Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/2/2016 10:37:49 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline 		That was my next question does his Noumea airbase have a torpedo capable HQ present?

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 121
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/2/2016 11:07:21 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

That was my next question does his Noumea airbase have a torpedo capable HQ present?


It is level three and there does not yet appear to be an HQ present. Am I correct in assuming that he needs both an HQ and a level four airfield for the Nell's and Betty's? I am making a major effort this early to keep the airfield from growing if not closed. Airfield Damage is holding grew from 20 to 22 last turn.

< Message edited by rook749 -- 8/2/2016 11:08:18 PM >

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 122
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/2/2016 11:55:41 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline 		you are still carrying Buffaloes and Vindicators, you got an LSD, it was a good decision not to try to engage the KB

do you have AKEs and AO/ TKs at Raoul? if not I suggest you go to Suva instead, that way you are still far... but close

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 123
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/3/2016 4:10:35 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

you are still carrying Buffaloes and Vindicators, you got an LSD, it was a good decision not to try to engage the KB

do you have AKEs and AO/ TKs at Raoul? if not I suggest you go to Suva instead, that way you are still far... but close


I agree moving the CV's to Land Based fighter cover at Raoul was the better play, if he came at me --- my CV's Plus 50 P-39's would have really hurt him. I have AO's at Raoul so my fuel will be topped off but the nearest AE's are at Pago Pago. There are more in route in the next five days and I will deploy two AE to Suva and one to Raoul to give me more flexibility.

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 124
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/4/2016 1:08:21 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Burma....

After his last attack went of at 1:6 at Mandalay (the first two were 1:2 and 1:1) he has shifted tactics. His air force is bombing the airfield to prevent fort building. My air force has been hitting his group forces which is why the odds shifted in the last attack. I don't know if we can hold Mandalay until the Oz Forces arrive in two weeks but we will see. I have another Burma BN set to arrive in three days to hold the line. I can only hold either Rangoon in the air or Mandalay and I am planning to hold Rangoon as I think this is a better area to hold the line. Even if Mandalay falls I should be able to hold Shwebo for a while.


Ground combat at Mandalay (59,46)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3249 troops, 22 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 103
Defending force 4345 troops, 43 guns, 33 vehicles, Assault Value = 103

Japanese adjusted assault: 25
Allied adjusted defense: 162
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 6 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), preparation(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: disruption(-), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
203 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Allied ground losses:
214 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
1st Raiding Regiment
I./143rd Infantry Battalion
III./143rd Infantry Battalion

Defending units:
9th Burma Rifles Battalion
BFF Brigade
10th Burma Rifles Battalion
1st Burma Auxiliary AA Regiment
103rd RAF Base Force




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 125
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/4/2016 1:10:25 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Clarks holds all hail x3 Terrain

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 32467 troops, 314 guns, 327 vehicles, Assault Value = 907
Defending force 33020 troops, 412 guns, 119 vehicles, Assault Value = 758

Japanese adjusted assault: 1186
Allied adjusted defense: 1438
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 3)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1631 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 106 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 20 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 19 disabled
Vehicles lost 49 (2 destroyed, 47 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1092 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 102 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 44 disabled
Engineers: 18 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 19 (1 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Vehicles lost 5 (3 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Assaulting units:
4th Tank Regiment
16th Engineer Regiment
48th Division
20th Recon Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
65th Brigade
Kimura Det
16th Recon Regiment
3rd Ind Engineer Regiment
7th Tank Regiment
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
14th Army
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
301st Construction Battalion
57th PS Infantry Regiment
31st PA Infantry Division
45th PS Infantry Regiment
51st PA Infantry Division
4th Marine Regiment
41st PA Infantry Division
91st PA Infantry Division
192nd Tank Battalion
21st PA Infantry Division
1st Constabulary Regiment
I Corps
I/Prov'nl SPM Grp
!/23rd PS FA Battalion
24th PS FA Regiment
1st USMC AA Battalion
II/Prov'nl SPM Grp
86th PS Field Artillery Battalion
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
Asiatic Fleet
III/Prov'nl SPM Grp




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 126
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/4/2016 1:12:06 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Singapore

