Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/6/2016 4:40:19 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Encourage the Chinese to attack your divisions with artillery in a city. Can't think of anything I would like better.

I can't believe his 4E are that painful in urban terrain with forts.


I don't think Francois would risk an attack. I'm starting to think this is just a way to harass me and burn up my supply. Then again, how much supply is he using to burn up mine? It would be interesting to see a comparison.


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 841
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/7/2016 5:53:45 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
March 29/42:

Francois continues to be able to avoid paying for mistakes when he puts naval assets at risk. Here's why.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Lord Howe Island at 100,169

Allied Ships
BB Warspite
BB Mississippi
BB New Mexico
BB Colorado

Port hits 26
Port supply hits 2

BB Warspite firing at Lord Howe Island
BB Mississippi firing at Lord Howe Island
BB New Mexico firing at Lord Howe Island
BB Colorado firing at Lord Howe Island

Why? Without conducting recon over the base, he bombards an empty island. Japanese troops have been withdrawn for months. Here's why he continues to be lucky. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Newcastle at 95,168

Japanese Ships
SS I-8

Allied Ships
BB New Mexico
BB Warspite
BB Colorado
DD Humphreys
DD Fox
DD Hatfield
DD Sands
DD Gilmer

SS I-8 launches 6 torpedoes at BB New Mexico...and DUDS! I think this is the third time I've had a dud, and I'm not exactly lighting it up here.

For those Allied players that claim Japanese submarines are overpowered. Go over any of my AAR's and see how they suck game after game. Yeah, overpowered my ass.


China:

I guess wrong with the B-17's. They hit my armour at Liuchow instead of Changsha. Oh well, but I learned something from this. Francois loves to bomb my armour, so I'm going to set a trap using an armoured unit for bait.

There is some great news in China though. Great leaders and 100% prep paid off big time. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Kweilin (76,54)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 38207 troops, 367 guns, 91 vehicles, Assault Value = 1162

Defending force 33697 troops, 161 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 608

Japanese adjusted assault: 2126

Allied adjusted defense: 445

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Kweilin !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1707 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 72 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 14 disabled

Allied ground losses:
15061 casualties reported
Squads: 375 destroyed, 16 disabled
Non Combat: 537 destroyed, 73 disabled
Engineers: 75 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 49 (30 destroyed, 19 disabled)
Units retreated 11
Units destroyed 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
22nd Division
15th Division
60th Division
1st Mortar Battalion
13th Army
4th Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
65th Chinese Corps
52nd Chinese Corps
2nd Prov Chinese Corps
64th Chinese Corps
31st Chinese/A Corps
2nd Chinese Base Force
35th Group Army
7th War Area
9th Group Army
16th Group Army
4th War Area
13th Chinese Base Force

On to Tuyun and Kweiyang!

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/7/2016 7:49:04 AM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 842
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/10/2016 5:05:02 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
March 1942 is in the books. The April 1st turn is away.

I'm not happy with my progress as everyone knows. April must be a productive month.

I've assigned IJA Imperial Guards Division and IJA 5th Division to seize Pegu by amphibious assault. Both divisions are loading up at Georgetown and Singapore respectively. I'm bypassing Port Blair for the moment. Dangerous I know, but Burma is the priority.

IJA 55th Division will embark transports at Sabang and reinforce the landings at Pegu.

IJA 18th and 38th Divisions will march overland from Chang Mai to Toungoo. RTA divisions will be tasked with moving against Moulmein. Supply for the entire operation will be based from Pegu. I want to cut off the forces in Moulmein and Rangoon for elimination if possible, rather than simply push them back.

I will not be assigning any carriers to support these operations. LBA is tasked with providing all air support.


Java:

With three divisions now in the DEI supported by KB, it's time to get a foothold on Java. I've opted to not land at Darwin at this time. I want to secure Java and the fuel/oil facilities and secure this theatre before turning my attention to Timor, Darwin and the Philippines.


China:

IJA 13th and 23rd Armies have begun the advance on Tuyun. Four divisions initially, followed by two more once the flank at Kweilin is secure.

