Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience, and Firepower

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience, and Firepower Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/8/2016 6:48:29 PM   
KenchiSulla


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline
The A6M8s did great against your four engines... Perhaps the self sealing fuel tanks and higher durability is paying off....

_____________________________

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 181
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/11/2016 8:07:26 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenchiSulla
The A6M8s did great against your four engines... Perhaps the self sealing fuel tanks and higher durability is paying off....

Yes I'm not fighting them off the way I used to. And many of these B-24 pilots have multiple kills. This vulnerability to even moderate CAP is relatively new. Luckily, I have around 75 B-24Js in reserve so I can replace losses easily.

(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 182
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/11/2016 8:09:47 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Butchers bill on the day. Here's what I lost at sea:



Notice no Fletchers lost! Two heavily damaged but under repair at Rossel island. On the other hand, the Japanese lost a lot more planes than I would have thought:



A lot of my losses were 4E but overall it wasn't a big VP loss for me on the day. And I can replace all those losses.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 183
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/11/2016 8:16:34 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Of note the N1K2-J has recently arrived. The first George to be able to fly off carriers. It's comparable to the Hellcat so my edge in fighters could diminish as production ramps up.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 184
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/11/2016 5:06:01 PM   
KenchiSulla


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline
Is it carrier capable? I don't think so. The A6M line (A6M3 not though) and then the A7M but not the George or Jack...

_____________________________

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 185
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/12/2016 2:56:47 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KenchiSulla
Is it carrier capable? I don't think so. The A6M line (A6M3 not though) and then the A7M but not the George or Jack...

You would be correct in real life. But this isn't real life....this is RA:



And now the F6F-3 which is the most common USN plane:


(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 186
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/12/2016 6:56:36 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Arggh...learned some rough lessons about conducting amphibious invasions.

A very large mixed amphibious TF composed of a few escorts and APAs, AKAs, LSTs, LCIs, etc, encountered a small TF of 2 MGBs at Ponape. And upon that encounter, decided to retreat. At the same time, another TF of a single AP unloaded by itself on Ponape and scuttled after taking significant damage being the only amphibious ship to unload that day leaving the V Amphibious Corps all alone on the island. Luckily, it is not an atoll. And to add insult to injury, a few LSTs were damaged from collisions. I learned a few lessons about threat tolerance and TF composition today.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 187
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/12/2016 1:35:55 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

Arggh...learned some rough lessons about conducting amphibious invasions.

A very large mixed amphibious TF composed of a few escorts and APAs, AKAs, LSTs, LCIs, etc, encountered a small TF of 2 MGBs at Ponape. And upon that encounter, decided to retreat. At the same time, another TF of a single AP unloaded by itself on Ponape and scuttled after taking significant damage being the only amphibious ship to unload that day leaving the V Amphibious Corps all alone on the island. Luckily, it is not an atoll. And to add insult to injury, a few LSTs were damaged from collisions. I learned a few lessons about threat tolerance and TF composition today.


It is probably not one of the best strategies but I almost always set my fleets to absolute with maximum threat tolerance. Saves me from those turns that make your hair grey!!

_____________________________


(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 188
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/13/2016 1:07:44 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wargmr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

Arggh...learned some rough lessons about conducting amphibious invasions.

A very large mixed amphibious TF composed of a few escorts and APAs, AKAs, LSTs, LCIs, etc, encountered a small TF of 2 MGBs at Ponape. And upon that encounter, decided to retreat. At the same time, another TF of a single AP unloaded by itself on Ponape and scuttled after taking significant damage being the only amphibious ship to unload that day leaving the V Amphibious Corps all alone on the island. Luckily, it is not an atoll. And to add insult to injury, a few LSTs were damaged from collisions. I learned a few lessons about threat tolerance and TF composition today.


It is probably not one of the best strategies but I almost always set my fleets to absolute with maximum threat tolerance. Saves me from those turns that make your hair grey!!


I don't think I will do it for every TF but for amphibious TFs I think I will start using absolute all the time just to make sure they land. I'm not going in unless I have overwhelming force anyway so unless my SCTFs can't intercept a real Japanese SCTF before it my its my amphibious troops I should be fine.

Though on that note I have had to be careful to provide more SCTF cover. I have started using Fletcher TFs of varying sizes (5-20) in this role to provide the primary cover for my transports. This allows me to use my cruisers and battleships to bombard more freely and only provide cover for transports when extra protection is needed.