Ground combat at Singapore (50,84)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 54777 troops, 629 guns, 344 vehicles, Assault Value = 1433
Defending force 54726 troops, 537 guns, 474 vehicles, Assault Value = 689

Japanese adjusted assault: 1560

Allied adjusted defense: 2681
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 3)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2981 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 213 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 55 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Guns lost 37 (1 destroyed, 36 disabled)
Vehicles lost 78 (19 destroyed, 59 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1332 casualties reported
Squads: 41 destroyed, 63 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 60 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
Vehicles lost 42 (2 destroyed, 40 disabled)

Assaulting units:
1st Tank Regiment
4th Division
56th Infantry Regiment
114th Infantry Regiment
Imperial Guards Division
12th Engineer Regiment
113th Infantry Regiment
5th Division
15th Ind Engineer Regiment
6th Tank Regiment
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
5th Mortar Battalion
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Mortar Battalion
31st Field AA Battalion
25th Army
56th Field Artillery Regiment
18th Mountain Gun Regiment
1st RF Gun Battalion
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
35th Field AA Battalion

Defending units:
SSVF Brigade
3rd Cavalry Regiment
27th Australian Brigade
22nd Australian Brigade
2nd Malay Battalion
2/17 Dogra Battalion
11th Indian Division
2nd Loyal Battalion
2nd Gordons Battalion
9th Indian Division
2nd ISF Base Force
III Indian Corps
2nd HK&S Heavy AA Regiment
Malayan Air Wing
1st Indian Heavy AA Regiment
Singapore Fortress
111th RAF Adv Base Force
1st Mysore Battalion
24th NZ Pioneer Coy
1st Hyderabad Battalion
110th RAF Adv Base Force
109th RN Base Force
112th RAF Adv Base Force
1st HK&S Heavy AA Regiment
224 Group RAF
113th RAF Adv Base Force
Singapore Base Force
FMSV Brigade
22nd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
Malaya Army
AHQ Far East
3rd Heavy AA Regiment
3rd HK&S Light AA Regiment
223 Group RAF
3rd SSVF Battalion




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 127
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/4/2016 3:10:14 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		NEI

Ground combat at Palembang (48,91)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5314 troops, 32 guns, 83 vehicles, Assault Value = 174
Defending force 3178 troops, 26 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 59

Japanese adjusted assault: 72
Allied adjusted defense: 40

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
77 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
305 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
55th Infantry Regiment
22nd Recon Regiment
56th Recon Regiment

Defending units:
Palembang Cdo
Lahat Cdo
Padang Cdo
Djambi Cdo
Tapanoeli Cdo
Palembang ML Base Force
PBg-Ld AA Afd


---------------------------------------------


Ground combat at Palembang (48,91)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2529 troops, 16 guns, 9 vehicles, Assault Value = 35

Defending force 5160 troops, 32 guns, 83 vehicles, Assault Value = 159

Assaulting units:
Djambi Cdo
Lahat Cdo
Padang Cdo
Tapanoeli Cdo
PBg-Ld AA Afd
Palembang ML Base Force
Palembang Cdo

Defending units:
22nd Recon Regiment
55th Infantry Regiment
56th Recon Regiment

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 128
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/4/2016 3:12:34 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		In other news -

1) The Austrian forces have almost completed the upgrade to the 1942 squads and there are 112 in the pool.

2) The Indian forces will start to upgrade on all fronts to the 1932 squads in six days with 160 squads in the pool and another 24 coming in a convoy on two days.

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 129
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/9/2016 11:53:51 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		As a Quick Update...

Lam0ttePicquet has been traveling as have I so the AAR fell to the way side and the turns slowed down a little bit but we should be back on track now. The only news to report is the loss of Palembang and Mandalay by the allied forces.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 130
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/11/2016 4:49:25 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline 		What does he have in Shwebo? You bomb can him for a few turns if he has powerful LCUs in good order there since you will have to make a river crossing. If he only has out of supply broken and light AV LCUs left, them press on.

< Message edited by Bif1961 -- 8/11/2016 4:50:04 PM >

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 131
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 2:51:16 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

What does he have in Shwebo? You bomb can him for a few turns if he has powerful LCUs in good order there since you will have to make a river crossing. If he only has out of supply broken and light AV LCUs left, them press on.


