Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Naval and Defense News

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/9/2016 4:28:30 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		http://chinese-military-aviation.blogspot.com/p/gallery-i.html#J-20

The first batch of J-20 stealth fighter is entering the service with PLAAF by the end of 2016.

Serialnumbers identified; 78271, 78272 (and possibly 78273 too) - those could signify the 21st, 22nd and 23rd J-20 produced (albeit, only 3 might be introduced to service now)


(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 1561
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/10/2016 4:40:12 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		UN chief appoints Chinese general as force commander of UN mission in Western Sahara

http://english.chinamil.com.cn/view/2016-12/09/content_7399547.htm

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1562
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/10/2016 4:58:40 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		I just spent two days at sea aboard the French Navy air defense frigate Chevalier Paul. It was awesome!
A first for me and a rare experience that I won't forget anytime soon (from the Sea State 5 overnight... to the "simulated anti air engagement" that the Captain was nice enough to organize around 11 PM for our video needs... with part of the CIC operators at "action stations" wearing their hood and googles and shouting orders left and right :D )
A lot of it looks and feels like CMANO... except there are many more factors (speed & direction of wind, tilting of the hull etc...)

And then they released a Mk 39 EMATT and I could watch the ASW Officers practicing their skills

Our video should be ready sometime this coming week or next


< Message edited by navyrecognition -- 12/10/2016 5:12:27 PM >

_____________________________

www.navalnews.com

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1563
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/10/2016 5:10:33 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		Nice scenario idea:

The Hunt for Med October: US Navy searching for Russian 'carrier killer' submarines feared to have been sent after NATO warships in the Mediterranean

NATO planes and ships are said to be on the look out for Russian submarines
One or two subs are believed to be operating near a French aircraft carrier
Incident has echoes of the Cold War book and film The Hunt For Red October


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4017522/The-Hunt-Med-October-Navy-searching-Russian-carrier-killer-submarines-feared-sent-NATO-warships-Mediterranean.html#ixzz4SSa0Dhjx



_____________________________

www.navalnews.com

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1564
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/10/2016 7:55:06 PM   
Zaslon

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 6/14/2015
Status: offline 		NH-90 Sea Lion for Bundesmarine.
http://www.slideshare.net/robbinlaird/nh90-briefing-june-2016

_____________________________


Kids think about Iran and Amateurs think about Russia, but professionals think about China

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1565
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 12:20:37 PM   
OnFire


Posts: 79
Joined: 6/12/2014
Status: offline 		How far China is willing to go over Taiwan? If the USA legitimize the RoC, there's a high degree of probability the PRC may attempt to take Taiwan by force. There's also a high likelihood China's already moving ballistic missiles towards the eastern and southern coastlines after Trump's statements. The PRC won't tolerate a legitimized Taiwan, saying before that using military force isn't quite off the table.

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan could thrust the US and NATO (at least bits of it) into a skirmish (or full blown war) in the Pacific. This would mean for the first time in history, two nuclear powers would be in direct conflict. It's uncharted territory for sure at that point, and at this point, is probably the most "realistic" scenario involving the use of nuclear weapons.

Of course, none of this could happen as well. What is your opinion?

_____________________________


(in reply to Zaslon)
Post #: 1566
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 1:11:00 PM   
jmax

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 12/5/2016
Status: offline 		Well the good news is that nobody wants to fight over Taiwan, or if one does break out, all sides will have an interest in keeping it contained. Mainland China doesn't want to alienate the islanders by destroying their productive infrastructure, but if they have to bomb Taiwan, they will try to keep it an "internal affair" and limit collateral damage because they don't want to reunify the hostile populace of a smoking ruin. Certainly nobody wants to see nuclear weapons used - anyway China's nuclear triad isn't a robust enough deterrent for it to enjoy strategic escalation dominance that way, though they'd enjoy a significant home team advantage in conventional conflict and political will to fight.

If the US were to legitimize Taiwan, some form of military coercion is a distinct possibility. Trump's statements alone won't lead to war, but it is dangerous and destabilizing talk to be sure. If you want to know what I think a realistic conflict scenario might look like, you can check out 'Breaking the Chain, 2020' in Mods & Scenarios forum! =P


(in reply to OnFire)
Post #: 1567
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 1:21:30 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		It's a news thread, though. Any ideas are welcome, but at least comes with a source for us to see first.