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 189
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/14/2016 6:04:44 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 15th 1944

A day after taking Lautem in eastern Timor, the Japanese launched heavy sweeps against my carrier aircraft:



A half dozen IJA and IJN squadrons of George's and Franks would sweep throughout the day. Overall losses were roughly even. But my carrier aircraft struck back against a Japanese transport fleet:



quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Ambon at 75,110

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 18 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes

Japanese aircraft
N1K2-J George x 24

Allied aircraft
F6F-3 Hellcat x 75
TBF-1 Avenger x 34
TBM-1C Avenger x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
N1K2-J George: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
F6F-3 Hellcat: 1 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 6 destroyed, 12 damaged
TBM-1C Avenger: 2 destroyed, 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
AK Kosei Maru, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
AK Nozima Maru, Torpedo hits 4, and is sunk
E Aoi, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
AK Huzikawa Maru, Torpedo hits 6, and is sunk
PG Hai Can 11, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage

Pretty good exchange for me. But after that a DB squadron went in unescorted against the BB Kirishima next to Kendari and got obliterated. Overall, here was the butchers bill on the day:



With the Japanese showing up in strength here and having taken moderate air losses, I am pulling back my fleet to rearm an take replacements. With Lautem in my control, I will soon have LBA of my own in Timor and bring Kendari within P-47 range. It's pretty clear that I am setting the tempo here in my favor; the Japanese aren't showing up until its too late so my ships can pull back without really affecting my operations.

Further east, my troops attacked Ponape for the first time:



quote:

Ground combat at Ponape (119,113)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 23013 troops, 427 guns, 405 vehicles, Assault Value = 774

Defending force 16383 troops, 284 guns, 22 vehicles, Assault Value = 346

Allied adjusted assault: 894

Japanese adjusted defense: 747

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 5)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 4

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
477 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 9 (6 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Vehicles lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
329 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 17 (1 destroyed, 16 disabled)

Assaulting units:
43rd Infantry Division
40th Infantry Division
I US Amphib Corps

Defending units:
7th Guard ADU Coastal Gun Battalion
2nd Amphibious Brigade
24th Ind.Mixed Brigade
Combined 8th SNLF
4th ADU Coastal Gun Regiment
Ponape Naval Fortress
28th JAAF AF Bn
4th Base Force
8th JAAF AF Coy


Reducing the fort was big for me. Now it's a downhill battle for me as my bombardment will have a greater effect than before. As a result, my CVs are withdrawing to cover (another) landing at Tulagi.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 190
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/14/2016 12:52:34 PM   
tiemanjw

 

Posts: 580
Joined: 12/6/2008
Status: offline
Do you have your CVs at the Lautem base? Air combat TFs only launch half sized CAP and strikes when in a base hex. (Though CVEs in a CV Escort TF launch at full strength).

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 191
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/14/2016 6:08:33 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tiemanj
Do you have your CVs at the Lautem base? Air combat TFs only launch half sized CAP and strikes when in a base hex. (Though CVEs in a CV Escort TF launch at full strength).

No, my CVs were one hex off Lautem for that reason. But I'm pretty sure they added to the CAP.

(in reply to tiemanjw)
Post #: 192
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/14/2016 6:38:01 PM   
Walker84


Posts: 850
Joined: 7/5/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenchiSulla
Is it carrier capable? I don't think so. The A6M line (A6M3 not though) and then the A7M but not the George or Jack...

You would be correct in real life. But this isn't real life....this is RA:



Thanks for providing this AAR of your longstanding game. As you said at the beginning its a little different to a lot of the campaigns out there - so plenty of interesting developments.

And I'm seriously mulling playing RA next time now I know about carrier-capable Georges



_____________________________

The most advanced nations are always those who navigate the most -
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803 -1882)

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 193
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/14/2016 9:44:09 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Walker84
Thanks for providing this AAR of your longstanding game. As you said at the beginning its a little different to a lot of the campaigns out there - so plenty of interesting developments.

And I'm seriously mulling playing RA next time now I know about carrier-capable Georges

You are very welcome! As long as I get readers in this AAR I am happy to spend the time on it. Though I would be interested in some tips to get more readers. One thing I have decided to do is post more screenshots (like in my last update). I have a feeling that many readers aren't satisfied with the text only combat report snippets that I generally prefer. But if you have any other suggestions I'm all ears.

Ya....if I had known about carrier-capable George's I may not have picked this scenario.

I told John (the maker of RA) about how I thought that it was unfair that the IJN gets a carrier capable George which is hands down better than the F6F-3. He basically brushed off my comment saying that it comes late (8/44). But of course putting more resources into R&D means that you could have it at a much earlier date such that the USN planes never get that superiority they enjoyed IRL (or that superiority only lasts for a brief period). This will definitely be the last time I play RA...I think John is just too biased towards the Japanese when it comes to modding RA.