1st Raiding Regiment
I./143rd Infantry Battalion
III./143rd Infantry Battalion

I have been hitting him a little in the air but playing CAP trap games on both sides. Given what he has there an the supply issues he has to have as the roads are not open I intend to fight on.

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 132
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 3:00:25 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		“They came on in the same old way and we defeated them in the same old way”


Ground combat at Wake Island (136,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 2833 troops, 26 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 69
Defending force 2402 troops, 28 guns, 20 vehicles, Assault Value = 42

Japanese adjusted assault: 15
Allied adjusted defense: 94

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 6 (fort level 3)

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1398 casualties reported
Squads: 60 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 8 destroyed, 67 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 14 (11 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Vehicles lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
31 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Vehicles lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Assaulting units:
Maizuru 2nd SNLF
83rd Naval Guard Unit
II/81st Naval Guard Unit

Defending units:
134th Cmbt Engineer Battalion
141st USN Stn Base Force
Wake (Det.) Defense Battalion

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 133
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 3:03:24 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		CAP Trap went well around Rangoon...
We have been standing down and running at zero range with the air forces out of Rangoon, this turn we extended the range to Pegu and had some good timing.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 134
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 3:10:55 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Australia????

Embarking Forces on Trains to see about holding the area north of Brisbane but with most Australian forces upgraded to the 1942 AIF this could be a lot of fun!!!! I will yield Cooktown and Cairns and the area in north. I will fight to hold Townsville. Outside of Cooktown all cities are building forces with a regiment or Brigade plus Austrian AF Base force.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 135
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 4:24:17 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		The Landing has begun

Does anyone have a listing of unrestricted Japanese Divisions and total Divisions available? Need to make a list and account for them?

Any thoughts on if I should move the 18th UK Division from Perth to Brisbane? Brisbane is going to be held by three Australian Infantry Brigades, engineers, AA and ART units. In Route to Townsville are the Americal Division, Three Australian Infantry Brigades, a lot of Armor and Light AA units.

I almost have an Air Bridge from Pago Pago to Australia to shuffle fighters, should be open in three days. And there are four USA Fighter ACU that will follow once it opens and one Marine Fighter ACU. Currently we just have two Australian Fighter ACU's and one USA HQ ACU at Brisbane.




The KB should be in that mass of taskforces.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rook749 -- 8/13/2016 4:25:01 AM >

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 136
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 4:30:08 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Thee Units Ashore... Two of the Infantry Regiments so I assume the third is a base force for Aircraft??????

Amphibious Assault at Cairns (92,140)

TF 115 troops unloading over beach at Cairns, 92,140

Japanese ground losses:
78 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

20 troops of a IJA Hy Inf Sqd 41 lost from landing craft during unload of 24th Infantry Rgt /9
15 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 24th Infantry Rgt /9
17 troops of a IJA Inf Squad lost in surf during unload of 146th Infantry Rgt
17 troops of a IJA Inf Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 146th Infantry Rgt
17 troops of a IJA Inf Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 146th Infantry Rgt /3
75mm T90 Field Gun lost in surf during unload of 146th Infantry Rgt /3
15 Support troops accidentally lost during unload of 146th Infantry Rgt /3





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 137
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 6:56:36 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Australian 1942 squads have better firepower but the A/T weapons are still not great. Make sure the Australian armoured units upgrade to at least Matildas before engaging Japanese Armour. The Marmon Harringtons are lightly armoured scout vehicles, not tanks. The 2 pounder A/T guns is OK against Japanese light tanks but iffy against the mediums ( I think their frontal armour is too thick but if the AI decides you have a side or rear shot you can knock it out).

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 138
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/13/2016 10:44:58 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Australian 1942 squads have better firepower but the A/T weapons are still not great. Make sure the Australian armoured units upgrade to at least Matildas before engaging Japanese Armour. The Marmon Harringtons are lightly armoured scout vehicles, not tanks. The 2 pounder A/T guns is OK against Japanese light tanks but iffy against the mediums ( I think their frontal armour is too thick but if the AI decides you have a side or rear shot you can knock it out).


Thanks for the details I will be posting later all of the forces that are going to shift, we are also looking at sending additional American units to this area of operations.