Anyway, will CMANO works for the mobile dry dock in the future? It's an underrated support vessel until the Zumwalt's malfunction. US is keep buying more Chinese dry docks for their shipyards:

http://fox5sandiego.com/2016/12/08/huge-floating-dry-dock-arrives-in-san-diego-after-voyage-from-china/

Previous report: http://breakingdefense.com/2016/09/us-navy-yards-already-use-chinese-built-drydocks/

< Message edited by Dysta -- 12/12/2016 1:26:52 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to jmax)
Post #: 1568
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 1:32:15 PM   
jmax

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 12/5/2016
Status: offline 		I registered less than 7 days ago so I can't post a link but he's referring to comments by Donald Trump about dumping the One-China policy, which is causing quite a stir in China as you might imagine

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1569
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 2:48:09 PM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jmax

I registered less than 7 days ago so I can't post a link but he's referring to comments by Donald Trump about dumping the One-China policy, which is causing quite a stir in China as you might imagine

There's a backdrop:

http://taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2016/12/12/2003661043

quote:

Several Chinese aircraft, reportedly Su-30 fighter jets, two Xian H-6K bombers, a Tupolev Tu-154 surveillance aircraft and a Shaanxi Y-8 tactical transport aircraft, passed over the Miyako Strait near Japan’s Ryukyu Islands and circled the international airspace surrounding Taiwan.
The Chinese exercise was the second one in as many weeks.
While the Chinese military said the flight was a routine offshore training exercise, the Japan Air Self-Defense Force scrambled some of its F-15 jets.


_____________________________


(in reply to jmax)
Post #: 1570
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 3:39:14 PM   
tomrlutong2

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 12/5/2016
Status: offline 		Also interesting, reported that China may be deploying S-400s to the South China Sea. Not unexpected, and probably too soon to be a reaction to Trump's Taiwan comments. Still, those comments are unlikely to slow down fortification of the islands. Figure the U.S. is unlikely to respond forcefuly to any but the most provocative actions between now and Jan 20. How much ground truth can China change in 39 days?

Before you call someone's bluff, best to be sure you know who's bluffing.

I'm too new to post links, but Fox and the Daily Mail have reported on the SA-21/S-400 deployments.

< Message edited by tomrlutong2 -- 12/12/2016 3:41:45 PM >

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1571
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 3:42:38 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		Pictures: US Navy F/A-18C Hornet Fighters Crossing Decks with French Navy Aircraft Carrier CDG

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2016/december-2016-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/4668-pictures-us-navy-f-a-18c-hornet-fighters-crossing-decks-with-french-navy-aircraft-carrier-cdg.html

Pictures: French Navy Rafale M Fighters Crossing Decks with US Navy Aircraft Carrier "Ike" CVN 69

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2016/december-2016-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/4665-pictures-french-navy-rafale-m-fighters-crossing-decks-with-us-navy-aircraft-carrier-ike-cvn-69.html

_____________________________

www.navalnews.com

(in reply to tomrlutong2)
Post #: 1572
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 4:39:25 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline 		Great photos of the Chevalier Paul. I'm a little surprised to see the Dauphin taking off (?) backwards.

_____________________________


(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1573
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/12/2016 5:25:27 PM   
xavierv


Posts: 517
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hellfish6

Great photos of the Chevalier Paul. I'm a little surprised to see the Dauphin taking off (?) backwards.

It actually landed that way... "6 O'Clock landing maneuver"...
I was just as surprised... first time I ever saw such a thing.
Crew told me it is easier in heavy seas/wind situations (it was sea state 4 at the time) because the helicopter doesn't feel the turbulence as much.

You'll see it soon landing this way in our video

_____________________________

www.navalnews.com

(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 1574
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/14/2016 2:02:59 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		CHINA’S NEW SPRATLY ISLAND DEFENSES

https://amti.csis.org/chinas-new-spratly-island-defenses/

Any speculation on specific composition of the defenses?

(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1575
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/14/2016 2:13:27 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: orca

CHINA’S NEW SPRATLY ISLAND DEFENSES

https://amti.csis.org/chinas-new-spratly-island-defenses/

Any speculation on specific composition of the defenses?


When I was working on Spratly Spat I did some research at at the time sources thought many of the naval guns being mounted on the builds are actually the PJ series of guns being mounted on warships.

My sense is a this point the infrastructure is being built up anything could go there at will. Be interesting to see if they build permanent sites or just revetments to slide and shift systems as needed.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to orca)
Post #: 1576
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/14/2016 2:19:19 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		From previous photos we have seen PJ-26 (AK-176) guns installed there, along with their associated FCR.
CIWS are possibly Type 1130 or 730 guns.

