even with a positive loss ratio. Will attempt to rekindle the air attrition when P-38Gs and Corsairs arrive next month and see what can be accomplished. Have learned that the British Air Arm is very fragile, and can’t sustain heavy losses – in either planes or pilots. On the ground, both sides seem to have culminated for the moment. Will resume limited offensive actions and heavy probes in Feb – goal is still to attrit the enemy.

China. The lone US P-40E squadron has done very well in executing CAP traps over Chungking – now my leading squadron with 251 kills – the last 150 over China. But that’s not going to defeat the Empire – on the ground, the IJA is slowly tightening the noose on Lanchow and Chungking. Will continue with CAP Traps as long as possible, and the fight goes on.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 661
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/5/2016 10:14:35 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Are you planning anything on CENPAC? Too many atolls there, I think it is wiser to wait for real amphibious capability for advancing in this theater.
SOPAC is a safer bet IMHO

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 662
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/6/2016 4:38:16 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Are you planning anything on CENPAC? Too many atolls there, I think it is wiser to wait for real amphibious capability for advancing in this theater.
SOPAC is a safer bet IMHO


One thing I have learned (from Aparog's AAR I think...) was that its best to have multiple axis of advance. I've found this especially true with L_S_T's tendency to really mass his fleet. That said, I'm going to open up a limited campaign in CENPAC - landing at Tabituea (sp?) and possibly a few other minor islands. Will still push slowly up the Solomon chain as well at the same time.

This may, or may not, pull the KB out of its hunting ground currently in the Arafura Sea - and as long as its there, my advance in SWPAC toward Darwin is on hold - when it pulls out, that advance will continue. WAUS slowly crawling to Port Hedland and shortly weather permitting I'll land on Attu - so my goal is to push on 4-5 axis of advance simultaneously in the Pacific Theater, less the one where the KB and the main IJN is located. While not involving the IJN, will also try and pressure in the Burma Theater.

So, I'm probably pushing too hard for my assets avail right now - airframes are the shortfall. Shipping is adequate, but not by much.

So that in a nutshell is the overall plan for the coming months....push where the KB and IJN aren't!

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 663
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/6/2016 6:44:49 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Do you have recon on Tabiteau? it is one of the juiciest targets of the Gilberts... which means he is likely defending it.

Max stacking is 40,000, a big atoll... but still an atoll, which is worrisome: you would need to amass a huge fleet of APDs, APs, AKs to guarantee quick unloading before the mandatory shock attack.
While in the other hand, you can wait a few months and do it with better tools (APAs, LSTs) you should have 3 Australian APAs coming soon (assuming of course you did the conversion)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 664
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/8/2016 8:58:33 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Do you have recon on Tabiteau? it is one of the juiciest targets of the Gilberts... which means he is likely defending it.

Max stacking is 40,000, a big atoll... but still an atoll, which is worrisome: you would need to amass a huge fleet of APDs, APs, AKs to guarantee quick unloading before the mandatory shock attack.
While in the other hand, you can wait a few months and do it with better tools (APAs, LSTs) you should have 3 Australian APAs coming soon (assuming of course you did the conversion)



Oh yeah, been doing recon on all the Gilberts for the last couple of months. Recon shows three units, 4800 troops, but only 29 guns. Intel says there are two construction units there. Figure he's got an SNLF or Naval Guard unit, plus the engineers.

I'm invading with 3rd USMC Div, Cmbt Eng Reg, Pioneer Bn, Tank Bn, Amtrac Bn, FA Bn all loaded in APs/AKs. Also have 1/3 of the US Army 24th Div as a floating reserve, also on APs, but will probably push that in on the following turn, along with construction Engineers.

Still a few turns away from loading all this and heading to the objective, but the troops are ready and prepped at 100% across the board.

This going to be enough??

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 665
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/9/2016 12:28:53 AM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Should be enough, assuming your intel is correct;

that said, better if you don't fill the APs to capacity, and keep some AKs devoted to supply only

most important, use all 3 phases for unloading: unload the day after you arrive

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 666
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/9/2016 5:10:32 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

most important, use all 3 phases for unloading: unload the day after you arrive


Hadn't thought about that at all - show up at the target with "do not unload" and then unload next turn??

