Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/26/2015 10:03:28 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
S/O 1939 Axis 3

Germany declares war on Denmark. On another 10, the US aren't bothered.

Germany & Japan Land, Italy Combined.

No naval air.

The Italian supply unit moves from the Red Sea to Tobruk.

Northern China after Japanese land movement.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AllenK -- 2/26/2015 11:03:59 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 31
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/26/2015 10:13:06 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
Denmark and Poland after land movement. The weather has bogged progress down.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 32
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/26/2015 10:25:09 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
The Germans declare just the one attack on Warsaw and throw engineers and Von Leeb into the scrap. The engineers perish and 4 units disorganised but the capital falls.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by AllenK -- 2/26/2015 11:28:16 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 33
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/26/2015 10:36:21 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
The Germans rebase a Ftr and 2 Lnd to the west.

The Japs rebase an OOS Ftr and Lnd to near Yamamoto.

The Ju-52 reorganises an Inf by Warsaw.

No HQ re-org.

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 34
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 7:50:40 AM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
SO 1939, Allied impulse 5.

No DOW. USSR demands Bessarabia, does Germany allow or deny that?

< Message edited by Mayhemizer -- 2/27/2015 8:51:22 AM >

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 35
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 8:04:49 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
Dear Uncle Joe,

Thank you for your recent communication on the subject of Bessarabia. I have flipped a coi ... I mean given such an urgent and pressing matter my undecisive attention and wish to inform you I am disinclined to acquiesce to your request.

I trust this won't lead to any souring of the understanding we have between our great nations.

Your most obedient servant,

The Little Bavarian Corporal.

< Message edited by AllenK -- 2/28/2015 1:30:53 PM >

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 36
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 8:21:57 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
USSR declared war on Rumania. US entry roll 2. 2 chits removed, no chits left in Germany/Italy pool.

Hmmm, how do I take East Poland now?

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 37
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 9:11:35 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
Nationalist China and France land
CW and USSR combined
USA pass

CW brings 2 transporters and a cruiser to North Sea with MOT, MECH and INF div.

France still remembers last weeks success in strategic bombings and attacks to Breslau with high hopes. With roll 7 another PP is lost! If anyone else has started a game with better strat bomb result (5 attacks, 6 PP) please let me know...





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Mayhemizer -- 2/27/2015 10:11:54 PM >

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 38
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 9:25:45 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
USSR makes 1 ground strike to attack hex.
Rain droppes factor to 2, rolls are 9 and 4 so 4-3 INF is not flipped.

RAIL MOVES
France rails one INF from south to north.
USSR rails one INF from Siberia to west.

LAND MOVE
Nationalist Chinese occupy empty city of Kaifeng.

DEBARK
CW lands 3 units to defend Denmark. This has been done to me once, I know that it is annoying...

LAND COMBAT
1 attack, USSR tries to break trough Rumanian line.
HQ support and ground support are used.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 39
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 9:36:19 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
USSR kills INF and enters Bessarabia.

AIR REBASE
Nationalist FTR rebased to Nanyang.
2 Polish planes are rebased to Lithuania and pilots will soon continue war as RAF pilots.
Spitfire is rebased to Scotland.

HQ REORGANIZATION
France reorganizes bomber again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 40
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 9:43:54 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
Western front after impulse 5.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 41
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 9:44:23 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
Eastern front after impulse 5.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 42
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 9:44:46 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
China after impulse 5.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 43
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 10:18:42 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
Are there any experienced players that can comment on this combat?

From what I can see, it hasn't taken into account the attack is across river and the rain.

The odds are listed as 39:4. There are 31 land factors attacking and 8 air factors. However, the land factors should be halved for attacking across the river, making 15.5 and the air factors should be halved for the rain, giving 4. That would be 19.5: 4.

19.5:4 is 4:1 (+8) with .875 chance of the fractional (I think). –2 for the rain and +1 HQ support gives +7 and with a fractional roll of .641, I think it would have got the +1. +8 in total. A 16 on the Blitz table would be 1 attacker lost, all attackers disorganised and defender retreats.