I keep guessing wrong on catching the 4E's. The day I rest my CAP over Changsha is the day the bombers return . Francois switches from Changsha to targets of opportunity often. As mentioned before, I'm going to set a CAP trap if I can to try and neuter the 4E's temporarily. Nick's will go into production soon, and I plan on producing 60/month initially to try and take the fight to the heavy bombers. The Nick can't be available soon enough in China. Luckily, Francois uses the 4E's to target ground troops and leaves my airbases alone.

There has been no reaction to the fall of Kweilin that I can see. Tuyun, Kweiyang and Chihkiang indicate no movement of troops.

I continue to advance in the north against Lanchow with two divisions. A third has begun the long trek along the secondary road to join them. I'm putting together four divisions to move on Yenan.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/10/2016 5:26:34 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 843
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/12/2016 3:53:07 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 1/42:

Allied 4E's are proving to be an elusive target these days. Francois is changing the target daily, but at least he's not targeting airfields or troops of my main advance towards Tuyun.

I've begun a slight redeployment in China. I have two good divisions tied up at Chusien and Pucheng. I'm going to rotate in some less experienced and lower strength divisions to maintain the sieges, and free up the better divisions for frontline service.

I almost succeeded in cutting off the Chinese forces retreating from Kweilin. Instead, both forces reached the hex at the same time so it's contested. I'm not worried, as my division should easily rout the already weakened Chinese, but there's no chance to isolate the enemy force now. Depending on where it retreats, it may turn out alright anyway.

Still muddling along everywhere else.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 844
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/13/2016 1:47:27 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

...Depending on where it retreats, it may turn out alright anyway.



be nice to be able to predict this ... not very realistic, but nice.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 845
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/13/2016 3:03:59 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

...Depending on where it retreats, it may turn out alright anyway.


be nice to be able to predict this ... not very realistic, but nice.


I'll post a screen to show the positions later, but I think the Chinese will retreat towards Tuyun. This means a retreat into x3 defensive terrain alongside my LOC. I'll reassess attacking, because it may be better to 'let' these troops withdraw so they don't cause me problems later. Combat wise they are no longer a threat, but they could be a pain to chase down if they're allowed to roam around.


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 846
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/13/2016 3:31:17 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Night Naval bombardment of Lord Howe Island at 100,169

Allied Ships
BB Warspite
BB Mississippi
BB New Mexico
BB Colorado

Port hits 26
Port supply hits 2

BB Warspite firing at Lord Howe Island
BB Mississippi firing at Lord Howe Island
BB New Mexico firing at Lord Howe Island
BB Colorado firing at Lord Howe Island

Why? Without conducting recon over the base, he bombards an empty island. Japanese troops have been withdrawn for months. Here's why he continues to be lucky. AAR follows:


Gain useful night experience. If there is one thing that truly hurts the Allies in '42, its poor night experience. Its why that island to the west of Puerto Rico is so important to the USN now.

_____________________________


(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 847
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/13/2016 4:09:43 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

For those Allied players that claim Japanese submarines are overpowered. Go over any of my AAR's and see how they suck game after game. Yeah, overpowered my ass.



I'm not one who has ever claimed they are overpowered so please don't take this to be a rebuttal.

You and I would seem to be kindred spirits. Yes I know how uncomfortable that claim must make you feel, but please hear me out.

If it wasn't for bad luck I wouldn't have any at all.

For many years of boardgaming I played against my best friend who was blessed with exquisite good luck.

If there was one bad result on the odds column of a combat results table I would roll that result EVERY time.

If there was only one good result in the odds column he would roll that result EVERY time.

When I managed to win a game it was NEVER because of good luck, but in spite of bad luck.

He mostly won, but more often than not it was attributed to his good luck and not good game play.

It becomes very frustrating for people like us to persevere in the face of our consistent bad luck.

Thought a little commiseration from some one who understands your plight might help lift your spirits.


