Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Naval and Defense News

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Naval and Defense News - 10/29/2015 5:38:10 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		The Sovremennys served the PLAN quite well as fast cruisers, despite their obsolete steam-plant propulsion. There's much hull life in them, and I can imagine that these 8000 ton ships will get at least 2x32 GJB-5860-2006 VLS like the 052D, as well as two PJ-38s and become full-fledged capital ships to escort the carrier (for once, because they are amongs the fastest ships in PLAN service). AShM is a question, but people so far rumor that they will possibly be the first to receive the ship-launched YJ-12A AShM (the one with the booster-stage in the rear) in place of the Moskits, so that their supersonic anti-ship loadout will not be changed.

With 64 large caliber VLS capable of loading YJ-18A AShM and eight dedicated YJ-12A slanted launch containers, the Sovremennys would be the most powerful classes in the PLAN in terms of missile armament, after the future Type 055.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 331
RE: Naval and Defense News - 10/31/2015 7:59:48 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		China has deployed PLANAF J-11 fighters to Woody Island (Phu Lam Island to Vietnam), largest island of the Paracels in the East Vietnam Sea. No reaction yet from the Vietnamese government (looking for a Chinese link probably from www.81.cn, photo showing J-11 with air-to-air loadout (2xPL-8+2xPL-15) landing in Phu Lam).


< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 10/31/2015 10:21:05 AM >

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 332
RE: Naval and Defense News - 10/31/2015 10:41:21 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		Perhaps a fake news report, same photo I saw but text says nothing about the deployement: http://www.81.cn/syjdt/2015-10/31/content_6747809_5.htm

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 333
RE: Naval and Defense News - 10/31/2015 9:56:17 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		Type 022 FACs have been deployed to Yongxing/Woody Island, though.



You can see the lighthouse in this aerial photo:



< Message edited by Hongjian -- 10/31/2015 10:56:30 PM >

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 334
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 2:46:22 PM   
NakedWeasel


Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline 		I'm sorry, a lighthouse is significant why?


_____________________________

Though surrounded by a great number of enemies
View them as a single foe
And so fight on!

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 335
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 3:42:52 PM   
Excroat3

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel

I'm sorry, a lighthouse is significant why?


It's proof of location, showing that the Type 22 is at Woody Island, and not some random other island

(in reply to NakedWeasel)
Post #: 336
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 5:23:06 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

The Sovremennys served the PLAN quite well as fast cruisers, despite their obsolete steam-plant propulsion. There's much hull life in them, and I can imagine that these 8000 ton ships will get at least 2x32 GJB-5860-2006 VLS like the 052D, as well as two PJ-38s and become full-fledged capital ships to escort the carrier (for once, because they are amongs the fastest ships in PLAN service). AShM is a question, but people so far rumor that they will possibly be the first to receive the ship-launched YJ-12A AShM (the one with the booster-stage in the rear) in place of the Moskits, so that their supersonic anti-ship loadout will not be changed.

With 64 large caliber VLS capable of loading YJ-18A AShM and eight dedicated YJ-12A slanted launch containers, the Sovremennys would be the most powerful classes in the PLAN in terms of missile armament, after the future Type 055.


Ever solve the C3M issues? Last I heard they couldn't share data with the rest of the fleet. Not sure if this was fact or rumor but they tend to deploy with each other and other older units.

Thanks!

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 11/1/2015 6:23:22 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 337
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 7:06:03 PM   
Death6


Posts: 66
Joined: 11/1/2015
Status: offline 		Any updates on the military build up on the artificial islands in the China Sea?

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 338
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 7:14:59 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		Some troves in the unspected miscellaneous "Gallery" I and II sections, including construction numbers of the ten J-15 carrier fighters (updated today casually!):

http://chinese-military-aviation.blogspot.com.es/p/gallery-i.html

(in reply to Death6)
Post #: 339
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 8:19:38 PM   
Triode

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014
Status: offline 		news from Russia