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 139
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/14/2016 2:52:35 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Australia

I am going to assume this is a full blown move to take out Australia, most likely this is just an effort to remove air bases from projecting power into the SWPAC. But better safe than sorry.

• Key point the air bridge from Pago Pago to Australia will open in five days, allowing Fighter Units to Transfer to this theater.
• There is a lot of OZ Armor units that disappear in the next 45 – 400 days some of these withdraw out of theater and are use them or lose them units.

The overall objective will be to hold the line at Townsville but if he wants to force me back to Brisbane he can do so depending on the level of force he commits. The only thing I need to be careful of is over committing to the northern fight and losing Melbourne/Sydney/Brisbane to a landing in the rear.

Cairnes
Forts Level 2(39), Port 2, airfield 2 and Supply 500. 7thLH Cav Rgt (428D) and 13th RAF Base Squad.

Clocurry
Forts Level (60) and Supply 600. 12th LH Cav Rgt (75D) and 8th Cav Recce Rgt (472D).

Townsville
Forts Level 3(54), Port 3, airfield 3 and Supply 1800. 11th Austrailian Bde, 2 CD ACU's, Townsville RAN Base Force.

Charter Towers
Forts Level 2(69), airfield 4 and Supply 300. Hobart RAFF Base Sqd and 1st LH MG Rgt(44D).

Bowen
Forts Level 2(92), Port 1, and Supply 500. Queenstown RAFF Base Sqd and 6th LH Motor Rgt.

Mackay
Forts Level 2(87), Port 1, Airfield 1 and Supply 500. 14th RAFF Base Sqd and 12th LH Cav Rgt(197D).

Rockhampton
Forts Level 2(30), Port 3, Airfield 3 and Supply 700. 17th RAFF Base Sqd and 15th LH MG Rgt(414).

There is at least a regiment of infantry and base force from Rockhampton to Brisbane building forts. From Brisbane south on all ports along the coast to Melbourne there is at least an Infantry Regiment. Melbourne and Sydney will be held by multiple Aus Inf Bdge --- Brisbane by Aus Inf Bde and the UK 18th Infantry division. All three locations have Forts in the 4 to 5 range and building as fast as possible.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 140
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/17/2016 12:42:45 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Singapore
Changing the leaders was a good call this time for Singapore. Supplies at 56K and falling.

Ground combat at Singapore (50,84)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 43041 troops, 527 guns, 269 vehicles, Assault Value = 1185
Defending force 54888 troops, 539 guns, 509 vehicles, Assault Value = 637
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 489
Allied adjusted defense: 3029
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 6 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
4250 casualties reported
Squads: 70 destroyed, 228 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 53 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 32 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1053 casualties reported
Squads: 53 destroyed, 24 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 17 (2 destroyed, 15 disabled)

Assaulting units:
56th Infantry Regiment
5th Division
113th Infantry Regiment
Imperial Guards Division
12th Engineer Regiment
114th Infantry Regiment
15th Ind Engineer Regiment
6th Tank Regiment
3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
56th Field Artillery Regiment
1st RF Gun Battalion
3rd Mortar Battalion
31st Field AA Battalion
25th Army
5th Mortar Battalion
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
18th Mountain Gun Regiment
35th Field AA Battalion

Defending units:
SSVF Brigade
11th Indian Division
2nd Gordons Battalion
3rd Cavalry Regiment
2nd Loyal Battalion
22nd Australian Brigade
2/17 Dogra Battalion
2nd Malay Battalion
27th Australian Brigade
9th Indian Division
Singapore Fortress
1st Indian Heavy AA Regiment
AHQ Far East
1st Hyderabad Battalion
Malayan Air Wing
2nd ISF Base Force
3rd HK&S Light AA Regiment
109th RN Base Force
III Indian Corps
113th RAF Adv Base Force
FMSV Brigade
1st Mysore Battalion
110th RAF Adv Base Force
1st HK&S Heavy AA Regiment
111th RAF Adv Base Force
2nd HK&S Heavy AA Regiment
3rd Heavy AA Regiment
Singapore Base Force
24th NZ Pioneer Coy
223 Group RAF
224 Group RAF
22nd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
Malaya Army
112th RAF Adv Base Force
3rd SSVF Battalion

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 141
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/17/2016 1:03:25 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		From
CICPAC
to
POTUS

Please find a brief summary for the following for Pacific Theater of Operations. Elements of the Japanese Carrier Fleet has just hit Wake and appear to be off the eastern coast of Australia but hard numbers are lacking for both forces.

