Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Naval and Defense News

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/24/2016 1:32:55 PM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

Philippines selects Lynx Wildcat for ASW mission

quote:

The Philippines has selected the AgustaWestland AW159 Lynx Wildcat to fulfil its anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopter requirement, IHS Jane's has learned.

The Philippine Department of National Defense (DND) has awarded the Anglo-Italian manufacturer a contract for PHP5.3 billion (USD114 million) under its Anti-Submarine Helicopter Acquisition Project for the Philippine Navy, according to a DND Notice of Award document seen by IHS Jane's on 23 March.

While the document gives no details on the helicopter type or numbers, AgustaWestland had previously announced that it was bidding two AW159s for the requirement.

The news of the contract award comes a month after AgustaWestland officials said they were optimistic it would be awarded "very soon", though the company told IHS Jane's it is unable to comment on the contract award at this time.

The competition to provide the Philippine Navy with an airborne ASW capability, which it currently lacks, was launched by the DND in September 2014. It is understood that Airbus Helicopters and its local partner PT Dirgantara Indonesia expressed interest in bidding the AS565 Panther for the programme, though it was not confirmed if a formal bid was entered, while Bell Helicopter, NHIndustries, and Sikorsky were also reported to have shown interest with the 412EP, NH90, and S-70B Seahawk respectively.

In the ASW role the AW159 can be configured to carry active dipping sonar (ADS), sonobuoys, and torpedoes, while for the anti-surface warfare role it can be armed with anti-ship missiles, rockets, and guns. Once in Philippine Navy service, the AW159s are expected to be deployed aboard the navy's Pilar (Hamilton and Hero)-class frigates BRP Gregorio Del Pilar and BRP Ramon Alcaraz, which were acquired from the US Coast Guard in 2012 and 2013.


IHS Jane's online

_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 781
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/24/2016 2:27:01 PM   
jtoatoktoe

 

Posts: 208
Joined: 10/9/2013
Status: offline
B-52H getting swap-able new internal launcher.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htairfo/articles/20160324.aspx

quote:


Enables them to carry satellite guided munitions in the internal weapons bay for the first time.

The new rotary launcher, six of which are to be delivered in April 2016, is going to be transferable between aircraft. Thanks to this, even though only 44 of these modified launchers are being purchased they will be available for use by all 76 aircraft as needed.

So far the launcher is able to carry 8 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) smart bombs. Future improvements of the launcher are expected to make it able to carry JASSM (Joint Air-to-Surface Stand Off Missile) cruise missiles and MALDs (Miniature Air Launched Decoy) decoy and jammer missiles.

(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 782
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/24/2016 8:00:24 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
http://www.cannews.com.cn/2016/0324/150690.shtml

According to this report, China's Deep Ocean Comprehensive Support Base (深海综合保障基地) has received the funding needed and is included in the next 5 year plan.

Information about this concept:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJc1OTsW1_k

Pretty much a floating island base. CMANO already has one as a speculative unit included in the DB for the US. Seems like China will actually receive one for real sometime in the future.

(in reply to jtoatoktoe)
Post #: 783
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/24/2016 8:27:02 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Hongjian, take a look at this news as well, it's in DB3000 update thread: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4050495

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 784
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/25/2016 11:00:39 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
http://www.janes.com/article/59003/imagery-suggests-china-has-deployed-yj-62-anti-ship-missiles-to-woody-island


quote:

Imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 anti-ship missiles to Woody Island

Key Points
-Recent imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 ASCMs to Woody Island in the Paracels
-The deployment potentially allows China to target any vessel within 400 km of Woody Island
-Recent imagery suggests China has significantly enhanced its military capabilities in the South China Sea by deploying the land-based version of the 400 km-range YJ-62 anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) to Woody Island in the Paracel Islands.

Posted on 20 March 2016 on the popular Weibo blog, the image of a launching YJ-62 ASCM is consistent with photos copied from one of the many monthly Chinese military magazines that appear on Chinese military issue web pages. The image of the launching ASCM also shows a radar dome that the Chinese blogger makes a strong case for being on Woody Island.

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) YJ-62 was likely deployed at about the same time the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile (SAM) system was first detected on the island in February 2016.