According to director of SRZ "Nerpa" Arkady Oganyan
http://www.redstar.ru/images/files/regions2015/1809_1/180915-na-s-z.pdf page 3 in russian

before the end of this year "Nerpa" transfer to Navy two nuclear subs , K-335 "Gepard"(pr.9711 mistakenly known as 971M) and B-336 "Pskov" (pr.945A)

also according to VPK magazine
http://vpk-news.ru/news/25314 in russian
and Russian MoD site
http://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/navy/news/more.htm?id=12036524@egNews in russian

before the end of this year DVZ "Zvezda" transfer to Navy two nuclear subs , K-331 "Magadan" (pr 9710 aka Akula) and K-419 "Kuzbass"(pr971 aka Improved Akula)

what is interesting is modernization that submarines receive

As example, B-335 "Pskov" is first from pr.945/945A recive 945M upgrade ,sonar system MGK-540M "Kizhuch-945M" instead of MGK-540 "Skat-3",Kalibr-PL complex and UGST torpedoes

K-331 "Magadan" and K-419 "Kuzbass" recive 971M upgrade, sonar system MGK-540M "Kizhuch-971M" instead of MGK-540 "Skat-3", Kalibr and UGST torpedoes
both K-331 and K-419 now 971M ,but also there is difrences between them, K-331 built according to VAH-74 (Vibro-Accoustic Characteristics Demands-74) ,K-419 built by
VAH-80 (and FYI about diffrences in pr971 subs: K-157 "Vepr" built by VAH-80, have SAG -system of active suppression of noise in the range of 50-500 Hz ,and K-335"Gepard" built by VAH-80 ,have SAG and longer improved TASS)

So, even if they both now 971M ,Improved Akula still better than Akula

Info about upgrades from annual report of Taganrog Plant "Priboi"
http://disclosure.1prime.ru/Portal/GetDocument.aspx?emId=6154093944&docId=bd47e1d1ed2046d6808349d3e9cc21a4 p.23-32 in russian
state contract 31401544741 (DVZ "Zvezda" buying MGK-540M for K-331 "Magadan" )
http://www.my-tender.ru/#!/tenders223/31401544741 in russian


K-335 "Gepard" does not recive 971M upgrade , only new Kalibr-PL missiles and UGST torpedoes
"Gepard" already have improved MGK-540 (early version of MGK-540M), sometimes because of that called pr.971M, but project number for "Gepard" is 9711,
Upgrade 971M is atempt to make other 971 as good as "Gepard"


So before the end of this year we could see significant improvments in ranks of Russian Navy submarines


It is possible that 971M upgrade includes not only MGK-540M installation.

P.S. about differences between VAH-74 and VAH-80 for pr.971, from magazine "Sudostroenie"("Shipbuilding") №1, 1998:
"In June, it passed the technical review of the project in 1 CNII MoD(Navy shipbuilding). Since that time, most disagreements on the draft had been settled, the discussion went on a normal working order. However, 1 CNII MoD suddenly required to reduce the noise level specification for submarine more than doubled, proving it a large number of implemented projects and reserves laid down in terms of noise. Note has been formulated as an ultimatum, otherwise the project is not recommended for approval. Chief designer, discussed these requirements with the Krylov Shipbuilding Research Institute and other industry organizations, has agreed to accept them. The concession was a very serious, as the number of frequency requirements on noise were tightened by 8-10 dB."



< Message edited by Triode -- 11/1/2015 10:45:03 PM >

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 340
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 8:51:34 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		More on the hypothetical J-18? concept (Su-34 alike):
http://chinese-military-aviation.blogspot.com.es/p/attack-aircraft.html
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-V7PktF05HvA/VjF3A_PH7hI/AAAAAAAANOQ/8OOnSdFsUAQ/s1600/J-18.jpg

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 341
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/1/2015 10:58:57 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

The Sovremennys served the PLAN quite well as fast cruisers, despite their obsolete steam-plant propulsion. There's much hull life in them, and I can imagine that these 8000 ton ships will get at least 2x32 GJB-5860-2006 VLS like the 052D, as well as two PJ-38s and become full-fledged capital ships to escort the carrier (for once, because they are amongs the fastest ships in PLAN service). AShM is a question, but people so far rumor that they will possibly be the first to receive the ship-launched YJ-12A AShM (the one with the booster-stage in the rear) in place of the Moskits, so that their supersonic anti-ship loadout will not be changed.

With 64 large caliber VLS capable of loading YJ-18A AShM and eight dedicated YJ-12A slanted launch containers, the Sovremennys would be the most powerful classes in the PLAN in terms of missile armament, after the future Type 055.