(in reply to Walker84)
Post #: 194
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/14/2016 9:45:32 PM   
tiemanjw

 

Posts: 580
Joined: 12/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli


quote:

ORIGINAL: tiemanj
Do you have your CVs at the Lautem base? Air combat TFs only launch half sized CAP and strikes when in a base hex. (Though CVEs in a CV Escort TF launch at full strength).

No, my CVs were one hex off Lautem for that reason. But I'm pretty sure they added to the CAP.


Cool... I saw the red line in your first picture and [mistakenly] assumed the CVs were there. My bad.
Yes they will add to the CAP so long as you have a mission range for squadrons flying some CAP > 0
They will add even more CAP if you have LRCAP set, though at the cost of CAP over your CVs.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 195
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/15/2016 10:00:34 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 17th 1944

So I sent a mid-sized Fletcher TF to infiltrate enemy lines and sink shipping. As it happens, they had an excellent opportunity to do so. But then absolutely blew it:

quote:

Day Time Surface Combat, near Emirau Island at 107,117, Range 30,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
PB Taiko Maru
PB Nako Maru #2
xAK Omi Maru
xAK Daido Maru
xAK Kaiko Maru
xAK Rakuto Maru
xAK Ryuko Maru
xAK Akagisan Maru
xAK Akasisan Maru
xAK Hiyoshi Maru
xAK Hino Maru #3
xAK Sinsyu Maru
xAK Hankow Maru
xAK Monji Maru
xAK Shanghai Maru
xAK Tasmania Maru
xAK Eihuku Maru
xAK Kosei Maru #2
xAK Koto Maru
xAK Sumanoura Maru
xAK Ikoma Maru
PB Kamitu Maru
PB Kenan Maru

Allied Ships
DD Caperton
DD Claxton
DD Spence
DD Stanly
DD Stembel
DD Doyle
DD Case

Maximum visibility in Partly Cloudy Conditions: 28,000 yards
Range closes to 28,000 yards...
CONTACT: Allies radar detects Japanese task force at 28,000 yards
Range increases to 30,000 yards...
Japanese Cargo TF evades combat


The commander of this TF is going to be sacked after he returns back to base. Fortunately for him this is not the USSR or else I would likely have him executed after that performance

My attack bombers did a little better. They sunk a pair of AKs off NG:

quote:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Woodlark Island at 104,133

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 1,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-25D1 Mitchell x 16

Allied aircraft losses
B-25D1 Mitchell: 5 damaged

Japanese Ships
TB Hiyodori, Bomb hits 1
TB Kasasagi
AK Hakkai Maru, Bomb hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage
AK Arima Maru, Bomb hits 5, heavy fires, heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
16 x B-25D1 Mitchell bombing and strafing from low level
Naval Attack: 6 x 500 lb SAP Bomb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Woodlark Island at 104,133

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 39 NM, estimated altitude 1,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-25G Mitchell x 10

Allied aircraft losses
B-25G Mitchell: 4 damaged

Japanese Ships
AK Arima Maru, Shell hits 2, Bomb hits 11, and is sunk
TB Hiyodori


That's a nice way to get around 30 VPs with no losses of my own.

(in reply to tiemanjw)
Post #: 196
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/16/2016 1:13:55 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Nice work with those assault bombers. I like seeing genuine Japanese naval AKs go down!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 197
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/16/2016 2:01:53 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline
Arrgh, very frustrating to work so hard to set up a good opportunity and then the incompetent commander won't cash it in. Those Japanese sailors are the luckiest (virtual) SOBs on the planet.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 198
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/16/2016 6:26:34 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 18th 1944

Japanese counter attack!

Since landing and taking Lautem in eastern Timor, the Japanese have decided to use their forces to bombard my positions with planes and now ships. Lautem comes under naval bombardment today. Which is actually significant because since sinking half the IJN BBs in the Marshalls, bombardments have been very rare in the Pacific:

quote:

Night Naval bombardment of Lautem at 72,115

Japanese Ships
CA Kumano
CA Mikuma
DD Yugiri
DD Arashio
DD Yugumo

Allied ground losses:
75 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 5
Port hits 1

CA Kumano firing at 32nd Infantry Division
CA Mikuma firing at Lautem
DD Yugiri firing at 32nd Infantry Division
DD Arashio firing at 1st Australian Division
DD Yugumo firing at 32nd Infantry Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Lautem at 72,115

Japanese Ships
BB Kirishima
BB Kongo
DD Uranami
DD Isonami
DD Usugumo
DD Akatsuki

Allied ground losses:
49 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Runway hits 3
Port hits 3
Port supply hits 1

BB Kirishima firing at 32nd Infantry Division
BB Kongo firing at 32nd Infantry Division
DD Uranami firing at 1st Australian Division
DD Isonami firing at 32nd Infantry Division
DD Usugumo firing at Lautem
DD Akatsuki firing at Lautem


