BBfanboy
Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010 From: Winnipeg, MB Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Yaab Congrats on your strategy shift! However, you have just exposed game's biggest weakness, which is the universal supply system. The bombers and subs operating out of China would need US-made supply, while in the game they can use China-made supply. In RL, your avenue of advance would have required a HUGE logistics effort, shipping TONS of supplies from USA to Burma. In the game, the Japs almost always lose the backdoor war in the CBI theatre due to the universal supply system powering the Allies. I think you overstate the case. With no carriers to fight in SOPAC and CENTPAC, a lot of US forces would have been sent to India and on to Burma when the time was right. Along with the troops would be a strong stream of supply from EC USA to Capetown to India/Burma/China. The abstraction of thousands of supply and transport clerks getting the right stuff on the right ship going to the right place is not so unbelievable. Yeah, it is feasible to separate supply into food/LCU ammo/bombs/Naval ammo/AVGAS/vehicle fuel, but I want to play for the battles, not for the additional burden of doing what thousands of real life people did.
_____________________________
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
|