_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 848
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/13/2016 4:11:52 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Gain useful night experience. If there is one thing that truly hurts the Allies in '42, its poor night experience. Its why that island to the west of Puerto Rico is so important to the USN now.


That may be true, but the crews should have also gained practical experience on how to prevent flooding from torpedo damage if not for a dud.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 849
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/13/2016 5:21:36 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

I'm not one who has ever claimed they are overpowered so please don't take this to be a rebuttal.


No worries Hans. I won't go down this path again though. When last I was 'complaining' about bad luck I was called a poor sport, so I won't elaborate further.

It's a complex game and the better you understand the mechanics, the better you can issue orders to increase your chance of things going right. I always strive to improve my play to get better results, but as you mention and I agree, sometimes you can do everything right and still come up empty due to a bad roll. I'll leave it at that. My opponent can't be lucky all the time...or can he?




< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/13/2016 5:25:09 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 850
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/18/2016 10:44:15 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
We've reached April 5/42 and I continue to advance in stops and starts.

An amphibious landing by 65th Bde. against Kendari today. Complete overkill against the weak Dutch defence and the base should fall tomorrow to deliberate attack.

I was about to pull the trigger on the Port Blair amphibious operation, but bailed at the last minute. I'll probably regret doing so, but I felt I had to better organize my task forces involved. I also need to conduct the Pegu landings soon, before Francois reacts to my overland movements in Burma. I'm nervous about conducting this operation purely under LBA coverage. I need to decide quickly before I'm spotted.

I'm in fuel trouble and need to get the DEI sorted out. I'm going to launch the amphibious operation against Java as soon as Kendari and Makassar are secured, so that I can refuel from Balikpapan relatively risk free. I've got KB in support and just waiting to have one of my carriers torpedoed.

In China, Allied fighters have massed at Kweiyang with 44 being shown present. I suspect they are to provide escorts for bombers and sweeps against my troops moving on Tuyun. I've noticed Ichang has half the garrison is did awhile ago with two big Chinese Corps being redeployed. The forts will be high, I left the base with level 3 which was stupid of me, and suspect they could be around level 5 now. I have 12th Army HQ and three divisions fully prepped for the base though. I'll start concentrated bombing raids against the base to see if I can wear down the defence a little and try a river assault in a month.

It's ugly overall. I mentioned in another AAR this has to be my worst game yet as Japan. I hope to feel better once I'm ashore in Burma and Java, but I fear the Allied defence is going to be tough to deal with after all this time. All my own fault.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/18/2016 10:46:16 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 851
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/18/2016 11:55:58 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
Don't worry about timing as long as you get the oil in tact. If he's defending forward that's great for you. Just land behind him and slowly envelop his troops. Don't measure your game against the kind of game where players are going for AV. A sow start is fine and if it makes the Allies want to fight, all the better. Smash them!

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 852
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/19/2016 1:23:29 AM   
pontiouspilot


Posts: 1127
Joined: 7/27/2012
Status: offline
Damm...next time I look for opponent I will have to make sure it is someone who is unlucky. I actually had a friend as a kid who played lots of AH games with me...god he was unlucky....I often thought he had a 3 sided dice! 2 x exchange and attacked elim!!!!

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 853
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/19/2016 4:46:26 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Don't worry about timing as long as you get the oil in tact. If he's defending forward that's great for you. Just land behind him and slowly envelop his troops. Don't measure your game against the kind of game where players are going for AV. A sow start is fine and if it makes the Allies want to fight, all the better. Smash them!


No, I've really pooched myself here. The Allies aren't even really defending forward at all. I just bungled my advance so badly it seems like an Allied forward defence is causing me problems, it hasn't, my own inept play has.

I'm landing divisions against small base forces and acting so timid it's laughable. I'm more embarrassed than anything else, and will continue to beat myself up until I rectify the situation. I threw away a fantastic opportunity in Australia, because I didn't do my homework or put much effort into understanding the changes in DBB.

