Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

The future of merchant convoys....

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Commander - The Great War >> The future of merchant convoys.... Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The future of merchant convoys.... - 5/15/2015 4:01:38 AM   
AEWHistory

 

Posts: 63
Joined: 8/6/2014
Status: offline
Well, that's sorta my question: what's the future of this gameplay feature? To be more specific, I'm curious if a few changes are still being considered.

First and foremost letting the players control the movement if these convoys. This would give Germany at least an ice cube's chance in hell of getting one of those Atlantic convoys... as it is that will never happen unless you have a generous or inept entente player.

Second, random convoy placement. This doesn't really apply for some, such as the Norwegian convoy which would originate in the same spot each time, but the convoys coming from the south Atlantic shouldn't necessarily appear in the same hex each time they show up. Some would appear near Africa, but others should appear closer to the Caribbean, and still others in the center. Now THAT would make for a neat game of hide and seek on the high seas!

Third idea I've had is for perhaps a little randomness to convoy size. Not sure if this is a good idea, but it seems like an idea that might be neat. The avg should still work out to 10, but the convoys don't always carry the same materials and have the same value, so why not let the game reflect that. Is that a neat idea or no?

One last question: when Germany loses control of the seas early in the game a note flashes that seems to indicate that Germany might be able to get their convoys to resume shipping if they can challenge entente control of the seas and break the blockade. However, I'm not aware of anywhere where it states what constitutes breaking a blockade, does anyone?

As always, many thanks!
Post #: 1
RE: The future of merchant convoys.... - 5/17/2015 5:31:02 AM   
DanielHerr

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 2/7/2015
Status: offline
Random placement should be possible to make. The blockade can be broken by building up your navy or sinking the British. Kirk has posted about enabling player convoy control, so it might be in the next patch.

_____________________________

danielherr.github.io

(in reply to AEWHistory)
Post #: 2
RE: The future of merchant convoys.... - 5/18/2015 7:16:08 AM   
AEWHistory

 

Posts: 63
Joined: 8/6/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DanielHerr

Random placement should be possible to make. The blockade can be broken by building up your navy or sinking the British. Kirk has posted about enabling player convoy control, so it might be in the next patch.


Could you elaborate on "building up your navy"? Is the blockade broken if the Germans launch a new dreadnought? Or sinking a Brit Dreadnought? I've wondered if it required the German navy to take control of some area of water and hold it.... I dunno.

(in reply to DanielHerr)
Post #: 3
RE: The future of merchant convoys.... - 5/18/2015 12:16:46 PM   
operating


Posts: 3158
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AEWHistory


quote:

ORIGINAL: DanielHerr

Random placement should be possible to make. The blockade can be broken by building up your navy or sinking the British. Kirk has posted about enabling player convoy control, so it might be in the next patch.


Could you elaborate on "building up your navy"? Is the blockade broken if the Germans launch a new dreadnought? Or sinking a Brit Dreadnought? I've wondered if it required the German navy to take control of some area of water and hold it.... I dunno.


Aaron

Here is the lua game file on breaking the blockade. Most of it is "mumbo-jumbo" to me, but there is a 1.5 ratio mentioned that could be the clue to your question:
quote:

-- German convoys reactivated
function BlockadeBroken()
if GetEvent("BlockadeEstablished") ~= 0 and GetEvent("BlockadeBroken") == 0 then
local entente = game:GetAllianceById(1)
local cp = game:GetAllianceById(2)
local ententeStrength = 0
local cpStrength = 0
for faction in entente.factions do
for unit in faction.units do
if unit.type == Unit.NAVAL then
if unit.hex ~= nil and unit.hex.region == 1 and unit.prototype.name ~= "transport" and unit.prototype.name ~= "convoy" then -- ignore convoys & transports
ententeStrength = ententeStrength + unit.hp
end
end
end
end

for faction in cp.factions do
for unit in faction.units do
if unit.type == Unit.NAVAL then
if unit.hex ~= nil and unit.hex.region == 1 and unit.prototype.name ~= "transport" and unit.prototype.name ~= "convoy" then -- ignore convoys & transports
cpStrength = ententeStrength + unit.hp
end
end
end
end

if cpStrength/ententeStrength > 1.5 then
-- Blockade broken
SetEvent("BlockadeBroken", game.turn)
game:GetFactionById(2).luaData.blockaded = 0
end
end
end

