Hongjian
Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Dysta The most recent ABM test launched by China was the DN-3 interceptor, and it hit DF-21 as a target successfully: https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/revealed-the-details-of-chinas-latest-hit-to-kill-interceptor-test/ Beat me to it. Good information on the other BMD missiles in Chinese arsenal: quote:
The DN-3 is thought to be China’s most capable midcourse hit-to-kill interceptor, but the country has other systems capable of exoatmospheric ballistic and anti-satellite interception, including the DN-2, the HQ-19, and the ASAT-oriented SC-19. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Defense observed in its annual report on the Chinese military that the HQ-19 might “fill the midtier of China’s BMD network.” “The HQ-19 is still undergoing PLAAF [People’s Liberation Army Air Force]-organized testing; as of May 2016, China was focused mainly on testing the HQ-19’s capability to intercept 3,000 km ranged ballistic missiles,” the report noted. The HQ-19 would be China's THAAD-ER equivalent, i.e. a terminal BMD. And we remember the DN-2 from a test of 2011 and 2013, 2015 and 2017, where it achieved an altitude capable of reaching GPS satellites in 2013: http://freebeacon.com/national-security/china-carries-flight-test-anti-satellite-missile/ quote:
China tested a DN-2 in 2013 that traveled 18,600 miles in space where U.S. intelligence satellites are located. http://freebeacon.com/national-security/china-conducts-test-of-new-anti-satellite-missile/ quote:
While details of the DN-2 are not known, U.S. officials said it is expected to be a high earth-orbit interceptor capable of destroying strategic navigation, communication, or intelligence satellites by ramming into them at high speeds. The DN-2 is said to be capable of hitting targets in high-earth orbit between 12,000 and 22,236 miles above earth. Many military, intelligence, and commercial satellites orbit at that altitude. So, if the DN-3 is based on the same booster and main stage, it might also be able to reach that orbit and hence would explain its larger size compared to the SM-3.
< Message edited by Hongjian -- 2/21/2018 5:30:00 PM >
|