There will be opportunities moving forward, but I really let Francois off the hook early in this one. I expect extremely aggressive Allied play soon to apply pressure to my positions in the Central Pacific. If he reinforces Java with any of the emergency package that campaign could turn into a nightmare.


< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/19/2016 4:48:42 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 854
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/19/2016 6:21:30 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Don't worry about timing as long as you get the oil in tact. If he's defending forward that's great for you. Just land behind him and slowly envelop his troops. Don't measure your game against the kind of game where players are going for AV. A sow start is fine and if it makes the Allies want to fight, all the better. Smash them!


No, I've really pooched myself here. The Allies aren't even really defending forward at all. I just bungled my advance so badly it seems like an Allied forward defence is causing me problems, it hasn't, my own inept play has.

I'm landing divisions against small base forces and acting so timid it's laughable. I'm more embarrassed than anything else, and will continue to beat myself up until I rectify the situation. I threw away a fantastic opportunity in Australia, because I didn't do my homework or put much effort into understanding the changes in DBB.

There will be opportunities moving forward, but I really let Francois off the hook early in this one. I expect extremely aggressive Allied play soon to apply pressure to my positions in the Central Pacific. If he reinforces Java with any of the emergency package that campaign could turn into a nightmare.



I'm not so sure. I see Allied moves like that in 42 as self-protecting POW camps.

Yo u can isolate any part of the map you want to with the KB for the next year. I understand you're not happy with your play. That's different. Mistakes, as I tell photography students, are just opportunities waiting to be discovered!

Hard to keep track of which of your AARs I am trying to get into here! I have to be careful!!


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 855
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/19/2016 8:05:52 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
I'll just see how things develop over the next month. I don't think KB is as potent a weapon in DBB and I wouldn't be surprised to see Francois take it on sooner than later.

Right now the priorities are Burma and Java, then the Philippines. If Francois takes advantage of my absence in the Solomons, then I'll counterattack when I'm able. If he goes for the Gilbert's or Marshall's I probably won't contest. I hate both those areas and won't lose ships defending them. He could grab them for a song right now if he wanted, I have no defence to speak of there. Heck, even the Solomons have no defence set up. Yes, I'm playing that bad.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 856
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/20/2016 2:47:51 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 6/42:

Kendari is captured today. I'll use this base to organize my Java invasion taskforces. There will be a delay before I launch to bring forward aviation support.

Nanning is captured today in China. Japanese forces should reach Tuyun in three days. Recon indicates four Chinese units, but less than 10k in troops with a 9/10 DL. I don't know if I can believe this reporting. If it's true though, two divisions and two armoured regiments should be able to take the base quickly. Kweiyang shows only three Chinese LCU's. Did Francois leave the back door open?

Allied heavy bombers targeted an armoured tank and two recon regiements near Kukong today. If they come again tomorrow, I'll have 130 Oscar fighters set to 50% LRCAP over my forces.

I've pulled the trigger on the Pegu invasion in Burma. I've decided to pass on Port Blair. Invading Pegu right now is the better option, because it coordinates well will my ground forces movements. One big downside is, no prep and disruption could be very bad. Opposition is expected to be light, but still, it's clear terrain and if the Allied bomber weigh in it could get messy.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/20/2016 2:49:52 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 857
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/21/2016 5:52:27 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 7/42:

Pretty quiet turn. Just Allied bombings in Burma and China.

4E's target my troops approaching Tuyun. I bet the cavalry is on the way and slowing my advance is the order of the day.

There will be fireworks in Burma tomorrow. I've ordered naval bombardments of both Pegu and Moulmein. I suspect mines at Moumein. See screen.




Also spotted a small Allied TF approaching Ndeni. With KB in the DEI, I expect to see a flurry of Allied activity in the SoPac theatre.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/21/2016 5:58:23 AM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 858
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/21/2016 5:53:28 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Another missed opportunity. Too timid!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/21/2016 5:55:59 AM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 859
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/21/2016 5:58:40 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 8/42:

The big news today is that the landings against Pegu went according to plan. Most of two divisions have unloaded with little disruption (I used a large amount of transports) and will assault the base tomorrow, which is lightly defended. Prior to the landings, a small heavy cruiser TF bombarded the base for minimal damage.