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Lautem at 72,115

Japanese Ships
CL Tama
DD Suzunami

Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

CL Tama firing at 1st Australian Division
DD Suzunami firing at 32nd Infantry Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Lautem at 72,115

Japanese Ships
CA Atago
DD Umikaze
DD Samidare
DD Takanami

Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 1
Port hits 2

CA Atago firing at 1st Australian Division
DD Umikaze firing at 1st Australian Division
DD Samidare firing at Lautem
DD Takanami firing at 1st Australian Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Lautem at 72,115

Japanese Ships
CA Ashigara
CA Myoko
CL Sakawa
DD Kawakaze
DD Shigure
DD Kasumi

Allied ground losses:
60 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Runway hits 1

CA Ashigara firing at 1st Australian Division
CA Myoko firing at 1st Australian Division
CL Sakawa firing at 1st Australian Division
DD Kawakaze firing at Lautem
DD Shigure firing at 32nd Infantry Division
DD Kasumi firing at 32nd Infantry Division


Not super effective but it will slow me down from taking Dili where my troops are marching. Unfortunately the air base at Laeutem was already toast so I couldn't fly in engineers with air transports and today only made it worse. That being said, I am still going to try to take Dili even under Japanese bombardment. The Japanese also seem to be trying to bring reinforcements into Timor:

quote:

Sub attack near Dili at 71,114

Japanese Ships
AK Nagara Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Tamon Maru
xAP Tenzan Maru
E Saga

Allied Ships
SS Sealion

Japanese ground losses:
21 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


This would explain why the KB is right off the northern coast. The plan is to use P-38s, F4Us, and P-47s to clear the air of Japanese fighters to cover more landings in Timor. But today it seems the weather was bad and none of my fighters flew.

On Ponape I am reducing the forts down consistently but surprisingly I got worse odds:

quote:

Ground combat at Ponape (119,113)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 22682 troops, 425 guns, 404 vehicles, Assault Value = 728

Defending force 15504 troops, 278 guns, 20 vehicles, Assault Value = 296

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Allied adjusted assault: 789

Japanese adjusted defense: 845

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
451 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 37 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 17 (1 destroyed, 16 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1065 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 122 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Vehicles lost 13 (3 destroyed, 10 disabled)

Assaulting units:
43rd Infantry Division
40th Infantry Division
I US Amphib Corps

Defending units:
2nd Amphibious Brigade
7th Guard ADU Coastal Gun Battalion
Combined 8th SNLF
24th Ind.Mixed Brigade
4th ADU Coastal Gun Regiment
Ponape Naval Fortress
28th JAAF AF Bn
4th Base Force
8th JAAF AF Coy


I will probably give them a day to rest before launching another attack.

One piece of good news is that recon confirms only a single unit on Wake; the Wake naval fortress with its big guns. But even with those big guns I have reason to believe that based off previous bombardments where none of my ships were hit that the Japanese are likely low on supply here. Today my invasion force of around 8,000 soldiers at Pearl Harbor started loading up to take the island. It's definitely going to be overkill but it won't hurt to get those units further west.

Meanwhile in the SoPac I finally prepare to take Tulagi with a large invasion force loading up at Nauru covered by the CentPac fleet which will move to the SoPac. Tulagi will be a key base for me since I have zero ports of size 7 or more between Brisbane and Pearl Harbor.

(in reply to jwolf)
Post #: 199
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/16/2016 7:38:21 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
If you have some Cats in range you could use them to fly in the engineers. Seaplane runways repair themselves!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 200
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/16/2016 9:00:50 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
If you have some Cats in range you could use them to fly in the engineers. Seaplane runways repair themselves!

Ya, that's what I was thinking. I can probably get 12 Catalinas to fly troop transport.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 201
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience... - 6/23/2016 6:10:09 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 19th 1944

I made a BIG mistake. Inexplicably, my CVEs were ordered to Timor by themselves with no external air cover. Luckily the Japanese did not expect this move any more than I did so only one naval strike went against my CVEs while more planes hit ground targets.



quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Lautem at 73,116

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 26 minutes

Japanese aircraft
B6N1 Jill x 57
D4Y1 Judy x 33
N1K2-J George x 122

Allied aircraft
F4U-1A Corsair x 24
F6F-3 Hellcat x 100

Japanese aircraft losses
B6N1 Jill: 19 destroyed, 11 damaged
B6N1 Jill: 3 destroyed by flak
D4Y1 Judy: 15 destroyed, 5 damaged
D4Y1 Judy: 1 destroyed by flak
N1K2-J George: 8 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
F4U-1A Corsair: 1 destroyed
F6F-3 Hellcat: 6 destroyed