A land-based version of the YJ-62 has been deployed by the Coastal Defence troops of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) since about 2008. Three YJ-62 ASCMs are carried on a CASIC-Sanjiang transporter-erector-launcher (TEL).

First seen in model form in 2006 under its export designation C-602, the YJ-62 also arms the Type 052C destroyer launched in 2003. Chinese brochures credit the C-602 with a range of 280 km, while the version in service with the PLAN is estimated to have at least a 400 km range.

The anti-ship version of the YJ-62 is cued by long-range radar or data from aircraft or satellites, then uses an internal nose-mounted radar for terminal guidance.

At the 2012 Zhuhai Airshow CASIC introduced the 290 km-range CM-602G land-attack variant, which has a 480 kg warhead as opposed to the 300 kg warhead carried by the C-602.


The part talking about the range difference between the export C-602 and PLAN-deployed YJ-62 is interesting and well within commom practice: Export cruise missiles are subject to the 300km range limitation as set by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), while domestic variants are not subject to it. The 400km number is well within the realms of possibility and even a bit too short-ranged compared to the rumors in the Chinese military watcher's forums (about 600km range - it is a big missile, after all).

The images in question:



And when all major island bases would have the same armaments (yellow for 200km HQ-9 and white for 400km YJ-62 AShM):


< Message edited by Hongjian -- 3/25/2016 11:02:21 AM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 785
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/26/2016 10:31:00 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Exclusive: First Image of the Lockheed Martin LRASM Top Side Launcher
quote:

Lockheed Martin supplied Navy Recognition with the first image showing a deck-mounted quadruple Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) launcher. According to our source, this "top side" launcher graphic is a notional concept that could be used on an appropriately sized surface vessel, such as the Arleigh Burke class (DDG 51) or Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) classes.

more and pic at the link: http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3761

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 786
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/26/2016 11:12:36 AM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Russia to Deploy Bal and Bastion ASM Coastal Batteries on Kuril Islands & Consider Naval Base

quote:

The Russian Navy will start a three month-long expedition to islands of the Greater Kuril Ridge in April to study the possibilities of setting up a Pacific Fleet base there, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said on Friday. "Pacific Fleet sailors will start a three month-long expedition to islands of the Greater Kuril Ridge in April. Their main goal is to study the possibilities of setting up a Pacific Fleet base there in future," Shoigu said at a meeting of the Defense Ministry’s board.

The defense minister said earlier that Russia would deploy Bal and Bastion coastal defense missile systems and new-generation Eleron-3 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) on the Kuril Islands in 2016.

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3762

_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 787
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/26/2016 11:55:23 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
http://www.cannews.com.cn/2016/0324/150665.shtml



According to this report, the conformal fueltank for the upcoming MA-60H MPA was successfully tested.

The MA-60H is an armed variant of the MA-60 turboprop liner, itself a development from the Y-7/An-24. The Chinese State Oceanic Administration would operate these MPAs, along with the PLANAF (the armed versions).



< Message edited by Hongjian -- 3/26/2016 11:57:37 AM >

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 788
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/26/2016 12:59:14 PM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

The USMC is on schedule to deploy F-35Bs to Japan in January 2017

Link


U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa establishes new Task Force: CTF 64

Link


The U.S. Congress has been notified of the sale of up to 9 P-8As to the UK

Link

_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 789
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/26/2016 1:58:49 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Scenario possibility:

http://www.news.com.au/world/sea-shepherd-chases-alleged-chinese-driftnet-fishing-vessel-into-south-china-sea/news-story/866f7362117ccd0a6bd6a4bc3d1125d2

https://youtu.be/HYNa6GKuUb4

https://youtu.be/3NQwWMcy36g

https://youtu.be/3ejENLPau9U

If "Operation Driftnet" gone wrong, then China will have a very good reason to conduct "Anti-Piracy" operation in SCS as well. I hope Sea Shepherd have some military backers if they still wish to survive doing their holy objectives.