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 667
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/9/2016 12:07:21 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Yes, remain on station, do not unload...better if a submarine arrives a few days before to confirm there are no mines

helps for the shock assault perspective, but gives KB/ enemy SCTFs another day to react

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 668
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/9/2016 12:31:25 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
sorry, wrong post... deleted

< Message edited by Jorge_Stanbury -- 8/9/2016 12:32:11 PM >

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 669
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/9/2016 3:48:06 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Yes, remain on station, do not unload...better if a submarine arrives a few days before to confirm there are no mines

helps for the shock assault perspective, but gives KB/ enemy SCTFs another day to react

Dangerous for the sub! I just embed AMs and DMS in the Amphib TF and they seem to do a good job of sweeping as the TF goes in to land. Rarely get a mine hit on the initial landing this way. The embedded BBs and cruisers keep the shore batteries busy too. If you just send the AM/DMS types in to sweep the mines the shore batteries will have nothing else to do but shoot them up.

The other nice thing about embedded BBs/CAs/CLs/ is they only shoot up enemy troops, not the facilities you want to capture. But if the landings will go on for more than a day before base capture, have an extra set of BBs/CAs/CLs to swap in to the Amphib TF to keep suppressing shore batteries on day two.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 670
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/9/2016 5:28:18 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
I'll normally have minesweeping TFs as well as minesweepers with the Amphib TF. I do use subs in a lightly defended enemy base - not to proof for mines per say (although that WILL happen) but I read somewhere that they help the odds of saving downed pilots from the air softening up campaign - not sure that's really true, but it makes sense.

Good thought BB about the rotating extra BB/CA/CLs to the Amph TFs - hadn't thought about that one!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 671
1-2 Feb 43 - 8/9/2016 5:43:53 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
1-2 Feb 1943

Highlights – Heavy Zero sweeps over Horn Is; KB moves to Darwin

Jpn ships sunk:
SS: 2 (I-31, I-35)
xAKL: 1

Jpn ships un-sunk:
CA: 1 (Kinugasa)

Allied ships sunk:
PT: 1 (second PT lost to the ALLIED mines at Tassaforonga!)

Air loss:
Jpn: 96
Allied: 62

Subwar:
Jpn: 0 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 5 Attacks, 1 ships hit (xAKL sunk)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: KB sighted at Darwin.

West Coast/Admin: B-24D factory converts to B-24D1; production ramped up from 15 Heavies a month to 43! Nice..very nice! Also, first two ARDs depart West Coast, heading for PH, then SOPAC, under heavy escort.

In NOPAC, PBYs back flying search.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, other than another PT finding a US laid mine off Tassafaronga its pretty quiet. However, recon reports over 100 fighters now at Munda, so I can expect sweeps over Lunga. Also, with the fighters back in Munda, I’m sending the fleet towards Ontong Java Atoll – the CVs “escorting” a CA TF that will bombard Munda next turn.

In SWPAC, I get a surprise when Horn Island is subject to heavy Zero (A6M5) sweeps. They are met by a fairly robust CAP of P-39s, P-40Ks and Aussie Kittyhawk IIIs. After two days, 41 Zeros are lost in exchange for 15 P-40K, 14 P-39s, and 7 Kittys. Good thing there weren’t any bombers as the CAP was just progressively worn down. Will swap out the worn down squadrons for fresh ones and get ready for more raids – although the Zero losses certainly weren’t light. The KB is sighted by search at Darwin, but KB air hit the Paras again at Groote prior to arriving at port – did no damage, but P-39/F4F CAP did well, 12 Zeros (A6M2) and 3 Kates lost in exchange for a pair of P-39s and Wildcats. But with the KB hanging around, I’m hesitant to send in much heavy shipping to bring supplies to either Groote or Gove. So, supply runs are being limited. Lastly, three subs attempt to penetrate the KB screen, one does, and fails to hit its target – the Soryu! Lucks gotta get better with sub attacks!!!

In WAUS, it’s the same story - IJA air continues to focus on the lead Allied force west of Port Hedland, still not covered well enough by LRCAP. LRCAP kills 10 Oscars, but loses 4 P-39s, 4 P-38Fs and a pair of P-40Es. Hopefully I can put a stop to these raids next turn – over 90 B-17/B-24s will launch to hit Broome supported by sweeps and LRCAP out of Exmouth by two P-38G squadrons.

In China, the 18 P-40Es of the Chungking CAP do pretty well: 4 Tojos and 13 Sonias are clawed down, and only one lost. That of course doesn’t help the massive ground losses suffered SW of Changsa – 14k Chinese lost in exchange for 2900 IJA troops – as the IJA drive on Changsa from the SW. Defendable areas of China are shrinking slowly but surely.