A battleship bombardment of Moulmein had good results with a number of Blenheim bombers being destroyed on the field. Damage to the airbase was moderate.

Both bombardment TF's withdrew successfully and are not in range of air attack. I've left the invasion shipping a little vulnerable to a full speed enemy surface attack, but I didn't want my BB's and CA's caught by air attack tomorrow. Allied torpedo bombers based from Rangoon did try to attack my amphibious taskforces, but the LRCAP I set performed well, shooting down 7 H81-A3's and 7 Swordfish. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Pegu at 55,53

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 8 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 43
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 4

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 9
Swordfish I x 7

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
H81-A3: 3 destroyed
Swordfish I: 5 destroyed


In Burma, Allied 4E's continue to target my troops moving to Tuyun. Despite a moderately large raid, very little disruption to my forces. Two divisions and three heavy artillery regiments attack tomorrow against what appears to be a weak garrison.

I expect a bloody turn tomorrow at Pegu.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/21/2016 6:01:50 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 860
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/22/2016 6:13:37 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 9/42:

Pegu falls easily. As a bonus, roughly 100 AV that was at Moulmein was caught in rail mode reinforcing Pegu. I've ordered all shipping to withdraw, but forgot to reset LRCAP over the TF. If anything happens tomorrow it's on me. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Pegu (55,53)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 26810 troops, 211 guns, 121 vehicles, Assault Value = 873

Defending force 4534 troops, 24 guns, 7 vehicles, Assault Value = 165

Japanese adjusted assault: 825

Allied adjusted defense: 8

Japanese assault odds: 103 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Pegu !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: op mode(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
96 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
2447 casualties reported
Squads: 83 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 79 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 11 (9 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 7 (7 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 3
Units destroyed 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
Imperial Guards Division
5th Division

Defending units:
1st Burma Brigade
1st Gloucestershire Battalion
11th Burma Rifles Battalion
2nd Burma Brigade

Allied bombers try to disrupt the attack against Pegu. In what I think was an uncoordinated raid, Allied fighters arrived first and three H81-A3's were shot down. The 15 Blenheim bombers that followed were all shot down. Japan loses 1 Oscar and 3 Zero fighters. British HDML's sortie from Rangoon to try and disrupt the unloading of my transports, but two Japanese DD's sink all five enemy motor launches.

A secondary river assault near Toungoo didn't go well. I had poor recon and faced two Indian Bde.'s that held the line. My troops are heavily disrupted and if Francois counterattacks here, I could be thrown back. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 56,51 (near Toungoo)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 5544 troops, 55 guns, 181 vehicles, Assault Value = 266

Defending force 5931 troops, 12 guns, 88 vehicles, Assault Value = 235

Japanese adjusted assault: 61

Allied adjusted defense: 249

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 4

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
30 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 43 (2 destroyed, 41 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
600 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 72 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled

Assaulting units:
14th Tank Regiment
6th Tank Regiment
4th RTA Division
1st RF Gun Battalion

Defending units:
44th Indian Brigade
45th Indian Brigade

A sloppy invasion, but I've now cut the Burma rail line and split the enemy forces. I hope the effectiveness of my fighters might scare away the bombers for the moment, but 53 enemy fighters are still indicated at Rangoon. They can now sweep my position to clear the CAP. I'm worried though as not enough supply was unloaded and I'm in a vulnerable position. The next few days will be tense as I try to hold my position. If Francois counterattacks at Pegu I could be in trouble. It will be a week until I can land additional reinforcements.


