Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Invasion West Coast!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Invasion West Coast! Page: <<   < prev  97 98 [99] 100 101   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 1:25:29 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

If US CVs get sunk during the game a replacement CV is put in the reinforcement queue - but I wonder if the same applies to CVEs? So maybe taking Portland takes all those CVEs off the queue but puts them back on somewhat later. And you don't get points for all the ships. Those that are "Building" give something like half points but those that haven't started building might not give you any points.

Neither CVs nor CVEs get replaced in the game.

Taking Portland would be a game-changer, what with the VP haul and lack of CVEs, AKs and TKs later in life. Of course, that begs the question of whether taking a port on the West Coast for a day or two, or even a month, should mean the whole build queue gets wiped out. I'd argue ships on the slips should be destroyed, but future ships could be built elsewhere, with say a two-month delay as production got re-started.

EDIT: Same goes for aircraft factories. Seattle gets wiped out? Simply grow the Boeing complex in Wichita, but with a delay, of course.

Cheers,
CC

< Message edited by Commander Cody -- 8/12/2016 1:28:14 AM >


_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2941
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 2:28:05 AM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Allied CVEs lost in battle don't get replaced (as far as I know; but every time I make a definitive statement, somebody brighter than me comes along and points out I am mistaken).

As for the P47Bs arriving in May 1942, they'll undoubtedly face opposition from aircraft that weren't available then...and in this case it would be the IJ player that triggered their appearance into the game. So I wouldn't lose any sleep over their "miraculous" early advent.


No Allied carriers get replaced if they are lost. This was a mechanic in the old WITP and only worked for the loss of the original six carriers but was not duplicated in AE. You get all the carriers regardless of losses and if you lose them, well you have then really lost....

If the loss of a major base would cause the permanent loss of ship or aircraft production for the Allies, then that gambit would be off the table for any game that I play. We are talking about exploiting a game flaw for a win rather than playing a simulation. For some it may be fine. Does not work for me. When I want fantasy-I play Diablo.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2942
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 3:13:39 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

If US CVs get sunk during the game a replacement CV is put in the reinforcement queue - but I wonder if the same applies to CVEs? So maybe taking Portland takes all those CVEs off the queue but puts them back on somewhat later. And you don't get points for all the ships. Those that are "Building" give something like half points but those that haven't started building might not give you any points.


This only applies if the switch is set on in the scenario data. I am not aware of any scenarios that actually use this switch. It is a holdover from WITP, I think?

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2943
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 3:15:33 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

If US CVs get sunk during the game a replacement CV is put in the reinforcement queue - but I wonder if the same applies to CVEs? So maybe taking Portland takes all those CVEs off the queue but puts them back on somewhat later. And you don't get points for all the ships. Those that are "Building" give something like half points but those that haven't started building might not give you any points.

Neither CVs nor CVEs get replaced in the game.

Taking Portland would be a game-changer, what with the VP haul and lack of CVEs, AKs and TKs later in life. Of course, that begs the question of whether taking a port on the West Coast for a day or two, or even a month, should mean the whole build queue gets wiped out. I'd argue ships on the slips should be destroyed, but future ships could be built elsewhere, with say a two-month delay as production got re-started.

EDIT: Same goes for aircraft factories. Seattle gets wiped out? Simply grow the Boeing complex in Wichita, but with a delay, of course.

Cheers,
CC


This entire question is of course rendered irrelevant if the Allied player builds forts and maintains CONUS defenses .

If I were planning on a CONUS invasion, I definitely wouldn't attack Hawaii first. I'd just go straight for the jugular in March, 1942.

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 2944
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 3:38:26 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

If US CVs get sunk during the game a replacement CV is put in the reinforcement queue - but I wonder if the same applies to CVEs? So maybe taking Portland takes all those CVEs off the queue but puts them back on somewhat later. And you don't get points for all the ships. Those that are "Building" give something like half points but those that haven't started building might not give you any points.


This only applies if the switch is set on in the scenario data. I am not aware of any scenarios that actually use this switch. It is a holdover from WITP, I think?

From the WITP-AE Manual (I never owned the original WITP):

16.1.1 AUTOMATIC SHIP REPLACEMENTS
There are several instances in which replacement ships may be provided as reinforcements
if a ship is sunk during the game. Replacement ships are generated if the option is selected
for the scenario and:
An American CV is sunk prior to 1944 will be replaced by an Essex-class CV.
An American or Australian CA that is sunk prior to 1944 will be replaced by a Baltimore-class
CA or a Cleveland-class CL. The replacement class is chosen at random.
Japanese Midget Submarines will be replaced with a Type “D” Midget Submarine
Whenever a replacement ship is created, it will be placed in the reinforcement queue with an arrival time 450 days from the date of loss.


EDIT: So it appears that CVEs are not included in the replacement rules.
Does anyone know if the replacement rules were done away with in one of the updates or Betas or DBB Mods?