Allied Ships
CVE Natoma Bay, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1
CVE Barnes, Torpedo hits 1
CVE Corregidor
CVE Kaskaskia, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CVE Breton, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
CVE Suwannee, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DE Duffy, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk




One CVE sunk and another one heavily damaged. It is clear that the Japanese intend to defend this area in strength. Due to these losses and strong Japanese defenses, I have changed my operational plans. The Koepang invasion in western Timor have been delayed. Instead, the remaining fleet forces are going to move to the SoPac to force a landing at Woodlark Island. This is at the same time as the CentPac fleet also is moving to this theatre. My plan is to advanced rapidly here relying almost exclusively on CVs and CVEs for air cover.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 202
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/23/2016 10:22:06 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 20th 1944

Things continue to heat up on Timor. First, I sunk the remainder of the transport fleet unloading the 31st IJA Division at Dili:

quote:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Dili at 71,115

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 70 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 33 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 9
SBD-5 Dauntless x 5
TBF-1 Avenger x 4

Allied aircraft losses
SBD-5 Dauntless: 1 damaged
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
AK Tamon Maru, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
xAP Tenzan Maru, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Dili at 71,115

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 58 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 27 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 9
SBD-5 Dauntless x 5
TBF-1 Avenger x 3

Allied aircraft losses
SBD-5 Dauntless: 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
AK Tatumiya Maru, Bomb hits 3, on fire, heavy damage
AK Nako Maru, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage

Japanese ground losses:
Guns lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

The previous day I hit more ships but I forgot to post that combat snippet. Not sure why the Japanese didn't provide air cover here...they had plenty of sweeping fighters. I believe these strikes were launched by the crippled CVE fleet which makes their success even more surprising.

Despite Japanese reinforcments, I launched an attack on Dili:

quote:

Ground combat at Dili (71,115)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 19738 troops, 299 guns, 477 vehicles, Assault Value = 834

Defending force 22977 troops, 145 guns, 154 vehicles, Assault Value = 537

Allied adjusted assault: 232

Japanese adjusted defense: 795

Allied assault odds: 1 to 3 (fort level 4)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
682 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 44 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled

Allied ground losses:
247 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 7 (1 destroyed, 6 disabled)
Vehicles lost 55 (4 destroyed, 51 disabled)

Assaulting units:
193rd Tank Battalion
637th Tank Destroyer Battalion
32nd Infantry Division
1st Australian Division
I US Corps

Defending units:
31st Division
41st Guard Battalion
25th Ind.Mixed Brigade
11th Indpt SNLF Coy
41st JAAF AF Bn
21st JAAF Base Force
15th JAAF Base Force
54th Construction Battalion
62nd JNAF AF Unit
56th Construction Battalion
68th JAAF AF Bn


Doesn't look like I have enough to take the base right now. But what was really interesting is that just to the rear, the Japanese counter invaded Lauetem:

quote:

Ground combat at Lautem (72,115)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 583 troops, 6 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 46

Defending force 1135 troops, 42 guns, 41 vehicles, Assault Value = 7

Japanese adjusted assault: 11

Allied adjusted defense: 9

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), fatigue(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
97 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
18 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Assaulting units:
1st Para Assault/C Div /1
1st Para Assault/B Div /1
1st Para Assault/A Div /1

Defending units:
641st Towed Tank Destroyer Battalion
6th USN Naval Const Rgt /1
1st USN Naval Const Rgt /1


Did not expect that! Glad I left behind that one tank destroyer battalion. I doubt the Japanese will try to attack again but just in case I will fly in some reinforcements.

At this point I think I will pull back from Dili and concentrate on holding and repairing Lautem. Truth be told I am rather happy with the Japanese plans here. They decided to send a division to Dili even though I already have a foothold on the island - and lost some of that division and the transports carrying it. My units in Dili are already at around 40 prep for their next objective which is not on Timor. At this point I have two options. Bypass Dili or land reinforcements at Lautem and take the base. I guess it will depend on if the Japanese bring in more units. I'm leaning towards letting them rot as it keeps them out of the OOB and reappearing elsewhere.