China:

The first assault against Tuyun is checked. I may regret not prepping any units for the base. The two armour units were not part of the assault. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Tuyun (74,51)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 29614 troops, 259 guns, 169 vehicles, Assault Value = 967

Defending force 6580 troops, 38 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 232

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 433

Allied adjusted defense: 553

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), fatigue(-)
experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
312 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Allied ground losses:
453 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 61 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 7 (1 destroyed, 6 disabled)

Assaulting units:
9th Tank Regiment
51st Division
3rd Tank Regiment
104th Division
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
23rd Army
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion

Defending units:
6th Chinese Corps
7th Chinese Base Force

I've ordered another assault for tomorrow and I hope the armour carries the day. I've set LRCAP to try and interdict the daily enemy 4E raids, but expect heavy resistance from 50+ fighters based at Kweiyang. I can't linger here long, Chinese reinforcements are en route from Chihkiang, Changteh and even Changsha. Now the real fighting in China begins, as I think Francois must have finally come to the realization my main push is from the southeast.


Thoughts:

I'm rushing things now somewhat, but so far it's working. Lack of fuel for my transports in the DEI is slowing down my operations. I need to secure Makassar so I can LRCAP the route to Balikpapan so my shipping can refuel. I'm taking a risk tomorrow with KB, moving her west to where I should have a few days ago. The Allied SCTF continues to remain at Denpasar, so I hope to attack it tomorrow. Using KB in the DEI always makes me nervous. I try and provide some more screens soon to make the current situation clear.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/24/2016 4:08:12 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 861
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/24/2016 4:22:59 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 10-11/42:


Burma:

No Allied air attacks against my forces at Pegu either day. There is enemy movement out of both Moulmein and Rangoon, but I don't know if it is a full blown withdrawal. In either case, I'm sure a rearguard will be left.

I've ordered IJA to remain at Pegu for now, while IJA Imperial Guards Division moves towards Toungoo to clear the Allied roadblock. I've got two divisions, IJA 18th and 33rd tied up marching through rough terrain near Chiang Mai, which in hindsight was dumb on my part. I should have just landed everything at Pegu by sea, instead I currently can only attack with half my forces.


China:

Tuyun falls easily to the second deliberate assault. I'm now going to risk a river shock attack northeast from Tuyun to keep the pressure on the Chinese. There could be two full Chinese Corps waiting on the other side though. The initial attack force of two divisions and two armoured regiments may get somewhat beat up and highly disrupted, but I'll have three follow up divisions to quickly reinforce. I'd take the long route through rough terrain if I had the time to do so, but I don't.

KB will reach Balikapapan tomorrow. Everything will be refueled and then I'll start preparations for the invasion of Java. I want to get KB back into the Central Pacific as quickly as possible, but once I'm ashore in Java, I also need to deal with Darwin before it's reinforced.


DEI:

KB's move is successful on the 10th and puts her in range of numerous small enemy TF's (the big fish are long gone) at and around Denpasar. I think watching the replay there is going to be some serious carnage among the AM's, AMc's and some small transports. Wait for it. The might of the Imperial Navy launches 20+ Kate torpedo bombers at a lone TF consisting of a xAKL. That's it. I really hate this game sometimes and the complete uselessness of KB, more often than not, when I commit it to battle. This was yet another joke of an attack by KB in my Japanese experience.


Southwest Pacific:

Allied taskforces are spotted at Ndeni and what appears to be a SCTF is heading northeast towards Tulagi. I suspect this is a bombardment TF. I have a lot of submarines in the area so maybe I'll get lucky. As predicted, with KB in the DEI the Allies will try to take advantage in the Solomons. I stick to the plan of securing the DEI first, then I plan a counteroffensive in the Solomons.


Economy:

I've depleted Port Arthur of both oil and resources. I'll stop exports from this base and see if Keijo and Fusan will start drawing more. I'll divert shipping to Shikuka in an effort to reduce the 500k stockpile. Fusan, so far, is just not drawing enough resources and it's taking forever to expand the port. I'm not exporting any fuel or resources from Singapore in an effort to draw it eastwards.


< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/24/2016 10:17:14 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 862
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/25/2016 3:47:53 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
The April 12th turn is away.

I continue to play cat and mouse with the Allied 4E's in China. I keep guessing wrong on the target. Last turn they targeted my troops at the base in clear terrain just west of Changsha. I've set a CAP over the base if they come again.