NEI
We expect this area to fall completely to the Japanese over the next thriy days. While Force Z has won a major navel victory early on and was able to blunt two more quick thrust for loss of only two Dutch CL’s the Repulse will be under repair in South Africa for the next thirty days, the remaining forces in Java can delay for a while but will be overwhelmed. All that remains as a fighting force is on the island of Java and it is just a matter of days or weeks until major land forces come ashore.

PHI
When supplies run out in the next 30 – 45 days, it will fall and no relief is possible. While we hold Clark and Bataan it is only a matter of time until our forces are reduced and then fall back on Bataan. Supplies are at 17K between all locations and fortifications are 3 at Bataan and 3 at Clark and building. The IJA last push went in our favor at 1:2 odds with IJA taking slightly more losses and disablements --- soon all losses will start to favor the IJA.

Singapore
We will be able to hold this area far longer than planned, all forces have fallen back to Singapore and are diggings in. Supplies are at 56K and the Forts at 2 and building. The IJA has now made its fourth push for Singapore and was pushed back with far more losses and displacements than were suffered by the allies at 1:6 odds.

Burma
The rail line and roads to Mandalay has been cut supplies are fine and if required we can support this front from the air. Neither side has a valid/active road path for supply and as long as he can’t base an air force in this area we should be able to hold as forces take positions in the jungle to allow the forces around Rangoon to pull out when required. Elements of the I AUS Corps are in route to Shwebo, we need to have enough pressure in the northern area to allow the forces from Rangoon to fallback once the time is right.

We may lose the forces that currently have stopped the IJA cold at Pegu/Rangoon but plan is to use the British 7th Armored Brigade to cover the final withdrawal. The forces that are holding Pegu should be able to hold as along as supply holds out (40K) and the air force can contest the skies to allow supply runs. We are currently trading airframes at a 2:1 or 3:1 but there have not been any air battels in the last week, airframes pools are growing for all but the British forces which are just barley keeping up with losses.

Australia
Two IJA Army Divisions that took Port Moresby could be used to take territory on the eastern coast, but have not been spotted. The landings conducted so far have been –

Normanton - 1st Sasebo SNLF Coy
Cooktown – Unknown but suspected to be light forces.
Cairns – 146th Infantry Regiment, 24th Infantry Regiment & 1st Ind Engineer Regiment.

At this point the landings are either (1) Simply to deny me the user of the northern airbases or (2) It’s a trap!!!! ----To allow me to over commit to the north. Forces are now in route and assembling at Townsville to march north and retake these bases. However, great care if being given to the lines of retreat and the defense of Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane.

As the existing USA Fighter ACU withdrew this month, efforts are underway to bring three US ACU’s to the area for replacement. These forces should arrive in the next five to seven days.

As always……





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 142
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/17/2016 8:33:51 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline 		If you can slip occasional supply single vessels into Singapore you can hold out far longer as he has not committed the amount of troops to take and as he has only 2 Divisions and several Regts. Regts fight worse when not combined into the Division and this will cause him more losses in the long run.

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 143
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/18/2016 2:24:10 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

If you can slip occasional supply single vessels into Singapore you can hold out far longer as he has not committed the amount of troops to take and as he has only 2 Divisions and several Regts. Regts fight worse when not combined into the Division and this will cause him more losses in the long run.


I have been able to get supplies in from time to time but it is getting harder as the has started to tighten the air search in the area. The good news is we just raised the supplies this turn from 56K to 58K with a blockage running getting though.

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 144
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/18/2016 6:12:39 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Was Hoping for More...
But it is all good. We covered a landing at Tanna this should force him to pull more fighters to cover the bases in the area.