< Message edited by Dysta -- 3/26/2016 1:59:36 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 790
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/28/2016 7:26:18 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
Speculation in new Israeli anti-ship missile, possibly supersonic and ram-jet powered: http://defense-update.com/20160327_israeli_anti_ship_missile.html

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 791
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/28/2016 10:14:57 PM   
redcoat


Posts: 1035
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: UK
Status: offline

Japan has activated a radar on the island of Yonaguni close to the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islands

Link

_____________________________

“‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

George Orwell, 1984

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 792
RE: Naval and Defense News - 3/28/2016 10:42:14 PM   
AlGrant


Posts: 912
Joined: 8/18/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: redcoat
Japan has activated a radar on the island of Yonaguni close to the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu islands
Link

Ooohh got to be a scenario in there somewhere

(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 793
Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frig... - 3/30/2016 2:21:06 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
Close encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese Frigate 575. Plain and clear situation, from the New York Times (even show clearly Jane's Fighting Ship's open in the bridge on page 144 in "Chinese Frigates", depending on open source intelligence, possible they've a reconnaissance book with parallel failures to this of US Army recent warplanes reconnaissance guide): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/31/world/asia/south-china-sea-us-navy.html?_r=0

(in reply to AlGrant)
Post #: 794
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 3/30/2016 2:32:33 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Broncepulido

(even show clearly Jane's Fighting Ship's open in the bridge on page 144 in "Chinese Frigates", depending on open source intelligence, possible they've a reconnaissance book with parallel failures to this of US Army recent warplanes reconnaissance guide)


Even generals can mis-identify the subject if not observing and examining carefully, so I think a book of Janes might not be a life-saver, but definitely helpful for comms and intels.

But I think the US is overplaying the importance of "military transparency", blaming China for the lacks of open info and speculations of their arsenals is one of the biggest reason why western combatants need books to ID what they are.

_____________________________


(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 795
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 3/30/2016 3:37:52 PM   
1Eddie2

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 2/7/2015
Status: offline
RAF looking at BriteCloud as additional DRFM jammer

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/international/europe/2016/03/30/raf-radar-guided-missile-threat/82417308/

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 796
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 3/30/2016 4:18:43 PM   
Tailhook

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 1/18/2015
Status: offline
I wouldn't read too much into using Janes as opposed to some fancy classified source. It's a pretty reliable source, serves the purpose of initial ID purposes, and can also be freely shown to New York Times reporters.

(in reply to 1Eddie2)
Post #: 797
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 3/30/2016 4:25:30 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tailhook

I wouldn't read too much into using Janes as opposed to some fancy classified source. It's a pretty reliable source, serves the purpose of initial ID purposes, and can also be freely shown to New York Times reporters.

What it lacks is the computer interface, and the simulation. We all paid good money for it already.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tailhook)
Post #: 798
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 3/31/2016 7:09:32 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
The Eastern Theatre Command of PLA offices has been upgraded to use Linux-based Kylin OS, which is using cloud service for all users, rather than individual systems.



http://military.china.com/important/11132797/20160331/22344703.html (Simplified Chinese)

< Message edited by Dysta -- 3/31/2016 7:11:22 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 799
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 4/1/2016 4:28:45 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
Turkmenistan was recently launched FD-2000 (HQ-9) & KS-1A (HQ-12) SAMs during the military drill. Both are imported from China a year ago.

http://m.get-top-news.com/?i11992063 (Google Translated to English)





< Message edited by Dysta -- 4/1/2016 4:40:49 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 800
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 4/1/2016 8:02:56 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
On 1 April 2016, "Citing multiple issues, the United Kingdom have announced their intention to scrap plans to purchase F-35" https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-cancels-f-35-purchase/

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 801
RE: Encounter between USS Chancellorsville and Chinese ... - 4/1/2016 8:16:18 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Broncepulido

On 1 April 2016, "Citing multiple issues, the United Kingdom have announced their intention to scrap plans to purchase F-35" https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-cancels-f-35-purchase/


quote:

In response to this, the Ministry of Defence are now considering purchasing a fleet F-4 Phantoms, painting go faster stripes on the carrier hulls and additional crayon provision.


A bit too much for April's Fool at this line.