< Message edited by Sangeli -- 6/24/2016 1:01:05 AM >

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 203
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/24/2016 8:34:38 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
Current map of the main theater of action, the central-eastern DEI:



Japanese are holed up in Kendari behind a level 8 air base outside range of my larger air bases. Everything including and south of Sorong and Ambon are left to my bombers. And what's left of the KB is here too. They're sending reinforcements into Timor as well; this is clearly the main focus for the Japanese right now. Which is why its an absolutely perfect time to use my interior lines and shift to the South Pacific. It's simply shorter trip for my ships and he will take at least a day to react; I'm basically guaranteed overall superiority for the landing at Woodlark which looms under the threat of Rabau.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 204
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/26/2016 4:15:59 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 22nd, 1944

Well Ponape finally fell:

quote:

Ground combat at Ponape (119,113)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 21417 troops, 423 guns, 401 vehicles, Assault Value = 550

Defending force 13984 troops, 276 guns, 22 vehicles, Assault Value = 186

Allied adjusted assault: 684

Japanese adjusted defense: 287

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Ponape !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
1184 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 62 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 155 (154 destroyed, 1 disabled)
Vehicles lost 20 (20 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
482 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 52 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Assaulting units:
43rd Infantry/A Division
40th Infantry Division
43rd Infantry/B Division
43rd Infantry/C Division
I US Amphib Corps

Defending units:
24th Ind.Mixed Brigade
Combined 8th SNLF
2nd Amphibious Brigade
4th ADU Coastal Gun Regiment
7th Guard ADU Coastal Gun Battalion
28th JAAF AF Bn
Ponape Naval Fortress
4th Base Force
8th JAAF AF Coy


Despite taking the base, most of the defenders are still there. So I will continue to bombard the base to make it easier for my LCUs to finish the job. But with Ponape in my hands that pretty much ends the main operations in the CentPac for some time. Intel shows that Truk is largely devoid of ships and planes so there likely will not be a fight for the air space over it once Ponape is repaired.

Things in the South Pacific are looking very good. Japanese don't seem prepared here at all and defenses are weak almost everywhere. Starting within a few days, I shall launch a quick succession of invasions against what appears to be almost no naval or air opposition. Seems that my threat against the DEI has done its job in keeping the Japanese tied down there. My CVs will stay a few more days at Darwin before heading east and supporting the invasions there.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 205
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/27/2016 12:00:08 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 23rd 1944

Big day with ships today but almost no air action.

First a small transport convoy gets wrecked by a small Japanese cruiser force east of Timor:



Those same ships bombarded Babar to good effect:

quote:

Night Naval bombardment of Babar at 76,117 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
P-38J Lightning: 23 damaged
P-38J Lightning: 1 destroyed on ground
Catalina I: 4 damaged
P-47D2 Thunderbolt: 16 damaged
C-47 Skytrain: 7 damaged
C-47 Skytrain: 1 destroyed on ground
P-39D Airacobra: 15 damaged
P-39D Airacobra: 1 destroyed on ground

8 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CL Noshiro
DD Michishio
DD Amatsukaze
DD Isokaze
DD Kuroshio

Allied Ships
CVE Breton, Shell hits 1, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
314 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 39 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 13 disabled

Airbase hits 12
Airbase supply hits 10
Runway hits 49

I'm going to happily pull back from here. The Japanese are in full counter-attack mode in the region. But there's just no way they're gonna push me out of Lautem with its two divisions. All this amounts to is base suppression with the bulk of their navy in a theater that I am not attacking in anymore.

That being said, I don't like losing ships, especially APAs:

quote:

Submarine attack near Bathurst Island at 78,122

Japanese Ships
SS I-177

Allied Ships
APA Henry T. Allen, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage


Second day in a row where I lost an APA down near Bathurst from a sub. There was supposed to be an escort ship but it got sunk the day before with the other APA. USN DD ASW TFs of two ships apiece are cleaning up the area and attacking Japanese subs with the aid of torpedo bombers from the nearby CVs and CVEs.

I unloaded a big invasion force at Tulagi to join the force that has been there for about a month. Luckily I included a number of BBs who took the brunt of the CD punishment:



Glad those idiot digital Japanese commanders are telling their CD regiments to fire at the most heavily armored ships. Here is what the situation on the ground looks like:



I have enough to take the base in under three deliberate attacks I think. And if you notice on the map I also have a unit in Munda now which was just dropped by seaplanes. Intending to build a small air base here. The engineers and other support units from the Gilberts and Marshalls are being moved to the SoPac in support of base building operations in parallel with actual invasions. Action in the South Pacific is increasing at a rapid pace and the Japanese just don't seem to care! The KB is firmly stuck in Kendari and all the IJN surface ships are there too. I guess the Japanese see the threat against their oil sources as being a mortal danger to the point of giving up areas that otherwise could be defended. He's letting me set up bases around Rabaul without making me fight for it. Even in the SWPAC he doesn't have a level 9 base for the Japanese; if he had his a part of his navy here (or even just hidden) I'd be a lot more reluctant to push quickly here. So I think the Japanese deployment is a mistake. Especially because he has no idea what my real plans are and how he may be playing exactly into what I want him to do ;)

EDIT: In my game the SwPaC is everything in to the west of the middle of New Guinea, the SoPac is everything east.