I wonder if SAM or at least PDMS are also installed as well...

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1577
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 2:12:42 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		Examples of the defensive weapons on those island fortifications: PJ-26 and Type 1130 CIWS (with off-board sensors)




(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1578
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 3:18:38 AM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline 		Is it just me or do those hexagonal gun positions seem like great target indicators? They just pop right out to the eye, don't they? Real accommodating of the designers to set them apart from the other architecture that way.

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 1579
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 7:27:00 AM   
edsw


Posts: 59
Joined: 4/14/2016
From: Ukraine
Status: offline

December 12 at Zhukovsky flew preproduction MiG-35
http://djoker-lj.livejournal.com/271446.html

(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 1580
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 10:20:56 AM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Primarchx

Is it just me or do those hexagonal gun positions seem like great target indicators? They just pop right out to the eye, don't they? Real accommodating of the designers to set them apart from the other architecture that way.


They are distinctive, I suspect that the form is designed to minimize weaknesses in the reinforced concrete, they are probably several feet thick - medieval almost but great protection from most naval ordinance these days.

B

(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 1581
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 1:40:39 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		Finally a half-decent shot of the DF-41 TEL.

Rumors indicate that the 1st Brigade has been established. 10 TELs.



< Message edited by Hongjian -- 12/15/2016 1:41:00 PM >

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 1582
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 2:06:45 PM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

medieval almost but great protection from most naval ordinance these days.


Not sure if I would want pull duty out there. Understood from A2/AD POV. Tactically, they are sitting ducks I would think.

Kevin

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 1583
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 2:16:43 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 5508
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kevinkin

medieval almost but great protection from most naval ordinance these days.

Not sure if I would want pull duty out there. Understood from A2/AD POV. Tactically, they are sitting ducks I would think.

Kevin


Against Americans - yes. Philippines - not so much perhaps.

Maginot line anyone?

b

< Message edited by Gunner98 -- 12/15/2016 2:17:46 PM >

(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 1584
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/15/2016 2:17:14 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gunner98


quote:

ORIGINAL: Primarchx

Is it just me or do those hexagonal gun positions seem like great target indicators? They just pop right out to the eye, don't they? Real accommodating of the designers to set them apart from the other architecture that way.


They are distinctive, I suspect that the form is designed to minimize weaknesses in the reinforced concrete, they are probably several feet thick - medieval almost but great protection from most naval ordinance these days.

B



Good point. The 'shoot-me!' factor on them is high, too, which makes one wonder if there's some sort of deception involved with them. Then again, when you're working with fortifications build on pilings I guess you need every advantage you can get!

(in reply to Gunner98)
Post #: 1585
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/16/2016 12:36:35 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1909
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline 		Liaoning & J-15's military drill with live missiles are shown in CCTV news. The rate of fire from HQ-10 can be seen as well:

https://youtu.be/WHbD7zC_Cn0

_____________________________


(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 1586
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/16/2016 12:58:53 AM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 834
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline 		Nice video. Shows for the first time YJ-83K carried by J-15s engaging a target ship.

Also, looks like the PLANAF allows their pilots to "customize" their helmets now.


(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 1587
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/16/2016 1:06:59 AM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: edsw


December 12 at Zhukovsky flew preproduction MiG-35
http://djoker-lj.livejournal.com/271446.html

Looks like a regular MiG-29K to me?

_____________________________


(in reply to edsw)
Post #: 1588
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/16/2016 1:53:42 AM   
kevinkins


Posts: 2257
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Testing in the Pacific. The missile looks like something out of a 1950's comic book. Very cool.

http://www.stripes.com/news/us/us-navy-conducts-missile-tests-off-hawaii-1.444605

The Missile Defense Agency and Navy continued testing the versatility of the SM-6 missile with a salvo of two missiles fired at a ballistic missile target in the “terminal” or final phase of flight early this morning off Hawaii.

The Pearl Harbor destroyer USS John Paul Jones fired the defensive missiles after a target missile was launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai just after midnight.

(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1589
RE: Naval and Defense News - 12/16/2016 3:30:30 AM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		I'm working on a SCS Spratly Island Scenario titled "Great Wall of Sand".

Appreciate the comments on the new island defenses. Do people think it's likely or at least possible that there are or could be missile CIWS such as HQ-10 as part of the structures?


(in reply to kevinkins)
Post #: 1590
Page:   <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> RE: Naval and Defense News Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.938