In India/Burma, another IJA attack on Warazup is held.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 672
RE: 1-2 Feb 43 - 8/9/2016 6:48:26 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
LST has been very lucky with your sub attacks on his carriers. He can't keep drawing to an inside straight forever.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 673
RE: January 1943 Summary - 8/9/2016 6:59:06 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
Dangerous for the sub! I just embed AMs and DMS in the Amphib TF and they seem to do a good job of sweeping as the TF goes in to land. Rarely get a mine hit on the initial landing this way. The embedded BBs and cruisers keep the shore batteries busy too. If you just send the AM/DMS types in to sweep the mines the shore batteries will have nothing else to do but shoot them up.



It is dangerous for the submarine, but so is the war. I wouldn't do this if I was storming Truk or Singapore, where I can expect lots and lots of mines, but a little atoll should be OK,
moreover, "discovering" a minefields reduces its efficacy significantly; so the following AMs/ DMS will have an easier job

And although a mine hit will guarantee a severe flooding, it is not a 100% chance of sinking, I have had many subs surviving mines and returning home for repair

Some other tricks:
- have minesweeping and ASW TFs following the invasion, this in addition to those embedded into the TF
- I would have lots of CVEs doing CAP and ASW

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 674
3-4 Feb 1943 - 8/10/2016 9:13:26 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
3-4 Feb 43

Highlights – Bad day for Bombers over Broome; KB back off Gove

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Amatsukaze)
SS: 1 (RO-103)

Allied ships sunk:
PT: 2
AM: 1
xAK: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 88
Allied: 71

Subwar:
Jpn: 2 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAK sunk by mini sub at Townsville!)
Allies: 2 Attacks, 0 ships hit

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: KB comes out again into the Arafura Sea to disrupt Gove operations.

West Coast/Admin: the Aussie Boomerang enters production!! This is actually an important plane for me as it frees up a couple of Aussie Spitfire and Kittyhawk squadrons from trainer duties, and converts from the infamous Wirraway. Also, another fast convoy departs LA for Auckland.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, with fighters again in short supply in Australia, I’m forced to pull a P-40 FG out of Pearl and send them to SOPAC/SWPAC. But this is a short term fix, I’m really short more airframes than units (so what else is new??!!).

In SOPAC, US CV launch a small strike hitting two xAPs at Buin, damaging both. CA TF links up with CVs TFs and will head to bombard Munda; CVs will pull back to a location east of Tulagi to cover Lunga. At Lunga, transports arrive to unload the 145th Reg of the 37th ID as well as additional engineers. Lunga AF should be ready to receive fighters shortly. Still no Jpn air raids on activities at Lunga. With the increased tempo in SWPAC due to the KB, a USMC F4F squadron and an Army P-40K squadron are moved to Cairns. Lastly, the Lunga Amph TF is due to head out of Luganville to Christmas Island next turn.

In SWPAC, KB enters the Arafura Sea again – no strikes yet, but scouting Kates bomb xAKLs heading to Gove. Again, all shipping needs to suspend activities and head for ports; fighters are in shorter supply with the recent heavy sweeps, so ports are vulnerable. Groote Eyeland is heavily swept by Zeros (Darwin based A6M2s?) which wear down the two squadron CAP, but enough Wildcats and P-400s survive to interdict the various 9 plane Betty raids looking for shipping. After two days, 19Z and 14 Bettys are lost in exchange for 17 P-400s and 7 F4Fs. Bettys don’t hit anything (AK, DD and APD at Groote). Bad part is, friendly fighters are further attritted. One Betty raid catches an AM off Merauke, and sinks her. Lastly, an IJN mini sub puts a torp into an xAK at Townsville, sinking her. Mother sub never detected.

In WAUS, not a good day for the good guys. Bombers “stream” into Broome, and the P-38Gs never sweep; only a small number manage LRCAP. I should know better than send the Heavies into a target without first sweeping for a few turns – but I truly figured the IJA fighters were worn down from supporting the Sally raids near Port Hedland. I was wrong, very wrong. Heavy bomber losses for very little gain: 13 B-17E and 14 B-24Ds lost (few crew loss though) in exchange for 20 Oscar IIbs and 4 Nicks in the air, bombing destroys only 14 Sallys on the ground with the AF still fully operational. Bombers are pretty well gutted, and will need the newly arriving B-24D1s to fill out the losses which will take some time. In the meantime, I’ll get the P-38Gs back to sweeping, although I really could better use them to support Gove.