Ever solve the C3M issues? Last I heard they couldn't share data with the rest of the fleet. Not sure if this was fact or rumor but they tend to deploy with each other and other older units.

Thanks!

Mike


Some minor modifications on the datalink has been done some years before. But this MLU is a major one that has been planned for at least a decade, according to the most reliable leakers.

So, it is suggested that the PLAN wasnt too happy with the Sovs. Which is also why they never took part in the counter-piracy patrols off Aden.


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 342
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/2/2015 12:18:27 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		My guess is it won't happen although they can operate together just fine.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 343
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/2/2015 4:18:18 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Comic C919 has been officially revealed:





It is also not found in DB3000. I suggest we should add one, either prior to the first flight debut, or in actual service. Details below:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comac_C919

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 344
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/2/2015 12:50:29 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		More recent pictures of Tu-95MS with 8 Kh-101 sortie:








(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 345
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/2/2015 2:04:51 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

Comic C919 has been officially revealed:

It is also not found in DB3000. I suggest we should add one, either prior to the first flight debut, or in actual service. Details below:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comac_C919


I would rather want a notional C919-based AWACS powered by the CJ-1000A (since the Leap-1X would probably be off-limits for a military plane). But this remains to be seen.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 346
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/3/2015 1:03:06 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

I would rather want a notional C919-based AWACS powered by the CJ-1000A (since the Leap-1X would probably be off-limits for a military plane). But this remains to be seen.

Good for range, not good for maintenance. CJ-1000A is aimed for civilian market, military applications will be unlikely because it isn't for rougher runway environment.

Not to forget Y-20 can also be converted to AWACS as well. If still insisted, an ASW version C919 installed with WS-20 engines is more likely than AWAC packages.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 347
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/3/2015 6:29:44 PM   
Glenn Beasley

 

Posts: 57
Joined: 2/21/2015
Status: offline 		http://worldwarwings.com/the-f-35-just-hit-another-roadblock-and-this-ones-major?a=mk&var=ww2-f35-canada, Interesting.

(in reply to Jorgen_CAB)
Post #: 348
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/3/2015 10:14:13 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

I would rather want a notional C919-based AWACS powered by the CJ-1000A (since the Leap-1X would probably be off-limits for a military plane). But this remains to be seen.

Good for range, not good for maintenance. CJ-1000A is aimed for civilian market, military applications will be unlikely because it isn't for rougher runway environment.

Not to forget Y-20 can also be converted to AWACS as well. If still insisted, an ASW version C919 installed with WS-20 engines is more likely than AWAC packages.


Narrow-body planes are better suited for AWACS due to being more fuel efficient since less drag than converted military transports.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 349
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/3/2015 11:02:18 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

I would rather want a notional C919-based AWACS powered by the CJ-1000A (since the Leap-1X would probably be off-limits for a military plane). But this remains to be seen.

Good for range, not good for maintenance. CJ-1000A is aimed for civilian market, military applications will be unlikely because it isn't for rougher runway environment.

Not to forget Y-20 can also be converted to AWACS as well. If still insisted, an ASW version C919 installed with WS-20 engines is more likely than AWAC packages.


Narrow-body planes are better suited for AWACS due to being more fuel efficient since less drag than converted military transports.



I rather think the opposite though. See how E-3 and E-767 offer superior endurances as well, they are also bigger than A320, B737, and C919. The older B707 and B767 are still have their viable purposes for military surveillance.

5500KM range is better than KJ-500, but still unacceptably short. Adding extra fuel tanks will be limited to the narrow-body, and hardly to take off from short runway. Y-20 or the future Y-30 would be a very capable STOL transports to be candidate for AWAC as I see it.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 11/4/2015 12:07:03 AM >

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 350
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/4/2015 5:58:02 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Agreement brokes as the meeting is cancelled, SCS is about to catch on fire.


https://uk.news.yahoo.com/no-signing-joint-declaration-asean-defence-forum-023343519.html

< Message edited by Dysta -- 11/4/2015 6:58:39 AM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 351
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/4/2015 12:57:24 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

Agreement brokes as the meeting is cancelled, SCS is about to catch on fire.


https://uk.news.yahoo.com/no-signing-joint-declaration-asean-defence-forum-023343519.html



Except this means the exact opposite. No joint declaration against China = Status Quo remains.