_____________________________


(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 802
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/2/2016 5:48:17 AM   
Excroat3

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline
U.S. Army’s new launcher fired AIM-9X and Longbow Hellfire at UAV targets
http://alert5.com/2016/04/02/u-s-armys-new-launcher-fired-aim-9x-and-longbow-hellfire-at-uav-targets/

(in reply to redcoat)
Post #: 803
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/3/2016 5:58:50 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e0ce3744-f70a-11e5-803c-d27c7117d132.html#axzz44mXAy0nL

quote:

China set to deploy longest-range nuclear missile

A new generation of Chinese intercontinental ballistic missiles may come into service as early as this year and will herald a period of rapid nuclear build-up by China, according to experts.
With a 14,500km estimated range, the DF-41 is the first Chinese missile capable of carrying multiple warheads that can strike any part of the US from anywhere in China. Previous missiles have been more limited. The first version of the DF-5, which went into service in 1980, could only hit the northwestern corner of the US from the north-east of China.

“Given the number of real reported tests, it is reasonable to speculate the DF-41 will be deployed to PLA Strategic Rocket Force bases in 2016,” said Richard Fisher, senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Washington.

The news comes as US President Barack Obama prepares to meet China’s President Xi Jinping at a nuclear security summit in Washington on Thursday.

The new missile is the latest in Chinese efforts to challenge US global primacy on a number of fronts. Beijing has been beefing up artificial islands in the South China Sea, while a new generation of weapons, including a stealth fighter, the DF-21D “carrier killer” missile and the 052D class destroyer, are underlining the transformation of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army from a peasant-based land army to a mobile modern fighting force capable of challenging the US in the western Pacific.

While it will be a long time before China achieves nuclear parity with the US and Russia, the world leaders in stockpiled warheads, China clearly sees this as a gap that must be addressed.

Until roughly 2008, according to Mr Fisher, the US believed China had a maximum of 20 nuclear missile warheads. Now, with the advent of a redesigned DF-5 and the new DF-41, both capable of carrying multiple warheads, Mr Fisher says current western estimates for total Chinese warheads are between 200 and 400, with the potential to increase very rapidly.
The US has a stockpile of 4,760 nuclear warheads, according to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.

With the ongoing deployment of the DF-5B multiple warhead equipped ICBM, and the new DF-41, “we will see a period of rapid increases in the numbers of China’s nuclear warheads that can reach the United States”, said Mr Fisher.
Tong Zhao, a nuclear security expert at the Carnegie Tsinghua centre in Beijing, said the DF-41 did a number of things that old missiles could not. While the DF-5 is silo-based, the DF-41 has a mobile launcher. The longer range also means it can be deployed anywhere in China, whereas previously China’s nuclear deterrent had to be based in the north-east of the country.
News of the DF-41’s imminent deployment was first reported by Canada-based military journal Kanwa Asian Defence.


Looks like the DF-41 will soon be deployed. The ability to strike the US from anywhere in China due to its range and mobility (and not just when deployed in the north-east) would be a completely new capability for the PLA-RF. It would be like having SSBNs on land - especially since they could now take advantage of the extensive underground great wall network in Central China, and the mountainous regions of provinces like Sichuan (where extensive nuclear production and storage faciliies already exist).

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 804
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/3/2016 6:27:28 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline
Additional news on Sea Hunter ACTUV: DARPA launched the ACTUV technology demonstrator on 27 January 2016 and conducted tests through February, achieving speeds of 27 knots (31 mph; 50 km/h). To be Christened in April 2016.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a20197/darpas-autonomous-sub-hunting-ship-takes-to-the-sea/
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/04/02/navy-tests-sub-hunting-drone-ship-vstan-orig.cnn/video/playlists/military-technology/

Also news on the boeing Echo Voyager UUV:
51 ft length
7500 range
50 ton weight
diesel generator plus rechareable batteries
11,000 max depth

http://www.gizmag.com/boeing-echo-voyager/42272/
http://www.wired.com/2016/03/boeings-monstrous-underwater-robot-can-wander-ocean-6-months/

There are a lot of details to be learned but platforms like tjhese are going to be very important in the future and it would be great to add these as hypothetical platforms to the database so we can experiment with them.