< Message edited by Sangeli -- 6/27/2016 12:10:36 AM >

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 206
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/27/2016 8:49:38 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
I neglected to mention that I am finally ready to assault Rangoon. I've assembled over 6,000 AV in the hex but I'm still not at the stacking limit of 250,000. I think I have enough to take the base but it's gonna be very bloody.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 207
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/29/2016 8:39:26 AM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
A sneak preview of what I had to deal with near Darwin. Lots of subs crawling around my CV fleets:


(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 208
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/29/2016 10:26:42 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Too bad you can't carpet bomb those ocean hexes!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 209
RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Logistics, Pati... - 6/29/2016 6:59:04 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline
February 24th 1944

First let's talk about those pesky subs. They caused more issues again this turn:

quote:

Submarine attack near Bathurst Island at 78,123

Japanese Ships
SS I-17

Allied Ships
TK H. M. Storey, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Bathurst Island at 78,123

Japanese Ships
SS I-17

Allied Ships
TK H. M. Storey, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage


Obviously that tanker would sink. Though of course I am periodically sinking Japanese tankers of my own, including this turn. I just don't usually post the combat snippets because by now that is pretty much standard

But this time the Japanese would hit a more important target:

quote:

Sub attack near Darwin at 77,124

Japanese Ships
SS I-28, hits 8

Allied Ships
BB North Carolina, Torpedo hits 3
BB Alabama
CLAA Atlanta
DD Ingersoll
DD Perkins
DD Maury
DD Morris
DD Endicott


The BB North Carolina is moderately damaged and seeking repairs in Darwin.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
Too bad you can't carpet bomb those ocean hexes!

I did the closest thing I could. I created around 5 different ASW fleets, set my torpedo bombers to 30% ASW, and brought two 18 bomber squadrons of trained ASW pilots to scour the area. This turn I attacked a few subs but don't think I sunk anything.

Well, after many days of inaction in the South Pacific, the Japanese finally come alive. A couple of different CAP traps and a Lilly DB attack. But it is very clear that these are the second tier Japanese squadrons as most of the George's and Frank's are in the DEI. Faced against Zeroes and Tonys with no doubt sub-par pilots, my fighters could not be stopped:

quote:

Morning Air attack on Buna , at 99,129

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 13 NM, estimated altitude 23,580 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M7 Zero x 33
A6M8 Zero x 48
Ki-61-Id Tony x 54

Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk III x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M7 Zero: 7 destroyed
A6M8 Zero: 7 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk III: 1 destroyed



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Buna , at 99,129

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 43 NM, estimated altitude 27,440 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M7 Zero x 15
A6M8 Zero x 25
Ki-61-Id Tony x 53

Allied aircraft
P-38J Lightning x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-61-Id Tony: 7 destroyed



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Arawe , at 102,126

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 49 NM, estimated altitude 28,440 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M8 Zero x 18
A6M8-J Zero x 76

Allied aircraft
P-38J Lightning x 25

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M8 Zero: 7 destroyed
A6M8-J Zero: 11 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38J Lightning: 1 destroyed


If Kittyhawks are getting 14-1 ratios in 1944, there MUST be a problem with Japanese pilots. The Kittyhawk III is pretty much on par with late model Zeroes.

And that one Lilly DB attack got annihilated:

quote:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Tulagi at 114,137

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 108 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 31 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIa Tojo x 32
Ki-44-IIc Tojo x 35
Ki-48-IIb Lily x 24

Allied aircraft
P-40K Warhawk x 4
F4U-1A Corsair x 36
F6F-3 Hellcat x 56

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-44-IIa Tojo: 1 destroyed
Ki-44-IIc Tojo: 4 destroyed
Ki-48-IIb Lily: 15 destroyed, 2 damaged

No Allied losses

Allied Ships
BB Mississippi, Bomb hits 1

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x Ki-48-IIb Lily releasing from 1000'
Naval Attack: 4 x 100 kg SAP Bomb


I later had a strange battle over Tulagi where I sent in torpedo bombers to do ground support. I really did not count on Japanese CAP here. But since my CVEs were in the same hex, the CAP added to the strike:

quote:

Afternoon Air attack on 5th ADU Coastal Gun Regiment, at 114,137 (Tulagi)

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid detected at 75 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 35 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIa Tojo x 61
Ki-44-IIc Tojo x 72

Allied aircraft
F4U-1A Corsair x 26
F6F-3 Hellcat x 53
TBF-1 Avenger x 40

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-44-IIa Tojo: 10 destroyed
Ki-44-IIc Tojo: 14 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
F6F-3 Hellcat: 3 destroyed
TBF-1 Avenger: 15 destroyed, 7 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x TBF-1 Avenger bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 500 lb GP Bomb
2 x TBF-1 Avenger bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 500 lb GP Bomb
7 x TBF-1 Avenger bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 500 lb GP Bomb


So somehow despite my Avengers being shredded, I actually came out ahead in planes destroyed. Those Tojos were no match for my Corsairs and Hellcats. On the whole, the Allies came out ahead about 170-70 on plane losses. Very good considering probably half those losses were Avengers and bombers.