In China, NSTR.

In India/Burma, NSTR.


(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 675
5-6 Feb 1943 - 8/12/2016 12:20:39 AM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
5-6 Feb 43

Highlights – Bad day for fighters over Broome this time; Entire IJN in Arafura Sea!

Jpn ships sunk:
DD: 1 (Arashio)
SS: 3 (I-25, I-33, I-38)

Jpn ships un-sunk:
SS: 3 (RO-33, RO-103, I-27)

Allied ships sunk:
DE: 1 (Parrott)
PT: 1
AM: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 117
Allied: 96

Subwar:
Jpn: 4 Attacks, 1 ship hit (DE Parrott sunk; also, CV Lex hit by a dud!)
Allies: 2 Attacks, 1 ship hit (xAK dam)

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: I think I’ve accounted for every significant (CA or better) operational warship in the IJN in the Arafura Sea!

West Coast/Admin: Still waiting for the B-25C factories to convert to the B-25D1

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, US CA TF (3CA, 2CL, 5DD, DMS) get a “nuclear bombardment” result in hitting Munda – my first! 35Z, 20V, 17K destroyed on the ground, with heavy damage to the facilities, although they are likely still operational. Enroute, the CA TF also destroyed a barge flotilla (1MGB, 11 barges) heading back from Tassafaronga. The CA TF will head back to Ndeni to replenish. CV TF heads SE to lay off Tulagi, and IJN sub I-38 puts a fish into the CV Lexington, which is very fortunately a dud . The sub is brought to the surface and sunk by escorts. Allied ASW a/c have a bonus day, claiming a good 4 hits on subs in the area. Lunga AF now operational, and the US CVs will clear the “sub zone” - Two CV TFs will head toward Ocean and Naura and search for game while one will head north of Ndeni to replenish. BB South Dakota will then detach w/escort and head to Auckland to refit. Troops and supplies continue to land at Lunga without issue, although waters are still heavily infested with subs. Squadron of Corsairs take up residence on Lunga as the air threat from Munda, Buin and Rabaul remains heavy. A small US CA TF (2CA, DDs) that was protecting transports at Lunga, will hit Munda before heading back to Kirakira to replenish.

In SWPAC, major bombardment effort by the IJN – in fact, I think the entire IJN is here! Overwatched by the KB, Groote (BB, 6CA, 4CL, DDs), Gove (3CA, DDs) and Merauke twice (2BB, 2CL, DDs and 3BB, 2CL, DDs) are all heavily bombarded. Groote and Merauke AFs are shut down, with heavy a/c loss at Merauke (9 P-400, 8 Mitchells, 8 B-25s, 8 PBYs, 6 Beauforts, 3 Beaufighters, 3 B-26s, and 2 SBDs lost) despite Fort level 4 and 300+ mines. The mines at Merauke did claim a DD. Gove lightly effected, and supplies remain good at both Merauke and Groote. IJN apparently has withdrawn – at least what PBYs were still able to fly didn’t see anything. US subs came up empty, no sightings, no attacks. IJN surface elements heading to bombard, also caught a number of Landing craft TFs off Groote, sinking AM, PT, 2LCT, 5 LCM), but the pair of xAKLs at Groote remain intact. Remaining PT squadron at Groote accomplished nothing but expending torps and fuel – and will have to move back to Horn to rearm. Big question now is will L_S_T sustain this effort, or will he send ships elsewhere? As long as the IJN fleet is concentrated here, moving supplies in to both Gove and Groote is extremely hazardous, and for now, the air bridge is the best method. US subs remain thick and a/c may still get lucky with night attacks. This is the kind of response I expected to the Merauke landings, and had reinforced airpower with land based carrier aircraft then – now, planes are in short supply. Still, unless L_S_T decides on a major counter landing, knowing where the IJN is concentrated, does have its benefits.

In WAUS, another bad day over Broome. I’ve GOT to pay more attention to airframe fatigue!!!! That’s the best reason I can think of for the poor showing of P-38Gs with excellent, well rested pilots over Broome. Two P-38G squadrons at 13 hexes (normal range with drop tanks), one on LRCAP and the other sweeping, lose 15 plane to only 14 Oscar IIbs and 5 Nicks on CAP. Ugly. Very ugly. P-38Gs will now need to rest and recover, but I’m not inclined to try this again over Broome anytime soon – I just can’t afford these losses right now. A small CA TF (2CA, CL, DDs) at Exmouth protecting transports, will attempt to bombard Broome on a high speed run next turn. On the ground, the slow advance to Port Hedland continues, with the majority of Allied forces concentrated in a single hex now – protected by two US AA Bns.