The joint declaration was designed by the US to shame China into the corner and criminalize China's claim over 80% of the SCS - and only China's claim alone, not the similiarily sized and equally excessive claims of the other claimants.

Now, with no joint declaration, everything goes back to business as usual, which means the dispute involving all parties including China continues to persist. So, at most, we will see some fishermen getting shot and coast guard ships ramming each other, but at least no South China Sea war where the US supports and joins the other claimants to forcibly evict China's island holdings in order to realize the de-jure criminalization of China's claims.

/politics


Other news:

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/chinese-submarine-stalked-us-aircraft-carrier/

quote:

Chinese Submarine Stalked U.S. Aircraft Carrier
Attack submarine sailed near USS Reagan south of Japan


Funnily, this one is exactly to the day 9 Years after the USS Kitty Hawk incident involving a Chinese Song-class SSK.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 352
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/4/2015 4:36:11 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline 		Presence of J-11BH (land-based naval variant of J-11B) of the 25th Naval Aviation Regiment confirmed in this site, 31 october 2015 news (I found this Chinese site some years ago, but forget about it), and the site says "Don't get too excited though -- the 25th has done this sort of things since the mid 2000s with their older J-8IIs" :
http://china-defense.com/

YongXing Island is the same Woody Island:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Island_(South_China_Sea)

< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 11/4/2015 5:38:38 PM >

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 353
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/6/2015 7:27:10 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		Oto Melara, Bofors and BAE Systems Inc all in Technical Talks with DCNS Regarding FTI Frigates
quote:

While attending various defense exhibitions this Fall, it was brought to Navy Recognition's attention that the leading naval gun manufacturers all have started technical talks with DCNS on the future FTI frigates. The FTI will be a 4,000 tons class multi-role frigate developed from the design stage to answer French Navy needs as well as export customer requirements. According to DCNS, the FTI will benefit from the most advanced technology solutions, including planar array radar.

Read http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3226

_____________________________

www.navalnews.com

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 354
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/7/2015 6:50:00 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Nicaragua drama, AKA environmental debate of canal project, has been marked a tick and proceed as planned:

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/11/5/nicaragua-oks-environmental-study-of-canal.html

CMANO map should be updated when it's open in 2019.

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 355
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/8/2015 11:28:17 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline


J-16 with PL-10, KD-88 and targeting pod, which looks like A-Star's STS-56.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 356
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/8/2015 11:37:55 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		http://www.network54.com/Forum/211833/thread/1446954755/last-1446961754/Chinese+Low+Altitude+Guard+II+Laser

Low Altitude Guard II Laser Weapon - the successor of that quad-copter buster from last year's Zhuhai Airshow.

Too bad they dont talk about the power. The LAG-I had 10kw. And the LAG-II is suppossed to be more powerful.

http://www.popsci.com/china-joins-laser-arms-race

< Message edited by Hongjian -- 11/8/2015 12:40:39 PM >

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 357
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/8/2015 11:48:51 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-11/08/c_134795247.htm

Yaogan-28 launched. Nothing said about the sensor payload. Too bad Wikipedia stopped updating since YG-27.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 358
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/8/2015 2:20:53 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

http://www.network54.com/Forum/211833/thread/1446954755/last-1446961754/Chinese+Low+Altitude+Guard+II+Laser

Low Altitude Guard II Laser Weapon - the successor of that quad-copter buster from last year's Zhuhai Airshow.

Too bad they dont talk about the power. The LAG-I had 10kw. And the LAG-II is suppossed to be more powerful.

http://www.popsci.com/china-joins-laser-arms-race


More importantly, it's vehicle-mounted instead of stationary. However, I'm still pretty certain it would be a huge machine for a mobile drone killer:



(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 359
RE: Naval and Defense News - 11/8/2015 3:23:18 PM   
AlmightyTallest

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/25/2014
Status: offline 		Rheinmetall Air Defence - Oerlikon Skyshield High Energy Laser (HEL) Demonstration

Adaptation of the earlier gun mounted Skyshield.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fefSQZVGD1g&index=55&list=FLUbMa9kEYoLP3_Zlc2nzVPA

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 360
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.063