The ground was a different story. I thought Tulagi was going to be a relatively quick battle. I was wrong!

quote:

Ground combat at Tulagi (114,137)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 34234 troops, 834 guns, 621 vehicles, Assault Value = 1202

Defending force 18128 troops, 123 guns, 16 vehicles, Assault Value = 275

Allied adjusted assault: 1556

Japanese adjusted defense: 2008

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 8)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
587 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 23 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 12 disabled
Guns lost 10 (2 destroyed, 8 disabled)
Vehicles lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1407 casualties reported
Squads: 52 destroyed, 108 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 7 destroyed, 16 disabled
Guns lost 50 (17 destroyed, 33 disabled)
Vehicles lost 14 (6 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Assaulting units:
27th Infantry Regiment
19th Infantry Regiment
161st Infantry Regiment
151st Combat Engineer Regiment
7th Infantry Division
35th Infantry Regiment
24th Marine Regiment
21st Infantry Rgt /1
223rd Field Artillery Battalion
249th Field Artillery Battalion
226th Field Artillery Battalion
2nd USMC Field Artillery Battalion
V US Amphib Corps
9th Marine Defense Battalion
30th Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
29th Ind.Mixed Brigade
5th ADU Coastal Gun Regiment
1st Guard ADU Coastal Gun Battalion
2nd Air Flotilla
6th Fleet
8th Base Force
111th Naval Construction Battalion
36th JNAF AF Unit


That level 8 fort in 3x terrain is going to be very tough to bring down. I am quite glad the Japanese did not bring reinforcements. Luckily, I have two more infantry regiments in the Gilberts and Marshalls I can bring over. But since I have to use the transports that dropped off these units, they probably will not land for another 3 weeks. In the meantime I am going to use my battleships and cruisers to smash the base like I was doing in the CentPac. With Lunga built up to a level 4 port, I can base my AEs there and just tee off on the Japanese. By the time those reinforcements land, Tulagi should be much easier to take.

Rangoon was not pretty. This probably was the most soldiers I lost in a battle in a single day since 1942:

quote:

Ground combat at Rangoon (54,53)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 185492 troops, 2966 guns, 2739 vehicles, Assault Value = 6444

Defending force 64481 troops, 695 guns, 345 vehicles, Assault Value = 2105

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 5

Allied adjusted assault: 5902

Japanese adjusted defense: 10679

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 5)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
3098 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 195 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 59 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 47 disabled
Guns lost 53 (2 destroyed, 51 disabled)
Vehicles lost 16 (1 destroyed, 15 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
15796 casualties reported
Squads: 151 destroyed, 1396 disabled
Non Combat: 89 destroyed, 297 disabled
Engineers: 55 destroyed, 196 disabled
Guns lost 221 (48 destroyed, 173 disabled)
Vehicles lost 160 (31 destroyed, 129 disabled)

Assaulting units:
26th Indian Brigade
7th Indian/C Division
7th Indian/A Division
25th Indian Division
11th Indian/A Division
7th Australian Division
5th Indian Division
72nd British Brigade
5th Chinese/C Corps
5th Chinese/A Corps
29th British Brigade
6th Chinese Corps
2nd British Division
6th Australian Division
Provisionl Tank
5th Chinese/B Corps
11th Indian/B Division
7th Indian/B Division
19th Indian Division
7th New Chinese Corps
17th Indian Division
14th Indian Division
268th Motorised Brigade
11th Indian/C Division
6th Mixed A/T Mtr Regiment
2/13th Field Regiment
14th Army
134th Field Artillery Battalion
1st Medium Regiment
8th Medium Regiment
28th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
2/11th Field Regiment
2/9th Field Regiment
97th Field Artillery Battalion
5th Field Regiment

Defending units:
16th Division
2nd Division
10th Division
8th Division
1st RTA Division
1st RF Gun Battalion
Burma Area Army
23rd Ind. Engineer Regiment
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
11th Shipping Engineer Regiment
3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
10th RF Gun Battalion


My AV dropped to under 5,000 after that attack. Luckily, I did bring down the fort a bit. And I have a small trickle of reinforcements heading to Rangoon as well. Still, this battle is going to be a long and bloody affair no doubt.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Straight Into the Teeth: A Story of Blood, Patience, and Firepower Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.906