Am I missing something?

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 44
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 10:21:19 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
No oil game, so this is a good gambit of the Germans not to allow the claim on Bessarabia. Question is only, will the turn end before the USSR gets a land unit into Rumania itself... The Axis can't all pass, because Germany needs to kill the Poles next impulse...

Interesting...

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 45
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 10:24:54 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

No oil game, so this is a good gambit of the Germans not to allow the claim on Bessarabia. Question is only, will the turn end before the USSR gets a land unit into Rumania itself... The Axis can't all pass, because Germany needs to kill the Poles next impulse...

Interesting...

Hi Centuur, thanks for the comment. Do you have any idea regarding the combat result question? By my reckoning, the Soviets should be largely disorganised.

< Message edited by AllenK -- 2/27/2015 11:25:28 PM >

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 46
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 10:25:48 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

Are there any experienced players that can comment on this combat?

From what I can see, it hasn't taken into account the attack is across river and the rain.

The odds are listed as 39:4. There are 31 land factors attacking and 8 air factors. However, the land factors should be halved for attacking across the river, making 15.5 and the air factors should be halved for the rain, giving 4. That would be 19.5: 4.

19.5:4 is 4:1 (+8) with .875 chance of the fractional (I think). –2 for the rain and +1 HQ support gives +7 and with a fractional roll of .641, I think it would have got the +1. +8 in total. A 16 on the Blitz table would be 1 attacker lost, all attackers disorganised and defender retreats.

Am I missing something?


Yes, Rumania is surprised and therefore rivers don't halve the attacking units and the ground support is doubled during the surprise impulse. So 31 factors and 8 air factors (doubled for surprise and halved for rain again) makes it 39...



_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 47
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 10:30:11 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

Are there any experienced players that can comment on this combat?

From what I can see, it hasn't taken into account the attack is across river and the rain.

The odds are listed as 39:4. There are 31 land factors attacking and 8 air factors. However, the land factors should be halved for attacking across the river, making 15.5 and the air factors should be halved for the rain, giving 4. That would be 19.5: 4.

19.5:4 is 4:1 (+8) with .875 chance of the fractional (I think). –2 for the rain and +1 HQ support gives +7 and with a fractional roll of .641, I think it would have got the +1. +8 in total. A 16 on the Blitz table would be 1 attacker lost, all attackers disorganised and defender retreats.

Am I missing something?


Yes, Rumania is surprised and therefore rivers don't halve the attacking units and the ground support is doubled during the surprise impulse. So 31 factors and 8 air factors (doubled for surprise and halved for rain again) makes it 39...




Ah. Well, you live and learn.

Now, how do I keep those pesky Russians at bay for a little longer?


< Message edited by AllenK -- 2/27/2015 11:36:38 PM >

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 48
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 10:39:06 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
S/O 1939 Axis 7

The weather doesn't get any better.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 49
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/27/2015 11:07:56 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: The little Bavarian corporal

I have flipped a coi ...



good stuff







quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

Now, how do I keep those pesky Russians at bay for a little longer?





you answered that one in the next post with a successful prayer to the weather gods ... somewhat

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 50
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 3:30:25 AM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
Best case scenario for the Germans is that they take Lodz and the turn ends (can it end?), leaving them in a position to force a peace in Rumania and conquer Poland without the USSR getting Eastern Poland.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 51
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 6:32:49 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

Are there any experienced players that can comment on this combat?

From what I can see, it hasn't taken into account the attack is across river and the rain.

The odds are listed as 39:4. There are 31 land factors attacking and 8 air factors. However, the land factors should be halved for attacking across the river, making 15.5 and the air factors should be halved for the rain, giving 4. That would be 19.5: 4.

19.5:4 is 4:1 (+8) with .875 chance of the fractional (I think). –2 for the rain and +1 HQ support gives +7 and with a fractional roll of .641, I think it would have got the +1. +8 in total. A 16 on the Blitz table would be 1 attacker lost, all attackers disorganised and defender retreats.