I've also ordered two sweeps and an escorted bombing mission against Kweiyang. I expect heavy losses as there are 45 enemy fighters at the base. I have not seen any P-38's yet, but I suspect I might see some tomorrow.

I'm closing in on Lanchow in the north. I just ordered recon of the base to see what I'm dealing with. I'll initially attack with two divisions and two armoured regiments. A third division is slowly making its way along the secondary road to reinforce. I wish I had Yenan as an airbase to allow bombing of the defenders. It's going to be tough relying on ground forces alone.

I've set a submarine screen around Tulagi in the Solomons in anticipation of the arrival of an enemy bombardment TF.

The last half of April will see action pretty much everywhere I'm guessing.



_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 863
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/26/2016 5:47:51 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 12/42:

Makassar falls. Now to quickly consolidate the airbase and start air operations against Soerabaja. I've decided to use Balikpapan as the kick-off point for the amphibious operations against Java. The base stacking limit is 90k, so I'll be able to organize all the land forces from one location. There will be a week delay until I get all the troops in place.

No Allied air intervention in Burma the last few days, so my troops continue to move unmolested. I'll have a total of four divisions assigned to Burma right now, and may reinforce with IJA 55th if needed. Right now I've decided to use it for Port Blair.

The 4E's in China today target my forces approaching Lanchow. One B-17 is downed by FLAK. There is a strong Chinese garrison at Lanchow, but I'm going to risk the river crossing with two divisions. I'm going to be fully prepped for the base, so it may go better than I think.

There was no Allied naval bombardment against Tulagi today. I expect something to happen any day.

Thoughts:

I have much to do. Japanese forces are on the move everywhere as I try to recover my position. The sooner I deal with the DEI, the sooner I can look for ways to increase the pressure on Francois once again.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 864
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/26/2016 7:08:04 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
It's been awhile since I've done this so my memory is fuzzy.

I have 2x30 size fully repaired R&D factories set to the Nick 'a' model that are showing blue. They start production in May. My question is: when I try to switch to the 'b' model they now switch to 0x21 fully damaged. Should they not go directly to the 'b' model and remain fully repaired? Did I do this too late and should have done the switch when the text was still grey?

For clarification, I don't want to switch to the 'b' model, I just want to refresh myself with when to switch a fully repaired R&D factory to the next model in the upgrade path. These are the only fully repaired factories I have to test with.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/26/2016 7:10:29 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 865
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/26/2016 7:43:18 PM   
FeurerKrieg


Posts: 3397
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
If they don't start production until May, and you are still in April, they shouldn't get damaged on the switch. I thought the B was the upgrade for the A, but maybe I'm remembering wrong.

In any case, the only things I can think of is that you are in May, the production date is April or the B is not the upgrade in your scenario.



_____________________________


Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 866
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/27/2016 8:01:23 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 13/42:

A frustrating turn in China.

No Allied Cap over Kweiyang, so the two Japanese sweeps and LRCAP I set don't bag any enemy fighters. I think great, the base is about to get hit by 60+ Sally's uncontested. Nope, only 16 fly despite operating from the same base. What could have been a great tactical success fizzles.

The Allied fighters on the other hand, sweep Tuyun and my LRCAP (I always forget to set range to zero after assigning a target, but don't know for sure if this will prevent bleeding LRCAP) set to Kweiyang reacts to Tuyun. My Zero LRCAP does well against Hurricane I's, but gets bounced by high sweeping P-40's on a second sweep. Almost every P-40 got a dive on my fighters while I didn't get a single one during the entire combat. I thought things were supposed to get mixed up more with the recent updates and tweaks. I lose 12 Zero fighters on the day for roughly the same number of Allied fighters. Considering I got completely bounced by the P-40's, my pilot's performance was fantastic. Still LRCAP burns me more often then not, once again despite setting a target my LRCAP still bleeds over to a base I didn't want defended. It's the game, I know, but I still don't have to like it. I'd feel better had all 60+ bombers hit Kweiyang hard, which would make my life easier.

