Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 5:43:07 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Assumed 1-6 CA was supposed to be 6-6 CA, but in the end did not matter, since the Axis aborted the FR CA. Only 1 CA and 1 CP left in the sea area.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 721
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 5:52:04 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Round 3, both found. Axis search was a 2, allies search was a 1.
I spend your two surprise points increasing the AA to lowest of 6. You rolled well with the lowest being a 3. The one AS had no impact on one ship. Onto round 4.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 722
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 5:54:43 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Round 4 allies find on a 2 versus axis 10. I avoided combat for you, nothing else makes sense to me.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 723
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 5:58:40 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		I aborted the Erbus to Malta, the other two CW CA to Gibraltar, and the FR CA to Casablanca.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 724
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:02:54 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		On 6 and 7's there was no contact in the North Sea.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 725
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:13:15 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		I went all out on the ground strikes on Paris resulted in all three being disorganized.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 726
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:47:48 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Well, I cannot catch a break on the Eurpean front. Paris stands, who do you wish to lose.

If I don't attack at +16 or better, I can't get it done. I expended everything to get it done now and failed. I swear that in this game rolls of 5 or worse are more likely than 11 or better. All of '41 is likely lost. I will not be able to get troops into position in any direction.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 727
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:49:12 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Oh, also, I lose the engineer again. I can only get one attack with him before I have to rebuild him. I am frustrated!!! time to sleep on this.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 728
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:13:43 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		I'll take the French HQ (Billotte) as my loss.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 729
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 4:22:26 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Europe situation. It has just taken too long for the axis and it is still not done. I would have probably done better to just wait it out for the weather to clear. Impatience in my key fault in this game.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 730
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 4:23:35 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		China. Note, the whole force around Chungking (only partially shown) is out of supply due to the weather.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 731
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:14:58 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 732
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:29:02 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. RN x 2 and FRA x 1 Naval Moves.

The RN moves 1 BB, 3 CAs, 2 CPs and the French 1 CA to the 0-box of the Western Med. The RN also moves 2 loaded TRS supported by the Ark Royal, 2 BBs and 2 CAs to the 2-box of Cape St. Vincent.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 733
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:31:23 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. Cape St. Vincent, Western Med.

The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate naval combat in Cape St. Vincent and the Western Med. We'll get back to whether and how the axis wish to proceed in these two areas after the allies try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 734
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:39:56 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate naval combat in Cape St. Vincent and the Western Med. We'll get back to whether and how the axis wish to proceed in these two areas after the allies try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea.

Will anything other than the Blenheim be able to react to the W. Med?

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 735
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:43:45 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. North Sea. RN, Attempt to Initiate Combat.

Here's the current situation in the North Sea. During their Naval Air Phase the CW flew their Whitley and Harrow bomber units supported by their Mk. IF fighter unit into the 3-box of the North Sea. During the try to initiate a naval combat the RAF added a Hurricane fighter unit to the 0-box. The Luftwaffe can add any of their three fighter units shown below.

Which units, if any, would you like to add and in which sea box would you like to add them?

Also, in order to get a jump on the other two sea areas would you like to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both of the Western Med and Cape St. Vincent? And, if so, which units would you like to use for the attempt?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 736
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 6:44:46 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate naval combat in Cape St. Vincent and the Western Med. We'll get back to whether and how the axis wish to proceed in these two areas after the allies try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea.

Will anything other than the Blenheim be able to react to the W. Med?
No, only the Blenheim.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 737
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:07:34 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Which units, if any, would you like to add and in which sea box would you like to add them?

Also, in order to get a jump on the other two sea areas would you like to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both of the Western Med and Cape St. Vincent? And, if so, which units would you like to use for the attempt?


Nobody is added to the N. Sea.

I will initiate in the W. Med with the BF110e.

I will skip the CSV zone.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 738
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:22:36 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

Which units, if any, would you like to add and in which sea box would you like to add them?

Also, in order to get a jump on the other two sea areas would you like to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both of the Western Med and Cape St. Vincent? And, if so, which units would you like to use for the attempt?


Nobody is added to the N. Sea.

I will initiate in the W. Med with the BF110e.

I will skip the CSV zone.


North Sea Search Rolls: Allies 5, Axis 6. No contact, no combat.

Western Med Search Rolls: Axis 10, Allies 2. The allies (RN) use their surprise points to avoid combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 739
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:47:46 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 740
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:48:23 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. East Africa.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 741
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:48:55 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. North Africa (East).

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 742
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:49:38 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. Gibraltar. West Med. North Africa (West).

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 743
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:50:18 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. France.

Post movement, no air or land combat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 744
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:51:03 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. End of Turn Check.

This turn continues.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 745
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 7:51:34 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Sep-Oct 1940. Axis #9. Weather.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 746
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 10:08:17 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		SO40 i9 Axis GS
Forgot to image the Chinese ground strikes on Chungking. Two plans and an ART all missed.
Strike on Antwerp shown below.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 747
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 10:47:59 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Three attacks at Nantes, Chungking and Antwerp. You have support options at Antwerp. first is shore bombardment and then air support (I do have a fighter in range). I don't think there is any support available for the other two attacks.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 748
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 10:57:05 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Antwerp defense - no defensive air support. Defensive shore bombardment - apply the max that can be applied.

By the way, I had forgotten that we were playing with defensive shore bombardment.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/21/2016 10:58:51 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 749
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/21/2016 11:02:26 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

By the way, I had forgotten that we were playing with defensive shore bombardment.

I had not, it influenced a number of earlier decisions around Antwerp and other coastal towns.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 750
Page:   <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.734