Morning Air attack on TF, near Luganville at 120,150

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 33 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 2

Allied aircraft
F2A-3 Buffalo x 19
F4F-3A Wildcat x 22
F4F-3 Wildcat x 39
SBD-2 Dauntless x 15
SBD-3 Dauntless x 68

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
SBD-2 Dauntless: 1 damaged
SBD-3 Dauntless: 3 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko, Bomb hits 2, on fire
CA Nachi, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Natsushio
CA Haguro, Bomb hits 1
DD Hatsukaze
DD Kuroshio

Aircraft Attacking:
10 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
7 x SBD-2 Dauntless releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
1 x F4F-3 Wildcat sweeping at 15000 feet
10 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
12 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb GP Bomb
12 x SBD-3 Dauntless releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
4 x F2A-3 Buffalo sweeping at 15000 feet
8 x SBD-2 Dauntless releasing from 2000'




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 145
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/19/2016 12:29:36 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Darn good result during severe storms!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 146
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/19/2016 12:46:37 AM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Darn good result during severe storms!


I agree but with the KB off the east coast of Australia and still having not gotten the fighters upgraded it was tine to pull the Sir Robin with the Fleet again.

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 147
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/19/2016 1:13:46 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rook749


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Darn good result during severe storms!


I agree but with the KB off the east coast of Australia and still having not gotten the fighters upgraded it was tine to pull the Sir Robin with the Fleet again.

No argument from me about pulling back. That was a good strike spoiled a bit by random weather. C'est la AE!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 148
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/19/2016 9:11:38 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		Wake.....
He brings another unit into Wake, the odds have shifted to his favor but that was after two days of air strikes from part of the KB and several rounds of shore bombardment for CL's, DD's and BB's.

Ground combat at Wake Island (136,98)
Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 5925 troops, 47 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 187
Defending force 2502 troops, 27 guns, 21 vehicles, Assault Value = 42

Japanese adjusted assault: 103
Allied adjusted defense: 39

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 4)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 3

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
2387 casualties reported
Squads: 52 destroyed, 13 disabled
Non Combat: 41 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 17 (17 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
414 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 24 disabled
Engineers: 28 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 5 (3 destroyed, 2 disabled)
Vehicles lost 8 (3 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Assaulting units:
63rd Naval Guard Unit
Maizuru 2nd SNLF
64th Naval Guard Unit
83rd Naval Guard Unit
II/81st Naval Guard Unit

Defending units:
134th Cmbt Engineer Battalion
141st USN Stn Base Force
Wake (Det.) Defense Battalion

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 149
RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) - 8/19/2016 9:13:40 PM   
rook749


Posts: 1105
Joined: 12/21/2006
Status: offline 		And at Clark.....
We hold again....

Ground combat at Clark Field (79,76)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 36115 troops, 353 guns, 264 vehicles, Assault Value = 993
Defending force 33280 troops, 408 guns, 119 vehicles, Assault Value = 720

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 1166
Allied adjusted defense: 1600
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
3409 casualties reported
Squads: 25 destroyed, 242 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 37 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 21 disabled
Guns lost 21 (1 destroyed, 20 disabled)
Vehicles lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1419 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 127 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Vehicles lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Assaulting units:
65th Brigade
48th Division
20th Recon Regiment
20th Infantry Regiment
16th Recon Regiment
Kimura Det
3rd Ind Engineer Regiment
9th Infantry Regiment
16th Engineer Regiment
7th Tank Regiment
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
14th Army
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
15th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
2nd Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
31st PA Infantry Division
57th PS Infantry Regiment
4th Marine Regiment
51st PA Infantry Division
21st PA Infantry Division
41st PA Infantry Division
45th PS Infantry Regiment
91st PA Infantry Division
192nd Tank Battalion
1st Constabulary Regiment
I Corps
88th PS Field Artillery Regiment
86th PS Field Artillery Battalion
301st Construction Battalion
II/Prov'nl SPM Grp
!/23rd PS FA Battalion
I/Prov'nl SPM Grp
Asiatic Fleet
24th PS FA Regiment
200th & 515th Coast AA Regiment
1st USMC AA Battalion
III/Prov'nl SPM Grp

_____________________________

Rook749
AAR: This will End Badly @ http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3516510&mpage=1&key= & http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4074294

(in reply to rook749)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Rook749 vs Lam0ttePicquet (DBB028-C) Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.875