< Message edited by BBfanboy -- 8/12/2016 3:40:44 AM >


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2945
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 4:11:15 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
Thanks for the clarification, BBFanboy. I haven't stumbled across a scenario that has that switch turned on.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2946
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 7:33:19 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I'll step in before the confusion grows amuck.

No aircraft factories have been damaged or lost, at L.A. or anywhere else. Acepylut misread something.

So this situation is just totaly victory - strategic, operational, tactical - for Jocke. The question is whether Jeff pulls himself together enough to soldier on. He has a good record of standing against despair, but this situation will really test his resolve. Encouraging words from the Peanut Gallery will be most appreciated, I think.

As for the P-47s, they do arrive in the summer of '43. Here we're already at January '43, so they're not ridiculously early. But Jocke is pointing out that an IJ invasion in early '42 would encounter Thunderbolts more than a year early.


Exactly!

From the excellent site of Joe Baugher.

This account of the P-47 Thunderbolt continues with an account of its service in the European theatre.

At one time in the days before Pearl Harbor, it had been hoped that it would be possible for the RAF to test the Thunderbolt in combat in the Middle East. However, production difficulties caused the British Air Ministry to be informed in September 1941 that it was not a good idea to do this until all the bugs had been wrung out of the design.

Consequently, it was a USAAF outfit that was to be the first to bring the Thunderbolt into service. The 56th Fighter Group based near New York City was the first outfit to receive the P-47B, and began to reequip with the type in June-July 1942. They were entrusted with the task of shaking the bugs out of their new mounts. Since their base was fairly close to the Farmingdale plant, the Group could easily call upon Republic engineers to solve problems as they were encountered. Tests and operational training went slowly, accompanied by the loss of 13 pilots and 41 aircraft in accidents. As more Thunderbolts became available, P-47Bs were subsequently issued to the 348th and 355th Groups.

The first P-47Cs arrived in England as early as December 20, 1942, and equipped the 4th Fighter Group which somewhat reluctantly traded in their Spitfires for the type. P-47Cs also reequipped the 82nd, 83rd, and 84th Squadrons of the 78th Fighter Group. P-47Cs were also supplied to the 56th Fighter Group which left their P-47Bs back home in the States when they transferred to England. Engine and radio problems caused some delays, but the first operational sorties began on March 10, 1943, and consisted of high-altitude escort duties and fighter sweeps. The first encounter with German fighters came on April 15, when the P-47Cs of the 335th Squadron shot down three German fighters for a loss of three of its own.

The high-altitude performance of the P-47C was far superior to anything the Luftwaffe could put up against it, but at low and medium altitudes the P-47C could not match the maneuverability and climb rates of its opponents. However, the P-47C could out-dive just about anything in the sky, and many a Thunderbolt saved itself from a sticky situation by using its superior diving performance to break off combat at will when it proved necessary to do so. According to Robert S. Johnson of the 56th Fighter Group, the Thunderbolt could outroll any other fighter. The Thunderbolt's eight 0.50-inch machine guns provided sufficient firepower to destroy any enemy plane which had the misfortune to come within its sights. The robust construction of the Thunderbolt enabled it to absorb a considerable amount of battle damage and still stagger home to fight another day.

The P-47Cs of the 56th, 4th and 78th Groups of the 8th Air Force were intended as bomber escorts, but were ineffectual until fitted with auxiliary fuel tanks to lengthen their range at the end of July 1943. These three groups were joined later in 1943 by seven new groups flying P-47Ds-- the 352nd, 353rd, 355th, 356th, 358th, 359th, and 361st Fighter Groups. P-47s flew escort missions until the end of 1943, when they began to be replaced by longer-range P-38 Lightnings and P-51 Mustangs which were better suited for the long-range escort role.


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2947
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 4:49:29 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Hi guys.

Got an email from Jeff. Hopefully I´ll get the turn so I have it for tomorrow morning. He has hurt his knee pretty badly though.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2948
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 6:16:38 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
So whats the next spot for an offensive? DEI, SW PAcific? Even if he decides to leave and gets most of the the troops out (small chance I think) you certainly have a fee hand for a bit

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2949
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 6:28:12 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

So whats the next spot for an offensive? DEI, SW PAcific? Even if he decides to leave and gets most of the the troops out (small chance I think) you certainly have a fee hand for a bit


I have Pencil II in about a month in the IO. Also have Paper happening very shortly. In fact the troops are already on ships heading towards the target. They will probably be spotted in 1-3 turns.

Stay tuned!

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 2950
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/12/2016 6:34:50 PM   
AcePylut


Posts: 1494
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
Ya my bad, thought you lost a city there. Confusion of trying to read a number of AAR's and get them all straight.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2951
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/13/2016 5:09:01 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Hi guys.

Didn´t get the turn and I´m off for the rest of the day now. Kräftskiva today! (Hint: it involves copious amount of schnapps)

Hopefully I have the turn on Sunday evening.