(in reply to AEWHistory)
Post #: 4
RE: The future of merchant convoys.... - 5/18/2015 11:28:42 PM   
AEWHistory

 

Posts: 63
Joined: 8/6/2014
Status: offline
WOW! That would require a truly impressive feat of naval victories, knocking out members of the entente, and/or building the CP navies to accomplish that! If I am understanding correctly then the CP would need to possess 1.5x the strength of the entente to break the blockade. I'm assuming this is raw strength points, but even that is tough. I'll have to go and do the math to figure this out. My gut says that if the CP could equal the entente in naval strength then the blockade would've been effectively broken. To put it another way, if both sides had equal strength then the entente would have been faced with the stark choices since they needed naval superiority much more than the CP. Consider:
1. A geographically close blockade of GER had to have naval superiority or risk the Germans breaking the whole damn fleet out or, worse, inflicting a decisive defeat on the Royal Navy.
2. The Austrian and Ottoman navies, such as they were, had to be controlled and limited.
3. Ships had to be protected.
4. Raiders had to be hunted (I'd love for the Germans to be able to build surface raiders in this game).
5. Subs had to be hunted.
6. I know I'm missing something else....

So by my reasoning the entente needed enough naval assets to control the CP navies AND cover their butts from the rear. This would require a substantial naval superiority, without which some areas would have to be left either unprotected or minimally protected, I think this would allow the CP to start running the blockade again.... Maybe. I'm still mulling this over, but I feel like this makes sense. Or I'm just tired from days of grading and gone punch drunk, :)

(in reply to operating)
Post #: 5
RE: The future of merchant convoys.... - 5/19/2015 12:42:03 AM   
operating


Posts: 3158
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AEWHistory

WOW! That would require a truly impressive feat of naval victories, knocking out members of the entente, and/or building the CP navies to accomplish that! If I am understanding correctly then the CP would need to possess 1.5x the strength of the entente to break the blockade. I'm assuming this is raw strength points, but even that is tough. I'll have to go and do the math to figure this out. My gut says that if the CP could equal the entente in naval strength then the blockade would've been effectively broken. To put it another way, if both sides had equal strength then the entente would have been faced with the stark choices since they needed naval superiority much more than the CP. Consider:
1. A geographically close blockade of GER had to have naval superiority or risk the Germans breaking the whole damn fleet out or, worse, inflicting a decisive defeat on the Royal Navy.
2. The Austrian and Ottoman navies, such as they were, had to be controlled and limited.
3. Ships had to be protected.
4. Raiders had to be hunted (I'd love for the Germans to be able to build surface raiders in this game).
5. Subs had to be hunted.
6. I know I'm missing something else....

So by my reasoning the entente needed enough naval assets to control the CP navies AND cover their butts from the rear. This would require a substantial naval superiority, without which some areas would have to be left either unprotected or minimally protected, I think this would allow the CP to start running the blockade again.... Maybe. I'm still mulling this over, but I feel like this makes sense. Or I'm just tired from days of grading and gone punch drunk, :)


Raiders were successful due to raider supply ships or supply subs for the most part. As far as supply subs go, it may have only supplied other subs.

(in reply to AEWHistory)
Post #: 6
RE: The future of merchant convoys.... - 5/20/2015 5:21:17 AM   
AdmiralSarek

 

Posts: 30
Joined: 1/31/2015
Status: offline
I can decode the script for you, it counts all of the hit points of naval ships for each side (not including ones in the productions queue, transports and convoys), then if the CP has greater than 1.5 x the hit points of the entente then the blockade is broken.

A 1:1 ration would seem to be more realistic, but hey that's what is says.

It would appear to include subs, so just get the CP to build about 15 subs? That would break the blockade nicely. Or sink lots of Entente ships. I guess this is a reason to preserve all of the CP ships rather than throwing away the useless old armored cruisers, pre-drednaughts and that Turkish cruiser just to save maintenance.

(in reply to operating)
Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Commander - The Great War >> The future of merchant convoys.... Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.982