In China, I kept the P-40Es up on CAP which proved to be a mistake as Chungking was heavily swept. 11 P-40Es were lost to a pair of Oscar IIb and a single Tojo. P-40s will pull back to Kumning to rebuild and await another chance. On the ground, the Chinese pocket at Lanchow is slowly being reduced, and Changsa is being threatened from the south. Lack of supplies are the usual problem – only troops at Chungking have anything near adequate supplies.

In India/Burma, Warazup is held against a single attack and forts remain at level 2. In the center, an Indian Tank Bde has managed to slip through the lines and reach Shwebo, which is reportedly lightly defended – they will attack next turn. Shwebo is a reach here – and I’m over extended, with heavy IJA concentration both north and south – but, taking Shwebo even temporarily could really disrupt IJA supply flow to troops in the Warazup/Myitkyina areas. After a long rest period, B-24s will hit Akyab next turn – less one squadron refitting with the newly available B-24D1.


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 676
7-8 Feb 1943 - 8/13/2016 5:34:31 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
7-8 Feb 43

Highlights – US CVs raid Ocean/Nauru area; KB remains in the Arafura Sea.

Jpn ships sunk:
xAK: 2 (one old)

Allied ships sunk: None

Air loss:
Jpn: 35
Allied: 17

Subwar:
Jpn: 0 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 2 Attacks, 0 ships hit

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: KB remains in the Arafura Sea while the remainder of the major surface elements appear to be at Darwin to rearm/refuel.

West Coast/Admin: NSTR.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, NSTR.

In SOPAC, US CA TF (2CA, 4DD, DMS) bombard Munda with moderate effect, but destroy only a Zero and Val on the ground – probably already damaged, as the remainder seemed to have been flown off. Good with that as Lunga anchorage remains secure. Meanwhile, two US CV TFs raid near Ocean/Nauru Islands catching a small convoy at Ocean Island - synch bug issues here, but I'm pretty sure an xAK was in fact sunk, as well as a CM and 2-3 other xAKs damaged by two small raids as well as patrolling SBDs getting a few hits. Both CV TFs will move NW and then SE towards the Gilberts to troll for more targets of opportunity. Wasp/Hornet CV TF successfully refuels well south of Ocean Is, and detaches BB South Dakota and a pair of escorting DDs to head to Auckland for refit. CVs and remaining escorts will head back north to join in the raid. At Lunga anchorage itself, its pretty congested with a pair of convoys offloading additional engineers and supplies. This congestion will continue as more troops are being shuttled in to expand the base – which should reach AF level 2 next turn. Other troops convoys are shuttling troops in from Suva to Luganville, while those troops at Lunganville are heading to both Lunga and Ndeni (to stage for later ops). On the ground, 1st USMC Div enters Tassafaronga, but will wait for support elements before attacking. So far, so good in the Solomons.

In SWPAC, a relatively quiet turn, all things considered. BB TF (2BB, 3CA, 2CL, 7DD) hit Gove with minimal effect – just enough to prevent any expansion of facilities. No air strikes from the KB, still parked in the middle of the Arafura Sea – probably providing air cover for the bombardment runs. Two subs fail to penetrate the screen one missing a DD. Will continue to troll with subs and will also sortie a PT squadron to the hex. In the air, only one small Betty strike (23Z, 13B) attack an offloading xAK with AM escort at Groote and fail to score any hits – small CAP (3 Wildcats, 4 P-400) down two Zeros for no loss. Groote AF back in operation, and I’ve reinforced the CAP with a fresh F4F squadron, pulling out the worn down VMF-121 back to Coen. Merauke is still repairing damage, but if left untouched, should be back in operation next turn. Allied strike a/c still remain on night operations, don’t have the assets to contest the KB CAP umbrella right now – airframes just in too short supply. Even if a strike did get through, I can't sustain the losses now. Will be interesting to see how long L_S_T keeps the major elements of the KB employed here in the Arafura Sea area.