I'm going to try two risky river assaults in China. The first against Lanchow where I will rely on 100% prep to soften the blow, and the second at Tuyun. I'm going to willingly sacrifice a division to cross first at Tuyun to meet the 1/3 requirement for river crossings, so that two more divisions, two tank regiments and three heavy artillery regiments can cross suffering no disruption. I may trash a division, but I gain weeks from not having to recover disablements and disruption on my entire force. If everything goes horribly wrong on both crossings, the Chinese just bought themselves a few months of respite.

I probably should hold off on the Lanchow river assault against six enemy LCU's and high forts, but I don't have the forces to flank the position. I could wait until Yenan is captured to free up additional troops, but that could be months away yet. I'm afraid I risk collapsing my entire northern offensive on the outcome of the rolls during the river assault.

No Allied bombardment in the Solomons again and the enemy TF is gone. Probing my air defence I guess.

I need to update with some screens, but I'm about to be conducting four offensives at once here. The ongoing Chinese campaign, and now Burma, Java and the Philippines. I have five divisions for Burma, three and a half for Java and four for Luzon. I have one division in New Guinea.


< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/27/2016 8:23:40 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 867
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/29/2016 3:44:10 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
April 15/42:

Disaster in China! My plan at Tuyun completely backfires and I run into a massive Chinese force defending the river line. Scratch one Japanese division. AAR follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (near Kweiyang)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 13224 troops, 104 guns, 24 vehicles, Assault Value = 416

Defending force 42470 troops, 238 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1464

Japanese adjusted assault: 0

Allied adjusted defense: 3772

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 99

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-), supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
7648 casualties reported
Squads: 557 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 256 disabled
Engineers: 36 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 66 (42 destroyed, 24 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
18 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
104th Division

Defending units:
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
59th Chinese Corps
66th Chinese Corps

I can honestly say I have never seen anything like it before in China. I always find these all or nothing results hard to take, but against that defence I didn't stand a chance. I've never seen such a large Chinese Corps at this stage of the war before. I went into the scenario and looked at the OOB for the Chinese. No 66th Corps is shown in the starting OOB and it does not appear in the reinforcement queue. Where did this unit come from?

It was a risk, but damn, I was not expecting a disaster such as this. I didn't even make the 1/3 river crossing requirement to avoid future shock attacks. Looks like it is plan 'B' after all, I now have to flank the enemy position. At least I have a bargain of a division to buy out.







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/29/2016 4:44:15 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 868
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/29/2016 3:49:09 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
A couple of CHI units start as frags that can be built up. If he puts supply to it, he can get it up to 720 squads of INF ... a good leader and he will have at least 45 exp by this time .... That all ties to what his modifiers were.

You had a disruption modifier and low supply on your unit .... pushing too hard? Lack of supply on attack is always a huge malus ... that is likely where your ZERO adjusted AV came from. ouch.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 869
RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) - 5/29/2016 4:10:36 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

A couple of CHI units start as frags that can be built up. If he puts supply to it, he can get it up to 720 squads of INF ... a good leader and he will have at least 45 exp by this time .... That all ties to what his modifiers were.

You had a disruption modifier and low supply on your unit .... pushing too hard? Lack of supply on attack is always a huge malus ... that is likely where your ZERO adjusted AV came from. ouch.


That must explain why I couldn't find the unit in the OOB.

As to the supply hit, I think that was rather bad luck. I was only short around 20 supply, so to get a (-) modifier for it is rather steep in my opinion. My force was disrupted as a result of the river crossing. My troops are not fatigued or suffering from supply shortages anywhere in China. This was almost a 100% series of bad rolls with one of my best divisions and leaders. I took a risk, it backfired, I move on. I'm not complaining, just shocked at such a huge Chinese Corps and lopsided result.


< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 5/29/2016 4:14:48 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 870
Page:   <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Insert witty AAR title here - Sqz(J) vs. fcharton (A) Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.234