What's the point of keeping minor characters happy?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

What's the point of keeping minor characters happy?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Barbarossa >> What's the point of keeping minor characters happy?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

What's the point of keeping minor characters happy? - 3/26/2016 1:45:47 AM

dhhd

Posts: 45
Joined: 1/24/2016
Status: offline

The only one who seems to have any purpose is Goebbels - if you get on his good side, divisions will be getting AP bonuses due to attached propaganda units. It will piss off the army group commander (or maybe Brauchitsch?) but a small enough amount that it usually doesn't matter.

I have no idea what Keitel, Jodl, and Himmler do - all I know is that what makes them happy usually makes army group commanders upset, and vice versa. Additionally, the decisions that make them happy are almost inevitably the ones where you're being a murderer in a computer game.

It just seems like, Goebbels aside, there's no reasons to keep the minor guys happy, and plenty of reasons not to, from the moral to the mechanical.

Post #: 1

RE: What's the point of keeping minor characters happy? - 3/26/2016 2:02:04 AM

demyansk

Posts: 2840
Joined: 2/20/2008
Status: offline

I think Goebbels club foot needs to be stuck up the fuhrer's butt,

(in reply to dhhd)

Post #: 2

RE: What's the point of keeping minor characters happy? - 3/26/2016 9:46:47 AM

Steve110

Posts: 41
Joined: 1/31/2016
Status: offline

Only reason I've found was you seem to get options later in the game to petition some/all the minor characters about pressing the case with Hitler for winter preparations.

The better the relationship the more chance/less PP the choice is.

Steve

(in reply to demyansk)

Post #: 3