Am I missing something?


Yes, Rumania is surprised and therefore rivers don't halve the attacking units and the ground support is doubled during the surprise impulse. So 31 factors and 8 air factors (doubled for surprise and halved for rain again) makes it 39...




Ah. Well, you live and learn.

Now, how do I keep those pesky Russians at bay for a little longer?

warspite1

Out of interest do you know about the problem with the Peace Keepers coding? Have you and your opponent discussed to ensure you are both on the same page?


_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 52
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 7:09:38 AM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
Things just got interesting. I have to admit that I maybe did not remember that I need to enter Rumania, not only Bessarabia. It came to mind when it was not possible to break trough during rain :)

I remembered that river does not affect during surprise impulse. But I forgot that air factors are doubled, I could have used one plane to ground other unit.

Now weather is even worse, so Rumania may survive. I should have set one INF div with for invasion.

On the other hand I like this situation, I have never before been in a game like that. What I hope to happen is (I need luck for this, but so far I have been a lucky guy):
-Germany can have Poland, if they really want it :)
-Turn does not end
-USSR manages to advance Rumania
-USSR takes East Poland and US gets mad refusing ever to help aggressive countries in Europe.

If this happens, I would be happy.

I once played a game with peacekeepers in Finland. We were able to work it out. We solved combat using random.org rolls and then worked out movements in game. Still there are problems, for example advancing after attack. If defenders get losses from Rumanian troops, those troops can do a suicide attack next impulse. German losses can be railed to Germany and right amount of BPs are thrown away.

But it is likely that we don't have to face this problem...

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 53
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 9:53:36 AM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
S/O 1939 Axis 7

Hungary aligned and units deployed. USA not bothered on an 8.

Now what to do?

If all pass, 30% chance for turn to end. Germany, however, has a couple of loose ends to tie up in Poland. They choose combined. Japan and Italy have things to do but these are less urgent. Indeed, one of the things on the Italian list would be accomplished by the turn ending. Both pass for a 20% chance.

A Do-17 flies to the North Sea 1 box, with an escort. They are joined by Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, Hipper and Blucher in the 4-box. Do the Allies wish to intercept? Needs a 2 or less.

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 54
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 10:33:21 AM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
To move things on, I am going to make a wild guess and assume the assorted Allied Trans and CP's probably don't want to attract undue attention to themselves.

This gives Germany choice of two sea areas; the North Sea and the Baltic.

In the North Sea, Blucher initiates combat. Would the RAF care to participate in the proceedings?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 55
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 11:38:06 AM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
Spitfire goes to 0 box to cover transporters. If aborted, abort to Denmark. 1st kill/abort Do 17 if I can choose.

I will avoid combat if possible.

< Message edited by Mayhemizer -- 2/28/2015 12:59:24 PM >

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 56
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 12:01:59 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
The Spitfires scramble to the defence of the transports and convoy.

Eager eyes scan the horizon. Lookouts on the Blucher report smoke on the horizon. The German ships turn to investigate and are delighted to find the Transports and a convoy, protected by 3 CA/CL. The Allies appear unaware of the German presence.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 57
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 12:11:32 PM   
AllenK


Posts: 7259
Joined: 2/17/2014
From: England
Status: offline
The German ships close to within gunnery range and unleash their opening broadsides on the leading CW transport (4 surprise to force naval combat and 3 to select target). Unfortunately, the accuracy is less than desired, leaving the transports heavily damaged but still afloat. Which would the Allies like to place the first abort on?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 58
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 12:43:43 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
Abort undamaged transporter. All aborted ships goes to south west UK major port.

(in reply to AllenK)
Post #: 59
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR - 2/28/2015 12:49:49 PM   
Mayhemizer_slith


Posts: 7654
Joined: 9/7/2011
From: Finland
Status: offline
Call CW sissy but they will leave the North Sea after combat :)

(in reply to Mayhemizer_slith)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer AAR Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844