Gilmer
Posts: 1452
Joined: 7/1/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Doggie3 quote:
ORIGINAL: wodin Steal Tigers, DC3 (Which is sounding amazing) and maybe TOAWIV. Doggie I'd go for WW1Gold every time over any other WW1 game..followed by Strategic Command The Great War. Wodin, thanks I'll take a look at those. How do they compare To End All Wars? What are the main points of difference? I've not had a lot of experience with the AGEOD system, tried Pride of Nations and it makes sense, albeit I found it a bit "clunky" if that makes sense. Cheers, Pride of Nations was a good concept but it just didn't work well with the Ageod system. To End All Wars is much better and obviously covers a much smaller period. WW1Gold was a board game ported to the PC - the armies are represented by numbers like 5 power and 4 power and such. To End All Wars much more detailed in that sense. There are some AARs of WW1 gold on the Ageod forums and you can get a sense of what it is like. CTGW is a lot simpler as well with units mostly just Artillery, Cavalry, Infantry, militia. Not a lot of different units. Very good game, but to me on scale of complicatedness maybe a 3, whereas To End All Wars more like an 8 on complicatedness.
< Message edited by H Gilmer -- 7/25/2015 10:23:34 PM >
_____________________________
"Venimus, vidimus, Deus vicit" John III Sobieski as he entered Vienna on 9/11/1683. "I came, I saw, God conquered." He that has a mind to fight, let him fight, for now is the time. - Anacreon
|