< Message edited by orca -- 4/3/2016 6:33:10 PM >

(in reply to orca)
Post #: 805
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/3/2016 6:33:42 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Excroat3

U.S. Army’s new launcher fired AIM-9X and Longbow Hellfire at UAV targets
http://alert5.com/2016/04/02/u-s-armys-new-launcher-fired-aim-9x-and-longbow-hellfire-at-uav-targets/


Still very much a prototype.

http://www.army.mil/article/154848/Multi_Mission_Launcher_Delivery_Ceremony/

Nice idea though!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 806
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/3/2016 6:36:47 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

http://www.janes.com/article/59003/imagery-suggests-china-has-deployed-yj-62-anti-ship-missiles-to-woody-island


quote:

Imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 anti-ship missiles to Woody Island

Key Points
-Recent imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 ASCMs to Woody Island in the Paracels
-The deployment potentially allows China to target any vessel within 400 km of Woody Island
-Recent imagery suggests China has significantly enhanced its military capabilities in the South China Sea by deploying the land-based version of the 400 km-range YJ-62 anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) to Woody Island in the Paracel Islands.

Posted on 20 March 2016 on the popular Weibo blog, the image of a launching YJ-62 ASCM is consistent with photos copied from one of the many monthly Chinese military magazines that appear on Chinese military issue web pages. The image of the launching ASCM also shows a radar dome that the Chinese blogger makes a strong case for being on Woody Island.

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) YJ-62 was likely deployed at about the same time the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile (SAM) system was first detected on the island in February 2016.

A land-based version of the YJ-62 has been deployed by the Coastal Defence troops of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) since about 2008. Three YJ-62 ASCMs are carried on a CASIC-Sanjiang transporter-erector-launcher (TEL).

First seen in model form in 2006 under its export designation C-602, the YJ-62 also arms the Type 052C destroyer launched in 2003. Chinese brochures credit the C-602 with a range of 280 km, while the version in service with the PLAN is estimated to have at least a 400 km range.

The anti-ship version of the YJ-62 is cued by long-range radar or data from aircraft or satellites, then uses an internal nose-mounted radar for terminal guidance.

At the 2012 Zhuhai Airshow CASIC introduced the 290 km-range CM-602G land-attack variant, which has a 480 kg warhead as opposed to the 300 kg warhead carried by the C-602.


The part talking about the range difference between the export C-602 and PLAN-deployed YJ-62 is interesting and well within commom practice: Export cruise missiles are subject to the 300km range limitation as set by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), while domestic variants are not subject to it. The 400km number is well within the realms of possibility and even a bit too short-ranged compared to the rumors in the Chinese military watcher's forums (about 600km range - it is a big missile, after all).

The images in question:



And when all major island bases would have the same armaments (yellow for 200km HQ-9 and white for 400km YJ-62 AShM):



Do you know what the radar types on the island are?

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 807
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/3/2016 7:48:45 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Do you know what the radar types on the island are?

Mike

Based on this picture (Woody island):

1, EW Radar (Unknown)
2, Weather Station (Unknown)
3, Possible HQ-9 Battery & Radar System
4, ELINT Antenna/Receiver (possibly from Type 815G ELINT vessel)
5, Possible YJ-62 Battery
6, Radio Communication Antenna (Unknown)

From WikiMapia



< Message edited by Dysta -- 4/3/2016 8:01:43 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 808
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/3/2016 8:47:06 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

Based on this picture (Woody island):

1, EW Radar (Unknown)

Is it possible that this radar site could be a YLC-4 radar?? Some months ago I did a little research for a SCS scenario and compared the radome on Woody Island to known YLC-4 radomes on the Chinese mainland. Diameters were always about the same size. Also the layout of the radar coverage of radars on Hainan Island with a YLC-4 on Woody Island lead me to this conclusion. Of course I could be horribly wrong...

_____________________________


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 809
RE: Naval and Defense News - 4/3/2016 10:41:32 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Supreme 2.0

Is it possible that this radar site could be a YLC-4 radar?? Some months ago I did a little research for a SCS scenario and compared the radome on Woody Island to known YLC-4 radomes on the Chinese mainland. Diameters were always about the same size. Also the layout of the radar coverage of radars on Hainan Island with a YLC-4 on Woody Island lead me to this conclusion. Of course I could be horribly wrong...

No luck with Chinese sites and forums either.

That approx. 20m diameter of green radome suggest its' for the long-range search radar, consider the smaller white radome can't house a better radar, and the weather station is too open for military purpose. I'm not sure if it's a permanent construction, or the radar inside is replaceable.

But so far, the only temporary solution is to treat it as a normal search radar, like YLC-4 you suggested.

_____________________________


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 810
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.625