RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 25 26 [27] 28 29 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 4:56:41 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Situation in Europe. Move East has started?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 781

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 4:57:25 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

North China (no change in Chung-king region)

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 782

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 4:58:09 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

And E. Africa. Looks like AES should be conquered.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 783

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 4:59:45 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Turn has ended.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 784

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 5:21:01 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

No partisans placed. Germany placed two markers as defensive and I placed the RU marker as defensive as well (based on the fact that all other markers were defensive

).

Italian subs return to base to La Rochelle in France.

The GE FIG and IT NAV in the W. Med drop one box and stay at sea.

The JP transports at sea return to Tokyo as do any excess CPs in the Japanese Coast sea zone (depends on US Entry options taken).

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 785

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 11:27:02 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. US Entry Options.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/22/2016 11:28:37 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 786

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 11:30:41 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Destroyed and Repair Pools.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 787

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 11:35:15 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Axis Oil usage. Kept a couple of your disorganized to manage the actual oil usage.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 788

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 11:44:30 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil. Neutral Allies.

China and the USSR required no oil and the USA only required 0.1 oil. So none of the neutrals consumed any oil.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/22/2016 11:48:14 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 789

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 11:45:39 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil. France (& China).

France required 0.2 oil and China required 0. Both countries consumed no oil points.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 790

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/22/2016 11:46:37 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil. CW.

The CW was able to save an entire oil point by not reorganizing the CA Terror.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 791

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 1:13:37 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Germans broke down two corp. A 5-4 in Antwerp and a 5-4 in Poland.

Below is Axis final production.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 792

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 1:25:31 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. (Active) Allies.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 793

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 1:26:01 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. Neutral Allies.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 794

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 1:26:40 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Force Reform.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 795

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 1:54:56 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Axis Production.
Germans have an offensive chit on the way.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 796

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 2:24:34 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Conquests.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 797

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 2:25:21 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. "Conquests".

Iceland and Greenland "conquered" by the USA.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 798

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 2:25:57 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Conquests.

Surrender China? No.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 799

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 2:26:24 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Conquests.

Surrender France? No.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 800

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 2:26:51 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Global Map.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 801

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 2:27:12 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Victory Totals.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 802

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 2:29:54 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Sep-Oct 1940. End of Turn. Allied Builds.

China (4 BPs): MTN(4)

CW (17 BPs): MIL(2), TERR(2), CA Repair(0), BB Repair(1), CP(1) x 2, CVP(0), NAV(4), FTR(2), Pilot(2) x 2

France (1 BP): CP(4)

USA (10 BPs): CV 2nd(3), BB 2nd(4), Pilot(2), CVP(1)

USSR (14 BPs): FTR(2), Pilot(2), ARM(6), MOT(4)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 803

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 3:14:33 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

ND40 Axis Reinforcements:

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 804

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 3:45:54 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Trade.

No changes by either side from last turn.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 805

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 3:47:45 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Initiative.

The allies win the first roll and the axis elect not to re-roll, which leaves the decision to move first with the allies. Playing the odds that the weather will be bad and this will be a short turn I decide to let the axis move first.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 806

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/23/2016 3:48:17 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. Axis #1. Weather.

By the way, bed is calling.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/23/2016 3:51:36 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 807

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/24/2016 5:54:30 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

ND40 i1 axis:
Sorry about not getting to this on Tuesday.
JP and GE take land actions, while IT takes a combined and sorties the sub fleet.
Three zone will have combat initiated. The first was the E. Coast with search rolls of 1/2 (axis/allies), so IT had 2 surprise points. Will the remaining convoys risk a round 2?
In the Bay of Biscay, what will you want to fly out?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 808

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/24/2016 11:32:41 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

1. East Coast - remaining CPs stay. Aborted CPs return to CW base without chance of axis intercept using the following priority: (1) Plymouth, (2) Gibraltar and (3) Halifax.

2. Bay of Biscay - Albacore to the 0-box (assuming no axis fighters can fly). If axis fighters can be added, then Beau FTR to 0-box.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 809

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/25/2016 2:31:33 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

E. Coast round 2 searches of 8/3 resulted in no contact. The 3 abort CPs went to Gibraltar.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 810