(in reply to AcePylut)
Post #: 2952
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/15/2016 4:25:03 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Back from the dead. Somewhat. Yesterday was absolutely horrible. Couldn´t get out of bed until 17:30 in the afternoon...I´m too old for kräftskiva...

Anyway. Turn is away to Jeff. I had some screens to post but lost them when the computer rebooted. So you will have to do without.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2953
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/16/2016 6:13:24 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
I googled that. It looks like you eat a ton of crayfish and drink copious quantities of aquavit or other schnapps while wearing silly party hats. In other words, my kind of fun!

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2954
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/16/2016 5:37:44 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

I googled that. It looks like you eat a ton of crayfish and drink copious quantities of aquavit or other schnapps while wearing silly party hats. In other words, my kind of fun!

Cheers,
CC


That is exactly what its all about! It was fun though. I think. Memory is a bit fuzzy!

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 2955
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/16/2016 7:31:32 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Got the replay back.

Not much to report. Bad attack at LA. No more action. No air strikes flew.



(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2956
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/16/2016 8:46:19 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister


quote:

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

I googled that. It looks like you eat a ton of crayfish and drink copious quantities of aquavit or other schnapps while wearing silly party hats. In other words, my kind of fun!

Cheers,
CC


That is exactly what its all about! It was fun though. I think. Memory is a bit fuzzy!


A large belch of heavily-fermented crayfish has been known to blow off one nostril, if not two.

You got off easy, young man.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2957
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/17/2016 4:49:20 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
A large belch of heavily-fermented crayfish has been known to blow off one nostril, if not two.

You got off easy, young man.


Didn´t feel like that on Sunday.


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 2958
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/17/2016 5:30:24 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
A large belch of heavily-fermented crayfish has been known to blow off one nostril, if not two.

You got off easy, young man.


Didn´t feel like that on Sunday.




Losing a whole day to a party on the previous day is nature's way of saying . . . something. I forget.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2959
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/17/2016 6:42:02 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
Losing a whole day to a party on the previous day is nature's way of saying . . . something. I forget.


Probably nothing important anyway.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 2960
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/20/2016 7:56:10 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Got the turn from Jeff yesterday and just sent it back. Hopefully the pace will pick up a bit soon. Jeff said it should get better after Tuesday this week.

I meant to put an update up but I´m too tired. Besides not much happened. No airstrikes flew. My LA attack didn´t go well. Have to rest for a few days. 150 tanks and 2 fresh IDs are coming. Jeff reinforced with another divisions. I managed to fly in a full RGT to SD so I now deem it safe. Another RGT will be flown in tomorrow.

Jeff attacked at Chungking again. It was bloody for both sides but he got a 1:1 and lowered the forts. About half the Chinese army are safe in the mountains though.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2961
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/22/2016 6:54:33 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Sorry guys. No turn. Maybe tomorrow.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2962
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/22/2016 7:06:53 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline
Not fair. I want to see Japan get crushed on the West Coast.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2963
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/23/2016 4:41:22 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

Not fair. I want to see Japan get crushed on the West Coast.


I´ll do my best to fulfill your wishes...

(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 2964
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/23/2016 4:42:09 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Got the turn from Jeff. Nothing to report basically. It will change next turn though I promise!

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2965
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/24/2016 7:18:18 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
No turn or replay yet. Sorry guys.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2966
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/24/2016 7:24:43 PM   
BillBrown


Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline
More time for and

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 2967
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/25/2016 4:51:00 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillBrown

More time for and


Haha, being who I am it means more time with WoT...

(And looking at a new car)


(in reply to BillBrown)
Post #: 2968
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/25/2016 4:54:37 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
January 29th -43
_____________________________________________________________________________

This was mostly for fun. Didn´t expect much and it delivered exactly that. At least it will make Jeff protect his LOC a little better...

quote:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Santa Catalina Is at 214,97, Range 9,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
AK Kinugasa Maru
AK Kagu Maru
AK Katuragi Maru
AK Kirishima Maru
AK Nankai Maru
AK Tokai Maru
AK Kumagawa Maru
AK Yamazuki Maru
AK Onoe Maru
AK Okiyu Maru
AK Nozima Maru, Shell hits 2, on fire
xAK Lima Maru
xAK Maebasi Maru
xAK Tazima Maru, Shell hits 3, on fire
xAK Tokiwa Maru
PB Ansyu Maru
PB Kamitu Maru, Shell hits 1
PB Kogyoku Maru, Shell hits 9, heavy fires, heavy damage


Allied Ships
AMC Westralia, Shell hits 2
AMC Cap des Palmes






Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2969
RE: Invasion West Coast! - 8/25/2016 4:55:58 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
January 29th -43
_____________________________________________________________________________

Hello? Please stay around until tomorrow...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2970
Page:   <<   < prev  97 98 [99] 100 101   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Invasion West Coast! Page: <<   < prev  97 98 [99] 100 101   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.078