In WAUS, it was quiet. Allied forces link up in the same hex west of Port Hedland, and with the exception of a battered Aussie IN Bde, continue slowly toward the objective. At sea CA TF (2CA, CL DDs) moved into position to bombard Broome undetected, and should hit the target shortly. Air forces at Exmouth recover and re-organize. One squadron of P-38Gs are sent back to SWPAC, leaving their damaged a/c for the remaining squadron to use. At least no IJA LBA attacks on the ground troops!

In China, NSTR.

In India/Burma, I manage to forget to set the Indian Tk Bde at Shwebo to attack...made sure I set them to attack this turn, hopefully didn’t miss an opportunity. Jpn LBA sweeps Cox’s Bazaar heavily and is met by a pretty weak CAP, but 7 Oscar IIbs are lost in exchange for 5 P-40Ks. B-24s hit Akyab with moderate effect, no a/c on the ground, but AF further damaged and supply lost. Allied ground troops enter the Akyab hex, but won’t attack until follow on troops arrive.


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 677
9-10 Feb 1943 - 8/18/2016 4:21:57 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
9-10 Feb 43

Highlights – US CVs catch two small convoys north and west of Nauru; Bettys hit Groote and the KB remains in the Arafura Sea.

Jpn ships sunk:
PB: 1
CM: 1
xAP: 1
xAK: 4

Allied ships sunk:
SS: 1 (S-40)
PT: 1
AM: 1
xAKL: 2

Air loss:
Jpn: 64
Allied: 17

Subwar:
Jpn: 0 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 3 Attacks, 2 ships hit (xAP sunk, PB dam)
S-40 sunk by DD Samidare NW of Gove

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost: None

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: Continued IJN presence in the Arafura Sea

West Coast/Admin: NSTR.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, US CV TFs, moving north of Nauru/Ocean Islands, catch two small IJN convoys fleeing the area – PB, CM and 4 xAK sunk for one TBF lost to ops. CVs will head SE more toward the Gilberts, then head to Suva to replenish in preparation for Tabiteura landings.

In SOPAC, US CA TF (2CA, 4DD, DMS) bombard Tulagi with moderate effect, and return safely to Kirakira. Still no Japanese response to the Lunga landings other than subs still patrolling in the area. Convoys continue to move supplies and troops without interference. Lunga AF reaches Level 2; Marine SBD squadron now based there.

In SWPAC, IJN continues heavy pressure in the Arafura Sea. KB continues to maintain its presence, but successfully manages to avoid subs – S-40 sunk by escorts, failing to penetrate screen. Bettys hit Groote port, heavily escorted by Zeros. CAP intercepts, 22Z and 4 Bettys are lost in exchange for 5 F4Fs, but the raid sinks a PT, AM and 2 xAKLs in Groote port. Another BB Bombardment run looks to be in progress as a BB TF is sighted heading east near Wessel Is. With this sighting, Groote airfield is emptied of any flyable a/c and the lone xAKL offloading cleared off. On the good side, Merauke AF now fully repaired. Still, no progress is being made at the moment. Troops at Gove still have sufficient supply, but the air bridge is tenuous, and the AF not expanding.

In WAUS, Allied CA TF (2CA, CL 4DD, DMS) bombards Broome with good effect: 10 Oscar IIb, 9 Nick, 5 Dinah, and 4 A6M3 Zeros destroyed on the ground, although the AF remains fully operational. CA TF returns to Exmouth without issue. Will see if this bombardment draws any attention away from the IJN in the Arafura Sea. Allied ground troops continue to march east toward Port Hedland, no raids in a couple of days.

In China, NSTR.

In India/Burma, forgetting to attack Shwebo last turn proved costly – the IN TK Bde attacked this turn and did well against the defending 3 IJA tank regiments in the first assault, but did not take the base. In the second day’s assault, a reinforcing IJA IN Regiment had moved in, securing the town against the attack – the IN tankers will pull back, opportunity missed.


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 678
11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/22/2016 4:47:55 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline
11-12 Feb 43

Highlights – KB still in Arafura Sea; IJN bombardment runs at Groote and Gove.

Jpn ships sunk: None

Allied ships sunk:
PT: 1
xAKL: 1

Air loss:
Jpn: 14
Allied: 17

Subwar:
Jpn: 0 Attacks, 0 ships hit
Allies: 2 Attacks, 0 ships hit

Jpn Amph Inv: None

Allied Amph Inv: None

Bases lost:
Pingsiang (China)

Bases Liberated: None

SIGINT/Intel: Continued heavy IJN presence in the Arafura Sea…how long will L_S_T keep this up is the question.

West Coast/Admin: B-25C factory converts to B-25D1.

In NOPAC, NSTR.

In CENPAC, US CV TF strikes in the Gilberts apparently weathered out – couple of small single ships sighted, but no strikes launched. All three CV TFs will clear the Gilberts area, heading to Suva to replenish. At Christmas, all AP/AKs for the Tabiteuea invasion have arrived, and troops are fully prepped – standing by at either Christmas (1st wave) and Fanning (2nd wave and support). Still need to shuttle appropriate ships between Christmas and Fanning, and still need some additional xAP/xAKs for follow on. Also waiting for CVEs to arrive (still heading to PH from West Coast) and CVs to complete replenishment at Suva – synchronizing operations are getting more and more challenging as the war progresses! I’m going to have to start putting together some sort of notebook listing invasion targets and troops (and maybe transports?) assigned to those targets. Any good ideas out there??

In SOPAC, US CA TF (3CA, 2CL, 5DD, DMS) bombard Tassafaronga with moderate effect, and head back toward Ndeni for replenishment. Marines will begin bombarding the Tassafaronga troops next turn, and will attack in a few days. Army troops still moving through the jungle from Lunga. Still pretty quiet at Lunga, as more convoys shuttle in troops and supplies – last major troop drop off enroute from Luganville before ships switch to Tulagi amphib. US CA TF (2CA, 4DD, DMS) bombards Rennel Is (400 troops defending) doing minimal damage – recon by fire bombardment mission.

In SWPAC, little change here. IJN still in command of the Arafura Sea with the KB overwatching naval bombardments of Gove (3BB, 2CL, 5DD) and Groote (BB, 6CA, 3CL, DDs). Minimal damage at Gove, while Groote has moderate damage, but AF remains operational. Neither base expanding, and all reinforcements of course have been suspended, so L_S_T has effectively delayed any SWPAC offensive operations here. Troops still in supply, but not by much. US subs and night time air attacks on enemy warships have accomplished little (a DD). Have two subs coming in to mine hexes currently being transited, but don’t expect much. Subs will continue to be the main threat to the IJN, and keeping fingers crossed that a sub manages to connect with a major warship. No plans to commit fleet (elsewhere) or massed aviation (just don’t have airframes) any time soon.

In WAUS, its been pretty quiet. Ground troops now consolidated two hexes west of Port Hedland and continuing to slowly move east, and are still in supply. Got a brief sighting (I vaguely remember seeing something, but can’t find a record of it on the ops reports) of a BB TF heading west NE of Broome – so I figure IJN is coming back to bombard the ground troops moving along the coast.

In China, Pingsiang, south of Changsa falls as the IJA slowly advances toward Changsa from the south. Supplies non-existant of course, not much can be done to hold any line, in any terrain. Chungking swept by fighters, but not bombed. US P-40E squadron remains at Kumning while the two Chinese squadrons I’ve been using swap out with fresh squadrons out of Ledo.

In India/Burma, Allied forces in Akyab conduct a small bombardment to see what is defending – two IJA divisions and support, but not a lot of artillery which is good. B-25s hit both divisions achieving little, but surprisingly no CAP encountered. Will increase the softening up and then launch a deliberate attack in the coming turns.


(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 679
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/22/2016 5:35:32 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Do you think the KB remaining at Arafura might mean he will try to contest or counter invade?

And you should rush Cenpac operation as having confirmation of long KB deployment is priceless

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 680
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/22/2016 8:06:53 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Do you think the KB remaining at Arafura might mean he will try to contest or counter invade?

And you should rush Cenpac operation as having confirmation of long KB deployment is priceless



Seems like a logical recommendation for the Cenpac. Maybe you can't contest the Arafura Sea -- yet -- but you can make him pay for staying there for so long.

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 681
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/22/2016 8:50:23 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jwolf


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

Do you think the KB remaining at Arafura might mean he will try to contest or counter invade?

And you should rush Cenpac operation as having confirmation of long KB deployment is priceless



Seems like a logical recommendation for the Cenpac. Maybe you can't contest the Arafura Sea -- yet -- but you can make him pay for staying there for so long.


jwolf - couldn't agree more. I'm finding the problem being the Pacific is a BIG Ocean! Taking a bit of time to get things in place. Will launch in CENPAC shortly!

Jorge - I figured a potential counter invasion was in the works back on around 5-6 Feb when Gove, Merauke and Groote were all bombarded. Thought that was the suppression prior to a landing at Groote or Gove. Didn't happen, and I think that moment has passed.

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 682
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/22/2016 11:26:21 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
but maybe he is prepping for them? lets say turn one after your invasion, he changed target for some LCUs; go from 100% to 33%; then he needs to wait ~40 days to have a decent preparation

if he doesn't invade, then the bombardment will mean very little, as the Allies have way too much repair/ build resources, not to mention supply

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 683
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/23/2016 5:23:33 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

but maybe he is prepping for them? lets say turn one after your invasion, he changed target for some LCUs; go from 100% to 33%; then he needs to wait ~40 days to have a decent preparation

if he doesn't invade, then the bombardment will mean very little, as the Allies have way too much repair/ build resources, not to mention supply


Its possible he's prepping. The bombardments used to delay Allied build-up, and the presence of the KB (and what appears to be the entire IJN for that matter) has slowed if not totally stopped any base expansion in the area.

That said, any counter-landing would have to be a full court press - division size at least, and full support of the IJN. While I might lose a base, keeping the IJN occupied for another month or so in the Arafura Sea wouldn't be a terrible thing either..

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 684
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/23/2016 6:14:37 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
I think you're hinting at the real question here: is the Arafura Sea area -- or at least the part held by the Allies currently -- strategically so valuable as to merit a counter-invasion by the Japanese? All the while giving you free time to move in the Solomons? Seems to me the answer is no, but I admit it's ultimately up to the Japanese player to make the call.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 685
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/24/2016 12:32:43 AM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Oil, Oil, Oil, whatever is closets to Japan's supply of oil will attract the biggest and swiftest response. The Solomons actually mean nothing to Japan except the 1st and furthest south line of defense. However, when you get bases to get heavy bombers in range of major oilfields he will attempt to take them back.

< Message edited by Bif1961 -- 8/24/2016 12:52:39 AM >

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 686
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/25/2016 3:44:19 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Oil, Oil, Oil, whatever is closets to Japan's supply of oil will attract the biggest and swiftest response. The Solomons actually mean nothing to Japan except the 1st and furthest south line of defense. However, when you get bases to get heavy bombers in range of major oilfields he will attempt to take them back.


Think you're right on the money Bif. L_S_T has alluded to the same in a couple of emails - very concerned about an Allied push towards Timor. Of course, the Allies are in no condition to "push" in that direction for another couple of months - I'm stretching resources just trying to squeeze the IJA out of Australia!

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 687
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/25/2016 6:50:45 PM   
dave sindel

 

Posts: 488
Joined: 3/13/2006
From: Millersburg, OH
Status: offline
Over the last few days, I've read this entire AAR and am now "up-to-date". What an interesting game this is.

(in reply to IdahoNYer)
Post #: 688
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/25/2016 7:59:12 PM   
Macclan5


Posts: 1065
Joined: 3/24/2016
From: Toronto Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Oil, Oil, Oil, whatever is closets to Japan's supply of oil will attract the biggest and swiftest response. The Solomons actually mean nothing to Japan except the 1st and furthest south line of defense. However, when you get bases to get heavy bombers in range of major oilfields he will attempt to take them back.


Actually a really insightful observation especially vis a vis PBEM play.

Thanks Bif / IdNyer for this conversation.

I had not considered this fully and this is the first time I have seen this sentiment explored / expressed explicitly in an Allied AAR.

Interestingly some of the most successful Allied AAR seem to have some elements of a 'push' be it Timor / Taberfame & Dobo / Babo & Sorong. Not only the more recent ones suggested such as Apbarog - but looking back at Witpqs and others as well.

Bomber range to oil fields has to be a IJN priority.

It rather contrasts with the "actual historical" strategy employed albeit no game should or could be expected to model every single facet of the war with 100% accuracy.




_____________________________

A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 689
RE: 11-12 Feb 1943 - 8/25/2016 9:02:16 PM   
IdahoNYer


Posts: 2616
Joined: 9/6/2009
From: NYer living in Boise, ID
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dave sindel

Over the last few days, I've read this entire AAR and am now "up-to-date". What an interesting game this is.


Thanks Dave, welcome aboard! Has been a great ride so far, much due to my opponent, L_S_T. Now if I could only convince him to get back to his AAR!

(in reply to dave sindel)
Post #: 690
Page:   <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> January 1943 Summary Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.391